中国全科医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (26): 3349-3358.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.01.206

所属专题: 乳腺癌最新文章合集 肿瘤最新文章合集 女性健康最新文章合集

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国女性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿危险因素的Meta分析

张浩,刘锐芮,朱琳,柏丁兮,钟懿珠,梁芸,高静*   

  1. 611137四川省成都市,成都中医药大学护理学院
    *通信作者:高静,教授;E-mail:729012934@qq.com
  • 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2021-09-15

Risk Factors for Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema in Chinese Women:a Meta-analysis 

ZHANG Hao,LIU Ruirui,ZHU Lin,BO Dingxi,ZHONG Yizhu,LIANG Yun,GAO Jing*   

  1. School of Nursing,Chengdu University of TCM,Chengdu 611137,China
    *Corresponding author:GAO Jing,Professor;E-mail:729012934@qq.com
  • Published:2021-09-15 Online:2021-09-15

摘要: 背景 乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)是乳腺癌术后最主要的并发症,目前临床尚无有效的治疗手段。因此,及早识别其发生的危险因素具有重要意义,但现有研究结论尚存争议,且国内尚无相关系统评价。目的 系统评价中国女性BCRL的危险因素。方法 计算机检索CINAHL、PubMed、EMBase、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普网、万方数据知识服务平台和中国生物医学文献数据库发表的相关文献,检索时间均从建库至2020年6月。由两名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料〔第一作者、发表时间、研究类型、样本量、水肿测量方式、水肿程度、随访时间、BCRL相关影响因素(年龄、体质指数、高血压情况、淋巴结转移阳性情况、腋窝淋巴结清扫范围、行腋窝淋巴结清扫术、淋巴结清扫数目、术后愈合并发症情况、化疗情况、放疗情况)〕、对文献进行偏倚风险质量评价,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入31篇文献,BCRL患者共2 618例,文献质量整体在中等及以上。Meta分析结果显示,年龄〔OR=2.59,95%CI(1.95,3.45),P<0.000 01〕、体质指数〔OR=2.33,95%CI(1.91,2.85),P<0.000 01〕、高血压情况〔OR=4.76,95%CI(2.53,8.94),P<0.000 01〕、淋巴结转移阳性情况〔OR=1.22,95%CI(1.06,1.39),P=0.005〕、腋窝淋巴结清扫范围〔OR=2.30,95%CI(1.88,2.81),P<0.000 01〕、腋窝淋巴结清扫术〔OR=8.29,95%CI(2.32,29.60),P=0.001〕、淋巴结清扫数目≥15个〔OR=1.12,95%CI(1.06,1.19),P<0.000 1〕、术后愈合并发症情况〔OR=4.11,95%CI(3.26,5.17),P<0.000 01〕、化疗情况〔OR=3.17,95%CI(2.16,4.63),P<0.000 01〕、放疗情况〔OR=2.69,95%CI(2.32,3.13),P<0.000 01〕是BCRL的影响因素。结论 年龄>40岁、体质指数≥24 kg/m2、高血压、淋巴结转移阳性、腋窝淋巴结清扫范围增加、行腋窝淋巴结清扫术、淋巴结清扫数目≥15个、术后愈合并发症、化疗、放疗是BCRL的危险因素。受纳入研究质量和数量的局限性,上述结论尚需开展更多大样本的前瞻性队列研究来进行验证。

关键词: 乳腺癌淋巴水肿, 影响因素分析, 女性, 病例对照研究, 队列研究, 系统评价, Meta分析

Abstract: Background Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL)is the most common postoperative complication of breast cancer,which cannot be cured clinically at present. Early identification of the risk factors for BCRL may improve the outcome significantly,yet it is still controversial in existing relevant studies,and there is no relevant systematic review in China. Objective To systematically evaluate the risk factors for BCRL in Chinese women. Methods We searched the databases of CINAHL,PubMed,EMBase,Web of Science,The Cochrane Library,CNKI,CQVIP,Wanfang Data and SinoMed for articles about the risk factors of BCRL among Chinese women published from inception to June 2020.Two researchers independently screened the studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria,extracted data 〔including the first author,time of publication,type of studies,sample size,measurement methods for edema,degree of edema,follow-up time,and BCRL-related factors(age,BMI,hypertension prevalence,lymph node metastasis prevalence,scope of axillary lymph node dissection,having a lymph node dissection,number of lymph nodes dissected,postoperative healing complication,chemotherapy,radiation therapy)〕,and performed risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Results 31 studies involving 2 618 subjects were included,with moderate or high methodological quality. Meta-analysis showed that older age〔OR=2.59,95%CI(1.95,3.45),P<0.000 01〕,increased BMI〔OR=2.33,95%CI(1.91,2.85),P<0.000 01〕,hypertension〔OR=4.76,95%CI(2.53,8.94),P<0.000 01〕,lymph node metastasis〔OR=1.22,95%CI(1.06,1.39),P=0.005〕,extended axillary lymph node dissection〔OR=2.30,95%CI(1.88,2.81),P<0.000 01〕,having a lymph node dissection〔OR=8.29,95%CI(2.32,29.60),P=0.001〕,number of dissected lymph nodes ≥15〔OR=1.12,95%CI(1.06,1.19),P<0.000 1〕,postoperative healing complication〔OR=4.11,95%CI(3.26,5.17),P<0.000 01〕,chemotherapy〔OR=3.17,95%CI(2.16,4.63),P<0.000 01〕,radiation therapy〔OR=2.69,95%CI(2.32,3.13),P<0.000 01〕were risk factors of BCRL. Conclusion BCRL among Chinese women may be associated with various risk factors,such as age>40,BMI≥24 kg/m2,hypertension,lymph node metastasis,extended axillary lymph node dissection,having a lymph node dissection,number of dissected axillary lymph nodes ≥15,postoperative healing complication,chemotherapy,and radiation therapy. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies,more large-sample prospective cohort studies are required to verify the above conclusion.

Key words: Breast cancer related lymphedema, Root cause analysis, Femininity, Case-control studies, Cohort studies, Systematic review, Meta-analysis