The training and development of general practitioners has always been the focus of the medical community, and there are also significant differences in the training models and methods of general practitioners in various countries.

The present study aims to uncover the emerging trends, patterns, and challenges concerning the training of general practitioners in China. Through juxtaposing these with international best practices, we seek to guide future developments in this sector domestically.

Using bibliometric methods and CiteSpace 6.1.R Advanced software as a tool, this study analyzes domestic research based on the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and international research based on the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database. It filters and quantitatively analyzes literature on general practitioner training from 2013 to 2023, both domestically and internationally, and summarizes the findings.

Research on general practitioner education in China has witnessed annual growth; The Capital Medical University's Institute of General Practice and Continuing Education has been particularly prolific in its output, although the collaboration between domestic institutions remains somewhat limited. Internationally, key contributors in this realm include the United Kingdom and Australia. Within China, research directed towards the training of general practitioners focuses on educational reform and optimizing services, whereas international research of the same period places an emphasis on the application of artificial intelligence and addressing mental health issues.

Research activity related to the training of general practitioners in China has seen marked growth, principally targeting educational reform and service optimization, although there remains a need to strengthen collaboration between research institutions. Observing international research trends indicates a necessity for us to more readily adopt emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, as well as to increase our attention towards mental health, which will in turn enhance the depth and breadth of general practitioner training.

全科医生的培养和发展始终是医学界关注的焦点，而各国对全科医生的培训模式和方法存在显著的差异。

总结并揭示我国全科医生培养的热点、趋势以及挑战，同时对比国外做法，为我国全科医生的未来发展提供借鉴和指导。

采用文献计量学的方法，以CiteSpace 6.1.R Advanced软件为工具，国内研究分析基于中国知网（CNKI），国外研究分析选取Web of Science核心数据库（WOSCC），对2013—2023年国内外全科医生培养的文献进行筛选与定量化分析，并归纳总结。

我国全科医生教育的研究数量逐年增长；我国研究机构以首都医科大学全科医学与继续教育学院发文量最多，但各机构间的合作不紧密；国外主要发文国家为英国和澳大利亚；我国全科医生培养研究偏向于教育方法改革和服务方向优化，而同期国外全科医生培养的研究侧重于人工智能技术的应用和对精神心理疾病的关注。

我国全科医生培养的研究活动增长显著，集中在教育方法改革和服务方向优化，但各研究机构间需加强合作。对比国外研究模式，我国需要更多地引入新兴技术（如人工智能），并提升对精神心理疾病的关注度，以促进全科医生培养的深度和广度发展。