中国全科医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (31): 3882-3885.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.31.022

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

全科门诊简洁干预联合团队链式管理对血脂异常的干预效果研究

马佳1,2,朱卫红1,刘文斌1,陆媛2,黄春美1,黄晨1,夏瑾1,张韶伟1*   

  1. 1.200090上海市杨浦区定海社区卫生服务中心 2.200438上海市,同济大学医学院全科医学系
    *通信作者:张韶伟,主治医师;E-mail:zhangshaowei2000@163.com
  • 出版日期:2018-11-05 发布日期:2018-11-05
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:上海市杨浦区示范家庭医生培育项目(YP2017SQ001)

Effect Evaluation of Concise Intervention and Group Chain Management on Dyslipidemia in General Clinics

MA Jia1,2,ZHU Weihong1,LIU Wenbin1,LU Yuan2,HUANG Chunmei1,HUANG Chen1,XIA Jin1,ZHANG Shaowei1*   

  1. 1.Yangpu District Dinghai Community Health Service Center,Shanghai 200090,China
    2.Department of General Practice,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200438,China
    *Corresponding author:ZHANG Shaowei,Attending physician;E-mail:zhangshaowei2000@163.com
  • Published:2018-11-05 Online:2018-11-05

摘要: 目的 探讨全科门诊简洁干预联合团队链式管理对血脂异常的干预效果。方法 选取2017年4—6月于上海市杨浦区定海社区卫生服务中心全科门诊就诊的血脂异常患者203例为研究对象,随机分为对照组(n=102)和干预组(n=101),并根据心血管危险分层将两组患者分别分为低危、中危、高危、极高危亚组。对照组进行常规门诊和社区管理,干预组行全科门诊简洁干预联合团队链式管理。干预时间均为6个月。比较干预前后两组患者血脂水平和达标率。结果 干预前,对照组和干预组血清总胆固醇(TC)、三酰甘油(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,干预组TC、TG、LDL-C水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组HDL-C比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预前,对照组和干预组LDL-C达标率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,干预组LDL-C达标率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,对照组和干预组低危、中危、高危、极高危4个亚组患者LDL-C达标率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,干预组高危、极高危亚组患者LDL-C达标率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);低危、中危亚组患者LDL-C达标率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 全科门诊简洁干预联合团队链式管理可改善血脂异常患者的血脂管理效果,提高血脂异常患者的LDL-C达标率。

关键词: 血脂异常, 达标率, 简洁干预, 全科门诊

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of concise intervention combined with group chain management on dyslipidemia in general clinics.Methods A total of 203 patients with abnormal blood lipid levelvisited Dinghai Community Health Service Center,Yangpu district of Shanghai from April to June 2017 were selected and randomly divided into control group (n=102)and intervention group(n=101).Subjects were further divided into very-high-risk,high-risk,intermediate-risk and low-risk groups according to different cardiovascular risk factors.The intervention group was treated with concise intervention and group chain administration for six months,whereas the control group received routine clinical treatment and community management.Lipid level and control rate were compared between two groups.Results There were no significant differences between levels of serum total cholesterol(TC),triacylglycerol(TG),low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C),and high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C) before intervention.After intervention,levels of TC,TG and LDL-C in intervention group were significantly lower than those in control group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in HDL-C between the two groups(P>0.05).Control rate of LDL-C in intervention group was significantly higher than that of control group(P<0.05) after intervention,while there was no significant difference before (P>0.05).Before intervention,there was no significant difference in control rate of LDL-C between low-risk,intermediate-risk,high-risk and very-high-risk subgroups in control group and intervention group(P>0.05).After intervention,control rate of LDL-C in high-risk and very-high-risk groups of intervention group were significantly higher than that in the same subgroups of control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the control rate of LDL-C between low-risk and intermediate-risk subgroups(P>0.05).Conclusion Our research proposes the mode of combining general clinical concise intervention and group chain management,which can improve the management of blood lipid level and facilitate the control rate of LDL-C in patients with dyslipidemia.

Key words: Dyslipidemia, Control rate, Concise intervention, General clinic