中国全科医学

• •

非肥胖2型糖尿病患者肌肉量减少危险因素的列线图预测模型研究

张冰青, 胡馨云, 欧阳煜钦, 向心月, 汤文娟, 冯文焕   

  • 收稿日期:2024-02-19 修回日期:2024-03-18 接受日期:2024-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 冯文焕

A Predictive Nomogram for the Risk factors of muscle mass loss in non-obese patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ZHANG Bingqing,HU Xinyun,OUYANG Yuqin,XIANG Xinyue,TANG Wenjuna,FENG Wenhuan   

  • Received:2024-02-19 Revised:2024-03-18 Accepted:2024-03-21
  • Contact: FENG Wenhuan
分享到

摘要: 背景 肌肉量减少增加2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者高血糖及肌少症风险,中国成人T2DM以非肥胖者为主,这些患者较肥胖者更容易伴发肌肉量减少。目的 建立个体化预测非肥胖T2DM患者肌肉量减少风险因素列线图模型。方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年9月在南京大学附属鼓楼医院内分泌科收治非肥胖T2DM患者905例,以简单随机抽样法按7∶3比例分为训练集(633例)和验证集(272例)。采用单因素logistic回归分析确定训练集肌肉量减少风险影响因素,根据多因素分析构建列线图,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、Hosmer-Lemeshow校准曲线及临床决策曲线(DCA)评估列线图的预测价值和临床实用性。结果 非肥胖T2DM患者肌肉量减少患病率为42.3%。训练集logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄(OR=1.037,95%CI 1.009~1.067,P=0.010)、男性(OR=3.464,95%CI 2.185~5.490,P<0.001)、体重指数<23.5 kg/m2(OR=18.583,95%CI 10.865~31.783,P<0.001)、糖化血红蛋白(OR=1.172,95%CI 1.063~1.292,P=0.001)、内脏脂肪面积(OR=1.021,95%CI 1.011~1.032,P<0.001)是非肥胖T2DM患者肌肉量减少独立危险因素。训练集和验证集预测非肥胖T2DM患者肌肉量减少风险曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.825(95%CI 0.793~0.856,P<0.001)和0.806(95%CI 0.753~0.859,P<0.001)。Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验结果显示拟合度较好(训练集:χ2=11.822,P=0.159;验证集:χ2=8.189,P=0.415)。Bootstrap法绘制模型校准图显示校准曲线与标准曲线贴合良好。DCA曲线显示当患者阈值概率为0.06~0.94时,使用列线图预测模型预测T2DM患者发生肌肉量减少风险更有益。结论 本研究构建的列线图模型可个体化预测非肥胖T2DM患者伴发肌肉量减少风险,便于早期识别高危人群,利于制定个体化干预措施。

关键词: 列线图, 糖尿病, 2型, 非肥胖, 四肢骨骼肌指数, 危险因素

Abstract: Background Muscle mass loss increases the risk of hyperglycaemia and sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and Chinese adults with T2DM are predominantly non-obese, who are more likely to be associated with muscle mass loss than the obese. Aims To establish an individualized prediction nomogram model for the risk factors of muscle mass loss in non-obese patients with T2DM. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 905 non-obese patients with T2DM admitted to the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University from January 2018 to September 2023. The patients were divided into a training set(n=633)and a validation set(n=272)using simple random sampling at a ratio of 7∶3. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for muscle mass loss in the training set. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of the multifactorial analysis.The predictive value and clinical utility of the nomogram were evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC)curve,Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration(H-L)curve,and Decision Curve Analysis(DCA),respectively. Results The prevalence of muscle mass loss in non-obese patients with T2DM was 42.3%. The logistic regression analysis in the training set revealed that age(OR=1.037,95%CI 1.009~1.067,P=0.010)、male(OR=3.464,95%CI 2.185~5.490,P<0.001)、Body mass index<23.5 kg/m2(OR=18.583,95%CI 10.865~31.783,P<0.001)、HbA1c(OR=1.172,95%CI 1.063~1.292,P=0.001)、Visceral Fat Area(OR=1.021,95%CI 1.011~1.032,P<0.001)were independent risk factors for muscle mass loss in non-obese patients with T2DM. The AUC for predicting the risk of muscle mass loss in the training and validation sets were 0.825(95%CI 0.793~0.856,P<0.001)and 0.806(95%CI 0.753~0.859,P<0.001), respectively. Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that this model fit the data well(χ2=11.822,P=0.159 in the training set;χ2=8.189,P=0.415 in the validation set). Calibration charts of the model drawn by Bootstrap method showed that the calibration curves fit well with the standard curves. DCA showed that the use of nomogram prediction model was more beneficial in predicting muscle mass loss in non-obese patients with T2DM when the threshold probability of patients was 0.06~0.94. Conclusion The nomogram model established in this study enables individualized prediction of the risk of muscle mass loss in non-obese patients with T2DM,which help to facilitate early identification of high-risk individuals and support the development of personalized intervention measures.

Key words: Nomogram, Diabetes mellitus, type 2, Non-obesity, Appendicular skeletal muscle index, Risk factors