Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (27): 3450-3455.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0804
Special Issue: 中医最新文章合集
• Combination of Medicine and Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-07-28
Revised:
2023-01-15
Published:
2023-09-20
Online:
2022-12-02
Contact:
SHANG Qiangqiang
通讯作者:
商强强
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0804
项目 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
VAS | 7.40±1.25 | 2.30±1.09 | 17.559 | <0.001 |
JOA | 11.68±2.52 | 24.55±2.71 | -20.754 | <0.001 |
ODI | 53.78±6.33 | 17.77±7.69 | 24.548 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of JOA,ODI and VAS scores before and after treatment
项目 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
VAS | 7.40±1.25 | 2.30±1.09 | 17.559 | <0.001 |
JOA | 11.68±2.52 | 24.55±2.71 | -20.754 | <0.001 |
ODI | 53.78±6.33 | 17.77±7.69 | 24.548 | <0.001 |
项目 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
步频(步/min) | 103.31±9.33 | 107.54±7.08 | -4.672 | <0.001 |
步速(m/s) | 0.96±0.19 | 1.03±0.14 | -3.019 | 0.004 |
步幅(m) | 1.05±0.14 | 1.15±0.14 | -6.966 | <0.001 |
步行周期(s) | 1.13±0.11 | 1.19±0.12 | -4.099 | <0.001 |
支撑相占比(%) | 62.17±2.29 | 61.14±3.56 | -2.226 | 0.032 |
摆动相占比(%) | 37.83±2.29 | 38.86±3.56 | 2.226 | 0.032 |
胫骨冲击力(g) | 2.88±0.28 | 2.98±0.28 | -2.760 | 0.010 |
足底冲击力(g) | 3.16±0.16 | 3.23±0.18 | -3.025 | 0.005 |
Table 2 Comparison of spatio-temporal gait parameters before and after treatment
项目 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
步频(步/min) | 103.31±9.33 | 107.54±7.08 | -4.672 | <0.001 |
步速(m/s) | 0.96±0.19 | 1.03±0.14 | -3.019 | 0.004 |
步幅(m) | 1.05±0.14 | 1.15±0.14 | -6.966 | <0.001 |
步行周期(s) | 1.13±0.11 | 1.19±0.12 | -4.099 | <0.001 |
支撑相占比(%) | 62.17±2.29 | 61.14±3.56 | -2.226 | 0.032 |
摆动相占比(%) | 37.83±2.29 | 38.86±3.56 | 2.226 | 0.032 |
胫骨冲击力(g) | 2.88±0.28 | 2.98±0.28 | -2.760 | 0.010 |
足底冲击力(g) | 3.16±0.16 | 3.23±0.18 | -3.025 | 0.005 |
项目 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
骨盆侧倾 | 2.89°±1.22° | 3.00°±1.17° | -0.993 | 0.329 |
骨盆侧斜 | 3.83°±1.73° | 3.60°±1.26° | 0.765 | 0.450 |
骨盆旋转 | 5.58°±2.64° | 5.78°±2.89° | -0.445 | 0.660 |
髋关节内收外展 | 9.60°±2.77° | 7.87°±2.64° | 3.210 | 0.003 |
髋关节屈伸 | 29.83°±6.31° | 28.43°±4.49° | 1.553 | 0.131 |
髋关节旋转 | 11.15°±4.09° | 8.70°±3.95° | 2.864 | 0.007 |
膝关节内外翻 | 9.82°±3.68° | 7.63°±3.41° | 3.283 | 0.003 |
膝关节屈伸 | 44.24°±4.51° | 45.28°±7.90° | -0.733 | 0.469 |
膝关节旋转 | 12.56°±4.43° | 9.78°±3.55° | 3.969 | <0.001 |
踝关节内外翻 | 12.73°±4.14° | 11.73°±3.40° | 1.291 | 0.206 |
踝关节屈伸 | 19.60°±4.38° | 19.10°±4.71° | 0.724 | 0.475 |
踝关节旋转 | 11.33°±3.86° | 9.86°±3.11° | 3.025 | 0.005 |
Table 3 Comparison of range of motion of different joints before and after treatment
项目 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
骨盆侧倾 | 2.89°±1.22° | 3.00°±1.17° | -0.993 | 0.329 |
骨盆侧斜 | 3.83°±1.73° | 3.60°±1.26° | 0.765 | 0.450 |
骨盆旋转 | 5.58°±2.64° | 5.78°±2.89° | -0.445 | 0.660 |
髋关节内收外展 | 9.60°±2.77° | 7.87°±2.64° | 3.210 | 0.003 |
髋关节屈伸 | 29.83°±6.31° | 28.43°±4.49° | 1.553 | 0.131 |
髋关节旋转 | 11.15°±4.09° | 8.70°±3.95° | 2.864 | 0.007 |
膝关节内外翻 | 9.82°±3.68° | 7.63°±3.41° | 3.283 | 0.003 |
膝关节屈伸 | 44.24°±4.51° | 45.28°±7.90° | -0.733 | 0.469 |
膝关节旋转 | 12.56°±4.43° | 9.78°±3.55° | 3.969 | <0.001 |
踝关节内外翻 | 12.73°±4.14° | 11.73°±3.40° | 1.291 | 0.206 |
踝关节屈伸 | 19.60°±4.38° | 19.10°±4.71° | 0.724 | 0.475 |
踝关节旋转 | 11.33°±3.86° | 9.86°±3.11° | 3.025 | 0.005 |
项目 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
骨盆侧倾指数 | 84.75±17.11 | 93.22±7.29 | -4.256 | <0.001 |
骨盆侧斜指数 | 69.31±19.15 | 87.05±9.58 | -6.340 | <0.001 |
骨盆旋转指数 | 89.86±14.01 | 92.73±10.08 | -1.130 | 0.265 |
髋关节内收外展指数 | 87.16±12.74 | 92.95±5.69 | -3.355 | 0.002 |
髋关节屈伸指数 | 97.38±3.29 | 98.49±1.70 | -2.643 | 0.012 |
髋关节旋转指数 | 72.47±18.25 | 84.52±11.92 | -5.060 | <0.001 |
膝关节屈伸指数 | 97.84±3.94 | 98.27±2.40 | -0.705 | 0.485 |
膝关节旋转指数 | 62.58±24.37 | 80.15±17.39 | -4.885 | <0.001 |
踝关节内外翻指数 | 79.55±21.80 | 91.27±9.34 | -4.143 | <0.001 |
踝关节屈伸指数 | 92.65±7.26 | 95.65±2.84 | -2.717 | 0.010 |
踝关节旋转指数 | 80.07±16.36 | 86.88±13.24 | -3.218 | 0.003 |
Table 4 Comparison of different symmetry indices of joint angles before and after treatment
项目 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
骨盆侧倾指数 | 84.75±17.11 | 93.22±7.29 | -4.256 | <0.001 |
骨盆侧斜指数 | 69.31±19.15 | 87.05±9.58 | -6.340 | <0.001 |
骨盆旋转指数 | 89.86±14.01 | 92.73±10.08 | -1.130 | 0.265 |
髋关节内收外展指数 | 87.16±12.74 | 92.95±5.69 | -3.355 | 0.002 |
髋关节屈伸指数 | 97.38±3.29 | 98.49±1.70 | -2.643 | 0.012 |
髋关节旋转指数 | 72.47±18.25 | 84.52±11.92 | -5.060 | <0.001 |
膝关节屈伸指数 | 97.84±3.94 | 98.27±2.40 | -0.705 | 0.485 |
膝关节旋转指数 | 62.58±24.37 | 80.15±17.39 | -4.885 | <0.001 |
踝关节内外翻指数 | 79.55±21.80 | 91.27±9.34 | -4.143 | <0.001 |
踝关节屈伸指数 | 92.65±7.26 | 95.65±2.84 | -2.717 | 0.010 |
踝关节旋转指数 | 80.07±16.36 | 86.88±13.24 | -3.218 | 0.003 |
[1] |
中华医学会骨科学分会脊柱外科学组,中华医学会骨科学分会骨科康复学组. 腰椎间盘突出症诊疗指南[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2020,40(8):477-487. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20200402-00213.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
喻加东,陈家平,马翔,等.中医综合疗法对肾虚血瘀型腰椎间盘突出症患者疗效及血清PGE2、5-HT、SOD水平的影响[J]. 广州中医药大学学报,2022,39(4):787-793. DOI:10.13359/j.cnki.gzxbtcm.2022.04.010.
|
[5] |
江振家. 正骨推拿结合温经通督针刺疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察[J]. 中国全科医学,2017,20(s1):231-233.
|
[6] |
陈祖平,董森,李辉,等.中医外治综合疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症1200例疗效观察[J]. 中医杂志,2015,56(13):1128-1130. DOI:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2015.13.014.
|
[7] | |
[8] |
|
[9] |
国家中医药管理局. 中医病证诊断疗效标准[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社,2012:201-202.
|
[10] |
孙传兴. 临床疾病诊断依据治愈好转标准[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社,2006.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global,regional,and national incidence,prevalence,and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories,1990-2017:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet,2018,392(10159):1789-1858. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
陈祖平,董森,李辉,等.中医外治综合疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症1200例疗效观察[J]. 中医杂志,2015,56(13):1128-1130. DOI:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2015.13.014.
|
[18] |
徐清平,宋登峰,朱晓峰,等.中药内服联合中医手法、针灸治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2018,36(3):765-768. DOI:10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2018.03.066.
|
[19] |
周谋望,岳寿伟,何成奇,等. "腰椎间盘突出症的康复治疗"中国专家共识[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2017,32(2):129-135. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2017.02.001.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
陶帅,韩星,孔丽文,等.基于步态的机器学习模型识别遗忘型轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病[J]. 中国全科医学,2022,25(31):3857-3865. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0437.
|
[23] |
岳友,吴海贺,齐岩松,等.不同步态分析系统在骨性关节炎中的应用进展[J]. 科技导报,2021,39(22):35-42.
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[1] | YAO Yuzhong, MA Xiaojun, SONG Huan, ZHONG Yu. The Management Effect of Diabetes "1358 model" on Community Diabetes Patients Based on "Precision Management Combining General Care and Specialty Care" [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4308-4314. |
[2] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yunshu, YAN Baoping, WANG Jian, MA Yanjuan, WANG Yuan, QIN Yingjie, NA Long, REN Zhiyong, SUN Junwei, DENG Huaili, MA Hongjun, QU Xuehui, ZHOU Nan, SI Tianmei. Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone Microspheres for Injection (Ⅱ) in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4007-4012. |
[3] | LIU Minghao, WANG Pan, GAO Lijian, XU Shuqing, WANG Huanhuan, ZHAO Guangxian, CHEN Jue, QIAO Shubin, XU Bo, YUAN Jinqing. Feasibility, Safety and Timing of Secondary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Artery Approach [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3366-3372. |
[4] | LU Bin, XIANG Chong, YUAN Xuesong, CAI Gaojun, WEI Wenfeng, YAN Yongmin. Effectiveness, Safety and Satisfaction of Distal Transradial Artery Approach in Cerebral Angiography [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3378-3382. |
[5] | BAO Yiru, BAO Shouqian, ZHANG Zhaohui, ZHANG Yinchuan. Tetanus with Low back and Knee Pain, Abdominal Distension and Constipation as Initial Presentations: Report of a Deaf and Mute Case and Literature Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 3074-3078. |
[6] | GUO Daiyao, PU Chuan, PENG Yang, QIU Lan, HU Xinyu. Utilization of Traditional Chinese Medicine Community Services and Influencing Factors by Residents in the Main Urban Areas of Chongqing [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(19): 2369-2375. |
[7] | GAO Yang, WANG Yunxia, GAO Chuanyu. Familial Hypercholesterolemia in 45-year-old and Younger Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Blood Lipid Control Effect [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2232-2237. |
[8] | YAN Hao, CHEN Sisi, NIE Hanlin, HUANG Zhengwei, HU Hanxu, ZHAO Weihan, YANG Yong, SHI Xuefeng. Preferences for the Use of Appropriate TCM Techniques among Primary Health Workers: a Discrete-choice Experiment-based Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(16): 1958-1964. |
[9] | YANG Bei, HAN Lin, WANG Yin, CHENG Kangyao. Effectiveness of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Injection in Type 2 Diabetes in Older Adults: a Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(15): 1892-1901. |
[10] | LIU Chuanfen, LI Zheng, WU Manyan, CUI Yuxia, SONG Jing, ZHANG Chunying, CHEN Hong. Analysis of Serum Lipid Level and Drug Use in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1325-1329. |
[11] | LIU Lanping, YANG Yue, HUANG Man, MA Xiaojing, YE Yongming, LIU Xiaoxu, LIN Huize, ZHU Kexin, GUO Shengnan, FEI Yutong, YANG Tao, YU Jinna. Identification of Clinical Questions for the Development of Clinical Practice Guideline on Acupuncture and Moxibustion for Nonspecific Low Back Pain Using the Modified Delphi Method [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1037-1043. |
[12] | LIN Huize, YAN Wenxi, ZHANG Pingping, FEI Jingwen, SHEN Jianghong, LIU Lanping, WANG Xiang, ZHU Kexin, YANG Tao, YU Jinna. Outcome Measures Used in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1053-1063. |
[13] | FEI Jingwen, LIN Huize, ZHANG Pingping, LIU Lanping, WANG Xiang, SHEN Jianghong, ZHU Kexin, YANG Tao, YU Jinna. Motion Style Acupuncture Can Effectively Improve the Effectiveness of Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1044-1052. |
[14] | GUAN Ningxiao, YAO Zhuoya, LI Ye, LIU Ziwei, LIU Fangli. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques Can Effectively Relieve Post-stroke Fatigue: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(08): 1008-1014. |
[15] | Nephrology Branch of China Association of Chinese Medicine, Nephrology Committee of Guangdong Provincial Association of Chinese Medicine, YANG Lihong, SU Peiling, BAO Kun. Clinical Practice Guideline for Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (2021) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(06): 647-659. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||