中国全科医学

• •

贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普治疗系统性红斑狼疮的疗效和安全性网状meta分析

李浩, 李江涛, 刘丹, 王建军   

  • 收稿日期:2023-11-29 接受日期:2024-01-05
  • 通讯作者: 李江涛

The efficacy and safety of belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus :A network meta-analysis

LI Hao, LI Jiangtao, LIU Dan, WANG Jianjun   

  • Received:2023-11-29 Accepted:2024-01-05
  • Contact: LI Jiangtao
分享到

摘要: 背景:系统性红斑狼疮是一种慢性多系统自身免疫性疾病,易累及多系统受损,治疗缓解后易于复发,降低患者生活质量,严重者危及生命,生物制剂的开发研究为系统性红斑狼疮患者带来了曙光,目前已有三种生物制剂被批准用于系统性红斑狼疮,分别为贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普,但目前尚缺乏研究直接比较三种药物的疗效及安全性的研究。因此本研究,采用网状meta分析方法间接比较三者的疗效及安全性。目的:分析贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普治疗系统性红斑狼疮的临床疗效及安全性进行网状meta分析。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、EMBASE中所有关贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普与SLE的随机对照研究,检索时间范围自建库至2023年8月。通过纳入排除标准筛选文献,获取数据,采用RevMan5.4.1软件、R语言4.3.1和ADDIS1.16.8软件对数据进行直接或网状meta分析,效应量以OR值及其95%CI表示。比较三种药物相关数据之间的疗效及安全性。结果:经过筛选后纳入12项随机对照研究,共计4 789例患者,其中试验组2 721人,安慰剂组2 068人,直接meta分析结果显示,在临床疗效方面,三种药物与安慰剂组相比,明显提升了SLE应答指数4(SLE Responder Index 4,SRI4),有效改善患者的临床症状[(OR=1.62,95%CI:1.40~1.88,P<0.001);(OR=2.39,95%CI:1.70~3.37,P<0.001);(OR=6.28,95%CI:3.20~12.33,P<0.001)];贝利尤单抗、阿尼鲁单抗较安慰剂组,可减少口服皮质类固醇剂量[(OR=1.48,95%CI:1.09~2.02,P<0.001);(OR=2.45,95%CI:1.69~3.54,P<0.001)],降低严重发作率(Severe flare,SF)[(OR=0.59,95%CI:0.49~0.71,P<0.001);(OR=0.52,95%CI:0.39~0.69,P<0.001)];在安全性方面,虽然阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普的总不良事件发生率(Total adverse events,TAEs)较安慰剂组高[(OR=1.80,95%CI:1.25~2.59,P=0.001);(OR=2.13,95%CI:1.18~3.83,P=0.01)](P<0.05),但阿尼鲁单抗可降低严重不良事件发生率(Serious adverse events,SAEs)(OR=0.67,95%CI:0.46~0.97,P=0.04),泰它西普也有相似的优点;与安慰剂组比较,贝利尤单抗组的总不良事件发生率(OR=0.89,95%CI:0.72~1.08,P=0.24)和严重不良事件发生率(OR=0.82,95%CI:0.59~1.12,P=0.25)无统计学意义;网状meta分析结果显示,三种药物治疗后的SRI4缓解率为泰他西普高于阿尼鲁单抗和贝利尤单抗,TAEs发生率为阿尼鲁单抗高于贝利尤单抗;贝利尤单抗不管静脉还是皮下注射都观察到相似的疗效和安全性。结论:三种药物治疗系统性红斑狼疮皆具有良好的临床疗效,其中泰它西普疗效更为显著,阿尼鲁单抗和泰它西普虽然增加了用药后的总不良反应事件发生率,但降低了严重不良事件发生率,贝利尤单抗在安全性方面更为稳定。

关键词: 系统性红斑狼疮, 贝利尤单抗, 阿尼鲁单抗, 泰它西普, 疗效, 不良反应事件, 网状meta分析

Abstract: Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic multisystem autoimmune disease that is prone to multiple system damage. After treatment, it is prone to recurrence, reducing the quality of life of patients, and in severe cases, endangering their lives. The development and research of biological agents have brought dawn to SLE patients. Currently, three biological agents have been approved for use in SLE patients, namely belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept, However, there is currently a lack of research that directly compares the efficacy and safety of the three drugs. Therefore, in this study, a network meta-analysis method was used to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of the three. Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept in the treatment of patients with SLE using a mesh meta-analysis. Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE to investigate the effects of belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept on SLE. The search was conducted from the establishment of the database until August 2023. By incorporating exclusion criteria to screen literature and obtaining data, direct or mesh meta-analysis was performed on the data using RevMan5.4.1 software, R language 4.3.1, and ADDIS1.16.8 software. The effects were expressed as OR values and their 95% CI. Compare the efficacy and safety of data related to three drugs. Results: After screening, a total of 4 789 patients were included in 12 randomized controlled studies, including 2 721 patients in the experimental group and 2 068 patients in the placebo group. Direct meta-analysis results showed that in terms of clinical efficacy, three drugs, belimumab, anifrolumab, and telitacicept, significantly improved the SLE Responder Index 4(SRI4) compared to the placebo group, Effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients [(OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.40-1.88, P<0.001); (OR=2.39, 95% CI: 1.70-3.37, P<0.001); (OR=6.28, 95% CI: 3.20-12.33, P<0.001)]; Compared with the placebo group, belimumab, anifrolumab can reduce oral corticosteroid doses [(OR=1.48, 95% CI: 1.09-2.02, P<0.001); (OR=2.45, 95% CI: 1.69-3.54, P<0.001)] and reduce severe flare rates (Severe flare, SF) [(OR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.49-0.71, P<0.001); (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.69, P<0.001)]; In terms of safety, although the incidence of Total adverse events (TAEs) was higher in the anifrolumab, and telitacicept groups compared to the placebo group (OR=1.80, 95% CI: 1.25-2.59, P=0.001); (OR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.18-3.83, P=0.01) (P<0.05), anifrolumab can reduce the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.97, P=0.04), and telitacicept also has similar advantages; Compared with the placebo group, the incidence of Total adverse events (OR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, P=0.24) and the incidence of serious adverse events (OR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.59-1.12, P=0.25) in the belimumab group were not statistically significant ; The indirect results of network meta-analysis showed that the remission rate of SRI4 after treatment with three drugs was higher than that of anifrolumab and belimumab , and the incidence of TAEs was higher than that of belimumab ; Similar efficacy and safety were observed in both intravenous and subcutaneous injections of belimumab. Conclusion: All three drugs have good clinical efficacy in the treatment of SLE patients, among which the efficacy of telitacicept is more significant. Although anifrolumab and telitacicept increase the overall incidence of adverse events after medication, they reduce the incidence of serious adverse events. belimumab is more stable in terms of safety.

Key words: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Belimumab, Anifrolumab, Telitacicept, Efficacy, Adverse reaction events, Network meta-analysis