Chinese General Practice ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (05): 569-575.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0510
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-05-29
Revised:
2022-09-01
Published:
2023-02-15
Online:
2022-09-22
Contact:
CHEN Min
通讯作者:
陈敏
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0510
组别 | 只数 | 初始体质量 | 造模后体质量增长量 | 治疗后体质量增长量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 193.85±12.15 | 50.03±13.68 | 71.94±15.12 |
模型组 | 8 | 196.81±11.76 | 24.75±5.42a | 39.25±3.73a |
B-F组 | 8 | 195.60±11.44 | 24.83±7.53a | 68.58±10.71b |
C-B组 | 8 | 192.46±10.01 | 25.73±2.73a | 61.26±8.62ab |
F值 | 0.227 | 11.890 | 16.010 | |
P值 | 0.877 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of the baseline weight and the growth of weight during the modeling period and subsequent treatment between four groups of rats
组别 | 只数 | 初始体质量 | 造模后体质量增长量 | 治疗后体质量增长量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 193.85±12.15 | 50.03±13.68 | 71.94±15.12 |
模型组 | 8 | 196.81±11.76 | 24.75±5.42a | 39.25±3.73a |
B-F组 | 8 | 195.60±11.44 | 24.83±7.53a | 68.58±10.71b |
C-B组 | 8 | 192.46±10.01 | 25.73±2.73a | 61.26±8.62ab |
F值 | 0.227 | 11.890 | 16.010 | |
P值 | 0.877 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | 造模前〔M(P25,P75)〕 | 造模后〔M(P25,P75)〕 | 治疗后( |
---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 4.00(3.25,4.00) | 4.00(3.25,4.00) | 3.88±0.83 |
模型组 | 8 | 4.00(3.00,4.75) | 6.00(5.25,7.00)a | 5.88±0.99a |
B-F组 | 8 | 4.00(3.00,4.00) | 6.00(5.25,6.00)a | 4.13±0.83b |
C-B组 | 8 | 4.00(3.25,4.00) | 6.00(5.25,6.75)a | 4.13±0.99b |
H(F)值 | 0.217 | 17.918 | 8.124c | |
P值 | 0.975 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of scores of the Bristol Stool Scale of rats in four groups at baseline,after the modeling period and after treatment
组别 | 只数 | 造模前〔M(P25,P75)〕 | 造模后〔M(P25,P75)〕 | 治疗后( |
---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 4.00(3.25,4.00) | 4.00(3.25,4.00) | 3.88±0.83 |
模型组 | 8 | 4.00(3.00,4.75) | 6.00(5.25,7.00)a | 5.88±0.99a |
B-F组 | 8 | 4.00(3.00,4.00) | 6.00(5.25,6.00)a | 4.13±0.83b |
C-B组 | 8 | 4.00(3.25,4.00) | 6.00(5.25,6.75)a | 4.13±0.99b |
H(F)值 | 0.217 | 17.918 | 8.124c | |
P值 | 0.975 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | 20 mm Hg〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 40 mm Hg( | 60 mm Hg〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 80 mm Hg〔M(P25,P75),分〕 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 0.33(0,0.33) | 1.63±0.49 | 2.50(2.08,3.25) | 3.67(3.67,4.00) |
模型组 | 8 | 1.33(1.00,2.42)a | 3.33±0.36 a | 3.67(3.67,3.92)a | 4.00(4.00,4.00) |
B-F组 | 8 | 1.67(1.33,2.33)a | 3.41±0.35 a | 4.00(3.67,4.00)a | 4.00(4.00,4.00) |
C-B组 | 8 | 1.67(1.67,2.00)a | 3.29±0.49 a | 3.67(3.67,4.00)a | 4.00(3.75,4.00) |
H(F)值 | 18.809 | 33.157b | 18.491 | 6.902 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.075 |
Table 3 Comparison of AWR score of rats in four groups under different pressure gradients after modeling
组别 | 只数 | 20 mm Hg〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 40 mm Hg( | 60 mm Hg〔M(P25,P75),分〕 | 80 mm Hg〔M(P25,P75),分〕 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 0.33(0,0.33) | 1.63±0.49 | 2.50(2.08,3.25) | 3.67(3.67,4.00) |
模型组 | 8 | 1.33(1.00,2.42)a | 3.33±0.36 a | 3.67(3.67,3.92)a | 4.00(4.00,4.00) |
B-F组 | 8 | 1.67(1.33,2.33)a | 3.41±0.35 a | 4.00(3.67,4.00)a | 4.00(4.00,4.00) |
C-B组 | 8 | 1.67(1.67,2.00)a | 3.29±0.49 a | 3.67(3.67,4.00)a | 4.00(3.75,4.00) |
H(F)值 | 18.809 | 33.157b | 18.491 | 6.902 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.075 |
组别 | 只数 | 20 mm Hg | 40 mm Hg | 60 mm Hg | 80 mm Hg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 0.67(0.33,1.17) | 1.33(0.75,2.25) | 2.67(2.42,3.33) | 3.83(3.67,4.00) |
模型组 | 8 | 1.33(0.83,1.58) | 3.17(3.00,4.00)a | 3.67(3.67,4.00)a | 4.00(3.75,4.00) |
B-F组 | 8 | 1.17(0.67,1.33) | 1.83(1.67,2.00)b | 2.33(2.33,2.58)b | 3.33(3.33,3.33)b |
C-B组 | 8 | 1.50(0.83,2.25) | 3.00(2.42,3.58)a | 3.67(3.42,4.00)c | 3.83(3.67,4.00)c |
H值 | 6.657 | 22.300 | 21.033 | 18.710 | |
P值 | 0.084 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of AWR scores of rats in four groups under different pressure gradients after treatment
组别 | 只数 | 20 mm Hg | 40 mm Hg | 60 mm Hg | 80 mm Hg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 0.67(0.33,1.17) | 1.33(0.75,2.25) | 2.67(2.42,3.33) | 3.83(3.67,4.00) |
模型组 | 8 | 1.33(0.83,1.58) | 3.17(3.00,4.00)a | 3.67(3.67,4.00)a | 4.00(3.75,4.00) |
B-F组 | 8 | 1.17(0.67,1.33) | 1.83(1.67,2.00)b | 2.33(2.33,2.58)b | 3.33(3.33,3.33)b |
C-B组 | 8 | 1.50(0.83,2.25) | 3.00(2.42,3.58)a | 3.67(3.42,4.00)c | 3.83(3.67,4.00)c |
H值 | 6.657 | 22.300 | 21.033 | 18.710 | |
P值 | 0.084 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 只数 | 结肠组织 | 海马组织 |
---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 201.00±22.30 | 157.02±31.98 |
模型组 | 8 | 257.03±39.64a | 102.39±20.80a |
B-F组 | 8 | 214.51±25.71b | 146.65±32.90b |
C-B组 | 8 | 246.27±32.71ac | 130.52±28.97 |
F值 | 5.701 | 5.376 | |
P值 | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Table 5 Comparison of BDNF expression levels in colon and hippocampus of rats in four groups after treatment
组别 | 只数 | 结肠组织 | 海马组织 |
---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 201.00±22.30 | 157.02±31.98 |
模型组 | 8 | 257.03±39.64a | 102.39±20.80a |
B-F组 | 8 | 214.51±25.71b | 146.65±32.90b |
C-B组 | 8 | 246.27±32.71ac | 130.52±28.97 |
F值 | 5.701 | 5.376 | |
P值 | 0.004 | 0.005 |
组别 | 只数 | 结肠组织 | 海马组织 |
---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 602.64±128.68 | 211.00±61.14 |
模型组 | 8 | 931.33±303.07a | 310.46±75.17a |
B-F组 | 8 | 624.55±185.55b | 236.96±59.49b |
C-B组 | 8 | 854.90±242.08ac | 304.30±69.21a |
F值 | 4.305 | 4.402 | |
P值 | 0.013 | 0.012 |
Table 6 Comparison of SP expression levels in colon and hippocampus of rats in four groups after treatment
组别 | 只数 | 结肠组织 | 海马组织 |
---|---|---|---|
空白组 | 8 | 602.64±128.68 | 211.00±61.14 |
模型组 | 8 | 931.33±303.07a | 310.46±75.17a |
B-F组 | 8 | 624.55±185.55b | 236.96±59.49b |
C-B组 | 8 | 854.90±242.08ac | 304.30±69.21a |
F值 | 4.305 | 4.402 | |
P值 | 0.013 | 0.012 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
张声生,汪红兵,李振华,等. 360例腹泻型肠易激综合征的聚类分析及证候特征研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2010,25(8):1183-1187.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
何力,杨力,凌志维,等. 基于脑肠交互机制探讨肠道微生物调节IBS-D内脏高敏的研究进展[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2019,25(11):224-229. DOI:10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20191129.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
尹小君,施茵,赵继梦. 从脑-肠轴角度探讨肠易激综合征及其中医治疗[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2011,29(10):2197-2201. DOI:10.13193/j.archtcm.2011.10.47.yinxj.026.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
陈敏,黄德铨,唐太春,等. 痛泻要方调控BDNFmRNA表达缓解肠易激综合征腹泻大鼠内脏高敏的机制研究[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2017,35(12):3095-3097. DOI:10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2017.12.029.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
周天然,张瑶,逯晓旭,等. 慢性束缚应激腹泻型肠易激综合征大鼠模型的改良与评价[J]. 广州中医药大学学报,2018,35(1):163-168. DOI:10.13359/j.cnki.gzxbtcm.2018.01.0032.
|
[21] |
陈颖,赵妍,罗丹妮,等. 腹壁撤退反射实验测量方法概述[J]. 中国比较医学杂志,2017,27(8):89-93. DOI:10.3969.j.issn.1671-7856.2017.08.018.
|
[22] |
魏伟,吴希美,李元建. 药理实验方法学[M]. 4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
杨焱麟,陈敏,周彦妮,等. P物质与肝郁脾虚型腹泻型肠易激综合征关系及中医药调控的研究进展[J]. 中华中医药学刊,2021,39(9):82-85. DOI:10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2021.09.022.
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
旺建伟,叶虹玉,殷越,等. 痛泻要方对肠易激综合征内脏高敏性大鼠结肠组织肥大细胞活化、P物质表达及相关性的影响[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2014,29(6):1982-1986.
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
孔梅,邢长永,王莺. 痛泻要方颗粒剂干预腹泻型肠易激综合征结肠黏膜VIP、SP表达的临床研究[J]. 中药材,2010,33(10):1668-1671. DOI:10.13863/j.issn1001-4454.2010.10.013.
|
[37] |
|
[1] | SU Haixia, FU Zhaoyuan, GAO Yongze, YU Rongrong, ZHONG Jianchun. Correlation between 5-HT and Diarrhea-type Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Regulation by Traditional Chinese Medicine [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(21): 2678-2685. |
[2] | HU Jiayan, LYU Mi, WANG Fengyun. The Exploration of the Effects and Mechanisms of Antibiotics on Irritable Bowel Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(21): 2666-2672. |
[3] | HOU Yujun, ZHAO Ying, JIANG Huiling, TAN Yu, ZHANG Wei, LI Ying, ZHENG Qianhua. Detection and Evaluation Methods of Visceral Sensitivity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Review of the Latest Developments [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(21): 2673-2677. |
[4] | WU Xiaoyu, WAN Chonghua, CHEN Ying, RUAN Yanqin, WENG Yijie, XU Xiaojiang. A Review of Studies on Patient-reported Outcomes and Disease-specific Health-related Quality of Life Instruments for Irritable Bowel Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2268-2276. |
[5] | QIN Yuning, ZHAO Tianyi, LIU Fengbin, WANG Xin, CAO Xue, SUN Minglin, LAI Keyun, DI Luyao, GE Zhishan, LIU Song, XING Ying, YANG Lei, YUE Lihong, ZOU Meimei, HE Liyun, LI Hongjiao. Research of the Measurement Properties of the Chinese Version of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale for Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2277-2285. |
[6] | DU Yeming, ZHANG Yunqiao, WANG Zongqi, MIN Xue, CUI Yalian, WANG Yanfang. Characteristics of Somatic Symptoms and Their Correlations with Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor and Inflammatory Cytokinesin Patients with Major Depressive Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1463-1471. |
[7] | ZHANG Jindong, ZHENG Haonan, ZHANG Tao, DUAN Liping. Effect of Microbiota-targeted Therapy on Gut Microbiota in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Scoping Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(12): 1520-1529. |
[8] | Min CHEN, Xin XIE, Yunzhou SHI, Hui ZHENG, Qiaofeng WU, Haiyan ZHOU, Zhigang LI, Shuguang YU. Research Status and Thoughts on the Comparative Effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of IBS-D [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(15): 1795-1800,F01. |
[9] | Kun YE, Min LEI, Xin XIE, Hui ZHENG, Min CHEN, Shuguang YU. Mechanism of Huangqi Jianzhong Decoction in Treating Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Technology [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(15): 1814-1824. |
[10] | Pengning WU, Shuai XIONG, Xiaohan JIANG, Yi ZHANG, Chao LIANG, Min CHEN. Research Progress of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Based on 5-hydroxytryptamine [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(15): 1800-1806. |
[11] | Yunzhou SHI, Hui ZHENG, Min CHEN, Zhigang LI, Shuguang YU. Review of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(15): 1807-1813. |
[12] | Mingxiu WANG, Junkai ZHANG, Wei XU, Xiaojie FAN, Fei LI, Guoying DENG. Irritable Bowel Syndrome Prevalence and Influencing Factors in Senior High School Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(12): 1506-1511. |
[13] |
GAO Lian, HUANG Xiaoming, WU Qingming.
Recent Developments in the Prevention and Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(09): 1148-1154. |
[14] | LI Qi,TIAN Fuling,GUO Zhenyu,ZHOU Liwei,ZHU Haosong. Effect of Fu's Subcutaneous Needling on Visceral Sensitivity,Gastrointestinal Motility,Intestinal Flora and Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Function in Mild and Moderate Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(9): 1111-1115. |
[15] | WANG Yating,YAO Jie,GUAN Shihe,CHENG Cheng. Predictive Value of Glycogen Protein 125 Combined with Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor for Acute Heart Failure in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(23): 2962-2966. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||