
Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (13): 1618-1623.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.341
Special Issue: 社区卫生服务最新研究合辑
• Original Research·Primary Health Services • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2021-08-19
Revised:2021-11-25
Published:2021-12-23
Online:2022-04-22
Contact:
Xuejiao ZHU
About author:
通讯作者:
朱雪娇
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.341
| 项目 | 例数 | 服务体验得分 | F(t)值 | P值 | 项目 | 例数 | 服务体验得分 | F(t)值 | P值 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | -2.640a | 0.009 | 合并其他疾病 | -2.253a | 0.025 | ||||||
| 男 | 264 | -1.74±0.80 | 否 | 313 | -1.71±0.76 | ||||||
| 女 | 261 | -1.56±0.75 | 是 | 212 | -1.55±0.80 | ||||||
| 年龄(岁) | 1.418 | 0.227 | 签约时长(年) | 3.528 | 0.002 | ||||||
| ≤59 | 38 | -1.64±0.77 | <1 | 4 | -1.70±0.88 | ||||||
| 60~69 | 153 | -1.73±0.73 | 1 | 26 | -1.99±0.67 | ||||||
| 70~79 | 213 | -1.61±0.77 | 2 | 49 | -1.97±0.74 | ||||||
| 80~89 | 109 | -1.65±0.83 | 3 | 73 | -1.75±0.81 | ||||||
| ≥90 | 12 | -1.23±1.02 | 4 | 64 | -1.48±0.76 | ||||||
| 文化程度 | 0.999 | 0.408 | 5 | 54 | -1.63±0.68 | ||||||
| 小学及以下 | 155 | -1.72±0.78 | ≥6 | 255 | -1.56±0.79 | ||||||
| 初中 | 185 | -1.64±0.77 | 更换服务团队 | 2.014a | 0.045 | ||||||
| 高中或中专 | 119 | -1.64±0.71 | 否 | 345 | -1.60±0.80 | ||||||
| 大专 | 33 | -1.59±0.95 | 是 | 180 | -1.74±0.73 | ||||||
| 本科及以上 | 33 | -1.43±0.85 | 接受的服务内容项目数(项) | 22.010 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 月收入(元) | 2.618 | 0.051 | 1 | 18 | -1.99±0.74 | ||||||
| ≤1 000 | 6 | -2.16±0.92 | 2 | 83 | -2.15±0.79 | ||||||
| 1 001~3 000 | 56 | -1.86±0.79 | 3 | 187 | -1.80±0.69 | ||||||
| 3 001~5 000 | 280 | -1.62±0.75 | 4 | 147 | -1.40±0.68 | ||||||
| ≥5 001 | 183 | -1.60±0.81 | 5 | 85 | -1.25±0.73 | ||||||
| 医疗费用支付方式 | 5.385 | 0.005 | 6 | 5 | -0.58±0.29 | ||||||
| 全自费 | 3 | -2.20±0.96 | 接受的服务方式种类数(种) | 12.240 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 部分自费 | 517 | -1.65±0.77 | 1 | 92 | -2.03±0.83 | ||||||
| 公费 | 5 | -0.60±0.34 | 2 | 235 | -1.71±0.74 | ||||||
| 生活自理能力评分(分) | 1.216 | 0.303 | 3 | 159 | -1.46±0.69 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 0.00±0.00 | 4 | 35 | -1.18±0.75 | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | -1.40±1.27 | 5 | 2 | -0.98±0.81 | ||||||
| 3 | 21 | -1.62±0.81 | 6 | 2 | -0.13±0.18 | ||||||
| 4 | 69 | -1.68±0.82 | 利用的智慧医疗项目数(项) | 8.123 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 5 | 432 | -1.65±0.77 | 1 | 256 | -1.78±0.77 | ||||||
| 患病数量(种) | 0.198 | 0.821 | 2 | 267 | -1.52±0.77 | ||||||
| 1 | 278 | -1.63±0.76 | 3 | 2 | -1.03±1.45 | ||||||
| 2 | 211 | -1.66±0.80 | |||||||||
| 3 | 36 | -1.72±0.81 | |||||||||
Table 1 Experience of integrated medical-elderly-nursing services in community-dwelling chronic disease patients by personal characteristics
| 项目 | 例数 | 服务体验得分 | F(t)值 | P值 | 项目 | 例数 | 服务体验得分 | F(t)值 | P值 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | -2.640a | 0.009 | 合并其他疾病 | -2.253a | 0.025 | ||||||
| 男 | 264 | -1.74±0.80 | 否 | 313 | -1.71±0.76 | ||||||
| 女 | 261 | -1.56±0.75 | 是 | 212 | -1.55±0.80 | ||||||
| 年龄(岁) | 1.418 | 0.227 | 签约时长(年) | 3.528 | 0.002 | ||||||
| ≤59 | 38 | -1.64±0.77 | <1 | 4 | -1.70±0.88 | ||||||
| 60~69 | 153 | -1.73±0.73 | 1 | 26 | -1.99±0.67 | ||||||
| 70~79 | 213 | -1.61±0.77 | 2 | 49 | -1.97±0.74 | ||||||
| 80~89 | 109 | -1.65±0.83 | 3 | 73 | -1.75±0.81 | ||||||
| ≥90 | 12 | -1.23±1.02 | 4 | 64 | -1.48±0.76 | ||||||
| 文化程度 | 0.999 | 0.408 | 5 | 54 | -1.63±0.68 | ||||||
| 小学及以下 | 155 | -1.72±0.78 | ≥6 | 255 | -1.56±0.79 | ||||||
| 初中 | 185 | -1.64±0.77 | 更换服务团队 | 2.014a | 0.045 | ||||||
| 高中或中专 | 119 | -1.64±0.71 | 否 | 345 | -1.60±0.80 | ||||||
| 大专 | 33 | -1.59±0.95 | 是 | 180 | -1.74±0.73 | ||||||
| 本科及以上 | 33 | -1.43±0.85 | 接受的服务内容项目数(项) | 22.010 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 月收入(元) | 2.618 | 0.051 | 1 | 18 | -1.99±0.74 | ||||||
| ≤1 000 | 6 | -2.16±0.92 | 2 | 83 | -2.15±0.79 | ||||||
| 1 001~3 000 | 56 | -1.86±0.79 | 3 | 187 | -1.80±0.69 | ||||||
| 3 001~5 000 | 280 | -1.62±0.75 | 4 | 147 | -1.40±0.68 | ||||||
| ≥5 001 | 183 | -1.60±0.81 | 5 | 85 | -1.25±0.73 | ||||||
| 医疗费用支付方式 | 5.385 | 0.005 | 6 | 5 | -0.58±0.29 | ||||||
| 全自费 | 3 | -2.20±0.96 | 接受的服务方式种类数(种) | 12.240 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 部分自费 | 517 | -1.65±0.77 | 1 | 92 | -2.03±0.83 | ||||||
| 公费 | 5 | -0.60±0.34 | 2 | 235 | -1.71±0.74 | ||||||
| 生活自理能力评分(分) | 1.216 | 0.303 | 3 | 159 | -1.46±0.69 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 0.00±0.00 | 4 | 35 | -1.18±0.75 | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | -1.40±1.27 | 5 | 2 | -0.98±0.81 | ||||||
| 3 | 21 | -1.62±0.81 | 6 | 2 | -0.13±0.18 | ||||||
| 4 | 69 | -1.68±0.82 | 利用的智慧医疗项目数(项) | 8.123 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 5 | 432 | -1.65±0.77 | 1 | 256 | -1.78±0.77 | ||||||
| 患病数量(种) | 0.198 | 0.821 | 2 | 267 | -1.52±0.77 | ||||||
| 1 | 278 | -1.63±0.76 | 3 | 2 | -1.03±1.45 | ||||||
| 2 | 211 | -1.66±0.80 | |||||||||
| 3 | 36 | -1.72±0.81 | |||||||||
| 自变量 | b(95%CI) | SE | b' | t值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别(以男为参照) | ||||||
| 女 | 0.175(0.048,0.302) | 0.064 | 0.112 | 2.713 | 0.007 | |
| 月收入(以实际值纳入) | 0.115(0.021,0.210) | 0.048 | 0.100 | 2.409 | 0.016 | |
| 医疗费用支付方式(公费)a | 0.785(0.178,1.392) | 0.309 | 0.098 | 2.540 | 0.011 | |
| 患病数量(以实际值纳入) | -0.111(-0.208,-0.013) | 0.050 | -0.088 | -2.227 | 0.026 | |
| 更换服务团队(以否为参照) | ||||||
| 是 | -0.128(-0.251,-0.004) | 0.063 | -0.078 | -2.030 | 0.043 | |
| 接受的服务内容项目数(以实际值纳入) | 0.254(0.196,0.313) | 0.030 | 0.350 | 8.518 | <0.001 | |
| 接受的服务方式种类数(以实际值纳入) | 0.178(0.107,0.248) | 0.036 | 0.199 | 4.944 | <0.001 | |
| 常量 | -3.348(-3.809,-2.887) | 0.235 | - | -14.271 | <0.001 | |
Table 2 Multiple linear regression analysis of the factors affecting community-dwelling chronic disease patients' experience of integrated medical-elderly-nursing services
| 自变量 | b(95%CI) | SE | b' | t值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别(以男为参照) | ||||||
| 女 | 0.175(0.048,0.302) | 0.064 | 0.112 | 2.713 | 0.007 | |
| 月收入(以实际值纳入) | 0.115(0.021,0.210) | 0.048 | 0.100 | 2.409 | 0.016 | |
| 医疗费用支付方式(公费)a | 0.785(0.178,1.392) | 0.309 | 0.098 | 2.540 | 0.011 | |
| 患病数量(以实际值纳入) | -0.111(-0.208,-0.013) | 0.050 | -0.088 | -2.227 | 0.026 | |
| 更换服务团队(以否为参照) | ||||||
| 是 | -0.128(-0.251,-0.004) | 0.063 | -0.078 | -2.030 | 0.043 | |
| 接受的服务内容项目数(以实际值纳入) | 0.254(0.196,0.313) | 0.030 | 0.350 | 8.518 | <0.001 | |
| 接受的服务方式种类数(以实际值纳入) | 0.178(0.107,0.248) | 0.036 | 0.199 | 4.944 | <0.001 | |
| 常量 | -3.348(-3.809,-2.887) | 0.235 | - | -14.271 | <0.001 | |
| 项目 | 适配标准 | 本模型结果 | 结果判定 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 绝对拟合度指数 | ||||
| χ2值 | P<0.05 | 194.479(P<0.001) | 良好 | |
| RMSEA | <0.08为适配合理,<0.05为适配良好 | 0.07 | 合理 | |
| SRMR | <0.08 | 0.05 | 良好 | |
| GFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| AGFI | >0.90 | 0.92 | 良好 | |
| 增值适配度指数 | ||||
| NFI | >0.90 | 0.92 | 良好 | |
| RFI | >0.90 | 0.90 | 良好 | |
| IFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| CFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| 简约适配度指数 | ||||
| PNFI | >0.50 | 0.70 | 良好 | |
| PGFI | >0.50 | 0.72 | 良好 | |
| χ2/df | >1~<5 | 3.30 | 良好 | |
Table 3 Goodness of fit indices for the verification model of the influencing factors of the experience of integrated medical-elderly-nursing services in community-dwelling chronic disease patients
| 项目 | 适配标准 | 本模型结果 | 结果判定 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 绝对拟合度指数 | ||||
| χ2值 | P<0.05 | 194.479(P<0.001) | 良好 | |
| RMSEA | <0.08为适配合理,<0.05为适配良好 | 0.07 | 合理 | |
| SRMR | <0.08 | 0.05 | 良好 | |
| GFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| AGFI | >0.90 | 0.92 | 良好 | |
| 增值适配度指数 | ||||
| NFI | >0.90 | 0.92 | 良好 | |
| RFI | >0.90 | 0.90 | 良好 | |
| IFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| CFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| 简约适配度指数 | ||||
| PNFI | >0.50 | 0.70 | 良好 | |
| PGFI | >0.50 | 0.72 | 良好 | |
| χ2/df | >1~<5 | 3.30 | 良好 | |
Figure 1 A structural equation model of the influencing factors of the experience of integrated medical-elderly-nursing services in community-dwelling chronic disease patients
| [1] |
浙江省统计局. 浙江统计年鉴2020[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2020.
|
| [2] |
杭州市人民政府. 杭州市人民政府办公厅关于推进医养护一体化智慧医疗服务的实施意见[EB/OL].(2014-05-30)[2021-08-16].
|
| [3] |
杭州市人民政府. 杭州市人民政府办公厅关于印发杭州市医养护一体化签约服务实施方案(试行)的通知[EB/OL].(2014-09-03)[2021-08-16].
|
| [4] |
魏雅宁. 杭州:重点人群家庭医生签约覆盖率达82.04%[EB/OL].(2019-01-26)[2021-08-16].
|
| [5] |
杨旻,朱雪娇,徐玛瑙. 杭州市社区慢性病患者医养护一体化服务体验的现况研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25(10):1232-1237. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.224.
|
| [6] |
汪冬晓. 杭州市"医养护一体化"综合服务质量及影响因素研究[D]. 杭州:浙江财经大学,2016.
|
| [7] |
陈育蕾. 浙江省医养护一体化服务质量发展状况调查与分析[M]. 北京:电子工业出版社,2020:112-113.
|
| [8] |
杨旻,朱雪娇,章琛越,等. 基于实施性研究的整合性理论框架医养护一体化服务实施影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25(4):505-509. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.210.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
胡赛. SERVQUAL量表用于我国社区卫生服务质量评价的适用性研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2018.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
倪云潮,周培森,李章平,等. 浙江省家庭医生签约居民续签意愿及影响因素调查[J]. 中国农村卫生事业管理,2020,40(8):552-556.
|
| [13] |
杭州市人民政府. 杭州市医养护一体化智慧医疗服务促进办法[EB/OL].(2015-04-13)[2021-08-16].
|
| [14] |
云美丽. 我国公众基本医疗卫生服务获得感的生成逻辑、影响因素和提升路径[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2019.
|
| [15] |
陈楚媛,沈勤,陈巧玲,等. 杭州市居家老年人家庭型医养护一体化服务利用情况及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学杂志,2019,34(21):64-67. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.21.064.
|
| [16] |
杭州市卫生计生委. 关于印发杭州市家庭病床服务规范(试行)的通知[EB/OL].(2014-11-24)[2021-08-16].
|
| [17] |
刘金玲. 杭州市居家老年人健康状况与家庭型医养护一体化服务需求的调查研究[D]. 杭州:浙江中医药大学,2017.
|
| [18] |
黄志杰,王皓翔,周志衡,等. 远程动态血压监测下综合干预在社区高血压管理中的应用效果及影响因素研究[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(19):2343-2347. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.17-9572.2018.19.015.
|
| [19] |
何炜,滕建荣,周智林,等. 杭州智慧医疗探索及其思考[J]. 中华医院管理杂志,2017,33(2):125-127.
|
| [20] |
国务院办公厅. 关于切实解决老年人运用智能技术困难实施方案的通知[EB/OL].(2020-11-15)[2021-08-16].
|
| [21] |
方之瑜. 智慧城市背景下老年群体信息技术现状与能力培养[J]. 中国电化教育,2018,39(2):67-72.
|
| [1] | HU Jieman, TAN Feixiang, YUAN Anxin, CHEN Shiyu, TANG Chulei, YIN Yueheng, BA Lei, XU Qin. Analysis of the Trajectory of Postoperative Frailty and Influencing Factors in Patients with Colorectal Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3276-3282. |
| [2] | CHOU Xintong, PENG Hanyu, MA Hui, ZHANG Zhen, SU Xian, QIU Hongyan. Maternal Preferences in Contraceptive Decision-making: an Analysis of Influencing Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3294-3299. |
| [3] | WEI Jiaohua, PENG Huiru, PENG Jianye, TAN Wenting, HUANG Jine, FANG Li. Expression of the Serum MOTS-c and Its Correlation with Atrial Remodeling in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3271-3276. |
| [4] | YU Zizi, LIU Duli, LI Ximin, RUAN Chunyi, YIN Xiangyang, CAI Le. Analysis of the Prevalence and Self-management of Hypertension and Its Influencing Factors in Rural [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3137-3143. |
| [5] | FAN Boyang, ZHANG Yu, SUN Wenning, ZHANG Huifang, WANG Yingjie, ZHANG Ao, ZHAO Yang, WANG Haipeng. Study of Behavioral Intention and Influencing Factors of Integrated Medical and Preventive Care Provided by Grassroots Doctors for Patients with Chronic Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3144-3150. |
| [6] | YAN Fanghong, PENG Guotian, ZHANG Guoli, SUN Ruiyi, MA Yuxia, HAN Lin. Matching Analysis of the Content of Chronic Disease Management for the Elderly in Medical Union: Based on the Perspective of "Guidance-Practice-Need" [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3119-3126. |
| [7] | WANG Rupeng, NAN Jing, HU Yiran, YANG Shenghua, JIN Zening. Predictive Value of the Triglyceride-Glucose Body Mass Index for Slow Flow/No-reflow Phenomenon in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 2985-2992. |
| [8] | WU Yue, WANG Xuetong, KE Bilian. Evaluation of Vision-related Quality of Life in Myopic Macular Degeneration Patients with Low Vision and Associated Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2908-2914. |
| [9] | DING Zijun, ZHOU Nannan, LUO Xing, LUO Jieyu, HAO Wenjuan, ZHANG Chunjiang, JIN Xin, ZHAO Dan. Cognitive Impairment in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis and Its Influencing Factors: a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2885-2893. |
| [10] | BAI Xue, CHEN Qianqian, LI Jie. Innovative Practices in Chronic Disease Management: a New Model for Generalist-Specialist Combination Management of Diabetes and Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2841-2845. |
| [11] | WEI Xiaoxia, CHEN Nuo, WANG Juanjuan, ZHU Jingfen. The Effects of Depression and Anxiety on Smoking Behavior among Vocational School Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2826-2832. |
| [12] | ZHAO Xiaoqing, GUO Tongtong, ZHANG Xinyi, LI Linhong, ZHANG Ya, JI Lihong, DONG Zhiwei, GAO Qianqian, CAI Weiqing, ZHENG Wengui, JING Qi. Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cognitive Impairment in Community-dwelling Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2776-2783. |
| [13] | LONG Chunxiao, LI Chenglu, FAN Yangdong, SHI Lei. Quantitative Analysis of Chronic Disease Prevention and Treatment Policy Texts in China: Three-dimensional Framework Based on Policy Tools, Policy Evolution and Policy Subjects [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2457-2463. |
| [14] | LI Liqing, YANG Sule, ZENG Chuanmei. Analysis of the Evolution Path and Development Trend of Research Hotspots in Chronic Disease Management in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(19): 2321-2329. |
| [15] | HAO Aihua, ZENG Ziying, JIN Aiqiong, TANG Lingling, ZHENG Zique, MA Jingtai, ZHAO Jianguo, ZENG Weilin, XIAO Jianpeng, NIE Hui, YANG Ying. Analysis of Factors Influencing Avoidable Hospitalization for Elderly Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(19): 2370-2375. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||