中国全科医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (19): 2361-2364.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.053

所属专题: 高血压最新文章合集

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

耳尖放血联合中药足浴疗法治疗老年轻度高血压的临床疗效研究

陈家鑫1*,陈庆昭1,廖卫峰1,林惠兴2   

  1. 1.528000广东省佛山市禅城区中心医院城南门诊   2.528000广东省佛山市禅城区中心医院中医科
    *通信作者:陈家鑫,副主任医师;E-mail:13630085086@163.com
  • 出版日期:2018-07-05 发布日期:2018-07-05
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:2015年中医药强省建设专项资金第二批名中医师承项目(粤中医办函〔2015〕93号);广东省佛山市医学类科技攻关项目(2015AB001471);佛山市十三五特色专科建设项目(FSTSZK005)

Bloodletting at Ear Apex Combined with Foot Bath with Chinese Medicine for Elderly Patients with Mild Hypertension:a Clinical Study

CHEN Jia-xin1*,CHEN Qing-zhao1,LIAO Wei-feng1,LIN Hui-xing2   

  1. 1.Chengnan Clinic,Foshan Chancheng Central Hospital,Foshan 528000,China
    2.Department of TCM,Foshan Chancheng Central Hospital,Foshan 528000,China
    *Corresponding author:CHEN Jia-xin,Associate chief physician;E-mail:13630085086@163.com
  • Published:2018-07-05 Online:2018-07-05

摘要: 目的 探讨耳尖放血联合中药足浴疗法治疗老年轻度高血压的临床疗效。方法 选取2015年8月—2016年11月在广东省佛山市禅城区中心医院城南门诊接受免费义诊的老年轻度高血压(1级)患者180例,采用随机数字表法分为A组、B组及C组,各60例。A组采用耳尖放血疗法治疗,B组采用中药足浴疗法治疗,C组采用耳尖放血联合中药足浴疗法治疗,3组患者均以4周为1个疗程。比较3组患者临床疗效及治疗前后收缩压与舒张压水平。结果 治疗后3组患者临床疗效比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中C组患者临床疗效优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前3组患者收缩压、舒张压水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后3组患者收缩压、舒张压水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中A、B组患者收缩压、舒张压水平高于C组,A组患者舒张压水平低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前3组患者收缩压、舒张压水平高于治疗后,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 耳尖放血联合中药足浴疗法改善老年轻度高血压患者的血压水平优于单纯耳尖放血疗法、单纯足浴疗法。

关键词: 高血压, 放血, 足浴, 老年人, 治疗结果

Abstract: Objective  To study the clinical effect of bloodletting at ear apex combined with foot bath with Chinese medicine for elderly patients with mild hypertension.Methods  We enrolled 180 elderly patients with mild hypertension(stage 1 hypertension) who received free medical consultation in Chengnan Clinic,Foshan Chancheng Central Hospital from August 2015 to November 2016 and using a random number table,equally divided them into group A treated by bloodletting at ear apex,group B treated by foot bath with Chinese medicine,and group C treated by bloodletting at ear apex combined with foot bath with Chinese medicine.All of them were treated for 4 weeks(a course of treatment).Comparisons were made between the groups in terms of the clinical response and systolic blood pressure(SBP) and diastolic blood pressure(DBP) measured at both baseline and the end of treatment.Results After treatment,the clinical response in the groups was significantly different(P<0.05);group C achieved better clinical response compared with group B(P<0.05).SBP and DBP levels at baseline were similar in all groups(P>0.05),but after treatment,the two parameters differed significantly(P<0.05),both of them were lower in group C compared with other two groups(P<0.05),and DBP level was lower in group A compared with group B(P<0.05).Both SBP and DBP levels decreased substantially in all groups after treatment(P<0.05).Conclusion The combination therapy was better than each of its components alone in improving the blood pressure.

Key words: Hypertension, Bloodletting, Foot bath, Aged, Treatment outcome