
Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (27): 3456-3462.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0171
Special Issue: 运动相关研究最新文章合辑
• Combination of Medicine and Engineering • Previous Articles
Received:2023-02-27
Revised:2023-04-12
Published:2023-09-20
Online:2023-05-24
Contact:
ZHANG Xiaohui
通讯作者:
张晓辉
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0171
| 组别 | 例数 | 凸侧横截面积(cm2) | 凸侧厚度(cm) | 凹侧横截面积(cm2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 15 | 3.39±0.37 | 3.46±0.37 | -1.233 | 0.238 | 2.09±0.22 | 2.02±0.11 | -0.587 | 0.567 | 2.56±0.31 | 2.56±0.32 | 0.654 | 0.524 |
| 试验组 | 15 | 3.77±0.67 | 3.78±0.68 | -0.796 | 0.439 | 2.09±0.21 | 2.01±0.11 | 0.055 | 0.957 | 2.86±0.51 | 2.89±0.52 | -2.828 | 0.013 |
| t值 | 1.902 | 1.823 | 1.239 | 1.126 | 1.952 | 2.144 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.067 | 0.079 | 0.226 | 0.270 | 0.061 | 0.041 | |||||||
| 组别 | 凹侧厚度(cm) | 凹凸侧横截面积比 | 凹凸侧厚度比 | ||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 1.58±0.19 | 1.57±0.19 | 1.544 | 0.145 | 0.75±0.05 | 0.75±0.05 | 1.815 | 0.091 | 0.78±0.07 | 0.77±0.07 | 1.928 | 0.074 | |
| 试验组 | 1.58±0.21 | 1.63±0.22 | -2.684 | 0.018 | 0.76±0.04 | 0.77±0.05 | -2.198 | 0.045 | 0.76±0.07 | 0.77±0.07 | -2.392 | 0.031 | |
| t值 | 0.018 | 0.753 | 0.316 | -0.679 | 0.193 | 0.067 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.986 | 0.458 | 0.754 | 0.502 | 0.848 | 0.947 | |||||||
Table 1 Comparison of the changes in cross-sectional area and thickness of the multifidus muscles before and after treatment between the two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | 凸侧横截面积(cm2) | 凸侧厚度(cm) | 凹侧横截面积(cm2) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 15 | 3.39±0.37 | 3.46±0.37 | -1.233 | 0.238 | 2.09±0.22 | 2.02±0.11 | -0.587 | 0.567 | 2.56±0.31 | 2.56±0.32 | 0.654 | 0.524 |
| 试验组 | 15 | 3.77±0.67 | 3.78±0.68 | -0.796 | 0.439 | 2.09±0.21 | 2.01±0.11 | 0.055 | 0.957 | 2.86±0.51 | 2.89±0.52 | -2.828 | 0.013 |
| t值 | 1.902 | 1.823 | 1.239 | 1.126 | 1.952 | 2.144 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.067 | 0.079 | 0.226 | 0.270 | 0.061 | 0.041 | |||||||
| 组别 | 凹侧厚度(cm) | 凹凸侧横截面积比 | 凹凸侧厚度比 | ||||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 1.58±0.19 | 1.57±0.19 | 1.544 | 0.145 | 0.75±0.05 | 0.75±0.05 | 1.815 | 0.091 | 0.78±0.07 | 0.77±0.07 | 1.928 | 0.074 | |
| 试验组 | 1.58±0.21 | 1.63±0.22 | -2.684 | 0.018 | 0.76±0.04 | 0.77±0.05 | -2.198 | 0.045 | 0.76±0.07 | 0.77±0.07 | -2.392 | 0.031 | |
| t值 | 0.018 | 0.753 | 0.316 | -0.679 | 0.193 | 0.067 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.986 | 0.458 | 0.754 | 0.502 | 0.848 | 0.947 | |||||||
| 组别 | 例数 | VAS评分 | RDQ评分 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 15 | 4.0(3.0,6.0) | 2.0(1.0,2.0) | 12.649 | <0.001 | 5.0(4.0,8.0) | 3.0(2.0,3.0) | 4.880 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 15 | 4.0(3.0,6.0) | 1.0(1.0,2.0) | 12.128 | <0.001 | 6.0(4.0,8.0) | 2.0(1.0,3.0) | 6.972 | <0.001 |
| Z值 | -0.349 | -0.990 | 0.635 | -2.141 | |||||
| P值 | 0.730 | 0.332 | 0.531 | 0.041 | |||||
Table 2 Comparison of VAS scores and RDQ scores before and after treatment in both two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | VAS评分 | RDQ评分 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 15 | 4.0(3.0,6.0) | 2.0(1.0,2.0) | 12.649 | <0.001 | 5.0(4.0,8.0) | 3.0(2.0,3.0) | 4.880 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 15 | 4.0(3.0,6.0) | 1.0(1.0,2.0) | 12.128 | <0.001 | 6.0(4.0,8.0) | 2.0(1.0,3.0) | 6.972 | <0.001 |
| Z值 | -0.349 | -0.990 | 0.635 | -2.141 | |||||
| P值 | 0.730 | 0.332 | 0.531 | 0.041 | |||||
| 组别 | 例数 | 前屈度 | 伸展度 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 15 | 83.0°(81.0°,86.0°) | 86.0°(85.0°,89.0°) | -3.387 | 0.004 | 28.0°(21.0°,29.0°) | 26.0°(20.0°,28.0°) | -4.664 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 15 | 81.0°(78.0°,86.0°) | 90.0°(87.0°,90.0°) | -5.953 | <0.001 | 23.0°(15.0°,28.0°) | 28.0°(26.0°,30.0°) | -4.897 | <0.001 |
| Z值 | -0.380 | 2.186 | -0.905 | 1.616 | |||||
| P值 | 0.707 | 0.037 | 0.373 | 0.117 | |||||
| 组别 | 左侧屈度 | 右侧屈度 | |||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 30.0°(26.0°,32.0°) | 33.0°(28.0°,35.0°) | -2.555 | 0.023 | 31.0°(27.0°,35.0°) | 35.0°(30.0°,35.0°) | -4.220 | 0.001 | |
| 试验组 | 28.0°(26.0°,31.0°) | 35.0°(34.0°,35.0°) | -6.175 | <0.001 | 30.0°(28.0°,33.0°) | 35.0°(34.0°,35.0°) | -5.881 | <0.001 | |
| Z值 | -0.341 | 2.706 | -0.200 | 1.603 | |||||
| P值 | 0.736 | 0.011 | 0.843 | 0.120 | |||||
| 组别 | 左旋转度 | 右旋转度 | |||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 81.0°(74.0°,86.0°) | 86.0°(80.0°,90.0°) | -5.855 | <0.001 | 82.0°(76.0°,86.0°) | 85.0°(82.0°,90.0°) | -4.905 | <0.001 | |
| 试验组 | 83.0°(74.0°,86.0°) | 90.0°(87.0°,90.0°) | -5.344 | <0.001 | 83.0°(76.0°,87.0°) | 90.0°(89.0°,90.0°) | -5.424 | <0.001 | |
| Z值 | 0 | 3.196 | 0.242 | 3.190 | |||||
| P值 | 1.000 | 0.003 | 0.811 | 0.003 | |||||
Table 3 Changes in range of motion of lumbar joints before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 前屈度 | 伸展度 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 15 | 83.0°(81.0°,86.0°) | 86.0°(85.0°,89.0°) | -3.387 | 0.004 | 28.0°(21.0°,29.0°) | 26.0°(20.0°,28.0°) | -4.664 | <0.001 |
| 试验组 | 15 | 81.0°(78.0°,86.0°) | 90.0°(87.0°,90.0°) | -5.953 | <0.001 | 23.0°(15.0°,28.0°) | 28.0°(26.0°,30.0°) | -4.897 | <0.001 |
| Z值 | -0.380 | 2.186 | -0.905 | 1.616 | |||||
| P值 | 0.707 | 0.037 | 0.373 | 0.117 | |||||
| 组别 | 左侧屈度 | 右侧屈度 | |||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 30.0°(26.0°,32.0°) | 33.0°(28.0°,35.0°) | -2.555 | 0.023 | 31.0°(27.0°,35.0°) | 35.0°(30.0°,35.0°) | -4.220 | 0.001 | |
| 试验组 | 28.0°(26.0°,31.0°) | 35.0°(34.0°,35.0°) | -6.175 | <0.001 | 30.0°(28.0°,33.0°) | 35.0°(34.0°,35.0°) | -5.881 | <0.001 | |
| Z值 | -0.341 | 2.706 | -0.200 | 1.603 | |||||
| P值 | 0.736 | 0.011 | 0.843 | 0.120 | |||||
| 组别 | 左旋转度 | 右旋转度 | |||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 81.0°(74.0°,86.0°) | 86.0°(80.0°,90.0°) | -5.855 | <0.001 | 82.0°(76.0°,86.0°) | 85.0°(82.0°,90.0°) | -4.905 | <0.001 | |
| 试验组 | 83.0°(74.0°,86.0°) | 90.0°(87.0°,90.0°) | -5.344 | <0.001 | 83.0°(76.0°,87.0°) | 90.0°(89.0°,90.0°) | -5.424 | <0.001 | |
| Z值 | 0 | 3.196 | 0.242 | 3.190 | |||||
| P值 | 1.000 | 0.003 | 0.811 | 0.003 | |||||
| 指标 | 治疗后凹凸侧多裂肌横截面积比 | 治疗后凹凸侧多裂肌厚度比 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
| 治疗后VAS评分 | -0.109 | 0.699 | 0.015 | 0.958 |
| 治疗后RDQ评分 | 0.161 | 0.565 | -0.066 | 0.815 |
| 治疗后前屈度 | -0.467 | 0.079 | -0.320 | 0.246 |
| 治疗后伸展度 | -0.332 | 0.227 | -0.108 | 0.702 |
| 治疗后左侧屈度 | -0.266 | 0.337 | -0.139 | 0.622 |
| 治疗后右侧屈度 | -0.189 | 0.500 | -0.614 | 0.015 |
| 治疗后左旋转度 | -0.362 | 0.185 | -0.104 | 0.712 |
| 治疗后右旋转度 | -0.660 | 0.007 | -0.495 | 0.061 |
Table 4 Correlation analysis of cross-sectional area and thickness ratios of the multifidus muscles on the concave and convex sides with other clinical indicators after treatment
| 指标 | 治疗后凹凸侧多裂肌横截面积比 | 治疗后凹凸侧多裂肌厚度比 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
| 治疗后VAS评分 | -0.109 | 0.699 | 0.015 | 0.958 |
| 治疗后RDQ评分 | 0.161 | 0.565 | -0.066 | 0.815 |
| 治疗后前屈度 | -0.467 | 0.079 | -0.320 | 0.246 |
| 治疗后伸展度 | -0.332 | 0.227 | -0.108 | 0.702 |
| 治疗后左侧屈度 | -0.266 | 0.337 | -0.139 | 0.622 |
| 治疗后右侧屈度 | -0.189 | 0.500 | -0.614 | 0.015 |
| 治疗后左旋转度 | -0.362 | 0.185 | -0.104 | 0.712 |
| 治疗后右旋转度 | -0.660 | 0.007 | -0.495 | 0.061 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
王晨,田野,沈晓龙,等. 初发腰腿痛年轻人群中腰椎间盘退变与椎旁肌群改变的相关性[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(7):589-593.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
(美)菲尔·佩治,(美)克莱尔C. 弗兰克,(美)罗伯特·拉德纳著[M].焦颖,译. 肌肉失衡的评估与治疗:扬达治疗法,北京:人民体育出版社,2016.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
张晓辉,韩晓峰,廖八根. 肌骨超声评估支具干预对Rigo E型青少年特发性脊柱侧凸椎旁软组织形态学的影响[J]. 临床超声医学杂志,2022,24(8):629-634. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-6978.2022.08.018.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
陈彦求. 基于Vicon三维动作捕捉技术与表面肌电介导的AIS矫正动作评估与分析[D]. 广州:广州体育学院.
|
| [16] |
杨红杰,乔文菲,董胜利. 功能性康复训练结合矫形器对青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者Cobb角、腰部活动范围的影响[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志,2021,53(10):1163-1166. DOI:10.16096/J.cnki.nmgyxzz.2021.53.10.004.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
李宏彦,宋俊. 核心稳定性训练治疗椎间盘源性下背痛的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2018,40(7):535-537. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2018.07.016.
|
| [20] |
赵群. 腰椎间盘突出症术后复发患者的腰痛功能障碍评估[D]. 苏州:苏州大学.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
袁望舒,陈丽霞,沈建雄,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者顶椎椎旁肌表面肌电信号与Cobb角及轴向躯干旋转角的相关性[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2019,23(24):3824-3828. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1223.
|
| [24] |
Comité Nacional de Adolescencia SAP, Comité de Diagnóstico por Imágenes SAP, Sociedad Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología Infantil, et al. Consenso de escoliosis idiopática del adolescente[Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis] [J]. Arch Argent Pediatr,2016,114(6):585-94.
|
| [25] |
孙晓蕾,张晓辉,林佳声,等. 器具辅助松解结合特定运动治疗RigoA型脊柱侧凸:改善躯干旋转角及减轻背部疼痛[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2023,27(18):2871-2877.
|
| [26] |
张晓辉,廖八根,曾利泉,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸Rigo分型的描述及信度检验[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(6):694-699. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.06.009.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
尹佳. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸椎旁肌肌纤维转化及机制研究[D].中国人民解放军海军军医大学.
|
| [29] |
|
| [1] | AN Yanhong, WANG Shidong, LI Xiaoran, GUO Jiayang, WANG Zhe, SHA Peilin, MENG Yijun, LI Xiaoxuan, SHI Xue, YU Zexing, XIAO Yonghua. Study on Risk Factors and Nomogram Prediction Model for Diabetic Kidney Disease: Based on Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Technology [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2995-3003. |
| [2] | WANG Rui, LUO Dan, YANG Cuicui, WENG Xinyi, WANG Yubing, XU Jingjing. Complex Network Analysis of Resilience in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Based on Multi-sourced Stigma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2264-2272. |
| [3] | YAN Beibei, XU Huaifu. Children's Type 1 Diabetes-specific Self-reported Outcomes Scales: Measurement Properties Evaluation Based on COSMIN Guidelines [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1624-1632. |
| [4] | FENG Zhanpeng, TAN Sijie, GUO Zhen, CAO Liquan. Study on the Isochronous Substitution Effect of 24-hour Activity Behaviors on Metabolic Syndrome in Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 325-330. |
| [5] | CHEN Zhixin, ZHANG Li, GUO Xinyue, ZHOU Zhongliang, ZHANG Jianduan, XU Jinhang, RONG Shengzhong, ZHAO Li, TIAN Qiyue, WANG Sufang, TIAN Xiangyang, GONG Shaoqing. Study on Dietary Factors Associated with Obesity Among University Freshmen [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 361-372. |
| [6] | XIANG Fengling, WANG Yuankun, WANG Xiaoyan, HE Shengjie, GAN Jinhua. The Prevalence of Hyperuricemia among Children and Adolescents in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4206-4213. |
| [7] | HUANG Lili, JIANG Yan, TANG Min, ZHANG Jialei, HE Jiabei, ZHUANG Jianlin. A Study on the Influence of Health Education Based on the Know-Belief-Act Model and Self-efficacy Theory on the Consumption of Sugary Drinks among Grade 4 Elementary School Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(28): 3558-3565. |
| [8] | QUAN Jialin, ZHU Lin, SU Yu, CHEN Zekai, CHEN Ziqi, ZHANG Zhuofan. Research on the Improvement Effect of Exercise Modes on the Executive Function of Overweight or Obese Children or Adolescents: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3422-3431. |
| [9] | JIANG Shihua, ZHU Zheng, REN Yingying, ZHU Yaolei, WANG Yue, GAO Xibin. Meta Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Myopia in Chinese Children and Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3043-3052. |
| [10] | NIE Daning, SHI Shusheng, TAO Yuru. Clinical Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique Combined with Spiral Stabilizing Muscle Chain Training in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3032-3042. |
| [11] | WEI Yunhong, YANG Li, WANG Yulu, YE Qiufang, DAI Anni, HE Yan. Study on Cardiopulmonary Function During Different Exercise Stages in Patients with Obesity-related Hypertension [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 2972-2978. |
| [12] | LI Miaoxiu, ZHU Bowen, KONG Lingjun, FANG Min. Progress in Research on Clinical Assessment Tools for Conservative Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3079-3088. |
| [13] | YANG Handan, QIAO Wen, HE Shu, CHEN Yi, TONG Yunmei. The Impact of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Combined with Sertraline on Depressive Mood, Suicidal Ideation, and Sleep Quality of Adolescents with Depression [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2813-2818. |
| [14] | WANG Ying, YAN Yijun, LIU Lei, HU Yumin, ZHANG Yang, LIU Kai, JIANG Boren. Effects of Resistance Exercise Combined with Nutritional Intervention on Blood Glucose Stability in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Sarcopenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2604-2610. |
| [15] | QIN Yuling, ZHU Lin, CHENG Guodong, XIE Weijun. Correlation between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Lipid Metabolic Flexibility in Obese Adolescents with Different Metabolic Phenotypes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(15): 1908-1913. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||