
Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (06): 692-698.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0650
Special Issue: 儿科最新文章合辑; 精神卫生最新文章合辑; 心理健康最新文章合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2022-07-26
Revised:2022-10-17
Published:2023-02-20
Online:2022-11-04
Contact:
PENG Juan
About author:
通讯作者:
彭娟
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0650
| 阶段 | EMDR详细信息 |
|---|---|
| 1.病史检验和拟定治疗计划 | 包括谈论治疗的基本原理和来访者遭受困扰的具体表述 |
| 2.准备 | 为目标创伤记忆的再处理做准备,并为来访者提供在创伤再处理期间更好地自我调节的策略 |
| 3.评估 | 识别特定的目标记忆/图像、相关的负性认知、令人不安的情绪和躯体感觉,更为重要的是识别出比负性认知更可取的积极认知 |
| 4.脱敏和再加工 | 涉及重复实用双侧刺激,例如跟踪移动的物体,要求患者同时关注目标记忆/图像、负面认知和令人不安的情绪或身体感觉,直到来访者觉得与这些不愉快经历相关的痛苦得到显著缓解 |
| 5.安装 | 鼓励来访者将创伤记忆与先前确定的积极认知或新的更具适应性的积极认知联系起来 |
| 6.身体扫描 | 旨在针对与创伤记忆相关的任何残留的躯体不适或紧张 |
| 7.关闭 | 通常涉及在治疗结束前使用痛苦管理和容忍的策略 |
| 8.反馈和再评估 | 来访者和治疗师重新评估之前的目标,以评估在进一步进行干预之前是否需要额外的工作 |
Table 1 A standard EMDR treatment plan
| 阶段 | EMDR详细信息 |
|---|---|
| 1.病史检验和拟定治疗计划 | 包括谈论治疗的基本原理和来访者遭受困扰的具体表述 |
| 2.准备 | 为目标创伤记忆的再处理做准备,并为来访者提供在创伤再处理期间更好地自我调节的策略 |
| 3.评估 | 识别特定的目标记忆/图像、相关的负性认知、令人不安的情绪和躯体感觉,更为重要的是识别出比负性认知更可取的积极认知 |
| 4.脱敏和再加工 | 涉及重复实用双侧刺激,例如跟踪移动的物体,要求患者同时关注目标记忆/图像、负面认知和令人不安的情绪或身体感觉,直到来访者觉得与这些不愉快经历相关的痛苦得到显著缓解 |
| 5.安装 | 鼓励来访者将创伤记忆与先前确定的积极认知或新的更具适应性的积极认知联系起来 |
| 6.身体扫描 | 旨在针对与创伤记忆相关的任何残留的躯体不适或紧张 |
| 7.关闭 | 通常涉及在治疗结束前使用痛苦管理和容忍的策略 |
| 8.反馈和再评估 | 来访者和治疗师重新评估之前的目标,以评估在进一步进行干预之前是否需要额外的工作 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别(例) | 年龄( | 民族(例) | 受教育程度(例) | 户口类别(例) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | 汉族 | 少数民族 | 初中及以下 | 高中或中专 | 城镇 | 农村 | |||
| 舍曲林治疗组 | 28 | 8 | 20 | 15.6±1.6 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 19 | 9 |
| EMDR治疗组 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 15.6±1.6 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 10 |
| χ2(t)值 | 0.01 | 0.04a | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.15 | |||||
| P值 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.70 | |||||
| 组别 | 家庭氛围(例) | 是否为单亲家庭(例) | 遭受创伤经历的年龄(例) | |||||||
| 和睦 | 偶有矛盾 | 常有矛盾 | 矛盾突出 | 否 | 是 | 0~6岁 | 7~12岁 | 13~18岁 | ||
| 舍曲林治疗组 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 19 | 8 | |
| EMDR治疗组 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 13 | 11 | |
| χ2(t)值 | 3.88 | 0.18 | 2.64 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.27 | |||||||
Table 2 Comparison of general demographic characteristics between two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别(例) | 年龄( | 民族(例) | 受教育程度(例) | 户口类别(例) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | 汉族 | 少数民族 | 初中及以下 | 高中或中专 | 城镇 | 农村 | |||
| 舍曲林治疗组 | 28 | 8 | 20 | 15.6±1.6 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 19 | 9 |
| EMDR治疗组 | 27 | 8 | 19 | 15.6±1.6 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 10 |
| χ2(t)值 | 0.01 | 0.04a | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.15 | |||||
| P值 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.70 | |||||
| 组别 | 家庭氛围(例) | 是否为单亲家庭(例) | 遭受创伤经历的年龄(例) | |||||||
| 和睦 | 偶有矛盾 | 常有矛盾 | 矛盾突出 | 否 | 是 | 0~6岁 | 7~12岁 | 13~18岁 | ||
| 舍曲林治疗组 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 19 | 8 | |
| EMDR治疗组 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 13 | 11 | |
| χ2(t)值 | 3.88 | 0.18 | 2.64 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.27 | |||||||
| 组别 | 例数 | BDI评分 | BAI评分 | CD-RISC评分 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗8周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗8周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗8周后 | ||
| 舍曲林治疗组 | 28 | 34.8±11.7 | 30.1±10.7b | 25.1±10.6bc | 32.6±14.7 | 30.2±11.0 | 25.6±11.0b | 29.7±14.8 | 29.5±13.8 | 33.2±12.5 |
| EMDR治疗组 | 27 | 35.9±10.9 | 27.3±9.4b | 18.4±8.6abc | 32.9±12.2 | 26.3±9.4b | 15.4±7.0abc | 25.5±10.4 | 47.0±7.9ab | 57.4±12.2abc |
| F值 | F时间=172.14,F组间=1.64,F交互=14.03 | F时间=30.87,F组间=4.30,F交互=5.31 | F时间=31.26,F组间=28.04,F交互=19.61 | |||||||
| P值 | P时间<0.01,P组间=0.21,P交互<0.01 | P时间<0.01,P组间=0.04,P交互=0.01 | P时间<0.01,P组间<0.01,P交互<0.01 | |||||||
Table 3 Comparison of BDI,BAI and CD-RISC scores before treatment and after four and eight weeks of treatment between two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | BDI评分 | BAI评分 | CD-RISC评分 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗8周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗8周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗8周后 | ||
| 舍曲林治疗组 | 28 | 34.8±11.7 | 30.1±10.7b | 25.1±10.6bc | 32.6±14.7 | 30.2±11.0 | 25.6±11.0b | 29.7±14.8 | 29.5±13.8 | 33.2±12.5 |
| EMDR治疗组 | 27 | 35.9±10.9 | 27.3±9.4b | 18.4±8.6abc | 32.9±12.2 | 26.3±9.4b | 15.4±7.0abc | 25.5±10.4 | 47.0±7.9ab | 57.4±12.2abc |
| F值 | F时间=172.14,F组间=1.64,F交互=14.03 | F时间=30.87,F组间=4.30,F交互=5.31 | F时间=31.26,F组间=28.04,F交互=19.61 | |||||||
| P值 | P时间<0.01,P组间=0.21,P交互<0.01 | P时间<0.01,P组间=0.04,P交互=0.01 | P时间<0.01,P组间<0.01,P交互<0.01 | |||||||
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
陈沼桦,沈思彤,谢菲,等. 童年创伤对成年早期抑郁的影响及中介机制:4年追踪研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2021,43(6):567-574. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.202011219.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
郭伟龙,柳进,李凌江. 伴童年创伤抑郁症:临床特点、生物学机制、治疗启示[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版),2020,45(4):462-468. DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2020.190699.
|
| [6] |
李泽钧,刘守桓,石雪雯,等. 儿童青少年抑郁症诊断与治疗进展[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020,35(14):2732-2734. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.14.061.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
杨文辉,刘绍亮,周烃,等. 贝克抑郁量表第2版中文版在青少年中的信效度[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(2):240-245. DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.02.018.
|
| [16] |
郑健荣,黄炽荣,黄洁晶,等. 贝克焦虑量表的心理测量学特性、常模分数及因子结构的研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(1):4-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2002.01.002.
|
| [17] |
于肖楠,张建新. 自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较[J]. 心理科学,2007,30(5):1169-1171. DOI:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2007.05.035.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [1] | LI Feng, HU Changhao, LUO Xu. Progress in the Study of Influencing Factors and Intervention Strategies of Mental Health in Elderly Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2816-2828. |
| [2] | YAN Wen, ZHANG Hanzhi, JIN Hua, QIAN Jie, YU Dehua. Study on the Diagnosis and Treatment Capacity for Depressive Disorders in Community Health Service Institutions in Shanghai [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2790-2799. |
| [3] | NIE Jiahui, LI Guojuan, HAO Zhuoqun, DU Qiaorong, LIU Penghong, LIU Zhifen, LIU Sha, ZHANG Aixia, WANG Yanfang. Heterogeneity and Influencing Factors of Cognitive Function Impairment in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2340-2346. |
| [4] | YU Chao, SONG Lihua, WANG Linyan, LU Yunping, WANG Linyang, CUI Wei. The Functional Outcomes and Influencing Factors in Patients with First-episode Major Depressive Disorder after 7 Years [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2221-2226. |
| [5] | WANG Rui, LUO Dan, YANG Cuicui, WENG Xinyi, WANG Yubing, XU Jingjing. Complex Network Analysis of Resilience in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Based on Multi-sourced Stigma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2264-2272. |
| [6] | YAO Dingye, LUO Guiping, SUN Junsheng, LI Hui. Research Progress on Identifying Bipolar Ⅱ Disorder and Depressive Disorder in Primary Care [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2092-2099. |
| [7] | YAN Beibei, XU Huaifu. Children's Type 1 Diabetes-specific Self-reported Outcomes Scales: Measurement Properties Evaluation Based on COSMIN Guidelines [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1624-1632. |
| [8] | LI Li, XU Tianchao, DONG Xiaomei, HUANG Hongfei, CUI Gang, LI Dongdong, ZHANG Ou, FAN Lin, WANG Qi. The Effect of Kidney Tonifying and Brain Strengthening Acupuncture Combined with Sertraline in the Treatment of Elderly Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1399-1404. |
| [9] | FENG Zhanpeng, TAN Sijie, GUO Zhen, CAO Liquan. Study on the Isochronous Substitution Effect of 24-hour Activity Behaviors on Metabolic Syndrome in Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 325-330. |
| [10] | CHEN Zhixin, ZHANG Li, GUO Xinyue, ZHOU Zhongliang, ZHANG Jianduan, XU Jinhang, RONG Shengzhong, ZHAO Li, TIAN Qiyue, WANG Sufang, TIAN Xiangyang, GONG Shaoqing. Study on Dietary Factors Associated with Obesity Among University Freshmen [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 361-372. |
| [11] | XIANG Fengling, WANG Yuankun, WANG Xiaoyan, HE Shengjie, GAN Jinhua. The Prevalence of Hyperuricemia among Children and Adolescents in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4206-4213. |
| [12] | HUANG Lili, JIANG Yan, TANG Min, ZHANG Jialei, HE Jiabei, ZHUANG Jianlin. A Study on the Influence of Health Education Based on the Know-Belief-Act Model and Self-efficacy Theory on the Consumption of Sugary Drinks among Grade 4 Elementary School Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(28): 3558-3565. |
| [13] | QUAN Jialin, ZHU Lin, SU Yu, CHEN Zekai, CHEN Ziqi, ZHANG Zhuofan. Research on the Improvement Effect of Exercise Modes on the Executive Function of Overweight or Obese Children or Adolescents: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3422-3431. |
| [14] | XIAO Caihong, CUI Jin, QUAN Fei, YAN Mingxi, LU Chunxia, CHEN Yinglong. Clinical Efficacy Study on the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction with Miao Medicine Bamboo-based Medicinal Moxibustion Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3300-3306. |
| [15] | GU Xiaolin, CHEN Junyu, CHEN Dan, HAN Guangli, CHEN Yidi, LI Chunhong, LUO Xiaoxi. Emotional Experience of Pregnant Women in Rural China: a Qualitative Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3283-3288. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||