Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (25): 3114-3121.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0195
Special Issue: 心血管最新文章合集; 老年问题最新文章合集
• Original Research·Geriatric Problems • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-02-22
Revised:
2022-06-25
Published:
2022-09-05
Online:
2022-07-15
Contact:
Zhigang PAN
About author:
通讯作者:
潘志刚
作者简介:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0195
项目 | 例数 | 构成比(%) | 项目 | 例数 | 构成比(%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | 受教育程度 | ||||||
男 | 171 | 56.6 | 小学及以下 | 215 | 71.2 | ||
女 | 131 | 43.4 | 初中和高中/中专 | 72 | 23.8 | ||
年龄(岁) | 大专及以上 | 15 | 5.0 | ||||
65~74 | 148 | 49.0 | 婚姻状况 | ||||
≥75 | 154 | 51.0 | 已婚 | 271 | 89.7 | ||
BMI(kg/m2) | 未婚 | 2 | 0.7 | ||||
<24.0 | 132 | 43.7 | 丧偶 | 29 | 9.6 | ||
24.0~28.0 | 125 | 41.4 | 医保参保情况 | ||||
>28.0 | 45 | 14.9 | 参保 | 301 | 99.7 | ||
吸烟 | 未参保 | 1 | 0.3 | ||||
是 | 34 | 11.3 | 个人月收入(元) | ||||
否 | 268 | 88.7 | <3 000 | 229 | 75.8 | ||
饮酒 | 3 000~5 000 | 66 | 21.9 | ||||
是 | 40 | 13.2 | >5 000 | 7 | 2.3 | ||
否 | 262 | 86.8 | 签约家庭医生服务情况 | ||||
签约 | 289 | 95.7 | |||||
未签约 | 13 | 4.3 |
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of 302 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients
项目 | 例数 | 构成比(%) | 项目 | 例数 | 构成比(%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | 受教育程度 | ||||||
男 | 171 | 56.6 | 小学及以下 | 215 | 71.2 | ||
女 | 131 | 43.4 | 初中和高中/中专 | 72 | 23.8 | ||
年龄(岁) | 大专及以上 | 15 | 5.0 | ||||
65~74 | 148 | 49.0 | 婚姻状况 | ||||
≥75 | 154 | 51.0 | 已婚 | 271 | 89.7 | ||
BMI(kg/m2) | 未婚 | 2 | 0.7 | ||||
<24.0 | 132 | 43.7 | 丧偶 | 29 | 9.6 | ||
24.0~28.0 | 125 | 41.4 | 医保参保情况 | ||||
>28.0 | 45 | 14.9 | 参保 | 301 | 99.7 | ||
吸烟 | 未参保 | 1 | 0.3 | ||||
是 | 34 | 11.3 | 个人月收入(元) | ||||
否 | 268 | 88.7 | <3 000 | 229 | 75.8 | ||
饮酒 | 3 000~5 000 | 66 | 21.9 | ||||
是 | 40 | 13.2 | >5 000 | 7 | 2.3 | ||
否 | 262 | 86.8 | 签约家庭医生服务情况 | ||||
签约 | 289 | 95.7 | |||||
未签约 | 13 | 4.3 |
项目 | 例数 | 百分比(%) | 项目 | 例数 | 百分比(%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
房颤类型 | 抗凝药的发放机构a | ||||||
阵发性 | 75 | 24.8 | 社区卫生服务中心 | 6 | 7.6 | ||
持续性 | 100 | 33.1 | 综合医院/专科医院 | 72 | 91.1 | ||
永久性 | 11 | 3.6 | 遗忘 | 1 | 1.3 | ||
不清楚 | 116 | 38.4 | 首次因房颤就诊时有无主动向医务人员咨询疾病管理方面的问题 | ||||
房颤症状 | 是 | 157 | 52.0 | ||||
无 | 45 | 14.9 | 否 | 92 | 30.5 | ||
有 | 257 | 85.1 | 遗忘 | 53 | 17.5 | ||
房颤病程(年) | 房颤危害知晓情况 | ||||||
<2 | 129 | 42.7 | 知晓 | 204 | 67.5 | ||
2~5 | 99 | 32.8 | 不知晓 | 98 | 32.5 | ||
>5 | 74 | 24.5 | 共病情况b | ||||
房颤发现途径 | 高血压 | 221 | 73.2 | ||||
体检 | 125 | 41.4 | 冠心病 | 146 | 48.3 | ||
房颤症状 | 146 | 48.3 | 糖尿病 | 64 | 21.2 | ||
遗忘 | 31 | 10.3 | 高脂血症 | 31 | 10.3 | ||
房颤的首次诊断机构 | 颈动脉斑块 | 17 | 5.6 | ||||
社区卫生服务中心 | 71 | 23.5 | 心力衰竭 | 10 | 3.3 | ||
综合医院/专科医院 | 205 | 67.9 | 并发症发生情况b | ||||
遗忘 | 26 | 8.6 | 血栓栓塞事件(脑卒中、其他血栓栓塞事件) | 45 | 14.9 | ||
首次因房颤就诊时药物开具情况 | 出血事件(脑出血、外周出血) | 11 | 3.6 | ||||
抗血小板药 | 115 | 38.1 | 脑卒中风险 | ||||
抗凝药 | 79 | 26.2 | 中风险 | 23 | 7.6 | ||
未开具抗血小板药和抗凝药中的任一类药品 | 86 | 28.5 | 高风险 | 279 | 92.4 | ||
遗忘 | 22 | 7.3 | 出血风险 | ||||
低、中风险 | 165 | 54.6 | |||||
高风险 | 137 | 45.4 |
Table 2 AF prevalence and associated medication utilization,awareness of AF,comorbidities and complications,as well as risk for stroke and bleeding in 302 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients
项目 | 例数 | 百分比(%) | 项目 | 例数 | 百分比(%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
房颤类型 | 抗凝药的发放机构a | ||||||
阵发性 | 75 | 24.8 | 社区卫生服务中心 | 6 | 7.6 | ||
持续性 | 100 | 33.1 | 综合医院/专科医院 | 72 | 91.1 | ||
永久性 | 11 | 3.6 | 遗忘 | 1 | 1.3 | ||
不清楚 | 116 | 38.4 | 首次因房颤就诊时有无主动向医务人员咨询疾病管理方面的问题 | ||||
房颤症状 | 是 | 157 | 52.0 | ||||
无 | 45 | 14.9 | 否 | 92 | 30.5 | ||
有 | 257 | 85.1 | 遗忘 | 53 | 17.5 | ||
房颤病程(年) | 房颤危害知晓情况 | ||||||
<2 | 129 | 42.7 | 知晓 | 204 | 67.5 | ||
2~5 | 99 | 32.8 | 不知晓 | 98 | 32.5 | ||
>5 | 74 | 24.5 | 共病情况b | ||||
房颤发现途径 | 高血压 | 221 | 73.2 | ||||
体检 | 125 | 41.4 | 冠心病 | 146 | 48.3 | ||
房颤症状 | 146 | 48.3 | 糖尿病 | 64 | 21.2 | ||
遗忘 | 31 | 10.3 | 高脂血症 | 31 | 10.3 | ||
房颤的首次诊断机构 | 颈动脉斑块 | 17 | 5.6 | ||||
社区卫生服务中心 | 71 | 23.5 | 心力衰竭 | 10 | 3.3 | ||
综合医院/专科医院 | 205 | 67.9 | 并发症发生情况b | ||||
遗忘 | 26 | 8.6 | 血栓栓塞事件(脑卒中、其他血栓栓塞事件) | 45 | 14.9 | ||
首次因房颤就诊时药物开具情况 | 出血事件(脑出血、外周出血) | 11 | 3.6 | ||||
抗血小板药 | 115 | 38.1 | 脑卒中风险 | ||||
抗凝药 | 79 | 26.2 | 中风险 | 23 | 7.6 | ||
未开具抗血小板药和抗凝药中的任一类药品 | 86 | 28.5 | 高风险 | 279 | 92.4 | ||
遗忘 | 22 | 7.3 | 出血风险 | ||||
低、中风险 | 165 | 54.6 | |||||
高风险 | 137 | 45.4 |
脑卒中风险 | 例数 | 服用抗凝药 | 服用抗血小板药 | 未服用抗血小板药和抗凝药中的任一类药品 |
---|---|---|---|---|
高风险 | 279 | 85(30.5) | 112(40.1) | 82(29.4) |
中风险 | 23 | 4(17.4) | 8(34.8) | 11(47.8) |
χ2值 | 3.731 | |||
P值 | 0.155 |
Table 3 Comparison of the use of antithrombotic agents in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at medium and high risk of stroke
脑卒中风险 | 例数 | 服用抗凝药 | 服用抗血小板药 | 未服用抗血小板药和抗凝药中的任一类药品 |
---|---|---|---|---|
高风险 | 279 | 85(30.5) | 112(40.1) | 82(29.4) |
中风险 | 23 | 4(17.4) | 8(34.8) | 11(47.8) |
χ2值 | 3.731 | |||
P值 | 0.155 |
自变量 | OR(95%CI) | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | 自变量 | OR(95%CI) | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别(以男为参照) | 房颤的首次诊断机构(以社区卫生服务中心为参照) | |||||||||||||
女 | 0.968(0.579,1.618) | -0.032 | 0.262 | 0.015 | 0.901 | 综合医院/专科医院 | 0.962(0.274,3.381) | -0.038 | 0.641 | 0.004 | 0.952 | |||
年龄(岁,以65~74为参照) | 遗忘 | 2.365(0.765,7.308) | 0.861 | 0.576 | 2.236 | 0.135 | ||||||||
≥75 | 0.582(0.348,0.974) | -0.541 | 0.262 | 4.251 | 0.039 | 首次因房颤就诊时即被开具抗凝药(以否为参照)a | ||||||||
BMI(kg/m2,以<24.0为参照) | 是 | 135.125(50.817,359.307) | 4.906 | 0.499 | 96.678 | <0.001 | ||||||||
24.0~28.0 | 1.192(0.554,2.564) | 0.176 | 0.391 | 0.202 | 0.653 | 抗凝药的发放机构(以社区卫生服务中心为参照) | ||||||||
>28.0 | 1.212(0.559,2.630) | 0.192 | 0.395 | 0.237 | 0.624 | 综合医院/专科医院 | 2.333(0.248,21.981) | 0.847 | 1.144 | 0.548 | 0.459 | |||
吸烟(以否为参照) | 遗忘 | 6.382(0.780,52.227) | 1.853 | 1.073 | 2.986 | 0.084 | ||||||||
是 | 2.152(0.789,5.867) | 0.766 | 0.512 | 2.243 | 0.134 | 首次因房颤就诊时有无主动向医务人员咨询疾病管理方面的问题(以无为参照) | ||||||||
饮酒(以否为参照) | 有 | 0.532(0.215,1.315) | -0.631 | 0.462 | 1.866 | 0.172 | ||||||||
是 | 0.905(0.420,1.951) | -0.100 | 0.392 | 0.065 | 0.799 | 遗忘 | 1.694(0.814,3.529) | 0.527 | 0.374 | 1.985 | 0.159 | |||
受教育程度(以小学及以下为参照) | 房颤危害知晓情况(以不知晓为参照) | |||||||||||||
初中和高中/中专 | 0.443(0.153,1.279) | -0.815 | 0.541 | 2.266 | 0.132 | 知晓 | 6.754(3.090,14.766) | -1.910 | 0.399 | 22.911 | <0.001 | |||
大专及以上 | 0.597(0.192,1.855) | -0.515 | 0.578 | 0.794 | 0.373 | 共病情况 | ||||||||
婚姻状况(以已婚为参照) | 高血压(以无为参照) | |||||||||||||
未婚 | 6.422(1.498,27.717) | 1.860 | 0.746 | 6.213 | 0.013 | 有 | 0.902(0.487,1.673) | -0.103 | 0.315 | 0.107 | 0.744 | |||
丧偶 | 6.500(0.396,106.712) | 1.872 | 1.428 | 1.719 | 0.190 | 冠心病(以无为参照) | ||||||||
个人月收入(元,以<3 000为参照) | 有 | 0.921(0.552,1.535) | -0.083 | 0.261 | 0.100 | 0.752 | ||||||||
3 000~5 000 | 0.830(0.148,4.651) | -0.186 | 0.879 | 0.045 | 0.832 | 糖尿病(以无为参照) | ||||||||
>5 000 | 1.023(0.174,6.028) | 0.023 | 0.905 | 0.001 | 0.980 | 有 | 0.828(0.442,1.550) | -0.189 | 0.320 | 0.349 | 0.555 | |||
签约家庭医生服务情况(以未签约为参照) | 高脂血症(以无为参照) | |||||||||||||
签约 | 0.181(0.023,1.411) | -1.712 | 1.049 | 2.662 | 0.103 | 有 | 2.781(1.330,5.816) | 1.023 | 0.376 | 7.387 | 0.007 | |||
房颤类型(以阵发性为参照) | 颈动脉斑块(以无为参照) | |||||||||||||
持续性 | 1.922(0.948,3.898) | 0.653 | 0.361 | 3.281 | 0.070 | 有 | 1.264(0.451,3.536) | 0.234 | 0.525 | 0.198 | 0.656 | |||
永久性 | 3.379(1.775,6.434) | 1.218 | 0.329 | 13.737 | <0.001 | 心力衰竭(以无为参照) | ||||||||
不清楚 | 1.638(0.397,6.760) | 0.494 | 0.723 | 0.466 | 0.495 | 有 | 3.608(0.991,13.133) | 1.283 | 0.659 | 3.788 | 0.052 | |||
房颤症状(以无为参照) | 并发症发生情况 | |||||||||||||
有 | 3.522(1.329,9.336) | 1.259 | 0.497 | 6.408 | 0.011 | 血栓栓塞事件(以未发生为参照) | ||||||||
房颤病程(年,以<2为参照) | 发生 | 0.802(0.392,1.641) | -0.221 | 0.365 | 0.365 | 0.546 | ||||||||
2~5 | 0.508(0.266,0.971) | -0.678 | 0.331 | 4.203 | 0.040 | 出血事件(以未发生为参照) | ||||||||
>5 | 0.903(0.472,1.724) | -0.103 | 0.330 | 0.096 | 0.756 | 发生 | 0.708(0.206,2.441) | -0.345 | 0.631 | 0.298 | 0.585 | |||
房颤发现途径(以体检为参照) | CHA2DS2-VASc评分量表得分(以实际值纳入)b | 0.891(0.726,1.094) | -0.115 | 0.105 | 1.210 | 0.271 | ||||||||
房颤症状 | 0.693(0.270,1.775) | -0.367 | 0.480 | 0.584 | 0.445 | 出血风险(以低、中风险为参照) | ||||||||
遗忘 | 2.048(0.855,4.905) | 0.717 | 0.446 | 2.590 | 0.108 | 高风险 | 0.351(0.204,0.603) | -1.047 | 0.276 | 14.374 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Univariate Logistic regression analysis of factors possibly associated with the use of anticoagulation therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of stroke
自变量 | OR(95%CI) | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | 自变量 | OR(95%CI) | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别(以男为参照) | 房颤的首次诊断机构(以社区卫生服务中心为参照) | |||||||||||||
女 | 0.968(0.579,1.618) | -0.032 | 0.262 | 0.015 | 0.901 | 综合医院/专科医院 | 0.962(0.274,3.381) | -0.038 | 0.641 | 0.004 | 0.952 | |||
年龄(岁,以65~74为参照) | 遗忘 | 2.365(0.765,7.308) | 0.861 | 0.576 | 2.236 | 0.135 | ||||||||
≥75 | 0.582(0.348,0.974) | -0.541 | 0.262 | 4.251 | 0.039 | 首次因房颤就诊时即被开具抗凝药(以否为参照)a | ||||||||
BMI(kg/m2,以<24.0为参照) | 是 | 135.125(50.817,359.307) | 4.906 | 0.499 | 96.678 | <0.001 | ||||||||
24.0~28.0 | 1.192(0.554,2.564) | 0.176 | 0.391 | 0.202 | 0.653 | 抗凝药的发放机构(以社区卫生服务中心为参照) | ||||||||
>28.0 | 1.212(0.559,2.630) | 0.192 | 0.395 | 0.237 | 0.624 | 综合医院/专科医院 | 2.333(0.248,21.981) | 0.847 | 1.144 | 0.548 | 0.459 | |||
吸烟(以否为参照) | 遗忘 | 6.382(0.780,52.227) | 1.853 | 1.073 | 2.986 | 0.084 | ||||||||
是 | 2.152(0.789,5.867) | 0.766 | 0.512 | 2.243 | 0.134 | 首次因房颤就诊时有无主动向医务人员咨询疾病管理方面的问题(以无为参照) | ||||||||
饮酒(以否为参照) | 有 | 0.532(0.215,1.315) | -0.631 | 0.462 | 1.866 | 0.172 | ||||||||
是 | 0.905(0.420,1.951) | -0.100 | 0.392 | 0.065 | 0.799 | 遗忘 | 1.694(0.814,3.529) | 0.527 | 0.374 | 1.985 | 0.159 | |||
受教育程度(以小学及以下为参照) | 房颤危害知晓情况(以不知晓为参照) | |||||||||||||
初中和高中/中专 | 0.443(0.153,1.279) | -0.815 | 0.541 | 2.266 | 0.132 | 知晓 | 6.754(3.090,14.766) | -1.910 | 0.399 | 22.911 | <0.001 | |||
大专及以上 | 0.597(0.192,1.855) | -0.515 | 0.578 | 0.794 | 0.373 | 共病情况 | ||||||||
婚姻状况(以已婚为参照) | 高血压(以无为参照) | |||||||||||||
未婚 | 6.422(1.498,27.717) | 1.860 | 0.746 | 6.213 | 0.013 | 有 | 0.902(0.487,1.673) | -0.103 | 0.315 | 0.107 | 0.744 | |||
丧偶 | 6.500(0.396,106.712) | 1.872 | 1.428 | 1.719 | 0.190 | 冠心病(以无为参照) | ||||||||
个人月收入(元,以<3 000为参照) | 有 | 0.921(0.552,1.535) | -0.083 | 0.261 | 0.100 | 0.752 | ||||||||
3 000~5 000 | 0.830(0.148,4.651) | -0.186 | 0.879 | 0.045 | 0.832 | 糖尿病(以无为参照) | ||||||||
>5 000 | 1.023(0.174,6.028) | 0.023 | 0.905 | 0.001 | 0.980 | 有 | 0.828(0.442,1.550) | -0.189 | 0.320 | 0.349 | 0.555 | |||
签约家庭医生服务情况(以未签约为参照) | 高脂血症(以无为参照) | |||||||||||||
签约 | 0.181(0.023,1.411) | -1.712 | 1.049 | 2.662 | 0.103 | 有 | 2.781(1.330,5.816) | 1.023 | 0.376 | 7.387 | 0.007 | |||
房颤类型(以阵发性为参照) | 颈动脉斑块(以无为参照) | |||||||||||||
持续性 | 1.922(0.948,3.898) | 0.653 | 0.361 | 3.281 | 0.070 | 有 | 1.264(0.451,3.536) | 0.234 | 0.525 | 0.198 | 0.656 | |||
永久性 | 3.379(1.775,6.434) | 1.218 | 0.329 | 13.737 | <0.001 | 心力衰竭(以无为参照) | ||||||||
不清楚 | 1.638(0.397,6.760) | 0.494 | 0.723 | 0.466 | 0.495 | 有 | 3.608(0.991,13.133) | 1.283 | 0.659 | 3.788 | 0.052 | |||
房颤症状(以无为参照) | 并发症发生情况 | |||||||||||||
有 | 3.522(1.329,9.336) | 1.259 | 0.497 | 6.408 | 0.011 | 血栓栓塞事件(以未发生为参照) | ||||||||
房颤病程(年,以<2为参照) | 发生 | 0.802(0.392,1.641) | -0.221 | 0.365 | 0.365 | 0.546 | ||||||||
2~5 | 0.508(0.266,0.971) | -0.678 | 0.331 | 4.203 | 0.040 | 出血事件(以未发生为参照) | ||||||||
>5 | 0.903(0.472,1.724) | -0.103 | 0.330 | 0.096 | 0.756 | 发生 | 0.708(0.206,2.441) | -0.345 | 0.631 | 0.298 | 0.585 | |||
房颤发现途径(以体检为参照) | CHA2DS2-VASc评分量表得分(以实际值纳入)b | 0.891(0.726,1.094) | -0.115 | 0.105 | 1.210 | 0.271 | ||||||||
房颤症状 | 0.693(0.270,1.775) | -0.367 | 0.480 | 0.584 | 0.445 | 出血风险(以低、中风险为参照) | ||||||||
遗忘 | 2.048(0.855,4.905) | 0.717 | 0.446 | 2.590 | 0.108 | 高风险 | 0.351(0.204,0.603) | -1.047 | 0.276 | 14.374 | <0.001 |
自变量 | OR(95%CI) | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄(岁,以65~74为参照) | |||||||
≥75 | 0.231(0.073,0.731) | -1.465 | 0.588 | 6.218 | 0.013 | ||
婚姻状况(以已婚为参照) | |||||||
未婚 | 2.551(0.247,26.386) | 0.936 | 1.192 | 0.617 | 0.432 | ||
丧偶 | 2.469(0.006,1 038.502) | 0.904 | 3.083 | 0.086 | 0.769 | ||
房颤类型(以阵发性为参照) | |||||||
持续性 | 1.153(0.252,5.278) | 0.142 | 0.776 | 0.034 | 0.855 | ||
永久性 | 5.887(1.502,23.078) | 1.773 | 0.697 | 6.467 | 0.011 | ||
不清楚 | 0.180(0.010,3.228) | -1.714 | 1.473 | 1.473 | 0.244 | ||
房颤症状(以无为参照) | |||||||
有 | 2.120(0.698,6.436) | 0.751 | 0.567 | 1.758 | 0.185 | ||
房颤病程(年,以<2为参照) | |||||||
2~5 | 0.492(0.114,2.121) | -0.709 | 0.745 | 0.905 | 0.342 | ||
>5 | 1.331(0.347,5.104) | 0.286 | 0.686 | 0.174 | 0.677 | ||
首次因房颤就诊时即被开具抗凝药(以否为参照)a | |||||||
是 | 317.522(72.953,1 381.985) | 5.761 | 0.750 | 58.933 | <0.001 | ||
房颤危害知晓情况(以不知晓为参照) | |||||||
知晓 | 4.628(1.015,21.095) | 1.532 | 0.774 | 3.920 | 0.048 | ||
共病情况 | |||||||
高脂血症(以无为参照) | |||||||
有 | 3.654(0.898,14.868) | 1.296 | 0.716 | 3.274 | 0.070 | ||
出血风险(以低、中风险为参照) | |||||||
高风险 | 0.441(0.155,1.253) | -0.819 | 0.533 | 2.363 | 0.124 |
Table 5 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of the influencing factors of the use of anticoagulation therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of stroke
自变量 | OR(95%CI) | b | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄(岁,以65~74为参照) | |||||||
≥75 | 0.231(0.073,0.731) | -1.465 | 0.588 | 6.218 | 0.013 | ||
婚姻状况(以已婚为参照) | |||||||
未婚 | 2.551(0.247,26.386) | 0.936 | 1.192 | 0.617 | 0.432 | ||
丧偶 | 2.469(0.006,1 038.502) | 0.904 | 3.083 | 0.086 | 0.769 | ||
房颤类型(以阵发性为参照) | |||||||
持续性 | 1.153(0.252,5.278) | 0.142 | 0.776 | 0.034 | 0.855 | ||
永久性 | 5.887(1.502,23.078) | 1.773 | 0.697 | 6.467 | 0.011 | ||
不清楚 | 0.180(0.010,3.228) | -1.714 | 1.473 | 1.473 | 0.244 | ||
房颤症状(以无为参照) | |||||||
有 | 2.120(0.698,6.436) | 0.751 | 0.567 | 1.758 | 0.185 | ||
房颤病程(年,以<2为参照) | |||||||
2~5 | 0.492(0.114,2.121) | -0.709 | 0.745 | 0.905 | 0.342 | ||
>5 | 1.331(0.347,5.104) | 0.286 | 0.686 | 0.174 | 0.677 | ||
首次因房颤就诊时即被开具抗凝药(以否为参照)a | |||||||
是 | 317.522(72.953,1 381.985) | 5.761 | 0.750 | 58.933 | <0.001 | ||
房颤危害知晓情况(以不知晓为参照) | |||||||
知晓 | 4.628(1.015,21.095) | 1.532 | 0.774 | 3.920 | 0.048 | ||
共病情况 | |||||||
高脂血症(以无为参照) | |||||||
有 | 3.654(0.898,14.868) | 1.296 | 0.716 | 3.274 | 0.070 | ||
出血风险(以低、中风险为参照) | |||||||
高风险 | 0.441(0.155,1.253) | -0.819 | 0.533 | 2.363 | 0.124 |
[1] |
陈灏珠,林果为,王吉耀. 实用内科学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:1386-1387.
|
[2] |
|
[3] | |
[4] |
张澍,杨艳敏,黄从新,等. 中国心房颤动患者卒中预防规范(2017)[J]. 中华心律失常学杂志,2018,22(1):17-30. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2015.03.002.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
薛源,李海红,刘婷,等. 基于多中心的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗凝治疗现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国临床医学,2018,25(5):728-732. DOI:10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2018.20180086.
|
[7] |
郑杨剑,王文娜,林韩立,等. 舟山地区非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中高危患者华法林抗凝治疗的影响因素分析[J]. 浙江医学,2016,38(7):476-478.
|
[8] |
上海市民政局. 解读上海养老服务发展报告(白皮书)[EB/OL]. (2016-01-29)[2021-10-11].
|
[9] |
卫生部. 关于印发《国家基本公共卫生服务规范(2009年版)》的通知[A/OL]. (2009-10-16)[2021-10-11].
|
[10] |
张维,吴毓敏,刘千军,等. 社区老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的抗凝治疗现状[J]. 国际心血管病杂志,2016,43(3):187-189. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6583.2016.03.016.
|
[11] |
戚玉勤,金雪娟,李双,等. 上海市社区老年人群心房颤动的流行病学特征及抗凝治疗现状调查[J]. 中国临床医学,2018,25(1):1-4. DOI:10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2018.20171045.
|
[12] |
中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会,中国医师协会心律学专业委员会,中国房颤中心联盟心房颤动防治专家工作委员会. 心房颤动:目前的认识和治疗建议(2021)[J]. 中华心律失常学杂志,2022,26(1):15-88. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113859-20211224-00264.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
孙艺红,胡大一. 非瓣膜病心房颤动患者全球抗凝注册研究中国亚组基线数据分析[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2014,42(10):846-850. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2014.10.011.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
周俊,李志明,李双,等. 上海市社区老年人群心房颤动的流行病学调查[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(9):1314-1318. DOI:10.7655/NYDXBNS20180929.
|
[18] | |
[19] |
宋文豪,干学东,张琳,等. 非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗凝治疗现状和影响因素[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版),2020,41(3):464-467. DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8852.2019.0710.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
朱婷,陈燕,缪春叶,等. 首因效应在改善骨折患儿家属心理状态中的应用[J]. 海军医学杂志,2018,39(4):364-366. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2018.04.024.
|
[1] | YAO Yuzhong, MA Xiaojun, SONG Huan, ZHONG Yu. The Management Effect of Diabetes "1358 model" on Community Diabetes Patients Based on "Precision Management Combining General Care and Specialty Care" [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4308-4314. |
[2] | QIN Fengyin, ZHANG Qishan, LAI Jinjia, HUANG Yimin, HAN Guoyin, SUN Xinglan, WANG Fen, TAN Yibing. Current Status and Influencing Factors of the Intention to Screen for High-risk Stroke among Community Residents in Guangdong [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4283-4289. |
[3] | FENG Xiaoyu, LI Wanling, LYU Siman, NI Cuiping, WANG Haocheng, LIU Yu. International Research Status and Hot Spot Analysis of InterRAI HC Based on Bibliometrics [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4351-4358. |
[4] | GU Hanxin, LIU Yang, LIU Yuanli. Falls Prevention Intervention for Community-dwelling Older Adults from the Perspective of Policy Tools: an International Comparative Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4231-4238. |
[5] | HAO Aihua, ZENG Weilin, LI Guanhai, XIA Yinghua, CHEN Liang. Current Situation of the Construction of Family Doctor Team: an Investigation Based on the Perspective of General Practitioners [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4261-4268. |
[6] | LI Dianjiang, PAN Enchun, SUN Zhongming, WEN Jinbo, WANG Miaomiao, WU Ming, SHEN Chong. The Current Status and Influencing Factors of Clinical Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Community [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4296-4301. |
[7] | HUANG Jinling, ZENG Zhirong. The Logic and Trend of Urban Community Health Service Policies in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4239-4245. |
[8] | YANG Hui, HU Ruwei, LIU Ruqing, LU Junfeng, WU Jinglan. Relationship between Community Health Service Experience and Glycemic Control Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4290-4295. |
[9] | WANG Yue, CHEN Qing, LIU Lurong. Detection Rate of Depression and Its Influencing Factors in Chinese Elderly: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4329-4335. |
[10] | XU Jian, DAI Fangfang, PAN Wenlei, HUANG Qian, LU Ping, WANG Jianfeng, JIA Huan, YANG Yuqi, HUANG Jiaoling. Visual Analysis of Hotspots and Cutting-edge Trends of Community TCM Service Research in China in the Context of Healthy China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4343-4350. |
[11] | YU Xinyan, ZHAO Jun, ZHAO Xiaoye, JIANG Qingru, CHEN Yatian, WANG Yan, ZHANG Haicheng. Application of Mobile Smart Healthcare in the Prevention and Control of Cardiovascular Diseases in Elderly Patients with Chronic Diseases in Primary Care [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4167-4172. |
[12] | XIN Gongkai, CONG Xin, YUAN Lei, CHENG Yuetong, NI Cuiping, ZHANG Weiwei, ZHANG Pingping, LIU Yu. Research Progress on Comprehensive Assessment Tools for the Elderly with Dementia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4103-4109. |
[13] | ZHANG Jin, DING Zhiguo, QI Shuo, LI Ying, LI Weiqiang, ZHANG Yuanyuan, ZHOU Tong. Relationship between Serum Thyroid Hormone Levels and Prognosis during Hospitalization in Heart Failure Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4125-4129. |
[14] | ZHOU Yuyu, GAO Chuan, CUI Puan, WANG Yaping, HE Zhong. Influencing Factors of Shared Decision Making between Doctors and Patients in Menopausal Hormone Therapy in Patients with Menopausal Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4181-4186. |
[15] | WANG Lina, GAO Pengfei, CAO Fan, GE Ying, YAN Wei, HE Daikun. Analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Different Gender Groups [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4143-4151. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||