中国全科医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (28): 3527-3532.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.470

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海市社区医务人员循证慢性病防控证据获取能力自我认知实证研究

陈宁1,王朝昕2,3,杨燕4,刘茜4,黄蛟灵2,俞文雅2,范峰1,金花5,于德华5,巩昕1,石建伟1,2,5*   

  1. 1.200090上海市,同济大学附属杨浦医院 2.200025上海市,上海交通大学医学院公共卫生学院 3.528244广东省佛山市,南方医科大学附属南海医院全科医学中心 4.200092上海市,同济大学经济与管理学院 5.200090上海市全科医学与社区卫生发展研究中心
    *通信作者:石建伟,助理研究员;E-mail:shijianwei_amy@126.com
  • 出版日期:2020-10-05 发布日期:2020-10-05
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71774116);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71603182);上海市卫生系统优秀青年人才项目(2018YQ52);2018年“重大慢性非传染性疾病防控研究”重点专项(2018YFC1314700);上海市浦江人才计划资助(2019PJC072);新型冠状病毒防治专项软课题(2020RK38)

Self-rated Ability to Obtain Evidence-based Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Information in Community Medial Workers,Shanghai:an Empirical Analysis 

CHEN Ning1,WANG Zhaoxin2,3,YANG Yan4,LIU Qian4,HUANG Jiaoling2,YU Wenya2,FAN Feng1,JIN Hua5,YU Dehua5,GONG Xin1,SHI Jianwei1,2,5*   

  1. 1.Yangpu Hospital of Tongji University,Shanghai 200090,China
    2.School of Public Health,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200025,China
    3.General Practice Center,Nanhai Hospital,Southern Medical University,Foshan 528244,China
    4.School of Economics & Management,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China
    5.Shanghai General Practice and Community Health Development Research Center,Shanghai 200090,China
    *Corresponding author:SHI Jianwei,Assistant researcher;E-mail:shijianwei_amy@126.com
  • Published:2020-10-05 Online:2020-10-05

摘要: 背景 目前慢性病防控形势依然严峻,提升社区医务人员慢性病防控能力迫在眉睫。循证慢性病防控作为一种提升医务人员慢性病防控能力的手段在西方国家已取得了一定成效,但在我国却鲜有研究。目的 探讨社区医务人员慢性病防控证据的获取途径、能力及影响因素,为提升社区医务人员循证慢性病防控能力提供理论依据。方法 于2019年4—7月,采用分层抽样的方法,以上海市75家社区卫生服务机构的975例医务人员为研究对象,对其进行问卷调查。问卷内容包括个人基本信息、循证基本认知情况、慢性病防控证据获取途径、慢性病防控证据获取能力。慢性病防控证据获取途径和慢性病防控证据获取能力由被调查者依据Likert 7级评分自评。采用多元线性逐步回归分析社区医务人员循证慢性病防控证据获取能力的影响因素。结果 892例(91.5%)社区医务人员的问卷被有效回收。临床指南为被调查医务人员获取慢性病防控证据的最常用途径,自评得分为(4.583±1.177)分。被调查对象自评获得的循证慢性病防控证据精准有效平均得分为(4.312±0.979)分,能获取针对慢性病危险因素的证据平均得分为(4.244±1.028)分,能应用针对慢性病危险因素的证据平均得分为(4.280±0.995)分。多元线性逐步回归分析结果显示,单位是否为大学附属是社区医务人员获得的循证慢性病防控证据精准有效、能获取针对慢性病危险因素的证据、能应用针对慢性病危险因素的证据的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 所在社区卫生服务机构是否为大学附属是社区医务人员循证慢性病防控证据获取能力的主要影响因素,社区应重视慢性病防控证据获取途径的提供,并加强对医务人员慢性病防控证据获取及利用能力的培养。

关键词: 医务人员, 慢性病, 循证医学, 影响因素分析

Abstract: Background Chronic disease prevention and control is still the primary health proposition in modern society. So it is urgent to improve the ability of chronic disease prevention and control in community medical workers. Evidence-based chronic disease prevention and control,a means for improving relevant abilities of medical workers,has achieved notable results in western countries,but has been rarely studied in China. Objective To explore the ways and ability for obtaining chronic disease prevention and control evidence and associated factors in community medial workers,offering a theoretical basis for improving the related abilities in such workers. Methods Using stratified sampling,a self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted in 975 medical workers in 75 community health centers from April to July 2019,for collecting the data about their socio-demographic information,awareness of evidence-based medicine,and ways and ability to obtain evidence for chronic disease prevention and control(with items scored on a self-rated 7-point Likert scale). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was applied to identity the influencing factors of ability for obtaining the evidence. Results A total of 892(91.5%) community medical workers returned responsive questionnaires. The results showed that clinical guidelines are the most common way for obtaining chronic disease prevention and control evidence,scoring(4.583±1.177) on average. The average self-rated score for the accuracy and effectiveness of obtained chronic disease prevention and control evidence was(4.312±0.979). The average self-rated scores for obtaining and using the evidence about risk factors for chronic diseases were(4.244±1.028) (4.280±0.995),respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that working at a community healthcare institution affiliated to a university was associated with the obtaining and use of chronic disease prevention and control evidence as well as the accuracy and effectiveness of the evidence(P<0.05). Conclusion Working at a community healthcare institution affiliated to a university may be the foremost factor associated with the ability of obtaining chronic disease prevention and control evidence in community medical workers. So the ways for obtaining the evidence in this group should be attached importance,and their abilities of obtaining and using the evidence should be improved by training.

Key words: Medical staff, Chronic disease, Evidence-based medicine, Root cause analysis