中国全科医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (04): 402-406.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0811-1

• 标准·指南·共识 • 上一篇    下一篇

实证研究在临床实践指南制订中的思考及方法学建议

高一城1,2,3, 于子津4, 曹蕊1,2,3, 刘芷含1,2,3, 方锐5, 李媛媛5, 邓迎杰5, 向文远5, 费宇彤1,2,3,*()   

  1. 1.100029 北京市,北京中医药大学循证医学中心
    2.100029 北京市,北京中医药大学国际循证中医药研究院
    3.100029 北京市,北京GRADE中心
    4.100029 北京市,北京中医药大学针灸推拿学院
    5.830000 新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市,新疆医科大学附属中医医院
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-02 修回日期:2024-10-15 出版日期:2025-02-05 发布日期:2024-12-03
  • 通讯作者: 费宇彤

  • 作者贡献:

    高一城提出论文思路,研究命题的提出、设计,撰写初稿、查阅文献、修订论文;于子津、曹蕊、刘芷含负责查阅文献、起草论文初稿、修订论文;方锐、李媛媛、邓迎杰、向文远负责查阅文献、修订论文;费宇彤提出论文思路,研究命题的提出、设计,负责文章整体质量把控、最终版本修订并对论文负责。

  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发计划(2021B03006-4)

Thinking and Methodological Suggestions of Empirical Research in the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines

GAO Yicheng1,2,3, YU Zijin4, CAO Rui1,2,3, LIU Zhihan1,2,3, FANG Rui5, LI Yuanyuan5, DENG Yingjie5, XIANG Wenyuan5, FEI Yutong1,2,3,*()   

  1. 1. Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
    2. Institute for Excellence in Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
    3. Beijing GRADE Center, Beijing 100029, China
    4. School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
    5. Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, China
  • Received:2024-04-02 Revised:2024-10-15 Published:2025-02-05 Online:2024-12-03
  • Contact: FEI Yutong

摘要: 临床实践指南制订的方法学理论在真实的制订情境下存在诸多问题,缺乏对于实际情况的考量,致使其对于指南制订的指导性下降。本文深入剖析了指南制订中理论与实践相关的多方面难点,包括指南制订时方法学理论与实践存在偏差、缺乏大样本的指南方法学相关的实证研究、方法学理论在实证运用后对于局限性和未来研究建议的报告内容不足且形式不规范的问题。为提高未来指南制订方法学的指导性,本课题组提出了多项方法学建议,包括倡导开展对方法学理论进行验证的实证研究、促进大样本实证研究和对比研究开展、规范实证研究后对局限性和未来研究建议的报告内容和形式,以期为指南制订方法学研究者及指南制订小组提供参考。

关键词: 循证医学, 实证研究, 方法学研究, 临床实践指南, 指南制订

Abstract:

There were many problems in the methodological theory of the formulation of clinical practice guidelines in in the real world situation, and the lack of consideration of the actual situation leads to the decline of the guidance for the formulation of guidelines. Through an in-depth analysis of the various difficulties related to theory and practice in the formulation of the guidelines, including the deviation between methodological theory and practice in the formulation of guidelinesn, lack of empirical studies of large samples related to guideline development, after the empirical application of methodological theory, the reports of limitations and future research recommendations were insufficient and not standardized. To improve the guidance of future guidelines, our team put forward a number of methodology recommendations, including advocating for empirical research that validates methodological theories, develop large sample empirical research and comparative research, standardize the content and form of reports on limitations and future research recommendations after empirical research, in order to provide reference for guidelines develop methodology researchers and guideline development groups.

Key words: Evidence-based medicine, Empirical research, Methodology research, Clinical practice guidelines, Guideline development