中国全科医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (34): 4252-4258.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0705

• 全科科研生产力研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

2001—2020年中国全科医学与社区卫生研究能力发展状况与策略

付强强1,2, 金花1,2,3, 于德华1,2,3,*()   

  1. 1.200090 上海市,同济大学附属杨浦医院全科医学科
    2.200090 上海市全科医学与社区卫生发展研究中心
    3.200090 上海市,同济大学医学院全科医学系
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-30 修回日期:2022-09-22 出版日期:2022-12-05 发布日期:2022-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 于德华
  • 付强强,金花,于德华. 2001—2020年中国全科医学与社区卫生研究能力发展状况与策略[J].中国全科医学,2022,25(34):4252-4258.[www.chinagp.net]
    作者贡献:
    付强强、金花负责文献/资料的收集与整理;付强强撰写论文,对数据进行统计分析;金花参与论文的撰写与修订;于德华负责文章的构思与设计、质量控制与审校,对文章整体负责。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72104183); 上海市领军人才(YDH-20170627); 上海市医药卫生发展基金会课题(Se1202137); 第十批上海市杨浦区中心医院学科带头人"攀登计划"(Ye2202103)

Development Status and Strategy of Research Capability of General Practice and Community Health in China: Based on the Data of Chinese Journals in General Practice from 2001 to 2020

FU Qiangqiang1,2, JIN Hua1,2,3, YU Dehua1,2,3,*()   

  1. 1.Department of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200090, China
    2.Shanghai General Practice and Community Health Development Research Center, Shanghai 200090, China
    3.Academic Department of General Practice, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200090, China
  • Received:2022-08-30 Revised:2022-09-22 Published:2022-12-05 Online:2022-09-29
  • Contact: YU Dehua
  • About author:
    FU Q Q, JIN H, YU D H. Development status and strategy of research capability of general practice and community health in China: based on the data of Chinese journals in general practice from 2001 to 2020[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25 (34) : 4252-4258.

摘要: 背景 科学研究是学科建设的重要内容和学科发展的动力,然而目前缺乏对我国全科医学与社区卫生领域研究能力、研究质量的系统性分析。 目的 了解2001—2020年中国全科医学与社区卫生领域的研究能力发展现况,分析存在的问题,为进一步提升我国全科医学与社区卫生领域的研究能力提供依据。 方法 于2021年12月,在中国知网检索2001—2020年《中国全科医学》《中华全科医师杂志》《中华全科医学》《中国初级卫生保健》刊发的学术论文。将2001—2020年按每5年划分为4个时间段,采用VOSviewer 1.6.17软件,对纳入文献第一作者所在机构的区域分布、机构类型分布、研究者合作网络、研究类型分布进行文献计量学分析。 结果 最终纳入文献54 726篇。华东地区研究机构的发文量最多(24 015篇,43.88%),其次为华北地区(11 288篇,20.63%)、华南地区(5 437篇,9.93%)。社区卫生服务中心的发文量总体呈上升趋势,由2001年的15篇(占当年总发文量的1.31%)上升至2020年的203篇(占当年总发文量的9.38%)。对研究者的共现分析共出现8个合作网络,包括复旦大学附属中山医院全科医学科、《中国全科医学》杂志、首都医科大学等研究团队。关于研究类型,理论类研究的占比从2001年的28.68%(329/1 147)下降至2020年的17.93%(388/2 164);干预类研究的占比从2001年的10.11%(116/1 147)逐渐增多至2020年的17.28%(374/2 164),但其在整体研究中的占比仍较低;观察类研究的占比最高,2020年达64.79%(1 402/2 164)。 结论 2001—2020年我国全科医学与社区卫生领域研究呈快速发展趋势,但存在研究能力发展不均衡、研究团队合作与交流不足、研究方法创新性不够等问题。建议加强国内科学研究合作网络建设,注重提升研究质量。

关键词: 全科医学, 社区卫生服务, 科学研究, 研究者, 研究机构, 研究能力, 文献计量学

Abstract:

Background

Scientific research is an important part of discipline construction and a driving force of discipline development. However, there is a lack of systematic analysis of research capacity and quality in the field of general practice and community health in China.

Objective

To understand the current situation of China's general practice research capabilities, analyze the existing problems and provide a basis for further improving the research capabilities in the field of general practice and community health in China.

Methods

In December 2021, academic papers published from 2001 to 2020 in Chinese General Practice, Journal of General Practitioners, China General Practice, and Primary Health Care in China were retrieved from CNKI platform. The years of 2001—2020 were divided into four time periods, on average of 5 years, and the regional distribution, institution type distribution, investigator cooperation network, and study type distribution of the institutions of the first author of the included articles were bibliometrically analyzed using Vosviewer 1.6.17.

Results

Finally, 54 726 papers were included. From 2001 to 2020, research institutions in East China published the largest number of papers (24 015, 43.88%) , followed by North China (11 288, 20.63%) and South China (5 437, 9.93%) . There was an overall upward trend in the number of publications in community health service centers, which increased from 15 in 2001 (1.31% of the total annual volume) to 203 in 2020 (9.38% of the total annual volume) . A total of 8 collaborative networks emerged from the analysis of co-occurrence among investigators, including the following research teams: Department of General Practice of Zhongshan Hospital, the Journal of Chinese General Practice, and the Capital Medical University. Regarding the types of studies, the percentage of studies in the theoretical class decreased from 28.68% (329/1 147) in 2001 to 17.93% (388/2 164) in 2020; the proportion of intervention type studies gradually increased from 10.11% (116/1 147) in 2001 to 17.28% (374/2 164) in 2020, but its proportion in the overall studies was still low; the percentage of observational studies was the highest, with 64.79% (1 402/2 164) in 2020.

Conclusion

The research in the field of general practice and community health in China has shown a rapid development trend from 2001 to 2020, but there still remain some problems such as unbalanced development of research capabilities, insufficient cooperation and communication of research teams, and insufficient innovation of research methods. It is recommended to further strengthen the construction of domestic scientific research cooperation network and focus on improving the quality of research.

Key words: General practice, Community health services, Research, Researcher, Research agency, Research capacity, Bibliometrics