中国全科医学

• •

基于血常规炎性因子构建衰弱发生风险列线图模型

石小天, 王珊, 杨华昱, 杨一帆, 李旭, 窦国泽, 马清   

  • 收稿日期:2023-12-07 修回日期:2024-02-26 接受日期:2024-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 马清
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生发展科技专项(首发2022-2-2028)

Construction of a Column-line Diagram Model of the Risk of Frailty based on Routine Blood Inflammatory Factors

SHI Xiaotian, WANG Shan, YANG Huayu, YANG Yifan, LI Xu, DOU Guoze, MA Qing   

  • Received:2023-12-07 Revised:2024-02-26 Accepted:2024-03-21
  • Contact: MA Qing
分享到

摘要: 背景 衰弱是一种常见的老年综合征,目前评估主要依赖于各种量表,缺乏统一金标准。慢性炎症作为衰弱的病理生理机制之一,血常规中炎性因子简单易获得,关于其和衰弱之间的相关研究较少。目的 探讨体检老年人血常规炎性指标和衰弱的相关性,分析衰弱的影响因素并构建衰弱发生风险的列线图模型。方法 一项横断面研究,共纳入2020年8月至2022年12月于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院行健康体检的老年人554例,采用FRAIL量表评估衰弱,采用Logistic回归分析衰弱的影响因素,基于影响因素构建列线图,采用Bootstrap进行模型内部验证。使用受试者工作曲线、Homster-Lemeshow拟合度检验合并校准曲线图、临床决策曲线图分别对模型进行性能评价。 结果 共纳入554例老年人,平均年龄是74.4±9.5岁,衰弱213例(38.4%),Logistic回归分析显示,ACCI(OR=1.42,95%CI 1.21-1.66)、MNA.SF(OR=0.71,95%CI 0.61-0.83)、HRR(OR=0.44,95%CI 0.23-0.86)及多重用药(OR=0.54,95%CI 0.36-0.81是老年人衰弱的独立影响因素。构建衰弱列线图模型,ROC曲线下面积为0.721,Bootstrap重抽样法进行内部验证后,列线图模型拟合度较好(P>0.05);校准曲线图显示, 预测概率与实际概率发生率的相关性良好;临床决策曲线图表明模型具有较好的临床实用性。结论 年龄、共病、多重用药、营养不良及HRR是衰弱的影响因素,构建的预测模型具有良好的区分度、一致性与临床实用性,可为衰弱早期筛查提供指导。

关键词: 衰弱, 炎性因子, 列线图, 影响因素, Logistic回归分析

Abstract: Background Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome, and there is currently no unified gold standard for assessments of this condition, which mostly depends on a range of measures. Chronic inflammation as one of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of frailty and the simple availability of inflammatory factors in the blood routine, there are fewer studies on the correlation between them and frailty. Objective The goals of this study are to build a columnar graphical model of the risk of acquiring frailty, assess the factors influencing frailty, and look into the relationship between routine blood inflammatory indicators and frailty in older adults receiving physical examination. Methods In August 2020 to December 2022, 554 elderly people who had health examinations participated in a cross-sectional study. The influencing elements of frailty were analyzed using logistic regression, column-line plots were created based on the influencing factors, and the model was internally validated using bootstrap. The subjects' working curve, the clinical decision curve graph, and the Homster-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test in conjunction with the calibration curve graph were used to assess the model's performance, respectively. Results A total of 554 older adults were included, the mean age was 74.4±9.5 years, and 213 (38.4%) were frail. In multivariate logistic regression analysis we identified several variables independently associated with the risk of frailty: ACCI (OR=1.42, 95% CI 1.21-1.66), MNA.SF (OR=0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.83), HRR (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.86), and polypharmacy (OR=0.54,95% CI 0.36-0.81). The column line diagram works by creating a multifactor regression model that has a 0.721 area under the ROC curve. The column-line diagram model had an excellent fit (P<0.05) after internal validation using the Bootstrap resampling approach; the calibration curve diagrams demonstrated a high match between the anticipated probability and the actual probability of occurrence. The model's strong clinical utility was demonstrated by the clinical decision plot. Conclusion Frailty was influenced by age, comorbidities, polypharmacy, malnourishment, and HRR. The developed prediction model can offer guidelines for early frailty screening and has strong distinction, consistency, and clinical utility.

Key words: Frailty, Inflammatory factors, Column-line diagram, Influencing factors, Logistic regression analysis