中国全科医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 1374-1377.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0439

• 标准·指南·共识 • 上一篇    

澳大利亚全科医生学会《全科医学的预防活动指南》解读与讨论:孕前保健与首次产前检查

陈晓南, 张涵予, 黄延焱*()   

  1. 200040 上海市,复旦大学附属华山医院全科医学科
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-06 修回日期:2026-01-21 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 黄延焱

  • 作者贡献:

    陈晓南负责文章的构思与设计、研究资料的收集与整理、论文撰写;张涵予负责研究资料的收集与表格整理;黄延焱负责论文修订、文章的质量控制及审校、对文章整体负责,监督管理。

  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生健康委员会2025年度卫生行业临床研究专项(20254Y0009); 上海市"医苑新星"青年医学人才培养资助计划(SHWSRS(2025)_071); 2025年复旦大学附属华山医院健康科普专项(HSKP202512)

Interpretation and Discussion of the RACGP Guidelines for Preventive Activities in General Practice: Preconception Care and the First Antenatal Visit

CHEN Xiaonan, ZHANG Hanyu, HUANG Yanyan*()   

  1. Department of General Practice, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2025-11-06 Revised:2026-01-21 Published:2026-04-15 Online:2026-03-12
  • Contact: HUANG Yanyan

摘要: 孕前保健与首次产前检查是保障母婴健康的重要预防策略。本文基于澳大利亚全科医生学会(RACGP)发布的《全科医学预防活动指南》(简称"红皮书")第十版中关于孕前保健和首次产前检查的建议,对比分析了中国和澳大利亚在孕前保健与首次产前检查的模式与实践方面的差异。澳大利亚模式以全科医生为核心,强调个体化服务,注重遗传病携带者筛查和慢性病管理。中国模式则以国家基本公共卫生服务项目为驱动,依托妇幼保健系统,强调群体性筛查与管理,实施"五色"分级风险管理。两种模式各具特色,中国模式在短时间内实现了服务的广覆盖和关键指标的快速改善,而澳大利亚模式则在个体化和连续性服务方面表现突出。未来中国可在现有优势基础上,进一步强化基层能力建设和个性化服务,以提供更优质、均衡、人性化的健康服务。

关键词: 孕前保健, 首次产前检查, 全科医学, 公共卫生

Abstract:

Preconception care (PCC) and the first antenatal visit are crucial preventive strategies for maternal and child health. Based on the recommendations regarding preconception care and initial antenatal assessment presented in the 10th edition of the Guidelines for Preventive Activities in General Practice (Red Book) issued by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), this review provided a comparative analysis of the models and practices of preconception care and first antenatal visit in China and Australia. The Australian model, centered on general practitioners (GPs), emphasized individualized services, including expanded carrier screening for genetic diseases and management of chronic diseases. In contrast, the Chinese model, driven by national public health projects and supported by the maternal and child health system, focused on group-based screening and management, implementing a "five-color" risk classification management system. Both models had their unique strengths. The Chinese model had achieved extensive service coverage and rapid improvement in key indicators, while the Australian model exceled in individualized and continuous services. Future directions for China could involve strengthening grassroots capacity and individualized services to provide higher quality, equitable, and humanized health services.

Key words: Preconception care, First antenatal visit, General practice, Public health