基于CiteSpaceⅤ软件的患者报告结局文献计量学分析

doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.317

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 背景　随着“以患者为中心”的医学模式的转变，患者在医疗服务中的角色和地位越来越重要，患者对自身健康相关信息的报告在识别/监测症状、评估治疗效果以及在医患共享决策等方面体现出其独特的临床价值。然而，我国患者报告结局（PROs）相关研究还处于起步阶段，尚缺乏基于PROs的文献计量学研究。目的　了解国际PROs研究成果及研究热点，为我国开展相关研究提供借鉴与参考。方法　基于“Web of Science核心合集”数据库，运用文献计量学分析方法和CiteSpaceⅤ软件对PROs相关研究的年度变化、主要国家/地区、机构、期刊、关键词及研究热点进行可视化分析，检索时间为建库至2019年8月。结果　通过检索最终获得3 288篇相关文献；近年来PROs相关研究报道逐年增多，美国发文量最多，为1 815篇（55.20%）；发文量最多的研究机构为美国西北大学；相关研究共发表在822种出版物上，以Quality of Life Research发文量最多（148篇）；中心性排名靠前的关键词为生活质量（quality of life）、患者报告结局（patient-reported outcome）、量表（questionnaire）、检验（validation）、影响（impact）、信度（reliablity）等，研究热点以PROs、健康相关生活质量、患者报告结局测量、临床应用研究等为主。结论　以美国为首的发达国家在PROs相关研究占有领先地位，我国在该领域的高质量研究还很少，建议国内学者基于我国国情，结合我国传统中医药特色，完善PROs相关研究的发展。

关键词: 患者报告结局, 文献计量学, 可视化, 研究热点, CiteSpaceⅤ软件

Abstract: Background　The transformation of the traditional medical model to patient-centered medical model indicates that the role of patients are becoming increasingly important in healthcare industry.And patient-reported health information demonstrates distinctive significance in identifying/monitoring symptoms，evaluating treatment effect and sharing decision-making.However，the research on patient-reported outcomes（PROs） is still in its infancy in China，and bibliometric studies based on PROs are still lacking.Objective　To evaluate the research results and hotspots about PROs from a global perspective，to provide references for relevant studies in China.Methods　Studies about PROs were searched from the database of Web of Science Core Collection from inception to August 2019.Bibliometric analysis and CiteSpaceⅤ were used to conduct a visualization analysis of the enrolled studies in terms of changes in annual publication number，major author countries/regions and institutions，publishing journals，keywords and research hotspots.Results　A total of 3 288 studies were enrolled.The annual number of these published studies showed a recent increasing trend.The country publishing the most studies was the United States，accounting for 55.20%（1 815/3 288） of the total.The institution with the largest number of papers published was Northwestern University.The publications in which the studies were published numbered 822，among which Quality of Life Research published the most（n=148）.The top 6 keywords with highest centrality value were "quality of life" "patient-reported outcomes" "questionnaire" "validation" "impact" "reliability".The major hotspots were PROs，health-related quality of life，measurement of PROs，and clinical application of PROs.Conclusion　Developed countries，led by the United States，take the lead in this field，and there are few high-quality studies in this field in China.Therefore，to improve the development of PROs related studies in China，scholars are suggested to put efforts on domestic PROs related development as well as features of traditional Chinese medicine.

Key words: Patient-reported outcomes, Bibliometrics analysis, Visualization, Research hotspots, CiteSpaceⅤ

李文姣,程侣,王晗,等. 基于CiteSpaceⅤ软件的患者报告结局文献计量学分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(32): 4128-4134. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.317.
LI Wenjiao,CHENG Lyu,WANG Han, et al. Bibliometric Analysis of Patient-reported Outcomes Using CiteSpaceⅤ　[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(32): 4128-4134. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.317.

参考文献

［1］VALDERAS J M，KOTZEVA A，ESPALLARGUES M，et al．The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice：a systematic review of the literature［J］．Qual Life Res，2008，17（2）：179-193．DOI：10.1007/s11136-007-9295-0.
［2］U.S.Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research，U.S.Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research，U.S.Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health.Guidance for industry：patient-reported outcome measures：use in medical product development to support labeling claims：draft guidance［J］．Health Qual Life Outcomes，2006，4：79．DOI：10.1186/1477-7525-4-79.
［3］JONES J B，SNYDER C F，WU A W.Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes［J］．Qual Life Res，2007，16（8）：1407-1417．DOI：10.1007/s11136-007-9235-z.
［4］ETON D T，BEEBE T J，HAGEN P T，et al．Harmonizing and consolidating the measurement of patient-reported information at health care institutions：a position statement of the Mayo Clinic［J］．Patient Relat Outcome Meas，2014，5：7-15．DOI：10.2147/PROM.S55069.
［5］DEMURO C，CLARK M，MORDIN M，et al．Reasons for rejection of patient-reported outcome label claims：a compilation based on a review of patient-reported outcome use among new molecular entities and biologic license applications，2006—2010［J］．Value Health，2012，15（3）：443-448．DOI：10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.010.
［6］GREENHALGH J，ABHYANKAR P，MCCLUSKEY S，et al．How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures（PROMs） in oncology consultations?［J］．Qual Life Res，2013，22（5）：939-950．DOI：10.1007/s11136-012-0218-3.
［7］BASCH E，DEAL A M，KRIS M G，et al．Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment：a randomized controlled trial［J］．J Clin Oncol，2016，34（6）：557-565．DOI：10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830.
［8］KUIJPERS W，GROEN W G，LOOS R，et al．An interactive portal to empower cancer survivors：a qualitative study on user expectations［J］．Support Care Cancer，2015，23（9）：2535-2542．DOI：10.1007/s00520-015-2605-0.
［9］YANG L Y，MANHAS D S，HOWARD A F，et al．Patient-reported outcome use in oncology：a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication［J］．Support Care Cancer，2018，26（1）：41-60．DOI：10.1007/s00520-017-3865-7.
［10］卞薇，刘洋，万君丽，等．成人斜视患者报告结局测评系统的构建及应用［J］．护理学杂志，2019，34（2）：1-4．DOI：10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.02.001.
BIAN W，LIU Y，WAN J L，et al．Design and application of patient-reported outcome information system for adult strabismus based on computer adaptive testing［J］．Journal of Nursing Science，2019，34（2）：1-4．DOI：10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.02.001.
［11］CHEN C M.CiteSpace Ⅱ：detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature［J］．J Am Soc Inf Sci，2006，57（3）：359-377．DOI：10.1002/asi.20317.
［12］SEBAG-MONTEFIORE D，STEPHENS R J，STEELE R，et al．Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer（MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016）：a multicentre，randomised trial［J］．Lancet，2009，373（9666）：811-820．DOI：10.1016/S0140-6736（09）60484-0.
［13］SLOAN J A，HALYARD M Y，FROST M H，et al．The Mayo Clinic manuscript series relative to the discussion，dissemination，and operationalization of the Food and Drug Administration guidance on patient-reported outcomes［J］．Value Health，2007，10（Suppl 2）：S59-63．DOI：10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00267.x.
［14］FISCELLA K，RANSOM S，JEAN-PIERRE P，et al．Patient-reported outcome measures suitable to assessment of patient navigation［J］．Cancer，2011，117（15 Suppl）：3603-3617．DOI：10.1002/cncr.26260.
［15］SNYDER C F，AARONSON N K，CHOUCAIR A K，et al．Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice：a review of the options and considerations［J］．Qual Life Res，2012，21（8）：1305-1314．DOI：10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x.
［16］WU A W，BRADFORD A N，VELANOVICH V，et al．Clinician's checklist for reading and using an article about patient-reported outcomes［J］．Mayo Clin Proc，2014，89（5）：653-661．DOI：10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.017.
［17］BLACK N.Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare［J］．BMJ，2013，346：f167．DOI：10.1136/bmj.f167.
［18］PETERS C M L，DE VRIES J，LODDER P，et al．Is a good quality of life and health status possible in older patients dying from critical limb-threatening ischemia：a prospective clinical study［J］．Ann Vasc Surg，2019：S0890-S5096（19）30888-X．DOI：10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.042.
［19］王煜.中国居民健康相关生命质量及其对卫生服务利用影响的研究［D］．北京：北京协和医学院，2010.
WANG Y.The study of health related quality of life and its effect on health service utilization in Chinese population［D］．Beijing：Peking Union Medical College，2010.
［20］WILSON I B，CLEARY P D.Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life.A conceptual model of patient outcomes［J］．JAMA，1995，273（1）：59-65.
［21］VALDERAS J M，ALONSO J.Patient reported outcome measures：a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice［J］．Qual Life Res，2008，17（9）：1125-1135．DOI：10.1007/s11136-008-9396-4.
［22］GROUP T W.The development of the world health organization quality of life assessment instrument（the WHOQOL）［M］//Quality of Life Assessment：International Perspectives.Berlin，Heidelberg：Springer Berlin Heidelberg，1994：41-57.
［23］DAWSON J，DOLL H，FITZPATRICK R，et al．The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings［J］．BMJ，2010，340（jan18 1）：c186．DOI：10.1136/bmj.c186.
［24］GILBERT A，SEBAG-MONTEFIORE D，DAVIDSON S，et al．Use of patient-reported outcomes to measure symptoms and health related quality of life in the clinic［J］．Gynecol Oncol，2015，136（3）：429-439．DOI：10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.071.
［25］ANKER S D，AGEWALL S，BORGGREFE M，et al．The importance of patient-reported outcomes：a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials［J］．Eur Heart J，2014，35（30）：2001-2009．DOI：10.1093/eurheartj/ehu205.
［26］BURKE L B，KENNEDY D L，MISKALA P H，et al．The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the evaluation of medical products for regulatory approval［J］．Clin Pharmacol Ther，2008，84（2）：281-283．DOI：10.1038/clpt.2008.128.
［27］刘淑红.西雅图心绞痛量表（SAQ）中文译本的信度、效度、反应度［D］．天津：天津医科大学，2003.
LIU S H.The evaluation of the reliability and validity of SAQ applied in a group of Chinese patients with CHD［D］．Tianjin：Tianjin Medical University，2003.

[1]	冯晓玉, 李婉玲, 吕思漫, 倪翠萍, 王浩成, 刘宇. 基于文献计量学的interRAI家庭护理评估工具国际研究现状及热点分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(34): 4351-4358.
[2]	林恺, 姚弥, 陈章, 纪欣鑫, 林润琪, 陈永松, Sim MOIRA. 2型糖尿病治疗负担的概念框架及应对方式：基于视频记录分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(34): 4302-4307.
[3]	徐健, 戴芳芳, 潘文雷, 黄倩, 陆萍, 王剑峰, 贾环, 杨宇琪, 黄蛟灵. "健康中国"背景下我国社区中医药服务研究热点和前沿趋势的可视化分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(34): 4343-4350.
[4]	王敏, 郭文军, 陈永真, 凤心雨, 汤忠泉, 赵晓敏, 欧婷, 戴昕妤, 李云涛. 基于Web of Science数据库的未分化疾病文献计量学和可视化分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(31): 3930-3938.
[5]	卫梦雨, 王佳佳, 张莹莹, 李春阳, 李建生. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者报告结局测评工具研究现状分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(30): 3725-3733.
[6]	郑晓, 田峰, 陈一鸣, 薛本立, 石磊, 张持晨. 2002—2022年我国多重慢病领域研究热点及演进趋势分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(21): 2567-2573.
[7]	冯佳, 王洁, 余丹, 刘永恒, 赵伟栋, 田宏远. 2010—2021年国内外老年多重慢病研究热点分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(21): 2574-2580.
[8]	巫小玉, 万崇华, 陈莹, 阮艳琴, 翁一洁, 许小江. 肠易激综合征患者报告结局与生命质量测定特异性量表研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(18): 2268-2276.
[9]	严雨格, 黄蛟灵. 新型冠状病毒感染背景下基层卫生研究热点可视化分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(16): 2027-2035.
[10]	刘春, 蹇文渊, 段俊国. 人工智能应用于糖尿病视网膜病变的文献计量学分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(15): 1847-1856.
[11]	杨鑫鑫, 郭清, 王晓迪, 司建平, 项锲, 龙鑫. 近十年我国可穿戴设备在健康管理领域的研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(12): 1513-1519.
[12]	涂嘉欣, 叶惠清, 张小强, 林雪婷, 杨善岚, 邓莉芳, 吴磊. 2000—2022年人工智能应用于食管癌领域全球研究的可视化分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(06): 760-768.
[13]	周慧, 林颖, 周国进, 唐可京, 元刚, 姚弥. 《将患者报告结局纳入临床研究的伦理考量：PRO伦理指南》解读[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(04): 395-400.
[14]	史钊, 窦蕾, 李顺平. 国内外患者报告结局的应用现状与研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(04): 401-408.
[15]	张年, 余昌胤, 朱纪明, 黎飞, 陈玲丽, 蒲海峰. 我国农村订单定向医学生培养的研究热点与趋势分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(04): 486-493.