中国全科医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (32): 4786-4797.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0575

所属专题: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑; 社区卫生服务最新研究合辑

• 论著·慢性病共病专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

45岁及以上中老年糖尿病共病的治疗负担:基于6所基层医院患者的横断面调查

汤皓晴1,2, 李明月1,2, 龙仁1,2, 朱胤博3, 梁伟欢4, 朱萍5, 赵炜6, 赵洋7,8,*(), 刘晓云2,9,10,11,*()   

  1. 1.100191 北京市,北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系
    2.100191 北京市,北京大学中国卫生发展研究中心
    3.410000 山东省烟台市莱山区黄海路街道社区卫生服务中心
    4.530029 广西壮族自治区南宁市青秀区桂雅社区卫生服务中心
    5.350004 福建省福州市台江区上海街道社区卫生服务中心
    6.350108 福建省福州市闽侯县上街中心卫生院
    7.169857 新加坡国立大学杜克-新国立医学院
    8.2050澳大利亚,新南威尔士大学乔治全球健康研究院
    9.100191 北京市,北京大学首都卫生与健康发展研究院
    10.100191 北京市,国家卫生健康委卫生体系改革与治理重点实验室
    11.100191 北京市,世界卫生组织全民健康覆盖合作中心
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-11 修回日期:2026-05-29 出版日期:2026-11-15 发布日期:2026-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 赵洋, 刘晓云

  • 作者贡献:

    汤皓晴、赵洋、刘晓云负责文章的构思与设计;汤皓晴负责数据处理与分析及撰写论文并对文章负责;汤皓晴、龙仁、朱胤博、梁伟欢、朱萍、赵炜、赵洋负责数据收集与管理;李明月、赵洋、刘晓云负责文章指导、质量控制与审校。

  • 基金资助:
    乔治-港中文联合研究基金项目(JCRF2023P01260)

Management Burden of Diabetic Mellitus Patients with Multimorbidity among Middle Aged and Older Adults: a Cross-sectional Survey in 6 Community Medical Institutes of China

TANG Haoqing1,2, LI Mingyue1,2, LONG Ren1,2, ZHU Yinbo3, LIANG Weihuan4, ZHU Ping5, ZHAO Wei6, ZHAO Yang7,8,*(), LIU Xiaoyun2,9,10,11,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
    2. China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
    3. Huanghai Road Subdistrict Community Health Service Center, Laishan District, Yantai 410000, China
    4. Guiya Community Health Service Center, Qingxiu District, Nanning 530029, China
    5. Shanghai Subdistrict Community Health Service Center, Taijiang District, Fuzhou 350004, China
    6. Shangjie Central Health Center, Minhou County, Fuzhou 350108, China
    7. Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 169857, Singapore
    8. The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2050, Australia
    9. Beijing Institute for Health Development, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
    10. National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health System Reform and Governance (Peking University), Beijing 100191, China
    11. WHO Collaborating Centre for Universal Health Coverage, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2026-01-11 Revised:2026-05-29 Published:2026-11-15 Online:2026-10-10
  • Contact: ZHAO Yang, LIU Xiaoyun

摘要: 背景 随着糖尿病共病日益普遍,患者治疗与自我管理负担不断增加,但我国基层卫生服务情境下相关负担模式及高风险人群特征尚缺少量化证据。 目的 基于患者体验视角,测量基层卫生服务情境下中老年糖尿病共病患者的治疗负担水平,识别其潜在亚型结构,并分析不同负担亚型的人群特征,为基层精准识别高负担患者提供依据。 方法 基于"中国慢性病共病负担与基本卫生保健研究(MBPC)"数据,2023年8—12月在山东省、福建省、广西壮族自治区6所基层医疗卫生机构开展横断面调查。纳入年龄≥45岁且合并≥1种慢性病的糖尿病患者248例。采用中文版患者治疗与自我管理体验量表(PETS 2.0量表)评估14个维度的治疗负担。通过潜在剖面分析(LPA)识别负担亚型,并采用多分类Logistic回归分析不同亚型的相关因素。 结果 糖尿病共病患者的平均年龄为(69.6±10.1)岁,共病数≥3种者占61.3%(152/248)。总体治疗负担较高,主要集中在饮食控制(45.9分)、运动或物理治疗(42.5分)、医疗服务获取(42.4分)、医疗与健康保健费用(37.8分)及医疗信息获取(31.5分)等方面。LPA识别出3类负担亚型:低整体负担型(53例,21.37%)、均衡中等负担型(170例,68.55%),多维高负担型(25例,10.08%)。与均衡中等负担型和低整体负担型相比,多维高负担型患者"专科门诊难以预约""难以预约合适就诊时间""就诊等待时间过长""难以负担医疗相关费用"及"理解药物信息困难"等问题比例均更高(P<0.05)。多分类Logistic回归结果显示,年龄增加与进入多维高负担型风险升高相关(RRR=1.098,P=0.008),而较高教育水平(RRR=0.159,P=0.008)及较高收入水平(RRR=0.231,P=0.034)与较低风险相关。 结论 中老年糖尿病共病患者的治疗负担呈现明显分层结构,主要由信息处理、就诊协调及费用管理等系统性管理负担所驱动。高龄、受教育程度低及低收入人群更易进入多维高负担状态。基层慢性病管理应在常规疾病控制基础上,加强对高负担风险患者的识别,并围绕信息支持、流程简化及连续照护开展针对性干预。

关键词: 糖尿病, 慢性病共病, 治疗负担, 中老年, 初级卫生保健

Abstract:

Background

As diabetes-related multimorbidity becomes increasingly prevalent, patients face growing demands associated with treatment and self-management. However, quantitative evidence on burden patterns and high-risk population characteristics in primary health care settings in China remains limited.

Objective

To assess management burden among middle-aged and older adults with diabetes and multimorbidity in primary health care settings from a patient-experience perspective, to identify latent burden subtypes, and to examine the sociodemographic characteristics associated with different burden profiles, thereby informing targeted identification of high-burden patients in primary care.

Methods

Data were drawn from the Multimorbidity Burden and Primary Health Care Research in China (MBPC) project. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between August and December 2023 in six primary health care institutions across three provinces in China (Shandong, Fujian, and Guangxi). A total of 248 patients aged ≥45 years with diabetes and at least one additional chronic condition were included. Management burden was assessed using the Chinese version of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS 2.0), covering 14 dimensions. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was applied to identify burden subtypes, and multinomial Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with different subtypes.

Results

The mean age of participants was (69.6±10.1) years, and 61.3% (152/248) had three or more comorbid conditions. Overall management burden was substantial, with the highest scores observed in dietary management (45.9), exercise or physical therapy (42.5), access to health care services (42.4), medical and health care costs (37.8), and access to medical information (31.5). LPA identified three distinct burden subtypes: low overall burden (53, 21.37%), balanced moderate burden (170, 68.55%), and multidimensional high burden (25, 10.08%). Compared with patients in the balanced moderate-burden and low-burden groups, those in the multidimensional high-burden group were more likely to report difficulties in scheduling specialist appointments, arranging suitable appointment times, coping with long waiting times for consultations, affording medical-related expenses, and understanding medication-related information (all P<0.05). Multinomial Logistic regression showed that increasing age was associated with a higher likelihood of belonging to the high-burden group (RRR=1.098, P=0.008), whereas higher educational attainment (RRR=0.159, P=0.008) and higher income level (RRR=0.231, P=0.034) were associated with a lower likelihood.

Conclusion

Management burden among middle-aged and older adults with diabetes and multimorbidity exhibits a clear stratified structure and is primarily driven by system-related management demands, including information processing, care coordination, and financial management. Older adults and individuals with lower education and income are more likely to experience multidimensional high burden. Primary care management should move beyond routine disease control to prioritize the identification of high-burden patients and implement targeted interventions focusing on information support, process simplification, and continuity of care.

Key words: Diabetes mellitus, Multimorbidity, Management burden, Middle-aged and elderly, Primary health care