Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (20): 2462-2467.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.02.001
Special Issue: 泌尿系统疾病最新文章合集
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-11-05
Revised:
2022-01-05
Published:
2022-07-15
Online:
2022-03-10
Contact:
Qiubi XU
About author:
通讯作者:
徐秋笔
作者简介:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.02.001
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) | 收缩压(mm Hg) | 舒张压(mm Hg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 18/28 | 33.6±6.6 | 22.7±2.2 | 127±11 | 78±11 |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 20/27 | 34.4±8.8 | 22.4±2.0 | 129±8 | 77±11 |
t(χ2)值 | 0.113a | 0.457 | 0.811 | 1.187 | 0.400 | |
P值 | 0.737 | 0.649 | 0.420 | 0.238 | 0.690 |
Table 1 Comparison of general between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics at baseline
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | BMI(kg/m2) | 收缩压(mm Hg) | 舒张压(mm Hg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 18/28 | 33.6±6.6 | 22.7±2.2 | 127±11 | 78±11 |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 20/27 | 34.4±8.8 | 22.4±2.0 | 129±8 | 77±11 |
t(χ2)值 | 0.113a | 0.457 | 0.811 | 1.187 | 0.400 | |
P值 | 0.737 | 0.649 | 0.420 | 0.238 | 0.690 |
组别 | 例数 | 血红蛋白(mmol/L) | 血清白蛋白(g/L) | Scr(μmol/L) | 补体C3(g/L) | 补体C4(g/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 76.0±13.3 | 26.68±6.38 | 61.99±12.07 | 0.55±0.20 | 0.11±0.03 |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 75.6±12.6 | 25.96±6.05 | 62.03±12.96 | 0.56±0.15 | 0.12±0.02 |
t值 | 0.049 | 0.559 | 0.015 | 0.273 | 1.895 | |
P值 | 0.961 | 0.578 | 0.988 | 0.785 | 0.061 |
Table 2 Comparison of clinica indices between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics at baseline
组别 | 例数 | 血红蛋白(mmol/L) | 血清白蛋白(g/L) | Scr(μmol/L) | 补体C3(g/L) | 补体C4(g/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 76.0±13.3 | 26.68±6.38 | 61.99±12.07 | 0.55±0.20 | 0.11±0.03 |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 75.6±12.6 | 25.96±6.05 | 62.03±12.96 | 0.56±0.15 | 0.12±0.02 |
t值 | 0.049 | 0.559 | 0.015 | 0.273 | 1.895 | |
P值 | 0.961 | 0.578 | 0.988 | 0.785 | 0.061 |
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗24周后 |
---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 16.8±4.9 | 8.7±3.6 |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 17.3±5.1 | 6.3±2.1 |
t值 | 0.520 | 4.090 | |
P值 | 0.604 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of SLEDAI scores between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗24周后 |
---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 16.8±4.9 | 8.7±3.6 |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 17.3±5.1 | 6.3±2.1 |
t值 | 0.520 | 4.090 | |
P值 | 0.604 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗12周后 | 治疗24周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 4.79±1.52 | 3.82±1.19a | 2.65±0.69a | 1.48±0.11a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 4.82±1.69 | 3.27±1.32a | 1.94±0.79a | 1.03±0.18a |
t值 | 0.090 | 2.109 | 4.612 | 14.510 | |
P值 | 0.929 | 0.038 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of 24-hour urinary protein between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗12周后 | 治疗24周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 4.79±1.52 | 3.82±1.19a | 2.65±0.69a | 1.48±0.11a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 4.82±1.69 | 3.27±1.32a | 1.94±0.79a | 1.03±0.18a |
t值 | 0.090 | 2.109 | 4.612 | 14.510 | |
P值 | 0.929 | 0.038 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗12周后 | 治疗24周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 15.87±1.62 | 13.13±1.51a | 10.25±1.59a | 8.64±1.08a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 15.92±1.87 | 12.49±1.49a | 9.59±1.02a | 7.08±1.39a |
t值 | 0.138 | 2.057 | 2.388 | 6.035 | |
P值 | 0.891 | 0.043 | 0.019 | <0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of BUN between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗12周后 | 治疗24周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 15.87±1.62 | 13.13±1.51a | 10.25±1.59a | 8.64±1.08a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 15.92±1.87 | 12.49±1.49a | 9.59±1.02a | 7.08±1.39a |
t值 | 0.138 | 2.057 | 2.388 | 6.035 | |
P值 | 0.891 | 0.043 | 0.019 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗12周后 | 治疗24周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 132.81±9.33 | 118.95±8.77a | 97.35±7.13a | 82.42±5.92a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 133.61±8.76 | 117.11±8.42a | 98.29±6.24a | 75.18±5.84a |
t值 | 0.426 | 1.032 | 0.677 | 5.937 | |
P值 | 0.671 | 0.305 | 0.500 | <0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of Scr between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗4周后 | 治疗12周后 | 治疗24周后 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 132.81±9.33 | 118.95±8.77a | 97.35±7.13a | 82.42±5.92a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 133.61±8.76 | 117.11±8.42a | 98.29±6.24a | 75.18±5.84a |
t值 | 0.426 | 1.032 | 0.677 | 5.937 | |
P值 | 0.671 | 0.305 | 0.500 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | IgE | IgG | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | ||
常规治疗组 | 46 | 26.32±3.42 | 21.89±2.87a | 15.92±3.22 | 12.93±2.47a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 26.51±3.15 | 18.60±1.53a | 16.03±3.24 | 10.28±2.65a |
t值 | 0.278 | 6.919 | 0.164 | 4.986 | |
P值 | 0.781 | <0.001 | 0.870 | <0.001 |
Table 7 Comparison of serum IgE and IgG between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | IgE | IgG | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | ||
常规治疗组 | 46 | 26.32±3.42 | 21.89±2.87a | 15.92±3.22 | 12.93±2.47a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 26.51±3.15 | 18.60±1.53a | 16.03±3.24 | 10.28±2.65a |
t值 | 0.278 | 6.919 | 0.164 | 4.986 | |
P值 | 0.781 | <0.001 | 0.870 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | CRP(mg/L) | IL-6(μg/L) | TNF-α(μg/L) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | ||
常规治疗组 | 46 | 2.68±0.96 | 1.43±0.75a | 21.96±2.21 | 8.05±2.32a | 4.65±0.67 | 1.78±0.68a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 2.69±1.05 | 1.09±0.69a | 22.08±2.21 | 6.67±2.48a | 4.73±0.69 | 1.16±0.73a |
t值 | 0.048 | 2.276 | 0.262 | 2.770 | 0.567 | 4.236 | |
P值 | 0.962 | 0.025 | 0.794 | 0.007 | 0.572 | <0.001 |
Table 8 Comparison of serum CRP,IL-6 and TNF-α between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | CRP(mg/L) | IL-6(μg/L) | TNF-α(μg/L) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | 治疗前 | 治疗24周后 | ||
常规治疗组 | 46 | 2.68±0.96 | 1.43±0.75a | 21.96±2.21 | 8.05±2.32a | 4.65±0.67 | 1.78±0.68a |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 2.69±1.05 | 1.09±0.69a | 22.08±2.21 | 6.67±2.48a | 4.73±0.69 | 1.16±0.73a |
t值 | 0.048 | 2.276 | 0.262 | 2.770 | 0.567 | 4.236 | |
P值 | 0.962 | 0.025 | 0.794 | 0.007 | 0.572 | <0.001 |
Figure 1 Taxonomic cladogram of LEfSe analysis of fecal flora between healthy controls,lupus nephritis patients before treatment,lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics
样本 | 例数 | 甲酸 | 乙酸 | 丙酸 | 丁酸 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
健康志愿者 | 12 | 254.03±26.27 | 259.68±27.38 | 246.61±26.01 | 249.23±26.28 |
LN患者 | 93 | 232.12±21.50 | 153.99±13.21 | 146.21±12.51 | 147.76±12.65 |
t值 | 3.726 | 12.01 | 26.14 | 25.57 | |
P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.0001 |
Table 9 Changes of short-chain fatty acid concentrations in feces between healthy controls and lupus nephritis patients before treatment
样本 | 例数 | 甲酸 | 乙酸 | 丙酸 | 丁酸 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
健康志愿者 | 12 | 254.03±26.27 | 259.68±27.38 | 246.61±26.01 | 249.23±26.28 |
LN患者 | 93 | 232.12±21.50 | 153.99±13.21 | 146.21±12.51 | 147.76±12.65 |
t值 | 3.726 | 12.01 | 26.14 | 25.57 | |
P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.0001 |
样本 | 例数 | 甲酸 | 乙酸 | 丙酸 | 丁酸 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
健康志愿者 | 12 | 254.03±26.27 | 259.68±27.38 | 246.61±26.01 | 249.23±26.28 |
常规治疗组治疗24周后 | 46 | 235.33±24.06 | 188.86±22.70a | 179.33±21.59a | 181.24±21.81a |
干预治疗组治疗24周后 | 47 | 246.48±34.28 | 216.31±23.42ab | 205.41±22.23ab | 207.59±22.47ab |
F值 | 2.736 | 46.788 | 46.783 | 46.785 | |
P值 | 0.067 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.010 |
Table 10 Changes of short-chain fatty acid concentrations in feces between healthy controls and lupus nephritis patients with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics
样本 | 例数 | 甲酸 | 乙酸 | 丙酸 | 丁酸 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
健康志愿者 | 12 | 254.03±26.27 | 259.68±27.38 | 246.61±26.01 | 249.23±26.28 |
常规治疗组治疗24周后 | 46 | 235.33±24.06 | 188.86±22.70a | 179.33±21.59a | 181.24±21.81a |
干预治疗组治疗24周后 | 47 | 246.48±34.28 | 216.31±23.42ab | 205.41±22.23ab | 207.59±22.47ab |
F值 | 2.736 | 46.788 | 46.783 | 46.785 | |
P值 | 0.067 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.010 |
组别 | 例数 | 肝功能异常 | 感染 | 腹泻 | 心动过速 | 其他药物不良反应 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 4(8.70) | 8(17.39) | 2(4.35) | 2(4.35) | 16(34.78) |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 6(12.77) | 6(12.77) | 2(4.26) | 1(2.13) | 15(31.91) |
χ2值 | 0.635 | 0.625 | 0.022 | 0.607 | 0.293 | |
P值 | 0.526 | 0.533 | 0.983 | 0.532 | 0.769 |
Table 11 Comparison of adverse drug reactions after treatment between lupus nephritis patients treated with routine treatment,and routine treatment plus probiotics
组别 | 例数 | 肝功能异常 | 感染 | 腹泻 | 心动过速 | 其他药物不良反应 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
常规治疗组 | 46 | 4(8.70) | 8(17.39) | 2(4.35) | 2(4.35) | 16(34.78) |
干预治疗组 | 47 | 6(12.77) | 6(12.77) | 2(4.26) | 1(2.13) | 15(31.91) |
χ2值 | 0.635 | 0.625 | 0.022 | 0.607 | 0.293 | |
P值 | 0.526 | 0.533 | 0.983 | 0.532 | 0.769 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[1] | YAO Yuzhong, MA Xiaojun, SONG Huan, ZHONG Yu. The Management Effect of Diabetes "1358 model" on Community Diabetes Patients Based on "Precision Management Combining General Care and Specialty Care" [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4308-4314. |
[2] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yunshu, YAN Baoping, WANG Jian, MA Yanjuan, WANG Yuan, QIN Yingjie, NA Long, REN Zhiyong, SUN Junwei, DENG Huaili, MA Hongjun, QU Xuehui, ZHOU Nan, SI Tianmei. Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone Microspheres for Injection (Ⅱ) in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4007-4012. |
[3] | YAO Junjie, SHANG Qiangqiang, WANG Yufeng, LI Jiahui, LIU Chang, PANG Tingting. Wearable Inertial Sensors-based Efficacy Evaluation of Comprehensive Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation Due to Qi-stagnation and Blood-stasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3450-3455. |
[4] | LIU Minghao, WANG Pan, GAO Lijian, XU Shuqing, WANG Huanhuan, ZHAO Guangxian, CHEN Jue, QIAO Shubin, XU Bo, YUAN Jinqing. Feasibility, Safety and Timing of Secondary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Artery Approach [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3366-3372. |
[5] | LU Bin, XIANG Chong, YUAN Xuesong, CAI Gaojun, WEI Wenfeng, YAN Yongmin. Effectiveness, Safety and Satisfaction of Distal Transradial Artery Approach in Cerebral Angiography [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3378-3382. |
[6] | GAO Yang, WANG Yunxia, GAO Chuanyu. Familial Hypercholesterolemia in 45-year-old and Younger Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Blood Lipid Control Effect [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(18): 2232-2237. |
[7] | YANG Bei, HAN Lin, WANG Yin, CHENG Kangyao. Effectiveness of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Injection in Type 2 Diabetes in Older Adults: a Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(15): 1892-1901. |
[8] | LIU Chuanfen, LI Zheng, WU Manyan, CUI Yuxia, SONG Jing, ZHANG Chunying, CHEN Hong. Analysis of Serum Lipid Level and Drug Use in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(11): 1325-1329. |
[9] | SHEN Fei, JIANG Weiping, MEI Xiaobin, HAN Yiping, ZHAO Jiayi, FAN Jian, GU Juan, SHEN Yanhong, XU Hongmei, ZHANG Dan, MEN Ying, DING Haiguang, CHEN Caiping, HAN Junhua. Influence of Microbiota-modulating Agents on Gut Flora in Community Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1112-1117. |
[10] | FEI Jingwen, LIN Huize, ZHANG Pingping, LIU Lanping, WANG Xiang, SHEN Jianghong, ZHU Kexin, YANG Tao, YU Jinna. Motion Style Acupuncture Can Effectively Improve the Effectiveness of Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(09): 1044-1052. |
[11] | GUAN Ningxiao, YAO Zhuoya, LI Ye, LIU Ziwei, LIU Fangli. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques Can Effectively Relieve Post-stroke Fatigue: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(08): 1008-1014. |
[12] | HUANG Tao, LUO Na, LUO Song, XU Qin. Clinical Application of a Novel Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Face Mask with Two Channels and Constant Leakage for Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Carbon Dioxide Retention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(03): 343-347. |
[13] | SONG Pingan, CHEN Xiaoliang, YAO Yuan, GAO Jin, YANG Yang, CUI Hongchun, ZHANG Yi. Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors Monotherapy for Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(02): 241-247. |
[14] | FAN Xiran, LI Duoduo, WANG Shuangshuang, GUO Ye, YU Changhe. A Qualitative Study on the Factors Influencing the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain by Tuina Manipulation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(02): 219-224. |
[15] | ZENG Zhigang, ZHENG Shimin, CHEN Xiaofen, MA Juan. Therapeutic Effect of Huazhi Suppository Combined with Cap-assisted Endoscopic Sclerotherapy on Internal Hemorrhoids [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(35): 4412-4417. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||