中国全科医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (31): 3845-3849.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.31.014

所属专题: 高血压最新文章合集

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

螺内酯、特拉唑嗪、比索洛尔对难治性高血压患者的治疗效果及安全性研究

杨晶敏,杨文,刘洁云*   

  1. 475000河南省开封市中心医院
    *通信作者:刘洁云,主任医师;E-mail:ljy6051@126.com
  • 出版日期:2018-11-05 发布日期:2018-11-05

Effectiveness and Safety of Spironolactone versus Terazosin and Bisoprolol in Patients with Refractory Hypertension

YANG Jingmin,YANG Wen,LIU Jieyun*   

  1. Kaifeng Central Hospital,Kaifeng 475000,China
    *Corresponding author:LIU Jieyun,Chief physician;E-mail:ljy6051@126.com
  • Published:2018-11-05 Online:2018-11-05

摘要: 目的 通过比较螺内酯与特拉唑嗪、比索洛尔对难治性高血压患者的治疗效果及安全性,从而探讨难治性高血压患者最优治疗方案。方法 2015-01-01至2017-06-30选取确诊难治性高血压患者120例,随机分为3组各40例,均在原有治疗方案不变的基础上分别给予以下药物:比索洛尔5 mg,1次/d;盐酸特拉唑嗪片2 mg,1次/d;螺内酯20 mg,1次/d。3组患者均连续用药12周,期间不更换其他药物,观察治疗前后血压控制情况,并测定糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、血钾、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、尿微量清蛋白与肌酐比值(UACR)等指标;记录不良事件。结果 3组降压治疗总有效率差异均有统计学意义(χ2=8.81,P<0.05),进一步两两比较,螺内酯组与特拉唑嗪组、比索洛尔组总有效率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.017),特拉唑嗪组与比索洛尔组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.017)。3组降压治疗效果整体比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),进一步两两比较,螺内酯组与特拉唑嗪组、比索洛尔组相比,血压下降更明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),特拉唑嗪组与比索洛尔组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。螺内酯组治疗12周后UACR与治疗前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而其余两组治疗前后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 螺内酯在难治性高血压降压效果及保护肾功能方面优于特拉唑嗪、比索洛尔,可作为难治性高血压第4线最优治疗方案,值得临床推广。

关键词: 高血压, 螺内酯, 特拉唑嗪, 比索洛尔, 肾功能, 治疗结果, 安全性

Abstract: Objective We aimed to explore a better regimen for refractory hypertension patients by comparing the effectiveness and safety of spironolactone versus terazosin and bisoprolol.Methods Totals of 120 patients with refractory hypertension were enrolled from January 1,2015 to June 30,2017.They were equally divided into groups 1,2,and 3 in a randomized order,receiving 12 consecutive weeks of once daily treatment with bisoprolol(5 mg),terazosin hydrochloride tablets(2 mg),spironolactone(20 mg),respectively,in addition to their baseline antihypertensive drugs.During this period,no drugs were changed.Blood pressure control status,glycosylated hemoglobin(HbA1c),low-density lipoprotein,serum potassium,estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR),urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) and so on were measured before and at the end of the intervention.Adverse events occurred during the intervention period were recorded.Results The overall response rate differed significantly among the three groups(χ2=8.81,P<0.05).Moreover,pairwise comparisons indicated that spironolactone group showed a significantly different overall response rate when compared with each of other two groups(P<0.017),but terazosin group demonstrated a overall response rate similar to bisoprolol group(P>0.017).The overall antihypertensive effectiveness varied significantly among the three groups(P<0.05).Moreover,pairwise comparisons found that the blood pressure was lowered more obviously in spironolactone group compared with each of other two groups(P<0.05),while similar reductions in blood pressure were found in both terazosin group and bisoprolol group(P>0.05).Compared with baseline,at the end of intervention,UACR improved significantly in spironolactone group (P<0.05),but not in other two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For refractory hypertension,spironolactone is superior to terazosin and bisoprolol in terms of antihypertensive effectiveness and renal function protection,which can be used as an optimal fourth-line drug for refractory hypertension and is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Hypertension, Spironolactone, Terazosin, Bisoprolol, Renal function, Treatment outcome, Safety