Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (23): 2908-2914.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0123
• Article • Previous Articles
Received:
2024-03-25
Revised:
2024-04-28
Published:
2025-08-15
Online:
2025-06-17
Contact:
KE Bilian
通讯作者:
柯碧莲
作者简介:
作者贡献:
吴越提出主要研究目标,负责研究的构思与设计,撰写论文;吴越、王雪彤进行研究的实施,数据的收集与整理,统计学处理,图、表的绘制;柯碧莲负责文章的质量控制与审查,对文章整体负责。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0123
组别 | 例数 | logMAR ( | logCS ( | 脉络膜厚度( | 萎缩性病变分级[例(%)] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A0 | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | |||||
较好眼 | 40 | 0.80±0.35 | 0.71±0.40 | 76.57±23.92 | 0 | 0 | 16(40.0) | 14(35.0) | 10(25.0) |
较差眼 | 40 | 1.64±0.76 | 0.22±0.22 | 65.62±20.29 | 0 | 0 | 3(7.5) | 22(55.0) | 15(37.5) |
Z(t)值 | -7.29a | 8.16a | 4.36a | 5.63 | |||||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
组别 | 牵拉性病变分级[例(%)] | 新生血管性病变分级[例(%)] | |||||||
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | N0 | N1 | N2 | ||
较好眼 | 16(40.0) | 16(40.0) | 3(7.5) | 2(5.0) | 3(7.5) | 15(37.5) | 7(17.5) | 18(45.0) | |
较差眼 | 13(32.5) | 14(35.0) | 5(12.5) | 3(7.5) | 5(12.5) | 5(12.5) | 8(20.0) | 27(67.5) | |
Z(t)值 | 1.93 | 3.17 | |||||||
P值 | 0.054 | 0.002 |
Table 1 Comparison of clinical characteristics of between better eyes and worse eyes of myopic macular degeneration patients
组别 | 例数 | logMAR ( | logCS ( | 脉络膜厚度( | 萎缩性病变分级[例(%)] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A0 | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | |||||
较好眼 | 40 | 0.80±0.35 | 0.71±0.40 | 76.57±23.92 | 0 | 0 | 16(40.0) | 14(35.0) | 10(25.0) |
较差眼 | 40 | 1.64±0.76 | 0.22±0.22 | 65.62±20.29 | 0 | 0 | 3(7.5) | 22(55.0) | 15(37.5) |
Z(t)值 | -7.29a | 8.16a | 4.36a | 5.63 | |||||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
组别 | 牵拉性病变分级[例(%)] | 新生血管性病变分级[例(%)] | |||||||
T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | N0 | N1 | N2 | ||
较好眼 | 16(40.0) | 16(40.0) | 3(7.5) | 2(5.0) | 3(7.5) | 15(37.5) | 7(17.5) | 18(45.0) | |
较差眼 | 13(32.5) | 14(35.0) | 5(12.5) | 3(7.5) | 5(12.5) | 5(12.5) | 8(20.0) | 27(67.5) | |
Z(t)值 | 1.93 | 3.17 | |||||||
P值 | 0.054 | 0.002 |
项目 | 较好眼 | 较差眼 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
logMAR | logCS | logMAR | logCS | |||||
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
远视力、移动和光感 | -0.921 | <0.001 | 0.953 | <0.001 | -0.124 | -0.446 | 0.277 | -0.083 |
调节能力 | -0.694 | <0.001 | 0.705 | <0.001 | -0.362 | 0.022 | 0.316 | 0.047 |
阅读精细工作 | -0.901 | <0.001 | 0.915 | <0.001 | -0.236 | -0.142 | 0.317 | 0.046 |
日常生活 | -0.795 | <0.001 | 0.83 | <0.001 | -0.166 | -0.307 | 0.276 | -0.085 |
LVQOL总分 | -0.916 | <0.001 | 0.943 | <0.001 | -0.226 | -0.161 | 0.320 | 0.044 |
Table 2 Correlation of LVQOL with BCVA and CS for myopic macular degeneration patients
项目 | 较好眼 | 较差眼 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
logMAR | logCS | logMAR | logCS | |||||
r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | r值 | P值 | |
远视力、移动和光感 | -0.921 | <0.001 | 0.953 | <0.001 | -0.124 | -0.446 | 0.277 | -0.083 |
调节能力 | -0.694 | <0.001 | 0.705 | <0.001 | -0.362 | 0.022 | 0.316 | 0.047 |
阅读精细工作 | -0.901 | <0.001 | 0.915 | <0.001 | -0.236 | -0.142 | 0.317 | 0.046 |
日常生活 | -0.795 | <0.001 | 0.83 | <0.001 | -0.166 | -0.307 | 0.276 | -0.085 |
LVQOL总分 | -0.916 | <0.001 | 0.943 | <0.001 | -0.226 | -0.161 | 0.320 | 0.044 |
项目 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β(95%CI) | P值 | β(95%CI) | P值 | β(95%CI) | P值 | |
常数 | 90.4(86.3~94.5) | <0.001 | 89.2(84.5~93.9) | <0.001 | 103.9(94.5~113.3) | <0.001 |
较好眼logMAR | -33.4(-38.1~-28.7) | <0.001 | -34.2(-39.1~-29.3) | <0.001 | -52.8(-64.2~-41.4) | <0.001 |
较差眼logMAR | 1.2(-1.3~3.5) | 0.327 | -5.7(-10.0~-1.4) | 0.014 | ||
交互项 | 8.3(3.5~12.9) | <0.001 |
Table 3 Stratified regression model of BCVA in the worse eye and in the better eye on LVQOL
项目 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β(95%CI) | P值 | β(95%CI) | P值 | β(95%CI) | P值 | |
常数 | 90.4(86.3~94.5) | <0.001 | 89.2(84.5~93.9) | <0.001 | 103.9(94.5~113.3) | <0.001 |
较好眼logMAR | -33.4(-38.1~-28.7) | <0.001 | -34.2(-39.1~-29.3) | <0.001 | -52.8(-64.2~-41.4) | <0.001 |
较差眼logMAR | 1.2(-1.3~3.5) | 0.327 | -5.7(-10.0~-1.4) | 0.014 | ||
交互项 | 8.3(3.5~12.9) | <0.001 |
参数 | β | 95%CI | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 | 0 | -0.13~0.14 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.941 |
性别 | 3.93 | 0.91~6.95 | 1.54 | 6.52 | 0.011 |
较好眼logMAR | -9.93 | -18.02~-1.85 | 4.13 | 5.80 | 0.016 |
较好眼logCS | 18.92 | 11.78~26.07 | 3.64 | 26.98 | <0.001 |
较好眼脉络膜厚度 | 0.08 | 0.02~0.14 | 0.03 | 7.40 | 0.007 |
Table 4 Generalized linear model of vision-related quality of LVQOL scores for myopic macular degeneration patients
参数 | β | 95%CI | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 | 0 | -0.13~0.14 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.941 |
性别 | 3.93 | 0.91~6.95 | 1.54 | 6.52 | 0.011 |
较好眼logMAR | -9.93 | -18.02~-1.85 | 4.13 | 5.80 | 0.016 |
较好眼logCS | 18.92 | 11.78~26.07 | 3.64 | 26.98 | <0.001 |
较好眼脉络膜厚度 | 0.08 | 0.02~0.14 | 0.03 | 7.40 | 0.007 |
[1] |
国家重点研发计划2020YFC2008200项目组,中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会眼视光专业委员会. 中国低视力康复临床指南(2021)[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2021,23(3):161-170. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20210221-00068.
|
[2] |
第二次全国残疾人抽样调查领导小组,中华人民共和国国家统计局. 2006年第二次全国残疾人抽样调查主要数据公报[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2006,12(12):1013. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2006.12.001.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
孙晓东,徐娴. 病理性近视眼黄斑新生血管及其相关黄斑萎缩的早期诊断和治疗[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2021,57(6):477-480. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210412-00171.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
张璐,汪灵燕,杨杰,等. 老年白内障患者术前焦虑障碍的影响因素分析及对术后干眼症状和视觉相关生活质量的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2023,23(17):3253-3257,3241. DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2023.17.010.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
邹海东,张皙,许迅,等. 低视力者生活质量量表中文版的研制和信度与效度考评[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2005,41(3):246-251. DOI:10.3760/j:issn:0412-4081.2005.03.013.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
俞素勤,许迅. 中国黄斑病变低视力患者康复训练的专家共识[J]. 中华眼底病杂志,2023,39(5):360-367. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn511434-20230404-00150.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] | |
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[1] | DING Zijun, ZHOU Nannan, LUO Xing, LUO Jieyu, HAO Wenjuan, ZHANG Chunjiang, JIN Xin, ZHAO Dan. Cognitive Impairment in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis and Its Influencing Factors: a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2885-2893. |
[2] | HAO Aihua, ZENG Ziying, JIN Aiqiong, TANG Lingling, ZHENG Zique, MA Jingtai, ZHAO Jianguo, ZENG Weilin, XIAO Jianpeng, NIE Hui, YANG Ying. Analysis of Factors Influencing Avoidable Hospitalization for Elderly Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(19): 2370-2375. |
[3] | JING Tao, DAI Yongmei, LUO Jianying, LUO Wei, JI Yelinfan, PENG Chi, ZHANG Cuijun, CAO Yanjun, ZHENG Qing, HUANG Yu, SHEN Hejun. The Body Mass Index, Dietary Knowledge Acquisition Level, Sedentary Time and Influencing Factors among Chinese High School Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(16): 2025-2032. |
[4] | HUANG Zhijie, MAI Zhihua, WANG Haoxiang, HE Yuming, DENG Qiaoyan, DAI Ranran, ZHOU Zhiheng. Multimorbidity of Hypertension, Diabetes, and Dyslipidemia and Influencing Factors of Family Function among the Elderly [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(16): 2001-2010. |
[5] | ZHAO Can, SHEN Ying, XI Qian, PENG Houxuan, QIN Jinqiong, WANG Xuan, ZHENG Yanping, QIN Li, ZUO Yanli. The Hospitalization Spending and Associated Factors in Inpatients with Multimorbidity in Township Health Centers in Guangxi [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(16): 2039-2049. |
[6] | SHENG Jingyu, LIU Fanfan, MA Mei, TIAN Lin, LIU Yutong, LIU Fengmin, GAO Shan, YU Chunquan. Association between Blood Urea Nitrogen to Serum Albumin Ratio and Carotid Plaque in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(15): 1831-1839. |
[7] | ZHANG Shujing, SUN Lixin, CAO Yuqing. Comparative Study on the Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic between HPV-related and Non-HPV-related Cervical Adenocarcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1758-1764. |
[8] | XIA Yuwen, SHI Huifeng, LI Mengshi, ZHANG Jingxu, WANG Xiaoli. Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Depression of Female Caregivers of Left-behind Children in Rural Area in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1717-1722. |
[9] | XU Jun, GAO Yanan, XU Yaxin, YAO Ting, CHEN Yamei. Latent Profiles Analysis and Its Influencing Factors of Disease Burden in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1744-1750. |
[10] | CHAI Yiyi, YE Qingfang, LIN Ping, LI Ling. Current Status and Influencing Factors of Motoric Cognitive Risk in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease in Frigid Zone [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1730-1736. |
[11] | HE Meiliang, LIU Xiuliang, ZHAO Meigui, GUO Yanfang, XU Ying. The Utilization and Influencing Factors of Community Electronic Health Records [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1628-1634. |
[12] | ZHANG Ying, JIANG Xintong, WANG Pingyu. The Influencing Factors of Depression Symptoms in the Chinese Female Elderly Population Based on Health Ecology Models [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1595-1600. |
[13] | YANG Jianying, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Jiaqi, WU Zihua, HUANG Ziwei, LEI Chunxin, ZHANG Xiya, LUO Jing, TAO Qingwen. The Immune-inflammatory Characteristics of Primary Sjögren's Syndrome with Different Levels of Rheumatoid Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1446-1452. |
[14] | LIU Feiran, CHEN Minghuang, ZHAO Shuaihong, BAI Wenpei. Application of Random Forest Algorithm in Pregnancy Prediction after Fallopian Tube Recanalization [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1361-1366. |
[15] | WEI Xuan, WANG Ning, WEI Ying, CHEN Qilin, ZHAO Yang. Analysis of Depression Status and Influencing Factors in Middle-aged and Elderly Patients with Chronic Diseases in China: an Empirical Analysis Based on CHARLS Data [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1303-1308. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||