
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (24): 3486-3492.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0492
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-04-10
Revised:2025-04-24
Published:2026-08-20
Online:2026-07-03
Contact:
LIU Mingfan
通讯作者:
刘明矾
作者简介:作者贡献:
徐西良提出主要研究目标,负责研究的构思与设计实施,撰写论文;程果进行试验操作,数据的收集与整理,统计学处理,图、表的绘制与展示;刘明矾负责文章的质量控制与审查以及论文的修订;杨立昊负责试验操作、统计分析、论文撰写与修改。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0492
| 项目 | 人数 | BDI-Ⅱ得分[M(Q1,Q3),分] | Z值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | -0.777 | 0.437 | ||
| 男 | 9 | 21.000(4.500,29.500) | ||
| 女 | 57 | 13.000(5.000,19.500) | ||
| 年级 | -0.414 | 0.679 | ||
| 低年级(大一、大二) | 51 | 13.000(5.000,20.000) | ||
| 高年级(大三、大四) | 15 | 14.000(5.000,27.000) | ||
| 是否独生 | -1.979 | 0.047 | ||
| 是 | 6 | 28.000(12.750,32.500) | ||
| 否 | 60 | 12.000(5.000,19.750) | ||
| 居住地 | -0.228 | 0.820 | ||
| 农村 | 38 | 13.500(5.000,21.000) | ||
| 城镇 | 28 | 13.500(5.500,23.000) | ||
| 家庭结构 | -1.077 | 0.281 | ||
| 完整 | 52 | 13.000(4.250,20.000) | ||
| 不完整 | 14 | 16.000(7.750,24.750) |
Table 1 Basic information of the subject
| 项目 | 人数 | BDI-Ⅱ得分[M(Q1,Q3),分] | Z值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | -0.777 | 0.437 | ||
| 男 | 9 | 21.000(4.500,29.500) | ||
| 女 | 57 | 13.000(5.000,19.500) | ||
| 年级 | -0.414 | 0.679 | ||
| 低年级(大一、大二) | 51 | 13.000(5.000,20.000) | ||
| 高年级(大三、大四) | 15 | 14.000(5.000,27.000) | ||
| 是否独生 | -1.979 | 0.047 | ||
| 是 | 6 | 28.000(12.750,32.500) | ||
| 否 | 60 | 12.000(5.000,19.750) | ||
| 居住地 | -0.228 | 0.820 | ||
| 农村 | 38 | 13.500(5.000,21.000) | ||
| 城镇 | 28 | 13.500(5.500,23.000) | ||
| 家庭结构 | -1.077 | 0.281 | ||
| 完整 | 52 | 13.000(4.250,20.000) | ||
| 不完整 | 14 | 16.000(7.750,24.750) |
| 模型 | 结果变量 | 预测变量 | 拟合指标 | 系数显著性 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | F值 | t值 | β | |||
| 模型1 | 相对解释偏向 | 总注视时间偏向分数 | 0.315 | 29.412a | -5.423 | -0.561a |
| 模型2 | BDI-Ⅱ得分 | 总注视时间偏向分数 | 0.430 | 48.300a | 6.950 | 0.656a |
| 模型3 | BDI-Ⅱ得分 | 总注视时间偏向分数 | 0.598 | 46.940a | 3.916 | 0.378a |
| 相对解释偏向 | -5.139 | -0.496a | ||||
Table 2 Linear regression analysis of mediating effects of interpretation bias
| 模型 | 结果变量 | 预测变量 | 拟合指标 | 系数显著性 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | F值 | t值 | β | |||
| 模型1 | 相对解释偏向 | 总注视时间偏向分数 | 0.315 | 29.412a | -5.423 | -0.561a |
| 模型2 | BDI-Ⅱ得分 | 总注视时间偏向分数 | 0.430 | 48.300a | 6.950 | 0.656a |
| 模型3 | BDI-Ⅱ得分 | 总注视时间偏向分数 | 0.598 | 46.940a | 3.916 | 0.378a |
| 相对解释偏向 | -5.139 | -0.496a | ||||
| 项目 | 效应值 | 间接效应的SE | 95%CI | 相对效应值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总效应 | 0.656 | 0.094 | 0.467~0.844 | |
| 直接效应 | 0.378 | 0.097 | 0.185~0.570 | 58% |
| 间接效应 | 0.278 | 0.078 | 0.148~0.453 | 42% |
Table 3 Mediating effects paths analysis of interpretation bias
| 项目 | 效应值 | 间接效应的SE | 95%CI | 相对效应值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总效应 | 0.656 | 0.094 | 0.467~0.844 | |
| 直接效应 | 0.378 | 0.097 | 0.185~0.570 | 58% |
| 间接效应 | 0.278 | 0.078 | 0.148~0.453 | 42% |
| 变量 | BDI-Ⅱ得分 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |
| 性别 | -0.685 | -0.609 | -1.376 |
| 是否独生 | -2.328a | -1.387 | -0.775 |
| 居住地 | 0.835 | 1.049 | 0.811 |
| 家庭结构 | 0.758 | -1.209 | -1.311 |
| 总注视时间偏向分数 | 4.244b | 5.633b | |
| 相对解释偏向 | -4.312b | -4.269b | |
| 总注视时间偏向分数×相对解释偏向 | -3.479a | ||
| R2 | 0.126 | 0.636 | 0.698 |
| ∆R2 | 0.068 | 0.598 | 0.662 |
| F值 | 2.191 | 17.147b | 19.192b |
Table 4 The moderating effect of interpretation bias on attention bias and depression
| 变量 | BDI-Ⅱ得分 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |
| 性别 | -0.685 | -0.609 | -1.376 |
| 是否独生 | -2.328a | -1.387 | -0.775 |
| 居住地 | 0.835 | 1.049 | 0.811 |
| 家庭结构 | 0.758 | -1.209 | -1.311 |
| 总注视时间偏向分数 | 4.244b | 5.633b | |
| 相对解释偏向 | -4.312b | -4.269b | |
| 总注视时间偏向分数×相对解释偏向 | -3.479a | ||
| R2 | 0.126 | 0.636 | 0.698 |
| ∆R2 | 0.068 | 0.598 | 0.662 |
| F值 | 2.191 | 17.147b | 19.192b |
| [1] |
黄杨. 基于文献及临床证据探究抑郁症中医辨证分型及其与客观指标的相关性研究[D]. 天津: 天津中医药大学, 2021. DOI: 10.27368/d.cnki.gtzyy.2021.000504.
|
| [2] |
张芮, 杨晨韵, 张耀东. 中国大学生抑郁影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(35): 4497-4502.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
王琼, 亓伊静, 胡伟, 等. 社会拒绝与大学生抑郁情绪的关系:情绪觉察的中介作用和微信亲子沟通的调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2022, 45(5): 1159-1165.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
赵方圆. 正念与情绪调节策略对负性注意偏向的影响——基于抑郁认知模型理论的视角[D]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2022.
|
| [9] |
夏海莎, 刘小菠, 苟馨云, 等. 注意偏向矫正疗法对抑郁患者干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(17): 2145-2151.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
方小平, 刘建平. 不同自立水平大学生在积极和消极事件上的解释偏向[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(4): 709-713, 708. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.04.025.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
王振, 苑成梅, 黄佳, 等. 贝克抑郁量表第2版中文版在抑郁症患者中的信效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(6): 476-480. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.06.014.
|
| [19] |
郑健荣, 黄炽荣, 黄洁晶, 等. 贝克焦虑量表的心理测量学特性、常模分数及因子结构的研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2002, 10(1): 4-6.
|
| [20] |
刘明矾, 武厚, 崔瑜. 用于情绪障碍研究的面部表情系统的初步建立[J]. 心理学探新, 2012, 32(4): 340-346.
|
| [21] |
徐西良, 刘明矾, 李宁, 等. 伴述情障碍抑郁大学生对情绪面孔注意偏向的眼动研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2023(1): 56-61. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371468-20220517-00269.
|
| [22] |
汪敏. 抑郁症患者负性情绪刺激注意偏向的眼动指标分析[J]. 现代实用医学, 2021, 33(2): 189, 207. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2021.02.022.
|
| [23] |
姜迪. 大学生拒绝敏感性对模糊社交信息的解释偏向[D]. 烟台: 鲁东大学, 2017.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
郑飞宇. 抑郁解释偏向测评工具的研制及其应用[D]. 重庆: 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学, 2019. DOI: 10.27001/d.cnki.gtjyu.2019.000375.
|
| [26] |
周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(6): 942-950.
|
| [27] |
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
|
| [28] |
刘利丹. 首发抑郁症患者情绪注意偏向与认知功能关系的研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2021.
|
| [29] |
朱文如, 张恩, 尹良爽, 等. 注意偏向矫正训练对抑郁症患者影响[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2022, 32(6): 462-464.
|
| [30] |
徐西良. 正性注意训练缓解大学生抑郁情绪的实验研究[J]. 信阳农林学院学报, 2015, 25(3): 155-157.
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
余红玉, 钱铭怡, 周鹏, 等. 注意偏向与社交焦虑:解释偏向的调节作用[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(3): 574-580. DOI: 10.13209/j.0479-8023.2016.030.
|
| [34] |
朱婉, 司峰, 邓星萍, 等. 抑郁症联合认知偏向的研究进展[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2022, 22(8): 591-595.
|
| [1] | LI Feng, HU Changhao, LUO Xu. Progress in the Study of Influencing Factors and Intervention Strategies of Mental Health in Elderly Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2816-2828. |
| [2] | CHEN Xiaolong, JIN Jing, HUA Jialu, LI Yuyu, PAN Youjia, PAN Qi, TU Chunjing, WANG Ping. Study on the Optimal Time-use Composition of 24-hour Movement Behaviors for Obesity Prevention in College Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1525-1532. |
| [3] | LIAO Qiuhon, TAO Hong, YANG Xiaohui, YUAN Yonggui, LIN Shanshan, XU Wei, LI Yuxiu, PEI Yu. Prevalence of Depression and the Influencing Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a National Multicenter Cross-sectional Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1558-1565. |
| [4] | LI Li, XU Tianchao, DONG Xiaomei, HUANG Hongfei, CUI Gang, LI Dongdong, ZHANG Ou, FAN Lin, WANG Qi. The Effect of Kidney Tonifying and Brain Strengthening Acupuncture Combined with Sertraline in the Treatment of Elderly Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1399-1404. |
| [5] | YU Xinyan, MA Zhong, CAO Fan, SU Peng, LIN Ying, ZHANG Haicheng. Predicting the Risk of Depression in Elderly Patients with Cardiovascular Metabolic Diseases Using Single-lead Wearable Electrocardiography at the Community Level [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1300-1310. |
| [6] | LI Juexi, LI Liyuan, GUO Yuxuan, XIAO Xiaoqiang, TANG Peiqi, PU Ting, ZUO Haixi, YANG Ting, FAN Xiaoxia, ZHOU Bo. The Childhood Trauma and Adolescent Internet Addiction: the Chain Mediation of Depression Symptoms and Academic Burnout and the Moderating Role of Gender [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 900-906. |
| [7] | Psychosomatic Endocrinology Coordination Group of the Psychosomatic Medicine Society of the Chinese Medical Association, Diabetes Prevention and Control Committee of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association. Chinese Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes Comorbid with Depression [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 273-292. |
| [8] | ZHAO Ziqi, LIU Mingyue, WANG Nan, LUO Zhenghao, CHEN Xinyang, LI Zheng, ZHANG Shangmingzhu, ZHANG Haoruo, CHEN Jiaqi, ZHENG Yizhan, ZHANG Xiujun, WU Jianhui. The Relationship between Lifestyle Factors and Depression: a Cross-sectional Study of Community Populations [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4148-4158. |
| [9] | MA Huaping, LI Hongpei, HU Wenyue, HU Yuli, MOU Lei, WU Yue, CHEN Runming, HAN Zhenyun. The Construction of the PROs Scale and Its Theoretical Model for Patients with Perimenopausal Depressive Disorder Treated with Traditional Chinese Medicine [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3703-3710. |
| [10] | ZHAO Ziqi, CHEN Jiaqi, ZHU Hongmin, ZHENG Yizhan, WANG Huan, HU Jiaqi, LIU Mingyue, WANG Nan, LUO Zhenghao, CHEN Xinyang, LI Zheng, ZHANG Shangmingzhu, ZHANG Haoruo, XUAN Xiaoqing, WU Jianhui, ZHANG Xiujun. A Cross-sectional Study on the Relationship between Social Support and Depression in Community Population [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3660-3667. |
| [11] | GU Xiaolin, CHEN Junyu, CHEN Dan, HAN Guangli, CHEN Yidi, LI Chunhong, LUO Xiaoxi. Emotional Experience of Pregnant Women in Rural China: a Qualitative Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3283-3288. |
| [12] | WEI Xiaoxia, CHEN Nuo, WANG Juanjuan, ZHU Jingfen. The Effects of Depression and Anxiety on Smoking Behavior among Vocational School Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2826-2832. |
| [13] | LI Xinyue, WU Minmin, ZHU Luwen. Exploration of the Association and Mechanism between Abnormal Lipid Metabolism and Depressive Development [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2562-2569. |
| [14] | FU Rong, SHI Lei, HE Feiying. Comorbidity of Diabetes and Depression in Middle-aged and Elderly People: the Impact of Sleep, Exercise, and Social Activities [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2491-2500. |
| [15] | FAN Yu, LI Rong, GONG Shuangying, YANG Xiaojuan, LI Rui. Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Postpartum Depression among Maternal Spouses in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2179-2185. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||