中国全科医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (33): 4105-4109.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.518

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

武侯区家庭医生签约信息化管理平台系统中糖尿病管理模块应用情况调查

王倩1*,李爱琳2,易敏1,董婷2,李其贤1,刘晓玲2,陈朝阳3   

  1. 1.610045四川省成都市武侯区机投桥社区卫生服务中心 2.610043四川省成都市武侯区簇锦社区卫生服务中心 3.200030上海市徐汇区,中电科软件信息服务有限公司
    *通信作者:王倩,护师;E-mail:496113925@qq.com
  • 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-20
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:成都市武侯区医院管理服务中心区级科研项目

Application of Diabetes Management Module in Electronic Contracted Family Doctors Services Management Platform:a Survey in Wuhou District 

WANG Qian1*,LI Ailin2,YI Min1,DONG Ting1,LI Qixian1,LIU Xiaoling2,CHEN Zhaoyang3   

  1. 1.Wuhou District Jitouqiao Community Health Center,Chengdu 610045,China
    2.Wuhou District Cujin Community Health Center,Chengdu 610043,China
    3.CLP Software Information Services Limited,Shanghai 200030,China
    *Corresponding author:WANG Qian,Primary nurse;E-mail:496113925@qq.com
  • Published:2019-11-20 Online:2019-11-20

摘要: 背景 随着糖尿病患病率与患病人数的不断增加,基层卫生服务机构的糖尿病管理工作愈加艰巨。如何进一步发挥信息化技术的效用,提高工作效率、促进规范管理、提升管理质量已成为糖尿病管理信息化建设的主旨和目标。目的 了解成都市武侯区家庭医生签约信息化管理平台(EPM)中糖尿病健康管理模块的应用情况,为进一步优化健康管理信息系统提供依据,进而规范2型糖尿病基层管理服务流程,提高管理质量与效率。方法 2017年11—12月,以成都市武侯区13家社区卫生服务中心的家庭医生团队为单位,采用随机抽样调查方法,抽取家庭医生团队共52个,成员共170名。采用自制调查问卷——《糖尿病健康管理信息系统应用情况调查问卷》,通过网络形式进行问卷调查。问卷包括《武侯区2型糖尿病患者健康管理服务服务规范》和《武侯区2型糖尿病患者健康管理服务技术规范》(以下简称“《规范》”)的知、信、行情况(包含6个条目),EPM系统中糖尿病管理模块的使用意愿(包含1个条目),EPM系统中糖尿病管理模块的优化需求(整体优化需求1个条目,临床管理路径优化需求5个条目,智能化决策功能优化需求3个条目),EPM系统中糖尿病管理模块具体使用的角色调查(包含6个条目)。结果 共发放问卷170份,回收有效问卷166份,有效回收率为97.6%。166名家庭医生团队成员中,全科医生、医生助理、健康促进师、辅助成员的比例约为4∶4∶1∶1。《规范》的知、信、行情况调查中,161人(97.0%)知晓《规范》内容;认为EPM系统中糖尿病管理模块与《规范》中的管理路径完全相同的仅有65人(39.2%);认为EPM系统中现有模块对其规范地、有效地管理2型糖尿病患者起到作用者有96人(57.8%)。EPM系统中糖尿病管理模块的使用意愿调查中,愿意使用EPM系统中糖尿病管理现有模块的有99人(59.6%)。EPM系统中糖尿病管理模块的优化需求情况中,认为需要糖尿病诊断情况(包括诊断、病程、并发症模块)的有150人(90.4%);认为需要甲状腺触诊模块的有112人(67.5%);认为需要足部痛觉、温度觉、震动觉检查情况模块的有146人(88.0%);认为需要合并症评估模块的有154人(92.8%);认为需要转诊评估模块的有148人(89.2%);认为需要根据前期信息采集和评估情况,自动生成个性化的控制目标,包括血糖值、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)值、血脂值、血压值等模块的有162人(97.6%);全部人员(100.0%)认为需要根据前期信息采集和评估情况,自动生成综合评估报告模块;认为需要根据前期信息采集和评估情况,自动生成个性化的健康指导,包括膳食处方、运用处方、减重处方、戒烟处方、限酒处方等模块的有165人(99.4%)。EPM系统中糖尿病管理模块具体使用的角色调查情况中,认为基础信息收集部分主要应该由医生助理来完成的有111人(66.9%);认为疾病信息收集、健康评估、患者个性化控制目标的制定、患者个性化健康指导主要应该由全科医生来完成的分别有94人(56.6%)、133人(79.5%)、142人(85.5%)和95人(57.2%);认为患者随访主要应该由护士来完成的有120人(72.3%)。医生助理、健康促进师、辅助成员在基础信息收集、疾病信息收集使用模块的人员负责情况的选择比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 武侯区家庭医生团队普遍认为EPM系统现有的糖尿病健康管理模块对现实工作有一定的指导意义,但仍需要进一步优化,其中最希望优化的系统功能主要是临床管理路径和智能化决策功能。

关键词: 糖尿病, 信息系统, 健康管理, 家庭医学, 家庭医生签约

Abstract: Background With the increasing prevalence of diabetes and the number of diabetic patients,diabetes management in primary care is becoming increasingly arduous.How to further give play to the role of information technology,raise working efficiency,promoting standardized management and management quality has become the aim and objective of diabetes management information construction.Objective To explore the application of diabetes management module in Electronic Contracted Family Doctors Services Management (ECFDSPM) platform in Wuhou District,Chengdu;to provide basis for further optimizing health management information system,by which type 2 diabetes management procedure in primary care can be standardized and the management quality and efficiency can be improved.Methods From November to December 2017,a total of 52 family doctor teams with 170 members were selected by random sampling from 13 community health centers in Wuhou District,Chengdu.They received an online survey with a self-designed questionnaire named as Application of Diabetes Health Management Information System,consisting of knowledge,belief and practice (total 6 items) of "health management service specification for type 2 diabetic patients in Wuhou District" and "health management service technical specification for type 2 diabetic patients in Wuhou District"(hereinafter referred to as "Specification"),intention of using diabetes management module (1 item),optimizing requirements of the diabetes management module (1 item for overall optimizing requirement,5 items for clinical path management optimizing requirement,3 items for intelligent decision function optimizing requirement),and subjective selection of health workers responsible for the application of specific diabetes management submodules (total 6 items) in the ECFDSPM system.Results The survey achieved a response rate of 97.6%(166/170).Of the respondents,the ratio of general practitioners(GPs) to physician assistants,health promoters and other assistant members was about 4∶4∶1∶1.The rate of knowing the contents of the Specification was 97.0%(161/166),but only 39.2%(65/161) of them thought that the diabetes management module in the ECFDSPM platform was the same as the management pathway in the Specification,and 57.8%(96/166) thought that the module could effectively manage diabetes patients effectively in a standardized way.The rate of intending to use the available diabetes management module was 59.6%(99/166).In terms of the submodules in the available diabetes management module,90.4%(150/166) reported that they needed diabetes diagnosis submodule (diagnosis,diabetes duration and complication),67.5%(112/166) needed the thyroid palpation submodule,88.0%(148/166) needed the submodule for examining foot pain,temperature and vibration,92.8%(154/166) thought that the evaluation submodules for diabetic complications should be integrated into one,89.2%(148/166) needed the referral submodule,97.6%(162/166)proposed to develop a submodule including the target objectives(glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,lipid and blood pressure) which could be generated automatically based on the evaluation results of each patient's pervious information,and all of them proposed to develop a comprehensive evaluation submodule,and 99.4%(165/166) proposed to develop a personalized health guidance submodule(dietary,exercise,weight loss,smoking cessation and alcohol limitation prescriptions),generated automatically based on the evaluation results of each patient's pervious information.In terms of healthcare providers responsible for using specific submodules of the diabetes management module,physician assistants were thought to be principal responsible persons for basic information collection by 66.9%(111/166) of the respondents,GPs were thought to be principal responsible persons for disease information collection,health assessment,development of individualized control objectives and individualized health instruction by 56.6%(94/166),79.5% (133/166),85.5%(142/166) and 57.2%(95/166) of the respondents,respectively,and nurses were thought to be principal responsible persons for follow-up services by 72.3%(120/166) of the respondents.The selection of major responsible persons for basic information collection and disease information collection submodules among physician assistants,health promoters and other assistant members were significantly different(P<0.05).Conclusion The family doctor teams in Wuhou District generally think that the existing diabetes health management module in ECFDSPM system has certain guiding significance for clinical practice,but it still needs further optimization.And the systematic functions expected to be optimized first are clinical management path and intelligent decision making.

Key words: Diabetes mellitus, Information systems, Health management, Family practice, Family doctor contract