中国全科医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (10): 1242-1248.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.102

所属专题: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合集

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2 926例2型糖尿病患者社区综合干预9年心血管风险的变化

张雪莲1,袁申元1*,万钢2,袁明霞1,杨光燃1,傅汉菁1,朱良湘1,BCDS课题组   

  1. 1.100730北京市,首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院内分泌科 2.100015 北京市,首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院病案统计科
    *通信作者:袁申元,主任医师,教授,硕士生导师;E-mail:fulvic@126.com
  • 出版日期:2021-04-05 发布日期:2021-04-05
  • 基金资助:
    首都医学发展科研基金(2007-1035);首都卫生发展科研专项(2011-2005-01);国际糖尿病联盟BRIDGES基金(ST12-024);首都卫生发展科研专项(2016-1-2057,2016-2-2054);首都临床特色应用研究项目(Z151100004015021)

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Changes in 2 926 Type 2 Diabetics with Community-based Multifactorial Interventions:a 9-year Study 

ZHANG Xuelian1,YUAN Shenyuan1*,WAN Gang2,YUAN Mingxia1,YANG Guangran1,FU Hanjing1,ZHU Liangxiang1,BCDS Group   

  1. 1.Department of Endocrinology,Beijing Tongren Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100730,China
    2.Medical Records and Statistics Department,Beijing Ditan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100015,China
    *Corresponding author:YUAN Shenyuan,Chief physician,Professor,Master supervisor;E-mail:fulvic@126.com
  • Published:2021-04-05 Online:2021-04-05

摘要: 背景 2型糖尿病与心血管疾病(CVD)和死亡率密切相关,不同心血管风险2型糖尿病人群CVD事件发生鲜有报道。目的 观察北京社区2型糖尿病患者长期综合干预后心血管风险的变化。方法 2008年从北京市15个社区纳入2 926例2型糖尿病患者。将入组的2型糖尿病患者分为单纯糖尿病组(DM组,n=824),合并高血压组(HTN组,n=1 267)及合并CVD者(CVD组,n=835)。按改良FRS评分(I-FRS)将上述三组人群进一步分别分为低危组(I-FRS<10%)、中危组(10%≤I-FRS≤20%)及高危组(I-FRS>20%)。截至2017年,所有患者均接受9年规范化的管理,并进行随访评估。随访结束时,比较各组心血管风险的变化,包括临床特征、I-FRS评分及终点事件。采用Cox回归模型分析终点事件的影响因素。结果 基线时,I-FRS中危组,CVD组年龄、糖尿病病程高于DM组及HTN组;CVD组及HTN组收缩压高于DM组,空腹血糖(FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)低于DM组(P<0.01)。基线时,I-FRS高危组,CVD组年龄高于DM组、HTN组;CVD组及HTN组的收缩压高于DM组;CVD组及HTN组的FPG、HbA1c、TC、LDL-C低于DM组(P<0.01)。9年随访结束时,I-FRS中危组,CVD组及HTN组血压、TC、LDL-C低于基线时,DM组舒张压、FPG、HbA1c、TC、LDL-C低于基线时;I-FRS高危组,CVD组及HTN组血压、FPG、TG、LDL-C低于基线时,DM组HbA1c、TC低于基线时;I-FRS中危组和高危组,CVD组、HTN组及DM组I-FRS均较基线明显下降(P<0.05)。9年随访结束时,CVD组及HTN组的累计全因死亡、CVD事件高于DM组(P<0.017)。Cox回归分析结果显示,校正年龄及性别的影响后,HTN组及CVD组发生终点事件的风险分别为DM组的1.542、1.923倍。结论 社区糖尿病合并CVD患者预后较差,综合干预CVD危险因素具有重要意义。应积极关注并干预I-FRS较高的糖尿病人群,即使是单纯糖尿病人群,从而实现个体化评估。

关键词: 糖尿病, 2型, 社区管理, 改良FRS评分, 心血管事件

Abstract: Background Type 2 diabetes(T2DM) patients have elevated risk of cardiovascular disease(CVD) and death,but CVD events in them with different levels of CVD risk are rarely reported. Objective To observe the changes of CVD risk in T2DM patients receiving long-term mutifactorial interventions living in urban communities of Beijing. Methods A total of 2 926 T2DM patients from 15 communities of Beijing were enrolled in 2008,including 824 without complications,1 267 with hypertension,and 835 with CVD with different levels of 10-year CVD risk〔low,medium and high(<10%,10%-20%,>20%)〕 stratified by using the improved Framingham Risk Score(I-FRS). All patients received a follow-up with standardized management as of December 2017 to assess the changes in cardiovascular risk during this period,including clinical characteristics,I-FRS and endpoint events. Cox regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of endpoint events. Results Among patients with medium 10-year CVD risk,those with CVD had greater mean age,longer mean duration of T2DM and higher mean baseline blood pressure than those with only diabetes or with hypertension(P<0.01). Those with only diabetes showed much higher mean baseline levels of fasting blood glucose(FPG),glycosylated hemoglobin(HbA1c),total cholesterol(TC),low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) compared with those complicated with CVD or hypertension(P<0.01). Among patients with high 10-year CVD risk,those with CVD had greater mean age than those with only diabetes or with hypertension(P<0.01). Those with only diabetes showed much lower mean baseline systolic blood pressure,and much higher mean baseline FPG,HbA1c,TC and LDL-C than those with CVD or hypertension (P<0.01). Among patients with medium 10-year CVD risk,the levels of blood pressure,TC and LDL-C in CVD group and HTN group were significant decrease when compared with baseline. Meantime,in DM group,the levels of diastolic blood pressure,FPG,HbA1c,TC and LDL-C were much lower than baseline. Compared with baseline in patients with high 10-year CVD risk,CVD group and HTN group had much lower levels in blood pressure,FPG,TG and LDL-C;while in DM group,the levels of HbA1c and TC significant decreased at the end of follow-up. In those with medium and high 10-year CVD risk,the I-FRS at the end of follow-up changed significantly compared with the baseline levels,regardless of having CVD or hypertension or not(P<0.05). Those with CVD or hypertension showed significant elevated cumulative incidence of all-cause death and CVD events compared with those without complications(P<0.017). In Cox regression analyses,after adjusting for age and sex,increased risk of endpoint events was found in those with hypertension(HR=1.542) and in those with CVD(HR=1.923). Conclusion The outcome of community-living T2DM patients with CVD was poor,so it is important to deliver multifactorial interventions to them to reduce CVD risk factors. Attentions should be paid to those with high I-FRS,regardless of having complications or not,to conduct individualized assessment for them to reduce CVD risk factors.

Key words: Diabetes mellitus, type 2;Community management;Improved Framingham risk scores;Cardiovascular events