中国全科医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (28): 3533-3539.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.724

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

纵向紧密型医疗联合体绩效评价指标筛选研究

王曼丽1,方海清2,陶红兵3*   

  1. 1.518060广东省深圳市,深圳大学中国经济特区研究中心 2.518020广东省深圳市,深圳市人民医院 3.430030湖北省武汉市,华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院
    *通信作者:陶红兵,教授;E-mail:hhbtao@hust.edu.cn
  • 出版日期:2020-10-05 发布日期:2020-10-05
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71473099);中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M653051);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJC630095)

Performance Evaluation Indicators Screening for the Vertical and Compact Medical Consortium 

WANG Manli1,FANG Haiqing2,TAO Hongbing3*   

  1. 1.China Center for Special Economic Zone Research,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China
    2.Shenzhen People's Hospital,Shenzhen 518020,China
    3.School of Medicine and Health Management,Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology,Wuhan 430030,China
    *Corresponding author:TAO Hongbing,Professor;E-mail:hhbtao@hust.edu.cn
  • Published:2020-10-05 Online:2020-10-05

摘要: 背景 纵向紧密型医疗联合体是我国医疗服务整合实践的重要形式,其绩效评价结果直接关系到纵向紧密型医疗联合体的良性发展,因此有必要构建一套专门针对纵向紧密型医疗联合体的绩效评价指标体系。目的 建立纵向紧密型医疗联合体绩效评价指标框架,为我国医疗联合体建设和绩效管理工作提供参考。方法 2017年8月—2018年10月,结合国内外文献分析和个人深入访谈,初步拟定纵向紧密型医疗联合体绩效评价指标体系;通过对16位专家进行两轮德尔菲法专家咨询,对绩效评价指标进行完善和修改,并对结果进行Kendall's W一致性检验。结果 两轮咨询的专家应答率均为100.0%,权威系数均为0.73,协调系数分别是0.30和0.51(P<0.01),达到一致性检验要求。最终构建了包含卫生服务可及性、卫生服务数量、卫生服务质量、卫生服务效率、卫生服务效果、卫生服务可负担性6个一级指标和24个二级指标的纵向紧密型医疗联合体绩效评价指标框架。结论 绩效评价指标的专家积极性、权威系数及协调系数较高,已筛选的指标可靠性和特异性较高,但需进一步优化指标、完善德尔菲法专家咨询并开展指标验证工作。

关键词: 医疗联合体, 绩效评价, 德尔菲技术

Abstract: Background The vertical and compact medical consortium is an important form of the integration of medical institutions in China,whose performance evaluation is directly related to its sound development. Hence,it is necessary to construct a sound performance evaluation system for this type of medical consortium. Objective To establish a framework for the performance evaluation of the vertical and compact medical consortium,to provide a reference for the construction and performance management of medical consortiums in China. Methods We conducted this study from August 2017 to October 2018. On the basis of analyzing related literature and semi-structured interview results,we developed the initial version of vertical and compact medical consortiums performance evaluation system(VCMCPES),and revised it in accordance with results of two rounds of Delphi consultation with 16 experts. We used the Kendall's W to assess the agreement among experts. Results The expert response rate of two rounds of consultation was 100.0%,the anthority coefficient of two-round of Delphi consultation was 0.73,the coordination coefficients for the two-round of Delphi consultation were 0.30,0.51(P<0.01),respectively,meeting the requirements of Kendall's W test. Finally,a framework of VCMCPES was developed,which consisted of six first-level indicators including accessibility of health services,quantity of health services,quality of health services,efficiency of health services,effect of health services and affordability of health services and 24 second-level indicators. Conclusion The response level,authority coefficient and coordination coefficient of the experts involved in the consultation are high. And the reliability and specificity of the included indicators are good. To optimize the system,expert consultations should be carried out,and the indicators should be verified further.

Key words: Medical consortium, Performance evaluation, Delphi technique