
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (30): 4445-4452.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2026.0033
• Article·Research Trends of Traditional Chinese Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2026-02-25
Revised:2026-04-29
Published:2026-10-20
Online:2026-09-02
Contact:
CHEN Zhaohui
通讯作者:
陈朝晖
作者简介:作者贡献:
张壹品主要参与试验实施并负责论文起草;张育康参与试验实施和数据收集;李冬静参与指标检测等研究过程的实施工作;谷欣宇承担数据统计学分析等工作;钱群群参与研究对象选取等研究过程的实施工作;程露露负责论文修改;陈朝晖主要负责项目经费,承担论文最终版本修订工作,并对论文负责。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2026.0033
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄( | 病程( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 试验组 | 35 | 21/14 | 42.7±9.5 | 5.94±1.62 |
| 对照组 | 34 | 19/15 | 41.6±8.2 | 5.82±1.66 |
| t(χ2)值 | 0.13a | 0.54 | 0.30 | |
| P值 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.76 |
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups of patients
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄( | 病程( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 试验组 | 35 | 21/14 | 42.7±9.5 | 5.94±1.62 |
| 对照组 | 34 | 19/15 | 41.6±8.2 | 5.82±1.66 |
| t(χ2)值 | 0.13a | 0.54 | 0.30 | |
| P值 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.76 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗后4周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 试验组 | 35 | 6.00(5.00,7.00) | 2.00(1.00,2.00)a | 2.00(1.00,2.00)ab |
| 对照组 | 34 | 6.00(5.00,7.00) | 3.00(2.00,3.00)a | 3.00(2.00,4.00)ab |
| Z值 | -0.198 | -4.530 | -4.980 | |
| P值 | 0.842 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of VAS scores between the two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗后4周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 试验组 | 35 | 6.00(5.00,7.00) | 2.00(1.00,2.00)a | 2.00(1.00,2.00)ab |
| 对照组 | 34 | 6.00(5.00,7.00) | 3.00(2.00,3.00)a | 3.00(2.00,4.00)ab |
| Z值 | -0.198 | -4.530 | -4.980 | |
| P值 | 0.842 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 试验组 | 35 | 15.42±1.70 | 6.43±1.24a |
| 对照组 | 34 | 15.35±1.63 | 11.12±1.55a |
| t值 | 0.175 | 13.855 | |
| p值 | 0.862 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of RMQ scores between the two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 试验组 | 35 | 15.42±1.70 | 6.43±1.24a |
| 对照组 | 34 | 15.35±1.63 | 11.12±1.55a |
| t值 | 0.175 | 13.855 | |
| p值 | 0.862 | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 例数 | PCS | PCS-R | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 试验组 | 35 | 13.00(8.00,24.00) | 6.00(3.50,12.00)a | 4.00 (2.50,7.00) | 2.00(1.00,4.00)a |
| 对照组 | 34 | 12.00(8.75,24.00) | 10.00(6.00,14.00)a | 4.00(3.00,7.00) | 3.00(2.00,4.00)a |
| Z值 | 0.822 | 2.124 | 0.198 | 2.316 | |
| P值 | 0.413 | 0.033 | 0.845 | 0.018 | |
| 组别 | PCS-H | PCS-M | |||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 试验组 | 7.00(5.00,13.00) | 3.00(2.00,7.00)a | 2.00(1.00,3.00) | 1.00(0.00,2.00)a | |
| 对照组 | 6.00(4.00,14.00) | 6.00(4.00,8.00)a | 2.00(1.00,4.00) | 1.00(0.00,2.00)a | |
| Z值 | 0.204 | 2.214 | 0.210 | 0.738 | |
| P值 | 0.841 | 0.025 | 0.832 | 0.444 | |
Table 4 Comparison of PCS and its subscale scores between the two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | PCS | PCS-R | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 试验组 | 35 | 13.00(8.00,24.00) | 6.00(3.50,12.00)a | 4.00 (2.50,7.00) | 2.00(1.00,4.00)a |
| 对照组 | 34 | 12.00(8.75,24.00) | 10.00(6.00,14.00)a | 4.00(3.00,7.00) | 3.00(2.00,4.00)a |
| Z值 | 0.822 | 2.124 | 0.198 | 2.316 | |
| P值 | 0.413 | 0.033 | 0.845 | 0.018 | |
| 组别 | PCS-H | PCS-M | |||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 试验组 | 7.00(5.00,13.00) | 3.00(2.00,7.00)a | 2.00(1.00,3.00) | 1.00(0.00,2.00)a | |
| 对照组 | 6.00(4.00,14.00) | 6.00(4.00,8.00)a | 2.00(1.00,4.00) | 1.00(0.00,2.00)a | |
| Z值 | 0.204 | 2.214 | 0.210 | 0.738 | |
| P值 | 0.841 | 0.025 | 0.832 | 0.444 | |
| 组别 | 例数 | 竖脊肌归一化肌电值nEMGES | 腹直肌归一化肌电值nEMGRA | 协同收缩率CCR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 试验组 | 35 | 78.90±4.37 | 61.20±3.03a | 32.30±2.70 | 48.60±3.04a | 70.90±2.67 | 56.10±2.21a |
| 对照组 | 34 | 77.70±3.77 | 71.10±3.24a | 32.50±2.81 | 38.10±2.57a | 70.40±2.75 | 63.80±2.38a |
| t值 | 1.220 | 13.113 | 0.302 | 15.476 | 0.766 | 13.928 | |
| P值 | 0.227 | <0.001 | 0.764 | <0.001 | 0.446 | <0.001 | |
Table 5 Comparison of CCR-related parameters between the two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 竖脊肌归一化肌电值nEMGES | 腹直肌归一化肌电值nEMGRA | 协同收缩率CCR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 试验组 | 35 | 78.90±4.37 | 61.20±3.03a | 32.30±2.70 | 48.60±3.04a | 70.90±2.67 | 56.10±2.21a |
| 对照组 | 34 | 77.70±3.77 | 71.10±3.24a | 32.50±2.81 | 38.10±2.57a | 70.40±2.75 | 63.80±2.38a |
| t值 | 1.220 | 13.113 | 0.302 | 15.476 | 0.766 | 13.928 | |
| P值 | 0.227 | <0.001 | 0.764 | <0.001 | 0.446 | <0.001 | |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
贾佃萍, 万颖, 于长禾, 等. 宫廷理筋术改良手法治疗慢性非特异性腰痛的临床研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2020, 35(12): 6425-6428.
|
| [8] |
王波. 理筋正骨手法治疗慢性非特异性下背痛的机制研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽中医药大学, 2018.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
朱涛, 蒋石琳, 张玉甲, 等. 针刺联合雷火灸治疗寒湿型腰痛:随机对照试验[J]. 中国针灸, 2025, 45(3): 312-316. DOI: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240805-k0001.
|
| [14] |
顾蕊, 王岩, 陈伯华. 中国非特异性腰背痛临床诊疗指南[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2022, 32(3): 258-268.
|
| [15] |
戚麟, 王馨, 陈瑞奇, 等. 评分量表在脊柱疾病评价中的应用进展[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(12): 1098-1102.
|
| [16] |
徐超, 王彦荣, 卢洁, 等. 动态神经肌肉稳定技术(DNS)对非特异性慢性下腰痛患者疼痛强度和腰椎稳定肌肌肉厚度的临床疗效观察[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2019, 10(11): 6-8.
|
| [17] |
孙树椿. 清宫正骨手法图谱[M]. 北京: 中国中医药出版社, 2012: 204-206.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
贺文华, 董晓慧, 汤臣建, 等. "宗筋主束骨而利机关"理论在经筋病中的临床应用概况[J]. 湖南中医杂志, 2019, 35(5): 155-157.
|
| [23] |
郭天赐, 刘爱峰, 陈继鑫, 等. 基于"骨正筋柔"理论探"筋柔骨正"治疗腰椎间盘突出症新思路[J]. 中医药临床杂志, 2022, 34(5): 819-822. DOI: 10.16448/j.cjtcm.2022.0508.
|
| [24] |
殷京, 孙树椿, 赵宝力, 等. 清宫正骨流派传承与其特色理筋手法运用探析[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2021, 36(1): 267-271.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
胡潇允, 江雨, 张文娣, 等. 基于动态足底压力及肌骨超声探究理筋正骨手法治疗梨状肌综合征的临床疗效[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2025, 45(12): 2420-2426.
|
| [28] |
江雨, 李冬静, 徐恩雨, 等. 理筋正骨手法联合氟比洛芬贴膏治疗轻中度肩袖损伤疗效观察[J/OL]. 安徽中医药大学学报, 2026-01-14.
|
| [29] |
王婷婷. 基于功能磁共振脑功能成像探索理筋正骨手法治疗颈性眩晕的神经生理机制[D]. 合肥: 安徽中医药大学, 2021.
|
| [30] |
梁颖. 理筋正骨手法改善神经根型颈椎病神经病理性疼痛模型大鼠中枢机制研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽中医药大学, 2025.
|
| [31] |
林永艳. 基于功能磁共振成像探讨理筋正骨手法治疗慢性颈痛的中枢作用机制[D]. 合肥: 安徽中医药大学, 2024.
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [1] | LIN Zehua, ZHANG Lan, DAI Shanshan, WEI Yuanyuan, LI Xingli, MA Yingchun. Evaluation and Comparison of Multidimensional Functional Disability in Geriatric Comorbidities and Comorbid Acute Kidney Injury [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(32): 4777-4782. |
| [2] | LI Zhijiang, WEI Shuimiao, LI Yang, YANG Tingting, WEN Xiangxiang, WANG Jiatian, JIA Jie. Experiences and Rehabilitation Needs of Patients during the Post-discharge Transitional Period after Sphincter-preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Qualitative Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(32): 4759-4767. |
| [3] | LIN Weiming, ZOU Yucong, SHEN Mei, YE Ruixue, WANG Yulong. The Relationship between the Levels of Medical Institutions and Rehabilitation Patient Satisfaction in China and the Influencing Factors of Patient Satisfaction [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(31): 4559-4564. |
| [4] | JIN Qianhui, ZHANG Xiaozhen, WANG Shuai, ZHOU Jihe, RUBTSOVA Nataliya Olegovna. Effects of an Intelligent Home-based Rehabilitation System on Functional Recovery and Family Caregiver Burden in Children with Cerebral Palsy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(31): 4650-4661. |
| [5] | CHENG Yu, YANG Rong, LONG Ren, LIAO Xiaoyang, ZHAO Yang. Study Design, Implementation and Case Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Community-based Primary Care Settings [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(31): 4528-4535. |
| [6] | WEI Xuejuan, WANG Lihua, WANG Li, REN Jinglin, YAN Haiqing, YU Haiyang, LIU Jingfeng. Effectiveness of an Intelligent Voice Outbound Call System as an Adjunct to Usual Care for Health Management in Older Community-dwelling Patients with "Three Highs" Multimorbidity: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(31): 4635-4640. |
| [7] | SU Die, ZHANG Yan, CHEN Xiaosong, HAN Yuxia, YAN Yongbin, DUAN Junya, CHEN Xinying, ZHAO Chenghao. Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Refractory Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(31): 4609-4618. |
| [8] | ZHAN Daowei, WEI Xuwang, HU Minlei, XU Yingmei, YANG Xibing, LUO Kaitao. Effect of Acupuncture Combined with Tirofiban on Early Neurological Deterioration in Patients with Ischemic Stroke after Thrombolysis: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4241-4247. |
| [9] | ZHAO Congjuan, JIN Tiantian, LIANG Jie, WANG Beining, GAO Yan. Comparative Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4326-4336. |
| [10] | SHI Li, ZHOU Zhenkun, LIU Jie, PAN Guofeng. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sinew Meridian Theory-based Combined Acupuncture and Cupping Therapy for Postmenopausal Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(28): 4141-4146. |
| [11] | DENG Wei, HUANG Mengting, YI Shengli, LIN Yang, XU Lidan, REN Zhexue, ZHU Xiuqiong, LI Yesha, REN Mengge, KE Dazhi, LI Guiqiong, WU Zhiqin, LUO Aoran, HE Fapei. Training and Effectiveness of AI-enabled Clinical Reasoning in General Practice [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(28): 4078-4085. |
| [12] | ZHANG Xiaozhen, YANG Chengbo, JIN Qianhui, WANG Shuai, ZHOU Jihe. Comparative Study on the Effects of the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment System and Conventional Rehabilitation on Improving Motor Function in Children with Global Developmental Delay [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(27): 3938-3946. |
| [13] | Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, Critical Care Rehabilitation Specialty Committee, DENG Luoyi, HUANG Huai, WU Shuang. Expert Consensus on Whole-period Systematic Rehabilitation Management for Critically Ill Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(26): 3713-3725. |
| [14] | LIN Yansheng, ZHANG Shuyang, LIN Jiaying, ZHU Jie, ZHOU Yuxin, LIN Jiali, JIA Jie. Correlation of Upper Limb Somatosensory Function and Attention, and Memory in Stroke Patients with Different Sides of Hemiplegia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(26): 3752-3759. |
| [15] | WANG Shuangrui, WANG Yongjia, FAN Xiaomin, LIU Xiangyu, HU Shunqing, YANG Zijian, ZHANG Xinjian. Efficacy and Safety of High-frequency Versus Low-frequency Stellate Ganglion Block Combined with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in the Treatment of Insomnia Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(25): 3678-3685. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||