Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (30): 3780-3784.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0188
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-03-11
Revised:
2023-05-10
Published:
2023-10-20
Online:
2023-05-26
Contact:
ZHANG Ming
通讯作者:
张明
作者简介:
基金资助:
时间 | NRS 2002评分(分) | BMI(kg/m2) | 白蛋白(g/L) | 前白蛋白(mg/L) | 血红蛋白(g/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 5.05±1.10 | 20.81±2.29 | 35.89±4.05 | 165.35±48.85 | 111.90±16.62 |
术后2个月 | 4.70±0.80 | 21.62±1.97 | 37.08±3.66 | 183.80±59.92 | 110.35±17.36 |
t配对值 | 1.377 | -2.729 | -2.996 | -3.213 | 0.555 |
P值 | 0.185 | 0.013 | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.586 |
Table 1 Comparison of nutritional parameters of patients before and 2 months after operation
时间 | NRS 2002评分(分) | BMI(kg/m2) | 白蛋白(g/L) | 前白蛋白(mg/L) | 血红蛋白(g/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 5.05±1.10 | 20.81±2.29 | 35.89±4.05 | 165.35±48.85 | 111.90±16.62 |
术后2个月 | 4.70±0.80 | 21.62±1.97 | 37.08±3.66 | 183.80±59.92 | 110.35±17.36 |
t配对值 | 1.377 | -2.729 | -2.996 | -3.213 | 0.555 |
P值 | 0.185 | 0.013 | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.586 |
时间 | 心理负担 | 食欲 | 进食时间 | 食物选择 | 语言交流 | 进食恐惧 | 心理健康 | 社会交往 | 睡眠 | 疲劳 | 吞咽症状 | 总分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 2.70±0.98 | 5.30±1.69 | 3.05±1.00 | 2.90±1.07 | 8.05±1.85 | 11.65±2.13 | 8.25±1.16 | 11.25±1.62 | 8.00±1.38 | 9.30±1.53 | 55.20±6.36 | 125.65±10.10 |
术后2个月 | 3.85±1.50 | 6.75±2.36 | 3.85±1.31 | 3.20±1.36 | 8.25±1.62 | 13.00±2.32 | 8.50±1.50 | 12.45±2.04 | 8.30±0.92 | 8.90±1.21 | 57.65±6.56 | 134.70±11.06 |
t配对值 | -3.708 | -2.570 | -3.387 | -1.831 | 0.777 | -2.189 | -0.546 | -1.955 | -1.031 | 1.566 | -2.735 | -5.826 |
P值 | 0.001 | 0.019 | 0.003 | 0.083 | 0.447 | 0.041 | 0.592 | 0.065 | 0.316 | 0.134 | 0.013 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of scores of different dimensions in SWAL-QOL before and 2 months after operation
时间 | 心理负担 | 食欲 | 进食时间 | 食物选择 | 语言交流 | 进食恐惧 | 心理健康 | 社会交往 | 睡眠 | 疲劳 | 吞咽症状 | 总分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 2.70±0.98 | 5.30±1.69 | 3.05±1.00 | 2.90±1.07 | 8.05±1.85 | 11.65±2.13 | 8.25±1.16 | 11.25±1.62 | 8.00±1.38 | 9.30±1.53 | 55.20±6.36 | 125.65±10.10 |
术后2个月 | 3.85±1.50 | 6.75±2.36 | 3.85±1.31 | 3.20±1.36 | 8.25±1.62 | 13.00±2.32 | 8.50±1.50 | 12.45±2.04 | 8.30±0.92 | 8.90±1.21 | 57.65±6.56 | 134.70±11.06 |
t配对值 | -3.708 | -2.570 | -3.387 | -1.831 | 0.777 | -2.189 | -0.546 | -1.955 | -1.031 | 1.566 | -2.735 | -5.826 |
P值 | 0.001 | 0.019 | 0.003 | 0.083 | 0.447 | 0.041 | 0.592 | 0.065 | 0.316 | 0.134 | 0.013 | <0.001 |
事件 | 分级(例) | 合计〔例(%)〕 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1级 | 2级 | 3级 | ||
发热 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 22(92) |
恶心 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 15(63) |
呕吐 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4(17) |
食管疼痛 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 20(83) |
食管瘘 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
皮肤光毒性 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3 Incidence of adverse reactions related to IGPDT
事件 | 分级(例) | 合计〔例(%)〕 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1级 | 2级 | 3级 | ||
发热 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 22(92) |
恶心 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 15(63) |
呕吐 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4(17) |
食管疼痛 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 20(83) |
食管瘘 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
皮肤光毒性 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
中国抗癌协会肿瘤营养专业委员会,中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会,中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会营养与支持治疗学组. 食管癌患者营养治疗指南[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2020,47(1):1-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.01.430.
|
[3] |
王谭,文秋月,胡鸿涛,等. DSA引导下经皮胃造瘘术治疗食管癌伴吞咽困难[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学,2020,17(1):13-17. DOI:10.13929/j.issn.1672-8475.2020.01.004.
|
[4] |
王谭,黎海亮,胡鸿涛,等. 胃造瘘术和支架置入在吞咽困难的老年食管癌患者治疗中的效果比较[J]. 介入放射学杂志,2020,29(9):942-945.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
中国抗癌协会肿瘤光动力治疗专业委员会.食管癌光动力治疗临床应用专家共识[J].食管疾病,2020,2 (1):1-7.
|
[7] |
谭嘉升,丘卫红,刘中良,等. 中文版吞咽生命质量量表信度和效度的研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2016,38(9):669-673. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2016.09.006.
|
[8] |
皋文君,刘砚燕,袁长蓉. 国际肿瘤化疗药物不良反应评价系统——通用不良反应术语标准4.0版[J]. 肿瘤,2012,32(2):142-144. DOI:10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2012.02.013.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
赵文浩. 晚期重度梗阻性食管癌多模态图像引导光动力治疗模式的探究[D]. 石家庄:河北医科大学,2021.
|
[14] |
张明,赵文浩,王会恩,等. X线透视引导下光动力治疗食管癌重度梗阻[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学,2021,18(11):641-644. DOI:10.13929/j.issn.1672-8475.2021.11.001.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[1] | LIU Ailing, ZHOU Jingjing, LI Chengcheng, HE Kaiyue, LIANG Shanshan, ZHOU Shangcheng. Analysis of the Disease Burden Trends and Death Projections for Esophageal Cancer Attributable to Tobacco in China from 1990 to 2019 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(36): 4587-4594. |
[2] | XIE Xuemei, GAO Jing, BAI Dingxi, LU Xianying, HE Jiali, LI Yue. Current Status of Polypharmacy in the Elderly and Its Influencing Factors: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4394-4403. |
[3] | XU Man, AN Zhuoling, ZHANG Yuhui, MA Zhuo. Current Situation of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Older Cancer Patients and Strategies to Address It [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4382-4387. |
[4] | ZHONG Pingping, NAN Yayun, PENG Linlin, ZHOU Yuting, CHEN Qiong. A Bibliometrics Analysis of Polypharmacy in the Elderly from 2003 to 2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4404-4411. |
[5] | ZHANG Qian, LI Shu, LI Pengmei. Interpretation of the 2023 AGS Beers Criteria: Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(35): 4372-4381. |
[6] | GU Hanxin, LIU Yang, LIU Yuanli. Falls Prevention Intervention for Community-dwelling Older Adults from the Perspective of Policy Tools: an International Comparative Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4231-4238. |
[7] | WANG Yue, CHEN Qing, LIU Lurong. Detection Rate of Depression and Its Influencing Factors in Chinese Elderly: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4329-4335. |
[8] | FENG Xiaoyu, LI Wanling, LYU Siman, NI Cuiping, WANG Haocheng, LIU Yu. International Research Status and Hot Spot Analysis of InterRAI HC Based on Bibliometrics [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4351-4358. |
[9] | YU Xinyan, ZHAO Jun, ZHAO Xiaoye, JIANG Qingru, CHEN Yatian, WANG Yan, ZHANG Haicheng. Application of Mobile Smart Healthcare in the Prevention and Control of Cardiovascular Diseases in Elderly Patients with Chronic Diseases in Primary Care [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4167-4172. |
[10] | XIN Gongkai, CONG Xin, YUAN Lei, CHENG Yuetong, NI Cuiping, ZHANG Weiwei, ZHANG Pingping, LIU Yu. Research Progress on Comprehensive Assessment Tools for the Elderly with Dementia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4103-4109. |
[11] | ZHANG Shuai, LI Qin, LI Dongfeng, XIAO Jinping, LI Yunpeng. A Prospective Cohort Study of Solid Fuels Use and Risk of Hypertension in Chinese Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4001-4006. |
[12] | JIAN Qiufeng, XU Ronghua, YAO Qian, ZHOU Yuanyuan. A Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Elderly Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4070-4079. |
[13] | ZHANG Jifang, CHEN Fang, TANG Jiawen, LI Hongliang. Predictive Value of Tumor Budding and Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes on Lymph Node Metastasis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4038-4042. |
[14] | ZHANG Peng, GAO Ying, YANG Hongxi, WAN Chunxiao. Association between Serum Uric Acid Level and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease among the Elderly in Longevity Areas of China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(31): 3884-3889. |
[15] | DUAN Yanqin, PENG Ying, LIU Shenglan, LIU Haijiao, YANG Huiqiong, HU Haiqing. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Potentially Inappropriate Medication among Elderly Outpatients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(31): 3902-3907. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 273
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 556
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||