中国全科医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (27): 3366-3372.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0868

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

经远端桡动脉入径行二次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性、安全性和手术时机研究

刘明浩1, 王攀2, 高立建1,*(), 徐淑清3, 王欢欢1, 赵光贤4, 陈珏1, 乔树宾1, 徐波1, 袁晋青1   

  1. 1.100037 北京市,中国医学科学院阜外医院心内科冠心病中心
    2.833400 新疆维吾尔自治区博乐市,新疆生产建设兵团第五师医院心内科
    3.130051 吉林省长春市人民医院心内科
    4.133099 吉林省延吉市,延边大学附属医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-17 修回日期:2023-03-28 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-04-14
  • 通讯作者: 高立建
  • 【专家简介】 高立建,中国医学科学院阜外医院心内科冠心病中心主任医师,擅长各类冠状动脉复杂病变的介入治疗,完成经远端桡动脉入径介入治疗病例1 900余例,每年完成冠状动脉慢性完全性闭塞(CTO)病例150余例;2017—2018年在德克萨斯医学中心赫尔曼纪念医院留学;中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会委员(介入学组)、全国冠心病介入培训基地导师、全国心血管专培医师指导及考核教师、白求恩研究会心血管分会委员、老年心血管病学会委员、海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会心血管专业委员会委员、中国医疗保健国际交流促进会心血管疾病预防与治疗分会青年委员、北京市精准医学学会会员、北京医学会青年CTO俱乐部成员、慢性闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)分会委员、京津冀CTO介入治疗俱乐部委员会委员、中国经远端桡动脉介入治疗俱乐部秘书、大拇指泛血管远桡俱乐部理事;CTO club及冠状动脉复杂病变介入治疗大会(CCT)、中国心脏介入大会(CIT)、中国心脏病大会(CHC)、东方心脏病学会议(OCC)等主席团成员;发表临床研究论文80余篇,SCI收录论文8篇,涉及经远端桡动脉入径介入治疗论文5篇;牵头组织经远端桡动脉入径介入治疗相关随机对照试验1项;获得国家发明专利3项,新技术1项;参编专著11部,参加国家自然科学基金项目3项,省部级课题3项,临床试验15项;荣获优秀援疆干部、国家卫生健康委直属单位优秀党员,所率团队荣获"远桡介入优秀团队"。
    刘明浩与王攀为共同第一作者

    作者贡献:刘明浩、王攀、高立建负责研究的构思与设计及可行性分析;刘明浩、王攀、徐淑清、王欢欢、赵光贤进行文献/资料收集与整理,负责撰写论文;刘明浩、高立建进行论文与英文的修订;高立建、陈珏、乔树宾、徐波、袁晋青负责文章的质量控制及审校;高立建对文章整体负责,进行监督管理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划(2016YFC1301301)

Feasibility, Safety and Timing of Secondary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Artery Approach

LIU Minghao1, WANG Pan2, GAO Lijian1,*(), XU Shuqing3, WANG Huanhuan1, ZHAO Guangxian4, CHEN Jue1, QIAO Shubin1, XU Bo1, YUAN Jinqing1   

  1. 1. Coronary Artery Disease Center, Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, Beijing 100037, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, Fifth Division Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Bole 833400, China
    3. Department of Cardiology, Changchun People's Hospital, Changchun 130051, China
    4. Department of Cardiology, Yanbian University Hospital, Yanji 133099, China
  • Received:2022-10-17 Revised:2023-03-28 Published:2023-09-20 Online:2023-04-14
  • Contact: GAO Lijian
  • About author:
    LIU Minghao and WANG Pan are co-first authors

摘要: 背景 经远端桡动脉入径(dTRA)行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)能有效降低桡动脉闭塞发生率,但目前国内尚无关于dTRA行二次PCI可行性、安全性及手术时机的研究报道。 目的 探讨dTRA行二次PCI的可行性、安全性及手术时机。 方法 连续纳入2021年7月—2022年7月中国医学科学院阜外医院收治的拟dTRA行二次PCI的患者70例,根据距上次dTRA行PCI时间间隔将其分为≤30 d组(n=33)与>30 d组(n=37)。比较两组患者一般临床资料、操作相关指标、冠状动脉病变情况及术前、术后24 h桡骨茎突近心端5、10、15 cm处桡动脉内径。 结果 70例患者中69例dTRA穿刺、置管均成功,成功率为98.6%(69/70);经评估需行二次PCI的67例患者中66例成功完成二次PCI,成功率为98.5%(66/67)。两组患者年龄、血小板计数、糖尿病发生率、病变血管支数、美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)冠状动脉病变分型比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者均于术后3 h解除加压包扎,术后即刻、术后24 h均可触及穿刺侧桡动脉搏动,无一例出现桡动脉闭塞,桡动脉通畅率为100.0%(69/69)。≤30 d组患者术前、术后24 h桡骨茎突近心端5、10、15 cm处桡动脉内径均大于>30 d组(P<0.05);≤30 d组患者术后24 h桡骨茎突近心端15 cm处桡动脉内径小于术前,>30 d组患者术后24 h桡骨茎突近心端5 cm处桡动脉内径大于术前(P<0.05)。 结论 dTRA行二次PCI安全、可行,且无论距首次dTRA行PCI时间是≤30 d还是>30 d,均能满足dTRA行二次PCI的血管条件,临床可根据患者病情及穿刺部位等决定dTRA行二次PCI手术时机。

关键词: 冠心病, 冠状动脉疾病, 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗, 桡动脉, 远端桡动脉, 再手术, 治疗结果, 安全

Abstract:

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via distal transradial artery approach (dTRA) is effective in reducing the incidence of radial artery occlusion, however, there are no reports on the feasibility, safety and timing of secondary PCI via dTRA domestically.

Objective

To explore the feasibility, safety and timing of secondary PCI via dTRA.

Methods

A total of 70 patients who were to undergo secondary PCI via dTRA in Fuwai Hospital, CAMS&PUMC from July 2021 to July 2022 were consecutively included and divided into ≤30 d group (n=33) and >30 d group (n=37) according to the time interval since the last PCI via dTRA. The general clinical data, operation-related indicators, coronary artery lesions and radial artery inner diameters at 5, 10 and 15 cm proximal to the radial styloid process before and 24 h after PCI were compared between the two groups.

Results

The dTRA puncture and catheterization were successfully conducted in 69 of 70 patients, with a success rate of 98.6% (69/70) . Second PCI via dTRA was successfully completed in 66 of 67 patients assessed for secondary PCI, with a success rate of 98.5% (66/67) . There were significantly difference in age, platelet count, incidence of diabetes, number of lesioned vessels and ACC/AHA coronary artery lesions typing (P<0.05) . The compression bandage was released 3 hafter surgery, and the radial artery pulsation on the puncture side was palpable immediately and 24 h after surgery, and none of the patients occurred radial artery occlusion, with the radial artery patency rate of 100.0% (69/69) . The radial artery inner diameters at 5, 10 and 15 cm proximal to the radial styloid process in ≤30 d group were significantly greater than that in >30 d group before and 24 h after PCI when comparing between the two groups, respectively (P<0.05) . Radial artery inner diameter at 15 cm proximal to the radial styloid process 24 h after PCI was smaller than that before surgery in ≤30 d group, radial artery inner diameter at 5 cm proximal to the radial styloid process 24 h after PCI was smaller than that before surgery in >30 d group (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

Secondary PCI via dTRA is safe and feasible independent of first dTRA PCI time (≤30 days or >30 days from the first dTRA PCI) , and the timing of secondary PCI via dTRA should be determined according to the patient's condition and puncture site.

Key words: Coronary disease, Coronary artery disease, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Radial artery, Distal radial artery, Reoperation, Treatment outcome, Safety