中国全科医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (07): 843-852.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0548

所属专题: 家庭医学的方法学精华特刊

• 论著·临床实践与改进研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

医生参与医患共享决策行为特征的混合方法研究

杨林宁1, 郑红颖2, 徐于睿1, 杨艳3,*()   

  1. 1.200127 上海市,上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院护理部
    2.200032 上海市,复旦大学公共卫生学院
    3.200025 上海市,上海交通大学护理学院
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-18 修回日期:2022-12-31 出版日期:2023-03-05 发布日期:2023-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 杨艳

  • 作者贡献:杨林宁、郑红颖共同进行文章的构思与设计、资料的收集与整理、结果的分析与解释;杨林宁撰写论文初稿;郑红颖、徐于睿指导修订论文;杨艳负责文章的质量控制及审校,对文章整体负责、监督管理。
  • 基金资助:
    上海交通大学护理高原学科建设国际合作基金(Hlgy1802gj)

Behavioral Characteristics of Physician Participation in Shared Decision-making: a Mixed-methods Study

YANG Linning1, ZHENG Hongying2, XU Yurui1, YANG Yan3,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Nursing, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
    2. School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    3. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2022-08-18 Revised:2022-12-31 Published:2023-03-05 Online:2023-01-04
  • Contact: YANG Yan

摘要: 背景 医患共享决策是"以患者为中心"的重要体现形式之一,其临床实施过程并不理想,医生是推进医患共享决策实施过程的主体之一,但目前鲜见对共享决策过程中医生行为的研究。 目的 探讨医生参与医患共享决策的过程及主要的行为特征,为医患共享决策在临床的推广和应用提供依据。 方法 采用混合方法研究的聚敛式设计,同时收集定量数据和定性数据。定量研究采用方便抽样法,于2020年5—12月选取上海市某三级甲等医院的在职临床医生360例进行问卷调查,探索医生参与共享决策的现况,并对医生参与共享决策的行为进行K-均值聚类,分析医生共享决策行为的分布特征;定性研究采用方便抽样和目的抽样法,于2020年6—12月选取定量研究中的23例医生进行半结构式访谈,探索医生参与共享决策的过程和体验,明确医生在决策各环节的主要行为特征。 结果 定量研究结果:325例(90.3%)医生的问卷被有效回收,参与共享决策行为的平均得分为(80.44±14.88)分。医生在解释治疗方案优缺点〔(4.38±0.74)分〕、提供多种治疗方案〔(4.30±0.84)分〕两项行为上的参与度较高,在告诉患者需要共同做一个重要的决定〔(3.72±1.22)分〕、共同决定选择某一治疗方案〔(3.74±1.03)分〕两项行为上的参与度较低;聚类分析结果显示,医生参与共享决策的行为特征可分为3组,分别为"知情同意组""患者部分参与组""共享决策组"。定性研究结果:医患共享决策过程中医生的参与行为包括创建决策意识,提供信息,检查患者对信息的理解,澄清患者价值观,共同权衡(治疗方案的评价),决策制定与实施。混合研究结果:在决策进程中,医生更关注信息的提供,忽视了医患沟通层面促进患者参与的行为要素,医生参与共享决策的各行为特征不同。 结论 医患共享决策的行为是有限实施的,医生对共享决策的行为过程存在误解。可从知识和态度层面入手,帮助医生明晰共享决策的过程,通过情景模拟、角色扮演等方式加深医生对共享决策的认识和理解,提高其对患者决策价值的认同,从而推动医患共享决策在临床的真正实施。

关键词: 共同决策, 医生病人关系, 行为特征, 混合研究

Abstract:

Background

Shared decision-making is a practice that fully reflects the idea of patient-centered care, but its clinical implementation process is not ideal. Physicians are main participants to promote the implementation of shared decision-making, but there are few studies on their behaviors in shared decision-making.

Objective

To explore the process and main behavioral characteristics of physicians' participation in shared decision-making, offering evidence for the promotion and implementation of shared decision-making in clinical practice.

Methods

A mixed-methods convergent design was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data. In the quantitative study, convenience sampling method was used to select in-service physicians (n=360) from a grade A tertiary hospital in Shanghai to attend a questionnaire survey from May to December 2020 to understand the status of their participation in shared decision-making. K-means clustering was conducted to analyze the distribution characteristics of physicians' participation in shared decision-making. In the qualitative study, 23 physicians selected from the participants of the quantitative study using convenience sampling and purposive sampling from June to December 2020 were recruited to attend semi-structured interviews to explore the process and experience of their participation in shared decision-making and identify the main behavioral characteristics of them in each part of the process of shared decision-making.

Results

Quantitative data analysis: in all, 325 (90.3%) of the physicians who returned responsive questionaries were included for analysis. The average total score of their participation behavior in shared decision-making was (80.44±14.88) . The further analysis found that physicians had the highest participation in behaviors of "Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the treatment options to my patient" (4.38±0.74) and "I told my patient that there are different options for treating his/her medical condition" (4.30±0.84) ; physicians had the lowest participation in behaviors of "I made clear to my patient that a shared decision needs to be made" (3.72±1.22) and "My patient and I selected a treatment option together" (3.74±1.03) . The results of cluster analysis showed that the behavioral characteristics of physicians' participation in shared decision-making could be divided into three groups, namely informed consent group, partial patient participation group and shared decision-making group. Qualitative data analysis: physicians' participation behaviors in shared decision-making included building up the awareness of shared decision-making, providing the patient with information, examining patient comprehension of the information, clarifying patient values, co-assessment (of the feasibility of the options) , reaching a decision and decision implementation. Analysis of the mixed-methods research results showed that in the decision-making process, physicians paid more attention to the provision of information, and ignored the behavioral factors of promoting patient participation at the level of doctor-patient communication. The behavioral characteristics of physicians' participation in shared decision-making were different.

Conclusion

The physicians' participation behavior in shared decision-making was limited. And they may have misunderstandings about the behavior process of shared decision-making. To promote the practical implementation of shared decision-making in clinical practice, it is suggested to help physicians clarify the process of shared decision-making via interventions enhancing their knowledge and attitudes regarding shared decision-making, deepen their understanding of shared decision-making through scenario simulation and role-playing, and improve their recognition of patient values in decision-making.

Key words: Decision making, shared, Physician-patient relations, Behavior characteristics, Mixed-method study