
Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (13): 1618-1623.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.341
Special Issue: 社区卫生服务最新研究合辑
• Original Research·Primary Health Services • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2021-08-19
Revised:2021-11-25
Published:2021-12-23
Online:2022-04-22
Contact:
Xuejiao ZHU
About author:
通讯作者:
朱雪娇
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.341
| 项目 | 例数 | 服务体验得分 | F(t)值 | P值 | 项目 | 例数 | 服务体验得分 | F(t)值 | P值 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | -2.640a | 0.009 | 合并其他疾病 | -2.253a | 0.025 | ||||||
| 男 | 264 | -1.74±0.80 | 否 | 313 | -1.71±0.76 | ||||||
| 女 | 261 | -1.56±0.75 | 是 | 212 | -1.55±0.80 | ||||||
| 年龄(岁) | 1.418 | 0.227 | 签约时长(年) | 3.528 | 0.002 | ||||||
| ≤59 | 38 | -1.64±0.77 | <1 | 4 | -1.70±0.88 | ||||||
| 60~69 | 153 | -1.73±0.73 | 1 | 26 | -1.99±0.67 | ||||||
| 70~79 | 213 | -1.61±0.77 | 2 | 49 | -1.97±0.74 | ||||||
| 80~89 | 109 | -1.65±0.83 | 3 | 73 | -1.75±0.81 | ||||||
| ≥90 | 12 | -1.23±1.02 | 4 | 64 | -1.48±0.76 | ||||||
| 文化程度 | 0.999 | 0.408 | 5 | 54 | -1.63±0.68 | ||||||
| 小学及以下 | 155 | -1.72±0.78 | ≥6 | 255 | -1.56±0.79 | ||||||
| 初中 | 185 | -1.64±0.77 | 更换服务团队 | 2.014a | 0.045 | ||||||
| 高中或中专 | 119 | -1.64±0.71 | 否 | 345 | -1.60±0.80 | ||||||
| 大专 | 33 | -1.59±0.95 | 是 | 180 | -1.74±0.73 | ||||||
| 本科及以上 | 33 | -1.43±0.85 | 接受的服务内容项目数(项) | 22.010 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 月收入(元) | 2.618 | 0.051 | 1 | 18 | -1.99±0.74 | ||||||
| ≤1 000 | 6 | -2.16±0.92 | 2 | 83 | -2.15±0.79 | ||||||
| 1 001~3 000 | 56 | -1.86±0.79 | 3 | 187 | -1.80±0.69 | ||||||
| 3 001~5 000 | 280 | -1.62±0.75 | 4 | 147 | -1.40±0.68 | ||||||
| ≥5 001 | 183 | -1.60±0.81 | 5 | 85 | -1.25±0.73 | ||||||
| 医疗费用支付方式 | 5.385 | 0.005 | 6 | 5 | -0.58±0.29 | ||||||
| 全自费 | 3 | -2.20±0.96 | 接受的服务方式种类数(种) | 12.240 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 部分自费 | 517 | -1.65±0.77 | 1 | 92 | -2.03±0.83 | ||||||
| 公费 | 5 | -0.60±0.34 | 2 | 235 | -1.71±0.74 | ||||||
| 生活自理能力评分(分) | 1.216 | 0.303 | 3 | 159 | -1.46±0.69 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 0.00±0.00 | 4 | 35 | -1.18±0.75 | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | -1.40±1.27 | 5 | 2 | -0.98±0.81 | ||||||
| 3 | 21 | -1.62±0.81 | 6 | 2 | -0.13±0.18 | ||||||
| 4 | 69 | -1.68±0.82 | 利用的智慧医疗项目数(项) | 8.123 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 5 | 432 | -1.65±0.77 | 1 | 256 | -1.78±0.77 | ||||||
| 患病数量(种) | 0.198 | 0.821 | 2 | 267 | -1.52±0.77 | ||||||
| 1 | 278 | -1.63±0.76 | 3 | 2 | -1.03±1.45 | ||||||
| 2 | 211 | -1.66±0.80 | |||||||||
| 3 | 36 | -1.72±0.81 | |||||||||
Table 1 Experience of integrated medical-elderly-nursing services in community-dwelling chronic disease patients by personal characteristics
| 项目 | 例数 | 服务体验得分 | F(t)值 | P值 | 项目 | 例数 | 服务体验得分 | F(t)值 | P值 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | -2.640a | 0.009 | 合并其他疾病 | -2.253a | 0.025 | ||||||
| 男 | 264 | -1.74±0.80 | 否 | 313 | -1.71±0.76 | ||||||
| 女 | 261 | -1.56±0.75 | 是 | 212 | -1.55±0.80 | ||||||
| 年龄(岁) | 1.418 | 0.227 | 签约时长(年) | 3.528 | 0.002 | ||||||
| ≤59 | 38 | -1.64±0.77 | <1 | 4 | -1.70±0.88 | ||||||
| 60~69 | 153 | -1.73±0.73 | 1 | 26 | -1.99±0.67 | ||||||
| 70~79 | 213 | -1.61±0.77 | 2 | 49 | -1.97±0.74 | ||||||
| 80~89 | 109 | -1.65±0.83 | 3 | 73 | -1.75±0.81 | ||||||
| ≥90 | 12 | -1.23±1.02 | 4 | 64 | -1.48±0.76 | ||||||
| 文化程度 | 0.999 | 0.408 | 5 | 54 | -1.63±0.68 | ||||||
| 小学及以下 | 155 | -1.72±0.78 | ≥6 | 255 | -1.56±0.79 | ||||||
| 初中 | 185 | -1.64±0.77 | 更换服务团队 | 2.014a | 0.045 | ||||||
| 高中或中专 | 119 | -1.64±0.71 | 否 | 345 | -1.60±0.80 | ||||||
| 大专 | 33 | -1.59±0.95 | 是 | 180 | -1.74±0.73 | ||||||
| 本科及以上 | 33 | -1.43±0.85 | 接受的服务内容项目数(项) | 22.010 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 月收入(元) | 2.618 | 0.051 | 1 | 18 | -1.99±0.74 | ||||||
| ≤1 000 | 6 | -2.16±0.92 | 2 | 83 | -2.15±0.79 | ||||||
| 1 001~3 000 | 56 | -1.86±0.79 | 3 | 187 | -1.80±0.69 | ||||||
| 3 001~5 000 | 280 | -1.62±0.75 | 4 | 147 | -1.40±0.68 | ||||||
| ≥5 001 | 183 | -1.60±0.81 | 5 | 85 | -1.25±0.73 | ||||||
| 医疗费用支付方式 | 5.385 | 0.005 | 6 | 5 | -0.58±0.29 | ||||||
| 全自费 | 3 | -2.20±0.96 | 接受的服务方式种类数(种) | 12.240 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 部分自费 | 517 | -1.65±0.77 | 1 | 92 | -2.03±0.83 | ||||||
| 公费 | 5 | -0.60±0.34 | 2 | 235 | -1.71±0.74 | ||||||
| 生活自理能力评分(分) | 1.216 | 0.303 | 3 | 159 | -1.46±0.69 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 0.00±0.00 | 4 | 35 | -1.18±0.75 | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | -1.40±1.27 | 5 | 2 | -0.98±0.81 | ||||||
| 3 | 21 | -1.62±0.81 | 6 | 2 | -0.13±0.18 | ||||||
| 4 | 69 | -1.68±0.82 | 利用的智慧医疗项目数(项) | 8.123 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 5 | 432 | -1.65±0.77 | 1 | 256 | -1.78±0.77 | ||||||
| 患病数量(种) | 0.198 | 0.821 | 2 | 267 | -1.52±0.77 | ||||||
| 1 | 278 | -1.63±0.76 | 3 | 2 | -1.03±1.45 | ||||||
| 2 | 211 | -1.66±0.80 | |||||||||
| 3 | 36 | -1.72±0.81 | |||||||||
| 自变量 | b(95%CI) | SE | b' | t值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别(以男为参照) | ||||||
| 女 | 0.175(0.048,0.302) | 0.064 | 0.112 | 2.713 | 0.007 | |
| 月收入(以实际值纳入) | 0.115(0.021,0.210) | 0.048 | 0.100 | 2.409 | 0.016 | |
| 医疗费用支付方式(公费)a | 0.785(0.178,1.392) | 0.309 | 0.098 | 2.540 | 0.011 | |
| 患病数量(以实际值纳入) | -0.111(-0.208,-0.013) | 0.050 | -0.088 | -2.227 | 0.026 | |
| 更换服务团队(以否为参照) | ||||||
| 是 | -0.128(-0.251,-0.004) | 0.063 | -0.078 | -2.030 | 0.043 | |
| 接受的服务内容项目数(以实际值纳入) | 0.254(0.196,0.313) | 0.030 | 0.350 | 8.518 | <0.001 | |
| 接受的服务方式种类数(以实际值纳入) | 0.178(0.107,0.248) | 0.036 | 0.199 | 4.944 | <0.001 | |
| 常量 | -3.348(-3.809,-2.887) | 0.235 | - | -14.271 | <0.001 | |
Table 2 Multiple linear regression analysis of the factors affecting community-dwelling chronic disease patients' experience of integrated medical-elderly-nursing services
| 自变量 | b(95%CI) | SE | b' | t值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别(以男为参照) | ||||||
| 女 | 0.175(0.048,0.302) | 0.064 | 0.112 | 2.713 | 0.007 | |
| 月收入(以实际值纳入) | 0.115(0.021,0.210) | 0.048 | 0.100 | 2.409 | 0.016 | |
| 医疗费用支付方式(公费)a | 0.785(0.178,1.392) | 0.309 | 0.098 | 2.540 | 0.011 | |
| 患病数量(以实际值纳入) | -0.111(-0.208,-0.013) | 0.050 | -0.088 | -2.227 | 0.026 | |
| 更换服务团队(以否为参照) | ||||||
| 是 | -0.128(-0.251,-0.004) | 0.063 | -0.078 | -2.030 | 0.043 | |
| 接受的服务内容项目数(以实际值纳入) | 0.254(0.196,0.313) | 0.030 | 0.350 | 8.518 | <0.001 | |
| 接受的服务方式种类数(以实际值纳入) | 0.178(0.107,0.248) | 0.036 | 0.199 | 4.944 | <0.001 | |
| 常量 | -3.348(-3.809,-2.887) | 0.235 | - | -14.271 | <0.001 | |
| 项目 | 适配标准 | 本模型结果 | 结果判定 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 绝对拟合度指数 | ||||
| χ2值 | P<0.05 | 194.479(P<0.001) | 良好 | |
| RMSEA | <0.08为适配合理,<0.05为适配良好 | 0.07 | 合理 | |
| SRMR | <0.08 | 0.05 | 良好 | |
| GFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| AGFI | >0.90 | 0.92 | 良好 | |
| 增值适配度指数 | ||||
| NFI | >0.90 | 0.92 | 良好 | |
| RFI | >0.90 | 0.90 | 良好 | |
| IFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| CFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| 简约适配度指数 | ||||
| PNFI | >0.50 | 0.70 | 良好 | |
| PGFI | >0.50 | 0.72 | 良好 | |
| χ2/df | >1~<5 | 3.30 | 良好 | |
Table 3 Goodness of fit indices for the verification model of the influencing factors of the experience of integrated medical-elderly-nursing services in community-dwelling chronic disease patients
| 项目 | 适配标准 | 本模型结果 | 结果判定 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 绝对拟合度指数 | ||||
| χ2值 | P<0.05 | 194.479(P<0.001) | 良好 | |
| RMSEA | <0.08为适配合理,<0.05为适配良好 | 0.07 | 合理 | |
| SRMR | <0.08 | 0.05 | 良好 | |
| GFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| AGFI | >0.90 | 0.92 | 良好 | |
| 增值适配度指数 | ||||
| NFI | >0.90 | 0.92 | 良好 | |
| RFI | >0.90 | 0.90 | 良好 | |
| IFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| CFI | >0.90 | 0.95 | 良好 | |
| 简约适配度指数 | ||||
| PNFI | >0.50 | 0.70 | 良好 | |
| PGFI | >0.50 | 0.72 | 良好 | |
| χ2/df | >1~<5 | 3.30 | 良好 | |
Figure 1 A structural equation model of the influencing factors of the experience of integrated medical-elderly-nursing services in community-dwelling chronic disease patients
| [1] |
浙江省统计局. 浙江统计年鉴2020[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2020.
|
| [2] |
杭州市人民政府. 杭州市人民政府办公厅关于推进医养护一体化智慧医疗服务的实施意见[EB/OL].(2014-05-30)[2021-08-16].
|
| [3] |
杭州市人民政府. 杭州市人民政府办公厅关于印发杭州市医养护一体化签约服务实施方案(试行)的通知[EB/OL].(2014-09-03)[2021-08-16].
|
| [4] |
魏雅宁. 杭州:重点人群家庭医生签约覆盖率达82.04%[EB/OL].(2019-01-26)[2021-08-16].
|
| [5] |
杨旻,朱雪娇,徐玛瑙. 杭州市社区慢性病患者医养护一体化服务体验的现况研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25(10):1232-1237. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.224.
|
| [6] |
汪冬晓. 杭州市"医养护一体化"综合服务质量及影响因素研究[D]. 杭州:浙江财经大学,2016.
|
| [7] |
陈育蕾. 浙江省医养护一体化服务质量发展状况调查与分析[M]. 北京:电子工业出版社,2020:112-113.
|
| [8] |
杨旻,朱雪娇,章琛越,等. 基于实施性研究的整合性理论框架医养护一体化服务实施影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25(4):505-509. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.210.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
胡赛. SERVQUAL量表用于我国社区卫生服务质量评价的适用性研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2018.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
倪云潮,周培森,李章平,等. 浙江省家庭医生签约居民续签意愿及影响因素调查[J]. 中国农村卫生事业管理,2020,40(8):552-556.
|
| [13] |
杭州市人民政府. 杭州市医养护一体化智慧医疗服务促进办法[EB/OL].(2015-04-13)[2021-08-16].
|
| [14] |
云美丽. 我国公众基本医疗卫生服务获得感的生成逻辑、影响因素和提升路径[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2019.
|
| [15] |
陈楚媛,沈勤,陈巧玲,等. 杭州市居家老年人家庭型医养护一体化服务利用情况及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学杂志,2019,34(21):64-67. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.21.064.
|
| [16] |
杭州市卫生计生委. 关于印发杭州市家庭病床服务规范(试行)的通知[EB/OL].(2014-11-24)[2021-08-16].
|
| [17] |
刘金玲. 杭州市居家老年人健康状况与家庭型医养护一体化服务需求的调查研究[D]. 杭州:浙江中医药大学,2017.
|
| [18] |
黄志杰,王皓翔,周志衡,等. 远程动态血压监测下综合干预在社区高血压管理中的应用效果及影响因素研究[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(19):2343-2347. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.17-9572.2018.19.015.
|
| [19] |
何炜,滕建荣,周智林,等. 杭州智慧医疗探索及其思考[J]. 中华医院管理杂志,2017,33(2):125-127.
|
| [20] |
国务院办公厅. 关于切实解决老年人运用智能技术困难实施方案的通知[EB/OL].(2020-11-15)[2021-08-16].
|
| [21] |
方之瑜. 智慧城市背景下老年群体信息技术现状与能力培养[J]. 中国电化教育,2018,39(2):67-72.
|
| [1] | LI Jiawei, GAO Xinyi, GE Aoqi, LI Juanjuan, YUAN Beibei. Demand and Associated Factors for Integrated Medical Care and Preventive Services among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 3028-3039. |
| [2] | YU Haiyan, XIANG Tong, GAO Wenjuan, WU Hao. Research and Application of Digital Health Technologies in Multimorbidity Management [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2933-2937. |
| [3] | LI Feng, HU Changhao, LUO Xu. Progress in the Study of Influencing Factors and Intervention Strategies of Mental Health in Elderly Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2816-2828. |
| [4] | CHENG Yu, HAN Shiyao, SUN Ping, XIANG Juan, YANG Hui, LI Dongze, ZHENG Li, LIAO Xiaoyang. Analysis of Socioeconomic and Demographic Challenges in Chronic Disease Management [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2800-2807. |
| [5] | ZHANG Xiaojuan, LIU Yang, PENG Bo, YE Yuan, ZHU Kun. Study on the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus in Community Hospital [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2614-2620. |
| [6] | ZHANG Huifang, CHEN Cunchuan, FAN Boyang, SUN Wenning, WANG Yingjie, ZHANG Ao, ZHAO Yang, WANG Haipeng. Study on the Service Capability of Primary Care Doctors to Integrate Medical and Preventive Services and Its Influencing Factors in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2711-2716. |
| [7] | TANG Lijuan, QI Qi, ZHANG Fan, GAO Yifu, CAO Yajing, YUE Fujuan, GAO Jinchai, LIU Xiaoli. Characterisation of the Prevalence of Overweight/Obesity among Residents Aged 18-44 Years in Hebei Province in 2013 and 2020 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2695-2704. |
| [8] | LIU Fang, LIU Weinan, XIANG Yuanyue, LU Cheng, ZHU Binhai. Factors Influencing Work-related Flow among "3+2" Order-oriented Assistant General Practitioners in Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(18): 2454-2460. |
| [9] | CHEN Qiulong, CHEN Jia, FANG Jing, DAI Wei, YANG Qing. Application Status and Research Progress of Observer-reported Outcome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(18): 2561-2570. |
| [10] | CHEN Yan, SHEN Dequan, SHENG Renlei, CHANG Yujie, YANG Jiaqi, DING Jie, SUN Zhifang, WANG Dahui. Influencing Factors and Importance Ranking of the Utilization of Primary-level Traditional Chinese Medicine Preventive and Health Care Services for the Elderly [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2182-2189. |
| [11] | YU Shan, CHE Yajie, SUBIYINUER· Maimaiti, GUO Kaiyang, FENG Xingxing, YAN Ping. A Comparative Study on the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Subjective Cognitive Decline among Urban and Rural Elderly People in Xinjiang [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2227-2233. |
| [12] | CHEN Bihua, LIN Qiyi, LI Wuhua, SU Jin, TU Liping, SHI Lan, DING Xiaoqin, YI Chuntao. The Influencing Factors and Mechanisms of the Work Output Level of Family Doctor Teams from the Perspective of Team Effectiveness [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2167-2173. |
| [13] | YU Chao, SONG Lihua, WANG Linyan, LU Yunping, WANG Linyang, CUI Wei. The Functional Outcomes and Influencing Factors in Patients with First-episode Major Depressive Disorder after 7 Years [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2221-2226. |
| [14] | LUO Yutong, LI Jing. The HPV Vaccine Coverage and Its Influencing Factors among the Eligible Population in China Based on a Geographically Weighted Regression Model [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2234-2243. |
| [15] | FU Mingyuan, YU Xiaoyi, GE Caiying, KONG Min. Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia: Prevalence and Determinants among Community-based Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2252-2258. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||