Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (27): 3456-3462.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0171
• Combination of Medicine and Engineering • Previous Articles
Received:
2023-02-27
Revised:
2023-04-12
Published:
2023-09-20
Online:
2023-05-24
Contact:
ZHANG Xiaohui
通讯作者:
张晓辉
作者简介:
基金资助:
组别 | 例数 | 凸侧横截面积(cm2) | 凸侧厚度(cm) | 凹侧横截面积(cm2) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 15 | 3.39±0.37 | 3.46±0.37 | -1.233 | 0.238 | 2.09±0.22 | 2.02±0.11 | -0.587 | 0.567 | 2.56±0.31 | 2.56±0.32 | 0.654 | 0.524 |
试验组 | 15 | 3.77±0.67 | 3.78±0.68 | -0.796 | 0.439 | 2.09±0.21 | 2.01±0.11 | 0.055 | 0.957 | 2.86±0.51 | 2.89±0.52 | -2.828 | 0.013 |
t值 | 1.902 | 1.823 | 1.239 | 1.126 | 1.952 | 2.144 | |||||||
P值 | 0.067 | 0.079 | 0.226 | 0.270 | 0.061 | 0.041 | |||||||
组别 | 凹侧厚度(cm) | 凹凸侧横截面积比 | 凹凸侧厚度比 | ||||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 1.58±0.19 | 1.57±0.19 | 1.544 | 0.145 | 0.75±0.05 | 0.75±0.05 | 1.815 | 0.091 | 0.78±0.07 | 0.77±0.07 | 1.928 | 0.074 | |
试验组 | 1.58±0.21 | 1.63±0.22 | -2.684 | 0.018 | 0.76±0.04 | 0.77±0.05 | -2.198 | 0.045 | 0.76±0.07 | 0.77±0.07 | -2.392 | 0.031 | |
t值 | 0.018 | 0.753 | 0.316 | -0.679 | 0.193 | 0.067 | |||||||
P值 | 0.986 | 0.458 | 0.754 | 0.502 | 0.848 | 0.947 |
Table 1 Comparison of the changes in cross-sectional area and thickness of the multifidus muscles before and after treatment between the two groups
组别 | 例数 | 凸侧横截面积(cm2) | 凸侧厚度(cm) | 凹侧横截面积(cm2) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 15 | 3.39±0.37 | 3.46±0.37 | -1.233 | 0.238 | 2.09±0.22 | 2.02±0.11 | -0.587 | 0.567 | 2.56±0.31 | 2.56±0.32 | 0.654 | 0.524 |
试验组 | 15 | 3.77±0.67 | 3.78±0.68 | -0.796 | 0.439 | 2.09±0.21 | 2.01±0.11 | 0.055 | 0.957 | 2.86±0.51 | 2.89±0.52 | -2.828 | 0.013 |
t值 | 1.902 | 1.823 | 1.239 | 1.126 | 1.952 | 2.144 | |||||||
P值 | 0.067 | 0.079 | 0.226 | 0.270 | 0.061 | 0.041 | |||||||
组别 | 凹侧厚度(cm) | 凹凸侧横截面积比 | 凹凸侧厚度比 | ||||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 1.58±0.19 | 1.57±0.19 | 1.544 | 0.145 | 0.75±0.05 | 0.75±0.05 | 1.815 | 0.091 | 0.78±0.07 | 0.77±0.07 | 1.928 | 0.074 | |
试验组 | 1.58±0.21 | 1.63±0.22 | -2.684 | 0.018 | 0.76±0.04 | 0.77±0.05 | -2.198 | 0.045 | 0.76±0.07 | 0.77±0.07 | -2.392 | 0.031 | |
t值 | 0.018 | 0.753 | 0.316 | -0.679 | 0.193 | 0.067 | |||||||
P值 | 0.986 | 0.458 | 0.754 | 0.502 | 0.848 | 0.947 |
组别 | 例数 | VAS评分 | RDQ评分 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 15 | 4.0(3.0,6.0) | 2.0(1.0,2.0) | 12.649 | <0.001 | 5.0(4.0,8.0) | 3.0(2.0,3.0) | 4.880 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 15 | 4.0(3.0,6.0) | 1.0(1.0,2.0) | 12.128 | <0.001 | 6.0(4.0,8.0) | 2.0(1.0,3.0) | 6.972 | <0.001 |
Z值 | -0.349 | -0.990 | 0.635 | -2.141 | |||||
P值 | 0.730 | 0.332 | 0.531 | 0.041 |
Table 2 Comparison of VAS scores and RDQ scores before and after treatment in both two groups
组别 | 例数 | VAS评分 | RDQ评分 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 15 | 4.0(3.0,6.0) | 2.0(1.0,2.0) | 12.649 | <0.001 | 5.0(4.0,8.0) | 3.0(2.0,3.0) | 4.880 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 15 | 4.0(3.0,6.0) | 1.0(1.0,2.0) | 12.128 | <0.001 | 6.0(4.0,8.0) | 2.0(1.0,3.0) | 6.972 | <0.001 |
Z值 | -0.349 | -0.990 | 0.635 | -2.141 | |||||
P值 | 0.730 | 0.332 | 0.531 | 0.041 |
组别 | 例数 | 前屈度 | 伸展度 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 15 | 83.0°(81.0°,86.0°) | 86.0°(85.0°,89.0°) | -3.387 | 0.004 | 28.0°(21.0°,29.0°) | 26.0°(20.0°,28.0°) | -4.664 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 15 | 81.0°(78.0°,86.0°) | 90.0°(87.0°,90.0°) | -5.953 | <0.001 | 23.0°(15.0°,28.0°) | 28.0°(26.0°,30.0°) | -4.897 | <0.001 |
Z值 | -0.380 | 2.186 | -0.905 | 1.616 | |||||
P值 | 0.707 | 0.037 | 0.373 | 0.117 | |||||
组别 | 左侧屈度 | 右侧屈度 | |||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 30.0°(26.0°,32.0°) | 33.0°(28.0°,35.0°) | -2.555 | 0.023 | 31.0°(27.0°,35.0°) | 35.0°(30.0°,35.0°) | -4.220 | 0.001 | |
试验组 | 28.0°(26.0°,31.0°) | 35.0°(34.0°,35.0°) | -6.175 | <0.001 | 30.0°(28.0°,33.0°) | 35.0°(34.0°,35.0°) | -5.881 | <0.001 | |
Z值 | -0.341 | 2.706 | -0.200 | 1.603 | |||||
P值 | 0.736 | 0.011 | 0.843 | 0.120 | |||||
组别 | 左旋转度 | 右旋转度 | |||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 81.0°(74.0°,86.0°) | 86.0°(80.0°,90.0°) | -5.855 | <0.001 | 82.0°(76.0°,86.0°) | 85.0°(82.0°,90.0°) | -4.905 | <0.001 | |
试验组 | 83.0°(74.0°,86.0°) | 90.0°(87.0°,90.0°) | -5.344 | <0.001 | 83.0°(76.0°,87.0°) | 90.0°(89.0°,90.0°) | -5.424 | <0.001 | |
Z值 | 0 | 3.196 | 0.242 | 3.190 | |||||
P值 | 1.000 | 0.003 | 0.811 | 0.003 |
Table 3 Changes in range of motion of lumbar joints before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 前屈度 | 伸展度 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 15 | 83.0°(81.0°,86.0°) | 86.0°(85.0°,89.0°) | -3.387 | 0.004 | 28.0°(21.0°,29.0°) | 26.0°(20.0°,28.0°) | -4.664 | <0.001 |
试验组 | 15 | 81.0°(78.0°,86.0°) | 90.0°(87.0°,90.0°) | -5.953 | <0.001 | 23.0°(15.0°,28.0°) | 28.0°(26.0°,30.0°) | -4.897 | <0.001 |
Z值 | -0.380 | 2.186 | -0.905 | 1.616 | |||||
P值 | 0.707 | 0.037 | 0.373 | 0.117 | |||||
组别 | 左侧屈度 | 右侧屈度 | |||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 30.0°(26.0°,32.0°) | 33.0°(28.0°,35.0°) | -2.555 | 0.023 | 31.0°(27.0°,35.0°) | 35.0°(30.0°,35.0°) | -4.220 | 0.001 | |
试验组 | 28.0°(26.0°,31.0°) | 35.0°(34.0°,35.0°) | -6.175 | <0.001 | 30.0°(28.0°,33.0°) | 35.0°(34.0°,35.0°) | -5.881 | <0.001 | |
Z值 | -0.341 | 2.706 | -0.200 | 1.603 | |||||
P值 | 0.736 | 0.011 | 0.843 | 0.120 | |||||
组别 | 左旋转度 | 右旋转度 | |||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | Z配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 81.0°(74.0°,86.0°) | 86.0°(80.0°,90.0°) | -5.855 | <0.001 | 82.0°(76.0°,86.0°) | 85.0°(82.0°,90.0°) | -4.905 | <0.001 | |
试验组 | 83.0°(74.0°,86.0°) | 90.0°(87.0°,90.0°) | -5.344 | <0.001 | 83.0°(76.0°,87.0°) | 90.0°(89.0°,90.0°) | -5.424 | <0.001 | |
Z值 | 0 | 3.196 | 0.242 | 3.190 | |||||
P值 | 1.000 | 0.003 | 0.811 | 0.003 |
指标 | 治疗后凹凸侧多裂肌横截面积比 | 治疗后凹凸侧多裂肌厚度比 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
治疗后VAS评分 | -0.109 | 0.699 | 0.015 | 0.958 |
治疗后RDQ评分 | 0.161 | 0.565 | -0.066 | 0.815 |
治疗后前屈度 | -0.467 | 0.079 | -0.320 | 0.246 |
治疗后伸展度 | -0.332 | 0.227 | -0.108 | 0.702 |
治疗后左侧屈度 | -0.266 | 0.337 | -0.139 | 0.622 |
治疗后右侧屈度 | -0.189 | 0.500 | -0.614 | 0.015 |
治疗后左旋转度 | -0.362 | 0.185 | -0.104 | 0.712 |
治疗后右旋转度 | -0.660 | 0.007 | -0.495 | 0.061 |
Table 4 Correlation analysis of cross-sectional area and thickness ratios of the multifidus muscles on the concave and convex sides with other clinical indicators after treatment
指标 | 治疗后凹凸侧多裂肌横截面积比 | 治疗后凹凸侧多裂肌厚度比 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
治疗后VAS评分 | -0.109 | 0.699 | 0.015 | 0.958 |
治疗后RDQ评分 | 0.161 | 0.565 | -0.066 | 0.815 |
治疗后前屈度 | -0.467 | 0.079 | -0.320 | 0.246 |
治疗后伸展度 | -0.332 | 0.227 | -0.108 | 0.702 |
治疗后左侧屈度 | -0.266 | 0.337 | -0.139 | 0.622 |
治疗后右侧屈度 | -0.189 | 0.500 | -0.614 | 0.015 |
治疗后左旋转度 | -0.362 | 0.185 | -0.104 | 0.712 |
治疗后右旋转度 | -0.660 | 0.007 | -0.495 | 0.061 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
王晨,田野,沈晓龙,等. 初发腰腿痛年轻人群中腰椎间盘退变与椎旁肌群改变的相关性[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(7):589-593.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
(美)菲尔·佩治,(美)克莱尔C. 弗兰克,(美)罗伯特·拉德纳著[M].焦颖,译. 肌肉失衡的评估与治疗:扬达治疗法,北京:人民体育出版社,2016.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
张晓辉,韩晓峰,廖八根. 肌骨超声评估支具干预对Rigo E型青少年特发性脊柱侧凸椎旁软组织形态学的影响[J]. 临床超声医学杂志,2022,24(8):629-634. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-6978.2022.08.018.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
陈彦求. 基于Vicon三维动作捕捉技术与表面肌电介导的AIS矫正动作评估与分析[D]. 广州:广州体育学院.
|
[16] |
杨红杰,乔文菲,董胜利. 功能性康复训练结合矫形器对青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者Cobb角、腰部活动范围的影响[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志,2021,53(10):1163-1166. DOI:10.16096/J.cnki.nmgyxzz.2021.53.10.004.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
李宏彦,宋俊. 核心稳定性训练治疗椎间盘源性下背痛的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2018,40(7):535-537. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2018.07.016.
|
[20] |
赵群. 腰椎间盘突出症术后复发患者的腰痛功能障碍评估[D]. 苏州:苏州大学.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
袁望舒,陈丽霞,沈建雄,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者顶椎椎旁肌表面肌电信号与Cobb角及轴向躯干旋转角的相关性[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2019,23(24):3824-3828. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1223.
|
[24] |
Comité Nacional de Adolescencia SAP, Comité de Diagnóstico por Imágenes SAP, Sociedad Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología Infantil, et al. Consenso de escoliosis idiopática del adolescente[Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis] [J]. Arch Argent Pediatr,2016,114(6):585-94.
|
[25] |
孙晓蕾,张晓辉,林佳声,等. 器具辅助松解结合特定运动治疗RigoA型脊柱侧凸:改善躯干旋转角及减轻背部疼痛[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2023,27(18):2871-2877.
|
[26] |
张晓辉,廖八根,曾利泉,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸Rigo分型的描述及信度检验[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(6):694-699. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.06.009.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
尹佳. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸椎旁肌肌纤维转化及机制研究[D].中国人民解放军海军军医大学.
|
[29] |
|
[1] | WANG Xu, WEI Xu, ZHU Liguo, FENG Tianxiao, WANG Zhipeng, SHI Bin. Research Ideas of the Efficacy Mechanism and Prospect Analysis of Traditional Chinese Manipulative Therapy on Treating Spinal Degenerative Diseases with Combination of Medicine and Industry [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4118-4124. |
[2] | YU Xinlian, DAI Xinyue, ZHAO Xicun, XU Ying. Chain Mediating Effects of Stressful Life Events and the Time Taken to Fall Asleep in the Relationship between Yin-deficiency Constitution and Depressed Mood in Junior High School Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4159-4166. |
[3] | TU Jinkang, LI Fangfang, WU Xiaoqiong, XI Chong, QI Shaohua, CHEN Jun. Effectiveness of Backward Walking Based on Anti-gravity Treadmill Training System Combined with Conventional Low Back Core Training on Patients with Non-specific Low Back Pain [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4203-4206. |
[4] | CHENG Jingwei, QIAO Junjun, YIN Zhen, HU Junpeng, WANG Qinghe, LIU Yangqing, WANG Yanfang. Interpretation of ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Exercise in Children and Adolescents with Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3719-3724. |
[5] | WANG Qianqian, WANG Xiaohang, ZHOU Xiaoying, QIU Shanhu, SUN Zilin. Exercise is the Foundation of Weight Loss [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(28): 3471-3476. |
[6] | BAI Yitong, LIN Lianjie, PEI Dongmei. Correlation between the Severity of Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease and Thyroid Nodules [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3392-3396. |
[7] | LUO Dan, XU Jingjing, WANG Yubing, LI Mingzi, FORBES Angus. Development and Preliminary Practice of Resilience-oriented Structured Treatment and Educational Program for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3423-3429. |
[8] | JI Mengying, LI Yujing, CHEN Xing, DAI Huihua, SUN Ying. Prediction Value of B-ultrasound with Tumor Markers for Malignant Transformation of Mucinous Ovarian Tumors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 3022-3027. |
[9] | REN Yuanyuan, CHENG Gong, JIANG Hongying, WANG Yiyang, CHEN Liang, ZHAO Hui, LIANG Chenyuan. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Coronary Artery Calcification and Its Severity in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 2980-2985. |
[10] | LIU Hai, HUANG Guanhua. The Significance of High Normal Blood Pressure for Children and Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2183-2189. |
[11] | LIU Lanping, YANG Yue, HUANG Man, MA Xiaojing, YE Yongming, LIU Xiaoxu, LIN Huize, ZHU Kexin, GUO Shengnan, FEI Yutong, YANG Tao, YU Jinna. Identification of Clinical Questions for the Development of Clinical Practice Guideline on Acupuncture and Moxibustion for Nonspecific Low Back Pain Using the Modified Delphi Method [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1037-1043. |
[12] | WANG Xixi, SHEN Rui, WANG Junjie, XU Niying. Best Evidence Summary of Exercise Interventions for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1151-1158. |
[13] | LIU Xiaolong, HE Mengxiao, YIN Yikun, YANG Yang, ZHANG Jingzhi. Intervention Effect of a Novel Core Stability Rehabilitation Training Program on Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1064-1074. |
[14] | LIN Huize, YAN Wenxi, ZHANG Pingping, FEI Jingwen, SHEN Jianghong, LIU Lanping, WANG Xiang, ZHU Kexin, YANG Tao, YU Jinna. Outcome Measures Used in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1053-1063. |
[15] | FEI Jingwen, LIN Huize, ZHANG Pingping, LIU Lanping, WANG Xiang, SHEN Jianghong, ZHU Kexin, YANG Tao, YU Jinna. Motion Style Acupuncture Can Effectively Improve the Effectiveness of Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1044-1052. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 336
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 622
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||