家庭肠内营养在食管癌患者中有效性和安全性的Meta分析

doi:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0853

中国全科医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (20): 2540-2547.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0853

所属专题：肿瘤最新文章合辑；消化系统疾病最新文章合辑；营养最新文章合辑

家庭肠内营养在食管癌患者中有效性和安全性的Meta分析

薛珊¹, 李来有¹^,^*(), 梁军利¹, 靳英辉², 魏淑艳³

1．050011　河北省石家庄市，河北医科大学第四医院护理部
2．430071　湖北省武汉市，武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心
3．050011　河北省石家庄市，河北医科大学第四医院麻醉科

收稿日期:2022-10-24 修回日期:2023-01-26 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-03-28
通讯作者: 李来有
作者贡献：薛珊提出方案设计，负责文献/资料整理，撰写论文；梁军利负责数据的分析/解释；靳英辉对文章整体负责，监督管理；魏淑艳进行研究的指导和审校；李来有负责研究的可行性分析、文章质量控制和审校。

The Efficacy and Safety of Home Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: a Meta-analysis

XUE Shan¹, LI Laiyou¹^,^*(), LIANG Junli¹, JIN Yinghui², WEI Shuyan³

1. Department of Nursing, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
2. Center for Evidence-based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
3. Department of Anesthesiology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China

Received:2022-10-24 Revised:2023-01-26 Published:2023-07-15 Online:2023-03-28
Contact: LI Laiyou

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 背景食管癌患者常发生营养不良，国内外研究显示，营养不良严重影响患者的恢复。目前居家期间接受家庭肠内营养（HEN）的患者越来越多，但HEN对食管癌患者的有效性和安全性并不明确。目的通过Meta分析评价HEN对食管癌患者的有效性和安全性。方法计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL、Scopus、万方数据知识服务平台、中国知网、维普网及中国生物医学文献数据库，搜集有关食管癌患者接受HEN的随机对照试验，检索时限从建库至2021年12月。试验组患者接受HEN支持〔肠内管饲（ETF）和口服营养补充（ONS）均可〕，对照组仅接受常规口服饮食。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料，并采用Cochrane协作网推荐的RoB 2.0工具对文献进行质量评价。采用RevMan 5.4.1软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入14篇文献，包括1 040例食管癌患者。Meta分析结果显示，试验组患者体质量增长值、BMI增长值、血红蛋白增长值、血清总蛋白增长值、血清前白蛋白增长值、血清转铁蛋白增长值均高于对照组〔SMD=0.63，95%CI（0.40，0.85），P<0.000 01；SMD=0.60，95%CI（0.44，0.76），P<0.000 01；SMD=1.58，95%CI（1.37，1.79），P<0.000 01；SMD=1.19，95%CI（0.79，1.58），P<0.000 01；SMD=0.97，95%CI（0.79，1.14），P<0.000 01；SMD=1.12，95%CI（0.45，1.79），P=0.001〕。在ETF亚组和ONS亚组分析中，试验组血清白蛋白增长值均高于对照组〔SMD=1.25，95%CI（0.82，1.68），P<0.000 01；SMD=0.61，95%CI（0.26，0.97），P<0.000 01〕。试验组营养不良发生率低于对照组〔OR=0.47，95%CI（0.33，0.67），P<0.000 1〕。两组胃肠道并发症发生率比较，差异无统计学意义〔RR=1.33，95%CI（1.00，1.77），P=0.05〕。试验组和对照组生活质量评分比较，差异无统计学意义〔MD=4.97，95%CI（0.06，9.87），P=0.05〕；试验组躯体功能评分高于对照组〔MD=6.67，95%CI（2.86，10.48），P=0.000 6〕，疲劳症状评分低于对照组〔MD=-7.31，95%CI（-11.85，-2.77），P=0.002〕。敏感性分析结果显示，合并结果稳定可靠。结论 HEN能够改善食管癌术后出院患者的营养状况和躯体功能，并减轻患者的疲劳症状，且并未增加胃肠道并发症的发生率，但暂未发现能够改善患者总体生活质量。

关键词: 食管肿瘤, 肠道营养, 家庭肠内营养, 管饲喂养, 口服营养补充, 营养状况, 生活质量, 随机对照试验, Meta分析

Abstract:

Background

Malnutrition is a common complication in patients with esophageal cancer, which has been validated by domestic and international studies to seriously impact the recovery of patients. While the number of patients receiving home enteral nutrition (HEN) is increasing, the effectiveness and safety of HEN for patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear.

Objective

To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HEN by meta-analysis.

Methods

RCTs on the HEN in patients with esophageal cancer were retrieved in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP and CBM from inception to December 2021. Patients in the experimental group received HEN support〔both enteral tube feeding (ETF) and oral nutritional supplement (ONS) were both acceptable〕, while patients in the control group received conventional oral diet only. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data. The RoB 2.0 recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and the RevMan 5.4.1 software was used to perform the meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 14 articles were included, involving 1 040 patients with esophageal cancer. Meta-analysis showed that the increase values of body mass, BMI, hemoglobin, serum total protein, serum prealbumin and serum transferrin in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group〔SMD=0.63, 95%CI (0.40, 0.85), P<0.000 01; SMD=0.60, 95%CI (0.44, 0.76), P<0.000 01; SMD=1.58, 95%CI (1.37, 1.79), P<0.000 01; SMD=1.19, 95%CI (0.79, 1.58), P<0.000 01; SMD=0.97, 95%CI (0.79, 1.14), P<0.000 01; SMD=1.12, 95%CI (0.45, 1.79), P=0.001〕. The increase value of serum albumin in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group in both ETF and ONS subgroups analysis〔SMD=1.25, 95%CI (0.82, 1.68), P<0.000 01; SMD=0.61, 95%CI (0.26, 0.97), P<0.000 01〕. The incidence of malnutrition was lower in the experimental group than in the control group〔OR=0.47, 95%CI (0.33, 0.67), P<0.000 1〕. There was no statistically significant differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal complications〔RR=1.33, 95%CI (1.00, 1.77), P=0.05〕and life quality score〔MD=4.97, 95%CI (0.06, 9.87), P=0.05〕 between the two groups. The physical function score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group〔MD=6.67, 95%CI (2.86, 10.48), P=0.000 6〕, and the fatigue symptom score was lower than that of the control group〔MD=-7.31, 95%CI (-11.85, -2.77), P=0.002〕. Sensitivity analysis showed that the combined results were stable and reliable.

Conclusion

HEN can significantly improve the nutritional status and physical function, reduce fatigue symptoms of discharged patients after esophageal cancer surgery, and does not increase the incidence of gastrointestinal complications, however, it has not been found to improve the global overall quality of life.

Key words: Esophageal neoplasms, Enteral nutrition, Home enteral nutrition, Enteral tube feeding, Oral nutritional supplements, Nutritional status, Quality of life, Randomized controlled trial, Meta-analysis

薛珊,李来有,梁军利,等. 家庭肠内营养在食管癌患者中有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(20): 2540-2547. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0853.
XUE Shan,LI Laiyou,LIANG Junli, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Home Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(20): 2540-2547. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0853.

图/表 16

参考文献 41

[1]	曹毛毛，陈万青. 中国恶性肿瘤流行情况及防控现状[J]. 中国肿瘤临床，2019，46(3):145-149. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.03.246.
[2]	SONG C H, CAO J J, ZHANG F，et al. Nutritional risk assessment by scored patient-generated subjective global assessment associated with demographic characteristics in 23，904 common malignant tumors patients[J]. Nutr Cancer，2019，71(1):50-60. DOI：10.1080/01635581.2019.1566478.
[3]	温静. 食管癌患者营养状况与治疗相关性的研究进展[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗，2017，30(3):213-218. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2017.03.012.
[4]	CHEN M J, WU I C, CHEN Y J，et al. Nutrition therapy in esophageal cancer-consensus statement of the Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan [J]. Dis Esophagus，2018，31(8). DOI：10.1093/dote/doy016.
[5]	陈静儒，张振香，郭瑾，等. 照顾者对食管癌患者营养照护的质性研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志，2018，34(2):126-130. DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2018.02.011.
[6]	MATSUOKA M, IIJIMA S. Consideration of nutritional support for decreased caloric intake in patients with severe weight loss after esophageal cancer surgery[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho，2019，46(Suppl 1):132-134.
[7]	HAVERKORT E B, BINNEKADE J M, DE HAAN R J，et al. Suboptimal intake of nutrients after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction[J]. J Acad Nutr Diet，2012，112(7):1080-1087. DOI：10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.032.
[8]	MARIETTE C, DE BOTTON M L, PIESSEN G. Surgery in esophageal and gastric cancer patients：what is the role for nutrition support in your daily practice?[J]. Ann Surg Oncol，2012，19(7):2128-2134. DOI：10.1245/s10434-012-2225-6.
[9]	医学名词审定委员会.肠外肠内营养学名词[M].北京：科学出版社，2019：11.
[10]	BISCHOFF S C, AUSTIN P, BOEYKENS K，et al. ESPEN guideline on home enteral nutrition[J]. Clin Nutr，2020，39(1):5-22. DOI：10.1016/j.clnu.2019.04.022.
[11]	LIU K, JI S, XU Y，et al. Safety，feasibility，and effect of an enhanced nutritional support pathway including extended preoperative and home enteral nutrition in patients undergoing enhanced recovery after esophagectomy：a pilot randomized clinical trial[J]. Dis Esophagus，2020，33(2):doz030. DOI：10.1093/dote/doz030.
[12]	ZENG J, HU J, CHEN Q X，et al. Home enteral nutrition's effects on nutritional status and quality of life after esophagectomy[J]. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr，2017，26(5):804-810. DOI：10.6133/apjcn.112016.07.
[13]	DONOHOE C L, HEALY L A, FANNING M，et al. Impact of supplemental home enteral feeding postesophagectomy on nutrition，body composition，quality of life，and patient satisfaction[J]. Dis Esophagus，2017，30(9):1-9. DOI：10.1093/dote/dox063.
[14]	WEIMANN A, BRAGA M, CARLI F，et al. ESPEN guideline：clinical nutrition in surgery[J]. Clin Nutr，2017，36(3):623-650. DOI：10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013.
[15]	HIGGINS J，THOMAS J，CHANDLER J，et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 6.0[Z]. 2019.
[16]	HIGGINS J P, GREEN S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions，Version 5.1.0[M]. New York：The Cochrane Collaboration，2011.
[17]	BOWREY D J, BAKER M, HALLIDAY V，et al. A randomised controlled trial of six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer：report on a pilot and feasibility study[J]. Trials，2015，16:531. DOI：10.1186/s13063-015-1053-y.
[18]	XIE H N, CHEN X K, XU L，et al. A randomized controlled trial of oral nutritional supplementation versus standard diet following McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with esophageal malignancy：a pilot study[J]. Ann Transl Med，2021，9(22):1674. DOI：10.21037/atm-21-5422.
[19]	CHEN T T, JIANG W, HE G M. Effect of family enteral nutrition on nutritional status in elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma after minimally invasive radical surgery：a randomized trial[J]. Ann Palliat Med，2021，10(6):6760-6767. DOI：10.21037/apm-21-1219.
[20]	LI X K, CONG Z Z, WU W J，et al. Efficacy of 4 wk of home enteral feeding supplementation after esophagectomy on immune function：a randomized controlled trial[J]. Nutrition，2020，77:110787. DOI：10.1016/j.nut.2020.110787.
[21]	CHEN X Y, ZHAO G Y, ZHU L G. Home enteral nutrition for postoperative elderly patients with esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Palliat Med，2021，10(1):278-284. DOI：10.21037/apm-20-2197.
[22]	ZENG J, HU J, CHEN Q X，et al. Home enteral nutrition's effects on nutritional status and quality of life after esophagectomy[J]. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr，2017，26(5):804-810. DOI：10.6133/apjcn.112016.07.
[23]	范富翠，童雅萍，梁冠冕，等. NRS2002结合营养指标评价食管癌术后出院患者的营养状况[J]. 广东医学，2020，41(19):1970-1974. DOI：10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20200938.
[24]	曹子昂，潘文标，梁而慷，等. 穿刺导管空肠造口术对食管癌患者术后肠内营养支持的临床意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志：电子版，2013，7(14):6355-6357. DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2013.14.033.
[25]	童雅萍，谢玲女，沈祝苹，等. 家庭肠内营养对食管癌根治术后患者营养状况的影响研究[J]. 护士进修杂志，2018，33(6):493-496. DOI：10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2018.06.005.
[26]	刘秀娟. 家庭肠内营养对微创食管癌根治术后患者营养状况的影响[J]. 中国临床护理，2021，13(3):158-161,164. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-3768.2021.03.006.
[27]	王倩，王振华，王萍，等. 家庭肠内营养支持治疗对食管癌切除术后患者营养状况的影响[J]. 医学临床研究，2019，36(8):1651-1652. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2019.08.077.
[28]	谷金玲，龚太乾，宋伟安，等. 家庭肠内营养治疗对微创食管癌根治术后营养状况的影响[J]. 武警医学，2020，31(8):657-660. DOI：10.14010/j.cnki.wjyx.2020.08.004.
[29]	石海燕，陈宏林，吴超，等. 口服营养补充对食管癌根治术后出院患者营养状况影响的研究[J]. 中国现代医生，2021，59(11):176-179.
[30]	HYNES O, ANANDAVADIVELAN P, GOSSAGE J，et al. The impact of pre- and post-operative weight loss and body mass index on prognosis in patients with oesophageal cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol，2017，43(8):1559-1565. DOI：10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.023.
[31]	MATSUOKA M, IIJIMA S. Consideration of nutritional support for decreased caloric intake in patients with severe weight loss after esophageal cancer surgery[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho，2019，46(Suppl 1):132-134.
[32]	BAKER M L, HALLIDAY V, ROBINSON P，et al. Nutrient intake and contribution of home enteral nutrition to meeting nutritional requirements after oesophagectomy and total gastrectomy[J]. Eur J Clin Nutr，2017，71(9):1121-1128. DOI：10.1038/ejcn.2017.88.
[33]	HAVERKORT E B, BINNEKADE J M, DE HAAN R J，et al. Suboptimal intake of nutrients after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction[J]. J Acad Nutr Diet，2012，112(7):1080-1087. DOI：10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.032.
[34]	KINGMA B F, STEENHAGEN E, RUURDA J P，et al. Nutritional aspects of enhanced recovery after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction[J]. J Surg Oncol，2017，116(5):623-629. DOI：10.1002/jso.24827.
[35]	MCKERNAN M, MCMILLAN D C, ANDERSON J R，et al. The relationship between quality of life （EORTC QLQ-C30） and survival in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer[J]. Br J Cancer，2008，98(5):888-893. DOI：10.1038/sj.bjc.6604248.
[36]	SYN N L, WEE I, SHABBIR A，et al. Pouch versus No pouch following total gastrectomy：meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies[J]. Ann Surg，2019，269(6):1041-1053. DOI：10.1097/SLA.0000000000003082.
[37]	GANNON J A, GUINAN E M, DOYLE S L，et al. Reduced fitness and physical functioning are long-term sequelae after curative treatment for esophageal cancer：a matched control study[J]. Dis Esophagus，2017，30(8):1-7. DOI：10.1093/dote/dox018.
[38]	ELLIOTT J A, DOYLE S L, MURPHY C F，et al. Sarcopenia：prevalence，and impact on operative and oncologic outcomes in the multimodal management of locally advanced esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Surg，2017，266(5):822-830. DOI：10.1097/SLA.0000000000002398.
[39]	郭敏，殷秀敏，王翠，等. 食管癌患者术后3个月症状群的调查[J]. 中华护理杂志，2019，54(8):1189-1193. DOI：10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.08.014.
[40]	SMALLEY S R, BENEDETTI J K, HALLER D G，et al. Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116：a phase Ⅲ trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection[J]. J Clin Oncol，2012，30(19):2327-2333. DOI：10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7136.
[41]	HEALY L A, RYAN A M, MOORE J，et al. Health-related quality of life assessment at presentation may predict complications and early relapse in patients with localized cancer of the esophagus[J]. Dis Esophagus，2008，21(6):522-528. DOI：10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00814.x.

步骤	检索式
#1	"Esophageal Neoplasms" [MeSH] OR "esophageal neoplasm" [Title] OR "esophageal neoplasms" [Title] OR "cancer of esophagus" [Title] OR "cancer of the esophagus" [Title] OR "esophagus cancer" [Title] OR "esophagus cancers" [Title] OR "esophageal cancer" [Title] OR "esophageal cancers" [Title] OR "esophageal carcinoma" [Title] OR "esophagus carcinoma" [Title] OR "esophagectomy" [Title] OR "esophagus resection" [Title] OR "postesophagectomy" [Title]
#2	"Enteral Nutrition" [MeSH] OR "home enteral nutrition" [Title/Abstract] OR "family enteral nutrition" [Title/Abstract] OR "enteral nutrition" [Title/Abstract] OR "enteral nutritional" [Title/Abstract] OR "nasogastric gavage" [Title/Abstract] OR "tube feeding" [Title/Abstract] OR "enteral feeding" [Title/Abstract] OR "enteric feeding" [Title/Abstract] OR "jejunostomy" [Title/Abstract] OR "oral nutritional supplements" [Title/Abstract] OR "ONS" [Title/Abstract]
#3	#1 AND #2
#4	"aftercare" [All Fields] OR "discharge" [All Fields] OR "home" [All Fields] OR "family" [All Fields] OR "community" [All Fields]
#5	#3 AND #4

步骤	检索式
#1	"Esophageal Neoplasms" [MeSH] OR "esophageal neoplasm" [Title] OR "esophageal neoplasms" [Title] OR "cancer of esophagus" [Title] OR "cancer of the esophagus" [Title] OR "esophagus cancer" [Title] OR "esophagus cancers" [Title] OR "esophageal cancer" [Title] OR "esophageal cancers" [Title] OR "esophageal carcinoma" [Title] OR "esophagus carcinoma" [Title] OR "esophagectomy" [Title] OR "esophagus resection" [Title] OR "postesophagectomy" [Title]
#2	"Enteral Nutrition" [MeSH] OR "home enteral nutrition" [Title/Abstract] OR "family enteral nutrition" [Title/Abstract] OR "enteral nutrition" [Title/Abstract] OR "enteral nutritional" [Title/Abstract] OR "nasogastric gavage" [Title/Abstract] OR "tube feeding" [Title/Abstract] OR "enteral feeding" [Title/Abstract] OR "enteric feeding" [Title/Abstract] OR "jejunostomy" [Title/Abstract] OR "oral nutritional supplements" [Title/Abstract] OR "ONS" [Title/Abstract]
#3	#1 AND #2
#4	"aftercare" [All Fields] OR "discharge" [All Fields] OR "home" [All Fields] OR "family" [All Fields] OR "community" [All Fields]
#5	#3 AND #4

第一作者	发表时间（年）	样本量（E/C）	年龄（E/C）	病理分期（Ⅰ/Ⅱ /Ⅲ/Ⅳ）	干预措施及持续时间（E/C）	结局指标
LIU^[11]	2020	26/24	62.04±5.12/64.58±5.87	24/16/10/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养或ONS 4周/常规口服饮食4周	①②④⑧⑨
BOWREY^[17]	2015	20/21	64.6±8.0/63.1±8.7	6/12/22/1	空肠造瘘管饲喂养6周/常规口服饮食6周	①⑧⑨
XIE^[18]	2021	42/35	61.57±8.45/63.06±5.79		ONS 4周/常规口服饮食4周	⑧⑨
CHEN^[19]	2021	53/53	67.83±7.17/67.79±7.24	49/57/0/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	②③④⑤⑥⑦⑨⑩
LI^[20]	2020	30/32	63.25±5.23/63.61±5.64	11/23/21/7	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	①②
CHEN^[21]	2021	30/30	70.37±7.58/69.53±9.4	9/27/24/0	ONS 4周/常规口服饮食4周	②③④⑥⑩
ZENG^[22]	2017	30/30	61.7±8.4/59.3±10.4	1/28/31/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	⑧⑨⑩
范富翠^[23]	2020	40/40	62.58±6.64/60.88±6.86	Ⅰ~Ⅲ	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	③④⑤⑥⑦⑩
曹子昂^[24]	2013	40/40	65.8/67.4	1/36/42/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养2个月/常规口服饮食2个月	④⑤⑥⑦⑨
童雅萍^[25]	2018	44/41	62.07±7.06/60.85±8.08	32/53/0/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	②③④⑤⑥⑦⑩
刘秀娟^[26]	2021	46/48	59.03±7.79/57.52±7.88	21/51/22/0	十二指肠营养管喂养2个月/常规口服饮食2个月	②③④⑤⑩
王倩^[27]	2019	48/48	53±6.75/55±7.25	41/55/0/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4个月/常规口服饮食4个月	①②③④⑤
谷金玲^[28]	2020	41/40	54±8.0/52±7.9	30/42/9/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	②③④⑤⑥⑩
石海燕^[29]	2021	34/34	67.3±8.1/68.4±8.5		ONS 4周/常规口服饮食4周	①④⑤⑥

第一作者	发表时间（年）	样本量（E/C）	年龄（E/C）	病理分期（Ⅰ/Ⅱ /Ⅲ/Ⅳ）	干预措施及持续时间（E/C）	结局指标
LIU^[11]	2020	26/24	62.04±5.12/64.58±5.87	24/16/10/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养或ONS 4周/常规口服饮食4周	①②④⑧⑨
BOWREY^[17]	2015	20/21	64.6±8.0/63.1±8.7	6/12/22/1	空肠造瘘管饲喂养6周/常规口服饮食6周	①⑧⑨
XIE^[18]	2021	42/35	61.57±8.45/63.06±5.79		ONS 4周/常规口服饮食4周	⑧⑨
CHEN^[19]	2021	53/53	67.83±7.17/67.79±7.24	49/57/0/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	②③④⑤⑥⑦⑨⑩
LI^[20]	2020	30/32	63.25±5.23/63.61±5.64	11/23/21/7	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	①②
CHEN^[21]	2021	30/30	70.37±7.58/69.53±9.4	9/27/24/0	ONS 4周/常规口服饮食4周	②③④⑥⑩
ZENG^[22]	2017	30/30	61.7±8.4/59.3±10.4	1/28/31/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	⑧⑨⑩
范富翠^[23]	2020	40/40	62.58±6.64/60.88±6.86	Ⅰ~Ⅲ	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	③④⑤⑥⑦⑩
曹子昂^[24]	2013	40/40	65.8/67.4	1/36/42/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养2个月/常规口服饮食2个月	④⑤⑥⑦⑨
童雅萍^[25]	2018	44/41	62.07±7.06/60.85±8.08	32/53/0/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	②③④⑤⑥⑦⑩
刘秀娟^[26]	2021	46/48	59.03±7.79/57.52±7.88	21/51/22/0	十二指肠营养管喂养2个月/常规口服饮食2个月	②③④⑤⑩
王倩^[27]	2019	48/48	53±6.75/55±7.25	41/55/0/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4个月/常规口服饮食4个月	①②③④⑤
谷金玲^[28]	2020	41/40	54±8.0/52±7.9	30/42/9/0	空肠造瘘管饲喂养4周/常规口服饮食4周	②③④⑤⑥⑩
石海燕^[29]	2021	34/34	67.3±8.1/68.4±8.5		ONS 4周/常规口服饮食4周	①④⑤⑥

家庭肠内营养在食管癌患者中有效性和安全性的Meta分析

The Efficacy and Safety of Home Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: a Meta-analysis

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

留言

[1]	张珂, 曾先昌, ZOLZAYA Enkhzaya, 朱烨琳, 黄怡文, 刘珍秀, 陶枫. 泄热醒脾饮对肥胖患者饮食行为及体质量相关结局的影响：一项随机对照试验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(20): 2759-2765.
[2]	李俞彤, 赵丹廷, 江枫, 王艳娜, 刘益宗, 梁文娟, 陆家海. 呼吸道合胞病毒mRNA疫苗与重组蛋白亚单位疫苗有效性和安全性的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(19): 2744-2752.
[3]	吴瑞宁, 周明, 张攻孜, 李军, 谢苏杭, 刘杨晓雪, 张佳丽, 刘毛毛, 黄丽萍. 固定式与移动式外骨骼机器人改善脑卒中患者下肢功能及生活质量：一项随机对照试验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(17): 2326-2333.
[4]	季颖, 郭川, 朱仕哲, 季盼盼, 王彤, 阚超杰, 王庆雷. 间歇性θ短阵脉冲刺激小脑改善幕上卒中患者多维度平衡功能的疗效：一项随机对照试验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(15): 2022-2028.
[5]	周慧, 唐欲博, 陈杰, 唐可京, 元刚, 姚弥. 遵循SPIRIT和CONSORT标准对随机对照试验中使用替代终点的扩展指南解读[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(15): 2107-2112.
[6]	姜楠, 杨巍. 基于肠神经系统调节作用探讨揿针改善慢性便秘与混合痔共病患者痔术后排便情况的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(14): 1849-1857.
[7]	詹立, 衡朝阳, 何俍钰, 赵捷, 陈杰, 邢晋山. 靶向B细胞成熟抗原的嵌合抗原受体-T细胞疗法治疗中国复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(14): 1921-1930.
[8]	田安妮, 杨晶, 孙晶, 王诗纯. 康复机器人辅助训练对不同阶段脑卒中患者手运动功能恢复效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(14): 1911-1920.
[9]	肖瑶, 林秀文, 吴倩芳, 凌鑫, 梁艺龄, 刘嘉玲, 石磊. 基于欧洲五维健康量表的中国多重慢病患者健康效用值的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(11): 1463-1472.
[10]	彭骏, 丁静林, 郝辰业, 吴骋, 朱荣慧, 顾春光, 管文琦, 万辉. 线上与线下培训对老年人数字健康素养提升效果的随机对照研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(10): 1348-1353.
[11]	王菲, 韩伟钰, 孙韬. 艾灸联合三阶梯疗法治疗癌性疼痛的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(09): 1203-1211.
[12]	胡琦, 徐宁, 马喜民, 贺嘉慧, 乔慧. 宁夏回族自治区南部山区农村女性健康相关生命质量及其对卫生服务利用的影响研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(08): 988-996.
[13]	裴志怡, 张晓欣, 林佳艺, 张向毅, 康晓凤. 基于患者决策辅助工具国际标准的心血管领域患者决策辅助工具质量及应用效果的系统评价[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(07): 945-952.
[14]	张玲, 黄双英, 徐慧, 梅慧婷, 洪咏萍. 不同运动方式对老年人跌倒效能影响的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(06): 741-751.
[15]	田蓉, 李开楊, 杨梅, 黄敬, 张飞, 赵琦. 中医药治疗消化性溃疡随机对照试验结局指标现状研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(05): 656-667.