
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (21): 2679-2685.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0484
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-09-11
Revised:2024-11-25
Published:2025-07-20
Online:2025-06-05
Contact:
LU Yibing
通讯作者:
鲁一兵
作者简介:作者贡献:
马盼盼负责构思设计与撰写文章;王思静负责检索与筛选文献;游娜和丁大法负责文章的修订;鲁一兵负责文章的质量控制与审校工作。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0484
| 第一作者(年份) | 组别 | 干预措施 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 病程(年) | 疗程(周) | 初始HbA1c(%) | 初始FPG(mmol/L) | 体质量(kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONO(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 40 mg | 10 | 55.9±10.0 | 2.9±2.2 | 8 | 8.2±1.1 | 9.6±1.7 | 79.7±13.6 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 9 | 58.0±6.7 | 9.1±5.8 | 8 | 8.6±1.0 | 9.8±1.8 | 79.6±10.0 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 50.7±7.5 | 5.7±7.7 | 8 | 8.4±1.2 | 9.1±2.6 | 81.5±10.4 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 9 | 58.6±8.8 | 5.5±4.1 | 8 | 8.3±1.2 | 10.2±2.0 | 73.3±9.9 | |
| SAXENA(2021)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 10 mg | 9 | 54.0±6.22 | 11.7±6.1 | 4 | 8.2±0.6 | 8.8±1.3 | 99.6±12.7 |
| Danuglipron 15 mg | 9 | 56.1±9.53 | 8.1±4.2 | 4 | 8.6±0.6 | 11.0±1.8 | 92.9±22.5 | ||
| Danuglipron 50 mg | 10 | 60.2±7.97 | 9.1±5.1 | 4 | 8.3±0.9 | 9.3±1.9 | 87.8±13.8 | ||
| Danuglipron 70 mg | 9 | 58.3±5.32 | 11.6±4.6 | 4 | 8.3±0.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 86.9±18.6 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 55.8±7.68 | 10.8±4.7 | 4 | 8.5±1.0 | 10.9±1.5 | 101.6±17.4 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 58.6±6.69 | 9.2±5.9 | 4 | 8.2±0.7 | 9.8±2.4 | 87.9±19.7 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 8 | 58.3±3.81 | 9.2±7.4 | 4 | 8.2±1.0 | 10.0±1.6 | 84.9±15.3 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 10 | 57.6±8.30 | 8.7±7.8 | 4 | 8.6±0.9 | 10.9±2.1 | 92.4±18.0 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 25 | 57.6±7.71 | 8.5±6.8 | 4 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.3±1.8 | 94.3±17.7 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 2.5 mg | 68 | 58.9±9.30 | 8.8±6.31 | 16 | 8.10±1.03 | 9.4±2.4 | 90.9±20.13 |
| Danuglipron 10 mg | 68 | 58.1±9.43 | 8.5±6.85 | 16 | 8.01±0.91 | 9.2±2.2 | 92.3±16.44 | ||
| Danuglipron 40 mg | 71 | 59.6±8.58 | 8.0±5.82 | 16 | 8.00±0.89 | 9.2±2.2 | 90.2±18.74 | ||
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 67 | 58.4±9.18 | 9.7±6.20 | 16 | 8.07±0.95 | 9.6±2.5 | 91.3±16.64 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 71 | 58.8±9.43 | 8.7±7.89 | 16 | 8.05±0.86 | 9.4±2.3 | 93.1±17.95 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 66 | 57.9±10.27 | 8.8±6.90 | 16 | 8.24±0.90 | 9.6±2.4 | 90.1±17.54 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 80 mg | 20 | 59.5±9.55 | 9.33±5.16 | 12 | 8.14±1.025 | 9.9±2.1 | 96.410±20.43 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 22 | 60.9±8.69 | 10.38±6.44 | 12 | 8.25±1.019 | 9.9±2.5 | 91.111±14.22 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 58.3±7.11 | 9.15±5.78 | 12 | 8.05±0.880 | 8.9±2.7 | 101.880±24.54 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 57.2±11.80 | 10.20±9.88 | 12 | 8.56±1.162 | 10.2±3.2 | 95.152±17.01 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 21 | 59.0±9.31 | 7.87±4.83 | 12 | 8.24±1.162 | 9.3±3.0 | 86.365±13.64 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 16 | 53.9±9.10 | 8.15±7.58 | 12 | 7.83±0.936 | 9.0±2.5 | 101.017±18.44 | |
| PRATT(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 9 mg | 9 | 57.7±6.4 | 13.48±8.29 | 12 | 8.02±0.62 | 85.61±12.76 | |
| OFG 15 mg | 10 | 59.6±4.6 | 15.02±11.97 | 12 | 7.84±0.74 | 88.02±14.36 | |||
| OFG 21 mg | 14 | 55.3±8.0 | 9.48±5.48 | 12 | 8.36±1.31 | 92.09±18.78 | |||
| OFG 27 mg | 9 | 58.8±4.6 | 7.60±4.39 | 12 | 7.82±0.69 | 92.80±15.36 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 9 | 62.8±4.4 | 10.38±4.78 | 12 | 7.93±0.79 | 81.49±10.24 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 17 | 56.0±6.0 | 8.63±4.89 | 12 | 8.09±0.75 | 90.29±20.04 | ||
| FRIAS(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 3 mg | 51 | 59.0±9.4 | 26 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.1±2.3 | 99.3±25.4 | |
| OFG 12 mg | 56 | 57.4±9.2 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 99.3±18.1 | |||
| OFG 24 mg | 47 | 60.5±9.1 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.5±2.5 | 98.5±22.9 | |||
| OFG 36 mg | 61 | 59.7±9.2 | 26 | 8.0±0.7 | 8.8±1.6 | 98.9±17.5 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 63 | 58.5±9.4 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.2±2.0 | 104.6±25.1 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 55 | 58.3±9.5 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 102.0±18.8 |
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
| 第一作者(年份) | 组别 | 干预措施 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 病程(年) | 疗程(周) | 初始HbA1c(%) | 初始FPG(mmol/L) | 体质量(kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONO(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 40 mg | 10 | 55.9±10.0 | 2.9±2.2 | 8 | 8.2±1.1 | 9.6±1.7 | 79.7±13.6 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 9 | 58.0±6.7 | 9.1±5.8 | 8 | 8.6±1.0 | 9.8±1.8 | 79.6±10.0 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 50.7±7.5 | 5.7±7.7 | 8 | 8.4±1.2 | 9.1±2.6 | 81.5±10.4 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 9 | 58.6±8.8 | 5.5±4.1 | 8 | 8.3±1.2 | 10.2±2.0 | 73.3±9.9 | |
| SAXENA(2021)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 10 mg | 9 | 54.0±6.22 | 11.7±6.1 | 4 | 8.2±0.6 | 8.8±1.3 | 99.6±12.7 |
| Danuglipron 15 mg | 9 | 56.1±9.53 | 8.1±4.2 | 4 | 8.6±0.6 | 11.0±1.8 | 92.9±22.5 | ||
| Danuglipron 50 mg | 10 | 60.2±7.97 | 9.1±5.1 | 4 | 8.3±0.9 | 9.3±1.9 | 87.8±13.8 | ||
| Danuglipron 70 mg | 9 | 58.3±5.32 | 11.6±4.6 | 4 | 8.3±0.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 86.9±18.6 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 55.8±7.68 | 10.8±4.7 | 4 | 8.5±1.0 | 10.9±1.5 | 101.6±17.4 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 58.6±6.69 | 9.2±5.9 | 4 | 8.2±0.7 | 9.8±2.4 | 87.9±19.7 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 8 | 58.3±3.81 | 9.2±7.4 | 4 | 8.2±1.0 | 10.0±1.6 | 84.9±15.3 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 10 | 57.6±8.30 | 8.7±7.8 | 4 | 8.6±0.9 | 10.9±2.1 | 92.4±18.0 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 25 | 57.6±7.71 | 8.5±6.8 | 4 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.3±1.8 | 94.3±17.7 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 2.5 mg | 68 | 58.9±9.30 | 8.8±6.31 | 16 | 8.10±1.03 | 9.4±2.4 | 90.9±20.13 |
| Danuglipron 10 mg | 68 | 58.1±9.43 | 8.5±6.85 | 16 | 8.01±0.91 | 9.2±2.2 | 92.3±16.44 | ||
| Danuglipron 40 mg | 71 | 59.6±8.58 | 8.0±5.82 | 16 | 8.00±0.89 | 9.2±2.2 | 90.2±18.74 | ||
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 67 | 58.4±9.18 | 9.7±6.20 | 16 | 8.07±0.95 | 9.6±2.5 | 91.3±16.64 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 71 | 58.8±9.43 | 8.7±7.89 | 16 | 8.05±0.86 | 9.4±2.3 | 93.1±17.95 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 66 | 57.9±10.27 | 8.8±6.90 | 16 | 8.24±0.90 | 9.6±2.4 | 90.1±17.54 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 80 mg | 20 | 59.5±9.55 | 9.33±5.16 | 12 | 8.14±1.025 | 9.9±2.1 | 96.410±20.43 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 22 | 60.9±8.69 | 10.38±6.44 | 12 | 8.25±1.019 | 9.9±2.5 | 91.111±14.22 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 58.3±7.11 | 9.15±5.78 | 12 | 8.05±0.880 | 8.9±2.7 | 101.880±24.54 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 57.2±11.80 | 10.20±9.88 | 12 | 8.56±1.162 | 10.2±3.2 | 95.152±17.01 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 21 | 59.0±9.31 | 7.87±4.83 | 12 | 8.24±1.162 | 9.3±3.0 | 86.365±13.64 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 16 | 53.9±9.10 | 8.15±7.58 | 12 | 7.83±0.936 | 9.0±2.5 | 101.017±18.44 | |
| PRATT(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 9 mg | 9 | 57.7±6.4 | 13.48±8.29 | 12 | 8.02±0.62 | 85.61±12.76 | |
| OFG 15 mg | 10 | 59.6±4.6 | 15.02±11.97 | 12 | 7.84±0.74 | 88.02±14.36 | |||
| OFG 21 mg | 14 | 55.3±8.0 | 9.48±5.48 | 12 | 8.36±1.31 | 92.09±18.78 | |||
| OFG 27 mg | 9 | 58.8±4.6 | 7.60±4.39 | 12 | 7.82±0.69 | 92.80±15.36 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 9 | 62.8±4.4 | 10.38±4.78 | 12 | 7.93±0.79 | 81.49±10.24 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 17 | 56.0±6.0 | 8.63±4.89 | 12 | 8.09±0.75 | 90.29±20.04 | ||
| FRIAS(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 3 mg | 51 | 59.0±9.4 | 26 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.1±2.3 | 99.3±25.4 | |
| OFG 12 mg | 56 | 57.4±9.2 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 99.3±18.1 | |||
| OFG 24 mg | 47 | 60.5±9.1 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.5±2.5 | 98.5±22.9 | |||
| OFG 36 mg | 61 | 59.7±9.2 | 26 | 8.0±0.7 | 8.8±1.6 | 98.9±17.5 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 63 | 58.5±9.4 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.2±2.0 | 104.6±25.1 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 55 | 58.3±9.5 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 102.0±18.8 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
US Food & Drug Administration. RYBELSUS prescribing information 2019[EB/OL].[2023-08-29].
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [1] | XU Jialan, YAN Hong, WEN Jun, ZHOU Zitong, WANG Siyu. Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Older Adults with Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3815-3822. |
| [2] | QUAN Jialin, ZHU Lin, SU Yu, CHEN Zekai, CHEN Ziqi, ZHANG Zhuofan. Research on the Improvement Effect of Exercise Modes on the Executive Function of Overweight or Obese Children or Adolescents: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3422-3431. |
| [3] | ZHANG Tianyu, YU Haibo, CHEN Fei, LI Xin, ZHANG Jiajia, ZHAN Xiaokai, SHEN Man, TANG Ran, FAN Sibin, ZHAO Fengyi, HUANG Zhongxia. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Treatment for POEMS Syndrome [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3447-3455. |
| [4] | JIANG Shihua, ZHU Zheng, REN Yingying, ZHU Yaolei, WANG Yue, GAO Xibin. Meta Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Myopia in Chinese Children and Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3043-3052. |
| [5] | WANG Xiaolin, LI Qiuyue, ZHOU Yanjun, ZHANG Jinhui, LIANG Tao. Incidence and Risk of Cardiovascular Toxicity with Fruquintinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2934-2940. |
| [6] | LI Hao, LI Jiangtao, LIU Dan, WANG Jianjun. Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab, Anifrolumab, and Telitacicept on the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2924-2933. |
| [7] | ADILI Tuersun, CHENG Gang. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2686-2691. |
| [8] | HU Wanqin, YU Shenyan, CAO Xuehua, XIANG Feng, JIA Yu. Factors Associated with Precocious Puberty in Chinese Children: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2661-2671. |
| [9] | GUO Shengteng, ZHANG Fenfen, WAN Di, YU Dongmei, WANG Qinghua. Risk Factors for Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Acute Lung Injury: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2546-2554. |
| [10] | WANG Biqing, ZHANG Ping, YANG Hongxia, WANG Qian, JU Chunxiao, ZHAO Junnan, MEI Jun, ZHANG Ying, XU Fengqin. Meta-analysis of Prevalence and Development Trend of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Hypertensive Patients in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2186-2192. |
| [11] | FAN Yu, LI Rong, GONG Shuangying, YANG Xiaojuan, LI Rui. Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Postpartum Depression among Maternal Spouses in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2179-2185. |
| [12] | ZHU Shengjie, DIAO Huaqiong, HANG Xiaoyi, SUN Wenjun. Network Meta-analysis of Different Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections for the Treatment of Posterior Circulatory Ischemic Vertigo [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1795-1808. |
| [13] | HE Yun, FAN Huanfang, MA Pan, XU Shaoqing, YANG Liu, JIN Mingzhe, ZHANG Mingrui, CHEN Jiaqi. Effect of Postoperative Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Treated with Different Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapies: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1788-1794. |
| [14] | LIU Caiping, ZHANG Yanhua, TANG Jianpin, WANG Chengpeng, XUE Fengfeng, WANG Huijuan, LI Chuanwei, ZHANG Guangya, LI Huafang. Efficacy and Safety of Long-acting Risperidone Microspheres in the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1622-1627. |
| [15] | WANG Xiaoyu, FENG Zhenzhen, WANG Jun, GUO Xiaochuan, LI Jiansheng. Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Systematic Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1527-1537. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||