
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (21): 2679-2685.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0484
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-09-11
Revised:2024-11-25
Published:2025-07-20
Online:2025-06-05
Contact:
LU Yibing
通讯作者:
鲁一兵
作者简介:作者贡献:
马盼盼负责构思设计与撰写文章;王思静负责检索与筛选文献;游娜和丁大法负责文章的修订;鲁一兵负责文章的质量控制与审校工作。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0484
| 第一作者(年份) | 组别 | 干预措施 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 病程(年) | 疗程(周) | 初始HbA1c(%) | 初始FPG(mmol/L) | 体质量(kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONO(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 40 mg | 10 | 55.9±10.0 | 2.9±2.2 | 8 | 8.2±1.1 | 9.6±1.7 | 79.7±13.6 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 9 | 58.0±6.7 | 9.1±5.8 | 8 | 8.6±1.0 | 9.8±1.8 | 79.6±10.0 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 50.7±7.5 | 5.7±7.7 | 8 | 8.4±1.2 | 9.1±2.6 | 81.5±10.4 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 9 | 58.6±8.8 | 5.5±4.1 | 8 | 8.3±1.2 | 10.2±2.0 | 73.3±9.9 | |
| SAXENA(2021)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 10 mg | 9 | 54.0±6.22 | 11.7±6.1 | 4 | 8.2±0.6 | 8.8±1.3 | 99.6±12.7 |
| Danuglipron 15 mg | 9 | 56.1±9.53 | 8.1±4.2 | 4 | 8.6±0.6 | 11.0±1.8 | 92.9±22.5 | ||
| Danuglipron 50 mg | 10 | 60.2±7.97 | 9.1±5.1 | 4 | 8.3±0.9 | 9.3±1.9 | 87.8±13.8 | ||
| Danuglipron 70 mg | 9 | 58.3±5.32 | 11.6±4.6 | 4 | 8.3±0.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 86.9±18.6 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 55.8±7.68 | 10.8±4.7 | 4 | 8.5±1.0 | 10.9±1.5 | 101.6±17.4 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 58.6±6.69 | 9.2±5.9 | 4 | 8.2±0.7 | 9.8±2.4 | 87.9±19.7 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 8 | 58.3±3.81 | 9.2±7.4 | 4 | 8.2±1.0 | 10.0±1.6 | 84.9±15.3 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 10 | 57.6±8.30 | 8.7±7.8 | 4 | 8.6±0.9 | 10.9±2.1 | 92.4±18.0 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 25 | 57.6±7.71 | 8.5±6.8 | 4 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.3±1.8 | 94.3±17.7 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 2.5 mg | 68 | 58.9±9.30 | 8.8±6.31 | 16 | 8.10±1.03 | 9.4±2.4 | 90.9±20.13 |
| Danuglipron 10 mg | 68 | 58.1±9.43 | 8.5±6.85 | 16 | 8.01±0.91 | 9.2±2.2 | 92.3±16.44 | ||
| Danuglipron 40 mg | 71 | 59.6±8.58 | 8.0±5.82 | 16 | 8.00±0.89 | 9.2±2.2 | 90.2±18.74 | ||
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 67 | 58.4±9.18 | 9.7±6.20 | 16 | 8.07±0.95 | 9.6±2.5 | 91.3±16.64 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 71 | 58.8±9.43 | 8.7±7.89 | 16 | 8.05±0.86 | 9.4±2.3 | 93.1±17.95 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 66 | 57.9±10.27 | 8.8±6.90 | 16 | 8.24±0.90 | 9.6±2.4 | 90.1±17.54 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 80 mg | 20 | 59.5±9.55 | 9.33±5.16 | 12 | 8.14±1.025 | 9.9±2.1 | 96.410±20.43 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 22 | 60.9±8.69 | 10.38±6.44 | 12 | 8.25±1.019 | 9.9±2.5 | 91.111±14.22 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 58.3±7.11 | 9.15±5.78 | 12 | 8.05±0.880 | 8.9±2.7 | 101.880±24.54 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 57.2±11.80 | 10.20±9.88 | 12 | 8.56±1.162 | 10.2±3.2 | 95.152±17.01 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 21 | 59.0±9.31 | 7.87±4.83 | 12 | 8.24±1.162 | 9.3±3.0 | 86.365±13.64 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 16 | 53.9±9.10 | 8.15±7.58 | 12 | 7.83±0.936 | 9.0±2.5 | 101.017±18.44 | |
| PRATT(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 9 mg | 9 | 57.7±6.4 | 13.48±8.29 | 12 | 8.02±0.62 | 85.61±12.76 | |
| OFG 15 mg | 10 | 59.6±4.6 | 15.02±11.97 | 12 | 7.84±0.74 | 88.02±14.36 | |||
| OFG 21 mg | 14 | 55.3±8.0 | 9.48±5.48 | 12 | 8.36±1.31 | 92.09±18.78 | |||
| OFG 27 mg | 9 | 58.8±4.6 | 7.60±4.39 | 12 | 7.82±0.69 | 92.80±15.36 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 9 | 62.8±4.4 | 10.38±4.78 | 12 | 7.93±0.79 | 81.49±10.24 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 17 | 56.0±6.0 | 8.63±4.89 | 12 | 8.09±0.75 | 90.29±20.04 | ||
| FRIAS(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 3 mg | 51 | 59.0±9.4 | 26 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.1±2.3 | 99.3±25.4 | |
| OFG 12 mg | 56 | 57.4±9.2 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 99.3±18.1 | |||
| OFG 24 mg | 47 | 60.5±9.1 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.5±2.5 | 98.5±22.9 | |||
| OFG 36 mg | 61 | 59.7±9.2 | 26 | 8.0±0.7 | 8.8±1.6 | 98.9±17.5 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 63 | 58.5±9.4 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.2±2.0 | 104.6±25.1 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 55 | 58.3±9.5 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 102.0±18.8 |
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
| 第一作者(年份) | 组别 | 干预措施 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 病程(年) | 疗程(周) | 初始HbA1c(%) | 初始FPG(mmol/L) | 体质量(kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONO(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 40 mg | 10 | 55.9±10.0 | 2.9±2.2 | 8 | 8.2±1.1 | 9.6±1.7 | 79.7±13.6 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 9 | 58.0±6.7 | 9.1±5.8 | 8 | 8.6±1.0 | 9.8±1.8 | 79.6±10.0 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 50.7±7.5 | 5.7±7.7 | 8 | 8.4±1.2 | 9.1±2.6 | 81.5±10.4 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 9 | 58.6±8.8 | 5.5±4.1 | 8 | 8.3±1.2 | 10.2±2.0 | 73.3±9.9 | |
| SAXENA(2021)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 10 mg | 9 | 54.0±6.22 | 11.7±6.1 | 4 | 8.2±0.6 | 8.8±1.3 | 99.6±12.7 |
| Danuglipron 15 mg | 9 | 56.1±9.53 | 8.1±4.2 | 4 | 8.6±0.6 | 11.0±1.8 | 92.9±22.5 | ||
| Danuglipron 50 mg | 10 | 60.2±7.97 | 9.1±5.1 | 4 | 8.3±0.9 | 9.3±1.9 | 87.8±13.8 | ||
| Danuglipron 70 mg | 9 | 58.3±5.32 | 11.6±4.6 | 4 | 8.3±0.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 86.9±18.6 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 55.8±7.68 | 10.8±4.7 | 4 | 8.5±1.0 | 10.9±1.5 | 101.6±17.4 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 58.6±6.69 | 9.2±5.9 | 4 | 8.2±0.7 | 9.8±2.4 | 87.9±19.7 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 8 | 58.3±3.81 | 9.2±7.4 | 4 | 8.2±1.0 | 10.0±1.6 | 84.9±15.3 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 10 | 57.6±8.30 | 8.7±7.8 | 4 | 8.6±0.9 | 10.9±2.1 | 92.4±18.0 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 25 | 57.6±7.71 | 8.5±6.8 | 4 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.3±1.8 | 94.3±17.7 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 2.5 mg | 68 | 58.9±9.30 | 8.8±6.31 | 16 | 8.10±1.03 | 9.4±2.4 | 90.9±20.13 |
| Danuglipron 10 mg | 68 | 58.1±9.43 | 8.5±6.85 | 16 | 8.01±0.91 | 9.2±2.2 | 92.3±16.44 | ||
| Danuglipron 40 mg | 71 | 59.6±8.58 | 8.0±5.82 | 16 | 8.00±0.89 | 9.2±2.2 | 90.2±18.74 | ||
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 67 | 58.4±9.18 | 9.7±6.20 | 16 | 8.07±0.95 | 9.6±2.5 | 91.3±16.64 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 71 | 58.8±9.43 | 8.7±7.89 | 16 | 8.05±0.86 | 9.4±2.3 | 93.1±17.95 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 66 | 57.9±10.27 | 8.8±6.90 | 16 | 8.24±0.90 | 9.6±2.4 | 90.1±17.54 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 80 mg | 20 | 59.5±9.55 | 9.33±5.16 | 12 | 8.14±1.025 | 9.9±2.1 | 96.410±20.43 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 22 | 60.9±8.69 | 10.38±6.44 | 12 | 8.25±1.019 | 9.9±2.5 | 91.111±14.22 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 58.3±7.11 | 9.15±5.78 | 12 | 8.05±0.880 | 8.9±2.7 | 101.880±24.54 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 57.2±11.80 | 10.20±9.88 | 12 | 8.56±1.162 | 10.2±3.2 | 95.152±17.01 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 21 | 59.0±9.31 | 7.87±4.83 | 12 | 8.24±1.162 | 9.3±3.0 | 86.365±13.64 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 16 | 53.9±9.10 | 8.15±7.58 | 12 | 7.83±0.936 | 9.0±2.5 | 101.017±18.44 | |
| PRATT(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 9 mg | 9 | 57.7±6.4 | 13.48±8.29 | 12 | 8.02±0.62 | 85.61±12.76 | |
| OFG 15 mg | 10 | 59.6±4.6 | 15.02±11.97 | 12 | 7.84±0.74 | 88.02±14.36 | |||
| OFG 21 mg | 14 | 55.3±8.0 | 9.48±5.48 | 12 | 8.36±1.31 | 92.09±18.78 | |||
| OFG 27 mg | 9 | 58.8±4.6 | 7.60±4.39 | 12 | 7.82±0.69 | 92.80±15.36 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 9 | 62.8±4.4 | 10.38±4.78 | 12 | 7.93±0.79 | 81.49±10.24 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 17 | 56.0±6.0 | 8.63±4.89 | 12 | 8.09±0.75 | 90.29±20.04 | ||
| FRIAS(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 3 mg | 51 | 59.0±9.4 | 26 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.1±2.3 | 99.3±25.4 | |
| OFG 12 mg | 56 | 57.4±9.2 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 99.3±18.1 | |||
| OFG 24 mg | 47 | 60.5±9.1 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.5±2.5 | 98.5±22.9 | |||
| OFG 36 mg | 61 | 59.7±9.2 | 26 | 8.0±0.7 | 8.8±1.6 | 98.9±17.5 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 63 | 58.5±9.4 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.2±2.0 | 104.6±25.1 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 55 | 58.3±9.5 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 102.0±18.8 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
US Food & Drug Administration. RYBELSUS prescribing information 2019[EB/OL].[2023-08-29].
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [1] | LI Yutong, ZHAO Danting, JIANG Feng, WANG Yanna, LIU Yizong, LIANG Wenjuan, LU Jiahai. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of mRNA and Recombinant Protein Subunit Vaccines Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2744-2752. |
| [2] | ZHANG Wenbo, WANG Junlong, ZHANG Yuping, JIANG Shuai, WANG Huaqi. The Risk of Pre-COPD Populations Progressing to COPD under Different Criteria: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2735-2743. |
| [3] | ZHAN Li, HENG Zhaoyang, HE Liangyu, ZHAO Jie, CHEN Jie, XING Jinshan. Efficacy and Safety of CAR-T Therapy Targeting the B Cell Maturation Antigen on Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Chinese People: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1921-1930. |
| [4] | TIAN Anni, YANG Jing, SUN Jing, WANG Shichun. Effect of Robot-assisted Training on the Recovery of Hand Motor Function in Patients with Different Stages of Stroke: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1911-1920. |
| [5] | LI Jing, JI Yan, SUN Liu, WANG Hanting, WU Jidong, LIU June. Summary of Best Evidence on the Management of Hearing Loss in Older Adults in Primary Health Care Settings [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1713-1719. |
| [6] | ZHANG Huijuan, LI Xinghui, ZHANG Xiaoming, YIN Long, SHAO Long. Efficacy and Safety of Selective Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1194-1202. |
| [7] | WANG Fei, HAN Weiyu, SUN Tao. Moxibustion Combined with Three-step Therapy in the Treatment of Cancer Pain: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(09): 1203-1211. |
| [8] | LIU Dianchun, CHEN Xiaoying, WANG Qianyun, PAN Xingru, WEI Xuehan, WANG Bohong, WANG Ying, XUE Xue, LU Chunli. Evidence-based Pharmacological Investigation of the Clinical Practice and Rational Use of Metformin in Pre-diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 1057-1068. |
| [9] | PEI Zhiyi, ZHANG Xiaoxin, LIN Jiayi, ZHANG Xiangyi, KANG Xiaofeng. Systematic Review of the Quality and Application of Patient Decision Aids in Cardiovascular Disease Based on IPDAS 4.0 Criteria [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 945-952. |
| [10] | ZHANG Ling, HUANG Shuangying, XU Hui, MEI Huiting, HONG Yongping. Effects of Different Exercise Types on Fall Efficacy in the Elderly: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 741-751. |
| [11] | ZHONG Lanfang, YU Xinyu, PI Zheyu, LI Bin. Drug-induced Cardiotoxicity in the Chinese Population: Current Analysis and Considerations [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 767-776. |
| [12] | ZHANG Yanjing, ZHOU Chunhua, LI Xiaodong, LIU Yan, WANG Jing, YU Jing. Study on the Clinical Value of a Risk Prediction Model for Venlafaxine Plasma Concentration Exceeding the Safety Threshold [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 777-782. |
| [13] | YANG Haifei, SUN Wu, WU Cheng, REN Wei, LI Rutian. Analysis of Predictors for Immune-related Adverse Events and the Correlation with Efficacy in Progressive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 710-717. |
| [14] | CHEN Xiaoying, ZHU Xuebo, CHEN Yue. Research on the Mechanism Influencing Professional Identity of Rural Targeted-admission Medical Students Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(04): 530-537. |
| [15] | ZHAO Xuejiao, LI Juan, LI Yujie, LU Ting, Xian Lihong, YAN Huan. Prevalence Trends and Influencing Factors for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 380-392. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||