中国全科医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (23): 2924-2933.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0864

• 医学循证 • 上一篇    

贝利尤单抗和阿尼鲁单抗及泰它西普治疗系统性红斑狼疮疗效和安全性的网状Meta分析

李浩1, 李江涛2,*(), 刘丹3, 王建军1   

  1. 1.637100 四川省南充市,川北医学院临床医学院
    2.644000 四川省宜宾市第一人民医院风湿免疫科
    3.610500 四川省成都市,成都医学院临床医学院
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-19 修回日期:2024-05-28 出版日期:2025-08-15 发布日期:2025-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 李江涛

  • 作者贡献:

    李浩负责文章的选题、研究设计、文献筛选、数据提取、统计分析、图表绘制、撰写文章;李江涛负责选题指导、文章的质量控制,对文章整体负责,监督管理;刘丹负责文献筛选、数据提取;王建军负责文献筛选时有歧异进行讨论及统计分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab, Anifrolumab, and Telitacicept on the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Network Meta-analysis

LI Hao1, LI Jiangtao2,*(), LIU Dan3, WANG Jianjun1   

  1. 1. School of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637100, China
    2. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, the First People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin 644000, China
    3. School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2023-11-19 Revised:2024-05-28 Published:2025-08-15 Online:2025-06-17
  • Contact: LI Jiangtao

摘要: 背景 系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种慢性多系统自身免疫性疾病,目前已有3种生物制剂被批准用于治疗SLE,分别为贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普,但目前尚缺乏直接比较3种药物疗效及安全性的研究。 目的 通过网状Meta分析探索贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普治疗SLE的临床疗效及安全性。 方法 检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase中有关贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普治疗SLE的随机对照试验,检索时间为建库至2023年8月。通过纳入、排除标准筛选文献,获取数据,采用RevMan 5.4.1软件、R语言4.3.1和ADDIS 1.16.8软件对数据进行直接或网状Meta分析。 结果 经过筛选后纳入12项随机对照试验,共计4 789例患者,其中试验组2 721例,安慰剂组2 068例。直接Meta分析结果显示,贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普SLE应答指数4(SRI4)缓解率均高于安慰剂组(OR=1.62,95%CI=1.40~1.88,P<0.001;OR=2.39,95%CI=1.70~3.37,P<0.001;OR=6.28,95%CI=3.20~12.33,P<0.001)。贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗口服皮质类固醇剂量减少所占比例高于安慰剂组(OR=1.48,95%CI=1.09~2.02,P<0.001;OR=2.45,95%CI=1.69~3.54,P<0.001),严重复发率(SF)低于安慰剂组(OR=0.59,95%CI=0.49~0.71,P<0.001;OR=0.52,95%CI=0.39~0.69,P<0.001)。阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普总不良事件(TAEs)发生率高于安慰剂组(OR=1.80,95%CI=1.25~2.59,P=0.001;OR=2.13,95%CI=1.18~3.83,P=0.01);阿尼鲁单抗严重不良事件(SAEs)发生率低于安慰剂组(OR=0.67,95%CI=0.46~0.97,P=0.04)。与安慰剂组比较,贝利尤单抗和安慰剂组TAEs发生率(OR=0.89,95%CI=0.72~1.08,P=0.24)和SAEs发生率(OR=0.82,95%CI=0.59~1.12,P=0.25)比较,差异无统计学意义。网状Meta分析结果显示,3种生物制剂治疗后的SRI4缓解率的概率排序为泰它西普>阿尼鲁单抗>贝利尤单抗(皮下注射)>贝利尤单抗(静脉注射);TAEs发生率的概率排序为泰它西普>阿尼鲁单抗>贝利尤单抗(静脉注射)>贝利尤单抗(皮下注射)。 结论 3种药物治疗SLE皆具有良好的临床疗效,其中泰它西普疗效更为显著,阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普虽然增加了用药后的TAEs发生率,但降低了SAEs发生率,贝利尤单抗在安全性方面更为稳定。

关键词: 系统性红斑狼疮, 贝利尤单抗, 阿尼鲁单抗, 泰它西普, 疗效, 不良事件, 网状Meta分析

Abstract:

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multisystem autoimmune disease. At present, three biological agents have been approved for treating SLE, including belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept. However, a direct comparison of their efficacy and safety is lacking.

Objective

To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept on the treatment of SLE using network meta-analysis.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept to treat SLE were searched in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from the establishment of the databases to August 2023. After screening the relevant literatures and obtaining data from eligible RCTs based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, direct or network meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.4.1, R language 4.3.1, and Aggregate Data Drug Information System (ADDIS) 1.16.8 software.

Results

After screening, 4 789 SLE patients from 12 RCTs were included, including 2 721 patients in the experimental group and 2 068 patients in the placebo group. The direct meta-analysis results showed that the relief rate of SLE responder index 4 (SRI4) in SLE patients treated with belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept was significantly higher in the experimental group compared with that of the placebo group (OR=1.62, 95%CI=1.40-1.88, P<0.001; OR=2.39, 95%CI=1.70-3.37, P<0.001; OR=6.28, 95%CI=3.20-12.33, P<0.001). Compared with that of the placebo group, the proportion of SLE patients with a reduced oral corticosteroid dosage after belimumab and anifrolumab treatment was significantly higher (OR=1.48, 95%CI=1.09-2.02, P<0.001; OR=2.45, 95%CI=1.69-3.54, P<0.001), and the severe recurrence (SR) rate was significantly lower (OR=0.59, 95%CI=0.49-0.71, P<0.001; OR=0.52, 95%CI=0.39-0.69, P<0.001). The incidence of total adverse events (TAEs) of anifrolumab and telitacicept was significantly higher than that of the placebo group (OR=1.80, 95%CI=1.25-2.59, P=0.001; OR=2.13, 95%CI=1.18-3.83, P=0.01), while the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) of anifrolumab was significantly lower (OR=0.67, 95%CI=0.46-0.97, P=0.04). There were no significant differences in the incidence of TAEs (OR=0.89, 95%CI=0.72-1.08, P=0.24) and SAEs (OR=0.82, 95%CI=0.59-1.12, P=0.25) between the belimumab group and placebo group. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the highest SRI4 was detected after the treatment of telitacicept, followed by anifrolumab, subcutaneous injection of belimumab and intravenous injection of belimumab. The highest incidence of TAEs was detected after the treatment of telitacicept, followed by anifrolumab, intravenous injection of belimumaband subcutaneous injection of belimumab.

Conclusion

Aelimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept all exhibit good clinical efficacy on the treatment of SLE, especially telitacicept. Although anifrolumab and telitacicept increase the overall incidence of TAEs after treatment, they reduce the incidence of SAEs. Belimumab exhibits the highest safety on treating SLE.

Key words: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Belimumab, Anifrolumab, Telitacicept, Efficacy, Adverse events, Network meta-analysis

中图分类号: