Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (24): 3043-3048.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0087
Special Issue: 脑健康最新研究合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-01-13
Revised:
2022-05-06
Published:
2022-08-20
Online:
2022-06-02
Contact:
Yanping HUANG
About author:
通讯作者:
黄艳平
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0087
指标 | 非TM亚组(n=76) | TM亚组(n=71) | χ2(t)值 | P值 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别〔n(%)〕 | 1.44 | 0.230 | |||
男 | 51(67.1) | 54(76.1) | |||
女 | 25(32.9) | 17(23.9) | |||
年龄( | 51.5±14.3 | 51.3±15.4 | -0.08a | 0.934 | |
发热〔n(%)〕 | 2.36 | 0.125 | |||
有 | 42(55.3) | 48(67.6) | |||
无 | 34(44.7) | 23(32.4) | |||
头痛〔n(%)〕 | 4.64 | 0.031 | |||
有 | 63(82.9) | 48(67.6) | |||
无 | 13(17.1) | 23(32.4) | |||
意识障碍〔n(%)〕 | 0.43 | 0.511 | |||
有 | 26(34.2) | 28(39.4) | |||
无 | 50(65.8) | 43(60.6) | |||
颈抵抗〔n(%)〕 | 0.98 | 0.322 | |||
有 | 21(27.6) | 25(35.2) | |||
无 | 55(72.4) | 46(64.8) | |||
HIV感染〔n(%)〕 | 14.91 | <0.001 | |||
有 | 52(68.4) | 26(36.6) | |||
无 | 24(31.6) | 45(63.4) | |||
CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数<200/μl〔n(%)〕 | 4.75 | 0.029 | |||
是 | 47(71.2) | 28(51.9) | |||
否 | 19(28.8) | 26(48.1) | |||
C反应蛋白升高〔n(%)〕 | 4.03 | 0.045 | |||
是 | 39(51.3) | 48(67.6) | |||
否 | 37(48.7) | 23(32.4) | |||
颅内压>200 mm H2O〔n(%)〕 | 4.13 | 0.042 | |||
是 | 48(63.2) | 33(46.5) | |||
否 | 28(36.8) | 38(53.5) | |||
脑脊液糖降低〔n(%)〕 | 13.03 | <0.001 | |||
是 | 31(40.8) | 50(70.4) | |||
否 | 45(59.2) | 21(29.6) | |||
脑脊液氯降低〔n(%)〕 | 11.91 | <0.001 | |||
是 | 49(64.5) | 63(88.7) | |||
否 | 27(35.5) | 8(11.3) | |||
脑脊液蛋白升高〔n(%)〕 | 17.23 | <0.001 | |||
是 | 51(67.1) | 67(94.4) | |||
否 | 25(32.9) | 4(5.6) | |||
脑脊液细胞数>200/μl〔n(%)〕 | 2.85 | 0.091 | |||
是 | 10(13.1) | 17(23.9) | |||
否 | 66(86.8) | 54(76.1) | |||
脑脊液单核细胞升高〔n(%)〕 | 7.78 | 0.005 | |||
是 | 34(44.7) | 48(67.6) | |||
否 | 42(55.3) | 23(32.4) |
Table 1 Clinical data of patients with tuberculous meningitis and non-tuberculous meningitis in the model group
指标 | 非TM亚组(n=76) | TM亚组(n=71) | χ2(t)值 | P值 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别〔n(%)〕 | 1.44 | 0.230 | |||
男 | 51(67.1) | 54(76.1) | |||
女 | 25(32.9) | 17(23.9) | |||
年龄( | 51.5±14.3 | 51.3±15.4 | -0.08a | 0.934 | |
发热〔n(%)〕 | 2.36 | 0.125 | |||
有 | 42(55.3) | 48(67.6) | |||
无 | 34(44.7) | 23(32.4) | |||
头痛〔n(%)〕 | 4.64 | 0.031 | |||
有 | 63(82.9) | 48(67.6) | |||
无 | 13(17.1) | 23(32.4) | |||
意识障碍〔n(%)〕 | 0.43 | 0.511 | |||
有 | 26(34.2) | 28(39.4) | |||
无 | 50(65.8) | 43(60.6) | |||
颈抵抗〔n(%)〕 | 0.98 | 0.322 | |||
有 | 21(27.6) | 25(35.2) | |||
无 | 55(72.4) | 46(64.8) | |||
HIV感染〔n(%)〕 | 14.91 | <0.001 | |||
有 | 52(68.4) | 26(36.6) | |||
无 | 24(31.6) | 45(63.4) | |||
CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数<200/μl〔n(%)〕 | 4.75 | 0.029 | |||
是 | 47(71.2) | 28(51.9) | |||
否 | 19(28.8) | 26(48.1) | |||
C反应蛋白升高〔n(%)〕 | 4.03 | 0.045 | |||
是 | 39(51.3) | 48(67.6) | |||
否 | 37(48.7) | 23(32.4) | |||
颅内压>200 mm H2O〔n(%)〕 | 4.13 | 0.042 | |||
是 | 48(63.2) | 33(46.5) | |||
否 | 28(36.8) | 38(53.5) | |||
脑脊液糖降低〔n(%)〕 | 13.03 | <0.001 | |||
是 | 31(40.8) | 50(70.4) | |||
否 | 45(59.2) | 21(29.6) | |||
脑脊液氯降低〔n(%)〕 | 11.91 | <0.001 | |||
是 | 49(64.5) | 63(88.7) | |||
否 | 27(35.5) | 8(11.3) | |||
脑脊液蛋白升高〔n(%)〕 | 17.23 | <0.001 | |||
是 | 51(67.1) | 67(94.4) | |||
否 | 25(32.9) | 4(5.6) | |||
脑脊液细胞数>200/μl〔n(%)〕 | 2.85 | 0.091 | |||
是 | 10(13.1) | 17(23.9) | |||
否 | 66(86.8) | 54(76.1) | |||
脑脊液单核细胞升高〔n(%)〕 | 7.78 | 0.005 | |||
是 | 34(44.7) | 48(67.6) | |||
否 | 42(55.3) | 23(32.4) |
自变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头痛 | -1.029 | 0.519 | 3.937 | 0.047 | 0.357 | (0.129,0.998) |
CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数<200/μl | -1.215 | 0.490 | 6.152 | 0.013 | 0.297 | (0.114,0.775) |
C反应蛋白 | 1.630 | 0.498 | 10.711 | 0.001 | 5.106 | (1.923,13.554) |
脑脊液糖 | 1.546 | 0.492 | 9.886 | 0.002 | 4.693 | (1.790,12.301) |
脑脊液蛋白 | 2.228 | 0.837 | 7.092 | 0.008 | 9.279 | (1.801,47.813) |
Table 2 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of tuberculous meningitis
自变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头痛 | -1.029 | 0.519 | 3.937 | 0.047 | 0.357 | (0.129,0.998) |
CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数<200/μl | -1.215 | 0.490 | 6.152 | 0.013 | 0.297 | (0.114,0.775) |
C反应蛋白 | 1.630 | 0.498 | 10.711 | 0.001 | 5.106 | (1.923,13.554) |
脑脊液糖 | 1.546 | 0.492 | 9.886 | 0.002 | 4.693 | (1.790,12.301) |
脑脊液蛋白 | 2.228 | 0.837 | 7.092 | 0.008 | 9.279 | (1.801,47.813) |
自变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头痛 | -1.187 | 0.530 | 5.015 | 0.025 | 0.305 | (0.108,0.862) |
CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数<200/μl | -1.113 | 0.506 | 4.840 | 0.028 | 0.329 | (0.122,0.886) |
C反应蛋白 | 1.603 | 0.535 | 8.991 | 0.003 | 4.969 | (1.742,14.173) |
脑脊液糖 | 1.191 | 0.515 | 5.343 | 0.021 | 3.290 | (1.199,9.033) |
脑脊液氯 | 0.752 | 0.591 | 1.618 | 0.203 | 2.122 | (0.666,6.763) |
脑脊液蛋白 | 2.075 | 0.874 | 5.639 | 0.018 | 7.966 | (1.437,44.170) |
脑脊液细胞数>200/μl | 1.163 | 0.649 | 3.210 | 0.073 | 3.199 | (0.897,11.416) |
Table 3 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with tuberculous meningitis
自变量 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头痛 | -1.187 | 0.530 | 5.015 | 0.025 | 0.305 | (0.108,0.862) |
CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数<200/μl | -1.113 | 0.506 | 4.840 | 0.028 | 0.329 | (0.122,0.886) |
C反应蛋白 | 1.603 | 0.535 | 8.991 | 0.003 | 4.969 | (1.742,14.173) |
脑脊液糖 | 1.191 | 0.515 | 5.343 | 0.021 | 3.290 | (1.199,9.033) |
脑脊液氯 | 0.752 | 0.591 | 1.618 | 0.203 | 2.122 | (0.666,6.763) |
脑脊液蛋白 | 2.075 | 0.874 | 5.639 | 0.018 | 7.966 | (1.437,44.170) |
脑脊液细胞数>200/μl | 1.163 | 0.649 | 3.210 | 0.073 | 3.199 | (0.897,11.416) |
因素 | 头痛 | CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数<200/μl | C反应蛋白升高 | 脑脊液糖降低 | 脑脊液氯降低 | 脑脊液蛋白升高 | 脑脊液细胞数>200/μl | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<6.9 mmol/L | ≥6.9 mmol/L | <0.2 g/L | ≥0.2 g/L | ||||||
分值 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 7 | 5.5 | 11 | 4 |
Table 4 The clinical diagnostic scoring system for tuberculous meningitis
因素 | 头痛 | CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数<200/μl | C反应蛋白升高 | 脑脊液糖降低 | 脑脊液氯降低 | 脑脊液蛋白升高 | 脑脊液细胞数>200/μl | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<6.9 mmol/L | ≥6.9 mmol/L | <0.2 g/L | ≥0.2 g/L | ||||||
分值 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 7 | 5.5 | 11 | 4 |
截断值(分) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 阳性预测值 | 阴性预测值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
20.25 | 0.732 | 0.763 | 0.743 | 0.753 |
20.75 | 0.704 | 0.803 | 0.769 | 0.744 |
21.50 | 0.690 | 0.855 | 0.817 | 0.747 |
22.25 | 0.662 | 0.855 | 0.810 | 0.730 |
22.75 | 0.648 | 0.855 | 0.807 | 0.722 |
Table 5 Diagnostic value of the clinical diagnostic scoring system for tuberculous meningitis in the model group
截断值(分) | 灵敏度 | 特异度 | 阳性预测值 | 阴性预测值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
20.25 | 0.732 | 0.763 | 0.743 | 0.753 |
20.75 | 0.704 | 0.803 | 0.769 | 0.744 |
21.50 | 0.690 | 0.855 | 0.817 | 0.747 |
22.25 | 0.662 | 0.855 | 0.810 | 0.730 |
22.75 | 0.648 | 0.855 | 0.807 | 0.722 |
[1] |
WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Global Tuberculosis Report[R]. Geneva:World Health Organization,2019.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中国艾滋病性病杂志,2018,24(12):1266-1282.
|
[5] |
吴玉珊,刘敏,鲁雁秋,等. 艾滋病/隐球菌性脑膜炎与艾滋病/结核性脑膜炎临床特征的差异性研究[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志,2019,19(6):590-593. DOI:10.16718/j.1009-7708.2019.06.002.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
李朝阳,赵之晗,冯国栋,等. 结核性脑膜炎和疱疹病毒脑膜脑炎脑脊液细胞学检查的特点分析[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2018,45(6):551-555. DOI:10.16636/j.cnki.jinn.2018.06.001.
|
[8] |
张钦林,罗霄鹏,包正军,等. 联合检测CRP,IL-6,Procalcitonin水平在成人脑膜炎诊断中的应用价值[J]. 卒中与神经疾病,2019,26(5):573-578. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0478.2019.05.016.
|
[9] |
赵帝,石晓丹,谢瑱,等. 非HIV人群中结核性脑膜炎和隐球菌性脑膜炎鉴别诊断列线图模型的开发和验证[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2021,48(2):103-109. DOI:10.16636/j.cnki.jinn.1673-2642.2021.02.001.
|
[10] |
中华医学会结核病学分会结核性脑膜炎专业委员会. 2019中国中枢神经系统结核病诊疗指南[J]. 中华传染病杂志,2020,38(7):400-408. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20200606-00645.
|
[1] | LI Hao, LI Peijin, LIU Tingting, CUI Yiyuan, LI Sicong, LIU Lixing, FENG Li, Working Group on Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Cancer Pain. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer Pain by Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3729-3740. |
[2] | ZHI Congcong, LI Xue, CHENG Yicheng, WANG Xiaolong, ZHENG Lihua. Guidelines for Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemorrhoids (2025 Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3217-3228. |
[3] | PAN Qi, REN Jingjing, MA Fanghui, HU Mengjie. Survey of General Practitioners' Cognition and Needs for AI Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment Systems [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3127-3136. |
[4] | Chinese Geriatrics Society, General Practice Branch of Zhejiang Medical Association, the Expert Collaboration Group on Medically Unspecified Disease in General Practice. Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Emaciation (2025) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2577-2594. |
[5] | LIU Hongya, YU Dehua. Construction and Practice of Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Combining General Practice and Specialist in Shanghai Community [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(19): 2390-2397. |
[6] | BIAN Ying, YIN Gang, ZHANG Zixun, TAO Hongbing. The Mechanism of Information Construction Enabling High-quality Development of Compact County-level Medical Consortium [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(19): 2426-2432. |
[7] | DENG Yaqian, CAO Chunli, MA Jinmei, LI Wenxiao, XU Zelin, CHENG Jing, LI Jun. Predictive Value of S-Detect Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification in Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2149-2155. |
[8] | LI Jie, DU Yue, SHAO Shen, PAN Dong, ZHANG Yaxin. The Operational Efficiency of Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment Services in Primary Medical Institutions in Tianjin Based on DEA and SFA [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(16): 1980-1986. |
[9] | GU Jie, HUANG Yanyan. Diagnosis and Comprehensive Management of Rare Diseases: the Indispensable Role of General Practitioners [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(16): 1955-1960. |
[10] | Chinese Academy Society of Sleep Medicine, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Sleep Medicine Group, China Neurologist Association. Chinese Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Co-morbid Insomnia and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2024) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1289-1303. |
[11] | HUANG Lujie, ZHANG Xiaoying, YU Shasha. Risk Factors, Prognosis and Rapid Screening in Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection Complicated with Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(09): 1100-1105. |
[12] | MA Xiaoxuan, WANG Rongqi. Research Progress in Metabolomics for HCC Diagnosis and Treatment [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(08): 1017-1022. |
[13] | MA Hongyang, YUE Anna, SUN Kangyun. Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Diagnostic Differences between Domestic and Foreign Guidelines [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(06): 655-665. |
[14] | DAI Yao, XUE Liping, ZHANG Shiqi, XU Min, ZHANG Qiu, HU Honglin. Congential Adrenal Hyperplasia Associated with CYP17A1 Gene Mutation: a Case Report and Literature Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(06): 771-776. |
[15] | LI Lingqi, GAO Yinyan, ZHANG Yuqin, SUN Dingkui, WU Xinyin, ZHANG Weiru. Survey on the Status and Training Demands of Capabilities for Diagnosing and Treating Common Diseases of Primary Care General Practitioners in Hunan Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(04): 443-449. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||