
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (21): 2679-2685.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0484
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-09-11
Revised:2024-11-25
Published:2025-07-20
Online:2025-06-05
Contact:
LU Yibing
通讯作者:
鲁一兵
作者简介:作者贡献:
马盼盼负责构思设计与撰写文章;王思静负责检索与筛选文献;游娜和丁大法负责文章的修订;鲁一兵负责文章的质量控制与审校工作。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0484
| 第一作者(年份) | 组别 | 干预措施 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 病程(年) | 疗程(周) | 初始HbA1c(%) | 初始FPG(mmol/L) | 体质量(kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONO(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 40 mg | 10 | 55.9±10.0 | 2.9±2.2 | 8 | 8.2±1.1 | 9.6±1.7 | 79.7±13.6 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 9 | 58.0±6.7 | 9.1±5.8 | 8 | 8.6±1.0 | 9.8±1.8 | 79.6±10.0 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 50.7±7.5 | 5.7±7.7 | 8 | 8.4±1.2 | 9.1±2.6 | 81.5±10.4 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 9 | 58.6±8.8 | 5.5±4.1 | 8 | 8.3±1.2 | 10.2±2.0 | 73.3±9.9 | |
| SAXENA(2021)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 10 mg | 9 | 54.0±6.22 | 11.7±6.1 | 4 | 8.2±0.6 | 8.8±1.3 | 99.6±12.7 |
| Danuglipron 15 mg | 9 | 56.1±9.53 | 8.1±4.2 | 4 | 8.6±0.6 | 11.0±1.8 | 92.9±22.5 | ||
| Danuglipron 50 mg | 10 | 60.2±7.97 | 9.1±5.1 | 4 | 8.3±0.9 | 9.3±1.9 | 87.8±13.8 | ||
| Danuglipron 70 mg | 9 | 58.3±5.32 | 11.6±4.6 | 4 | 8.3±0.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 86.9±18.6 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 55.8±7.68 | 10.8±4.7 | 4 | 8.5±1.0 | 10.9±1.5 | 101.6±17.4 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 58.6±6.69 | 9.2±5.9 | 4 | 8.2±0.7 | 9.8±2.4 | 87.9±19.7 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 8 | 58.3±3.81 | 9.2±7.4 | 4 | 8.2±1.0 | 10.0±1.6 | 84.9±15.3 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 10 | 57.6±8.30 | 8.7±7.8 | 4 | 8.6±0.9 | 10.9±2.1 | 92.4±18.0 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 25 | 57.6±7.71 | 8.5±6.8 | 4 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.3±1.8 | 94.3±17.7 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 2.5 mg | 68 | 58.9±9.30 | 8.8±6.31 | 16 | 8.10±1.03 | 9.4±2.4 | 90.9±20.13 |
| Danuglipron 10 mg | 68 | 58.1±9.43 | 8.5±6.85 | 16 | 8.01±0.91 | 9.2±2.2 | 92.3±16.44 | ||
| Danuglipron 40 mg | 71 | 59.6±8.58 | 8.0±5.82 | 16 | 8.00±0.89 | 9.2±2.2 | 90.2±18.74 | ||
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 67 | 58.4±9.18 | 9.7±6.20 | 16 | 8.07±0.95 | 9.6±2.5 | 91.3±16.64 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 71 | 58.8±9.43 | 8.7±7.89 | 16 | 8.05±0.86 | 9.4±2.3 | 93.1±17.95 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 66 | 57.9±10.27 | 8.8±6.90 | 16 | 8.24±0.90 | 9.6±2.4 | 90.1±17.54 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 80 mg | 20 | 59.5±9.55 | 9.33±5.16 | 12 | 8.14±1.025 | 9.9±2.1 | 96.410±20.43 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 22 | 60.9±8.69 | 10.38±6.44 | 12 | 8.25±1.019 | 9.9±2.5 | 91.111±14.22 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 58.3±7.11 | 9.15±5.78 | 12 | 8.05±0.880 | 8.9±2.7 | 101.880±24.54 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 57.2±11.80 | 10.20±9.88 | 12 | 8.56±1.162 | 10.2±3.2 | 95.152±17.01 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 21 | 59.0±9.31 | 7.87±4.83 | 12 | 8.24±1.162 | 9.3±3.0 | 86.365±13.64 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 16 | 53.9±9.10 | 8.15±7.58 | 12 | 7.83±0.936 | 9.0±2.5 | 101.017±18.44 | |
| PRATT(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 9 mg | 9 | 57.7±6.4 | 13.48±8.29 | 12 | 8.02±0.62 | 85.61±12.76 | |
| OFG 15 mg | 10 | 59.6±4.6 | 15.02±11.97 | 12 | 7.84±0.74 | 88.02±14.36 | |||
| OFG 21 mg | 14 | 55.3±8.0 | 9.48±5.48 | 12 | 8.36±1.31 | 92.09±18.78 | |||
| OFG 27 mg | 9 | 58.8±4.6 | 7.60±4.39 | 12 | 7.82±0.69 | 92.80±15.36 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 9 | 62.8±4.4 | 10.38±4.78 | 12 | 7.93±0.79 | 81.49±10.24 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 17 | 56.0±6.0 | 8.63±4.89 | 12 | 8.09±0.75 | 90.29±20.04 | ||
| FRIAS(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 3 mg | 51 | 59.0±9.4 | 26 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.1±2.3 | 99.3±25.4 | |
| OFG 12 mg | 56 | 57.4±9.2 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 99.3±18.1 | |||
| OFG 24 mg | 47 | 60.5±9.1 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.5±2.5 | 98.5±22.9 | |||
| OFG 36 mg | 61 | 59.7±9.2 | 26 | 8.0±0.7 | 8.8±1.6 | 98.9±17.5 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 63 | 58.5±9.4 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.2±2.0 | 104.6±25.1 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 55 | 58.3±9.5 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 102.0±18.8 |
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
| 第一作者(年份) | 组别 | 干预措施 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 病程(年) | 疗程(周) | 初始HbA1c(%) | 初始FPG(mmol/L) | 体质量(kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONO(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 40 mg | 10 | 55.9±10.0 | 2.9±2.2 | 8 | 8.2±1.1 | 9.6±1.7 | 79.7±13.6 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 9 | 58.0±6.7 | 9.1±5.8 | 8 | 8.6±1.0 | 9.8±1.8 | 79.6±10.0 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 50.7±7.5 | 5.7±7.7 | 8 | 8.4±1.2 | 9.1±2.6 | 81.5±10.4 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 9 | 58.6±8.8 | 5.5±4.1 | 8 | 8.3±1.2 | 10.2±2.0 | 73.3±9.9 | |
| SAXENA(2021)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 10 mg | 9 | 54.0±6.22 | 11.7±6.1 | 4 | 8.2±0.6 | 8.8±1.3 | 99.6±12.7 |
| Danuglipron 15 mg | 9 | 56.1±9.53 | 8.1±4.2 | 4 | 8.6±0.6 | 11.0±1.8 | 92.9±22.5 | ||
| Danuglipron 50 mg | 10 | 60.2±7.97 | 9.1±5.1 | 4 | 8.3±0.9 | 9.3±1.9 | 87.8±13.8 | ||
| Danuglipron 70 mg | 9 | 58.3±5.32 | 11.6±4.6 | 4 | 8.3±0.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 86.9±18.6 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 55.8±7.68 | 10.8±4.7 | 4 | 8.5±1.0 | 10.9±1.5 | 101.6±17.4 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 58.6±6.69 | 9.2±5.9 | 4 | 8.2±0.7 | 9.8±2.4 | 87.9±19.7 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 8 | 58.3±3.81 | 9.2±7.4 | 4 | 8.2±1.0 | 10.0±1.6 | 84.9±15.3 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 10 | 57.6±8.30 | 8.7±7.8 | 4 | 8.6±0.9 | 10.9±2.1 | 92.4±18.0 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 25 | 57.6±7.71 | 8.5±6.8 | 4 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.3±1.8 | 94.3±17.7 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 2.5 mg | 68 | 58.9±9.30 | 8.8±6.31 | 16 | 8.10±1.03 | 9.4±2.4 | 90.9±20.13 |
| Danuglipron 10 mg | 68 | 58.1±9.43 | 8.5±6.85 | 16 | 8.01±0.91 | 9.2±2.2 | 92.3±16.44 | ||
| Danuglipron 40 mg | 71 | 59.6±8.58 | 8.0±5.82 | 16 | 8.00±0.89 | 9.2±2.2 | 90.2±18.74 | ||
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 67 | 58.4±9.18 | 9.7±6.20 | 16 | 8.07±0.95 | 9.6±2.5 | 91.3±16.64 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 71 | 58.8±9.43 | 8.7±7.89 | 16 | 8.05±0.86 | 9.4±2.3 | 93.1±17.95 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 66 | 57.9±10.27 | 8.8±6.90 | 16 | 8.24±0.90 | 9.6±2.4 | 90.1±17.54 | |
| SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 80 mg | 20 | 59.5±9.55 | 9.33±5.16 | 12 | 8.14±1.025 | 9.9±2.1 | 96.410±20.43 |
| Danuglipron 80 mg | 22 | 60.9±8.69 | 10.38±6.44 | 12 | 8.25±1.019 | 9.9±2.5 | 91.111±14.22 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 58.3±7.11 | 9.15±5.78 | 12 | 8.05±0.880 | 8.9±2.7 | 101.880±24.54 | ||
| Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 57.2±11.80 | 10.20±9.88 | 12 | 8.56±1.162 | 10.2±3.2 | 95.152±17.01 | ||
| Danuglipron 200 mg | 21 | 59.0±9.31 | 7.87±4.83 | 12 | 8.24±1.162 | 9.3±3.0 | 86.365±13.64 | ||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 16 | 53.9±9.10 | 8.15±7.58 | 12 | 7.83±0.936 | 9.0±2.5 | 101.017±18.44 | |
| PRATT(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 9 mg | 9 | 57.7±6.4 | 13.48±8.29 | 12 | 8.02±0.62 | 85.61±12.76 | |
| OFG 15 mg | 10 | 59.6±4.6 | 15.02±11.97 | 12 | 7.84±0.74 | 88.02±14.36 | |||
| OFG 21 mg | 14 | 55.3±8.0 | 9.48±5.48 | 12 | 8.36±1.31 | 92.09±18.78 | |||
| OFG 27 mg | 9 | 58.8±4.6 | 7.60±4.39 | 12 | 7.82±0.69 | 92.80±15.36 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 9 | 62.8±4.4 | 10.38±4.78 | 12 | 7.93±0.79 | 81.49±10.24 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 17 | 56.0±6.0 | 8.63±4.89 | 12 | 8.09±0.75 | 90.29±20.04 | ||
| FRIAS(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 3 mg | 51 | 59.0±9.4 | 26 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.1±2.3 | 99.3±25.4 | |
| OFG 12 mg | 56 | 57.4±9.2 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 99.3±18.1 | |||
| OFG 24 mg | 47 | 60.5±9.1 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.5±2.5 | 98.5±22.9 | |||
| OFG 36 mg | 61 | 59.7±9.2 | 26 | 8.0±0.7 | 8.8±1.6 | 98.9±17.5 | |||
| OFG 45 mg | 63 | 58.5±9.4 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.2±2.0 | 104.6±25.1 | |||
| 对照组 | 安慰剂 | 55 | 58.3±9.5 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 102.0±18.8 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
US Food & Drug Administration. RYBELSUS prescribing information 2019[EB/OL].[2023-08-29].
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [1] | YAO Ying, DUAN Liran, HAN Dianli, MIAO Tianxin, CHEN Ke, ZHANG Lan, GU Haiyue. Construction and Application of Fall Prevention Continuous Intervention Program for Young-old Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(30): 4415-4423. |
| [2] | GUO Zhihong, CHEN Yingying, LIU Dewu. Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Bone Cement Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage for Diabetic Foot: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(30): 4503-4512. |
| [3] | ZHAO Congjuan, JIN Tiantian, LIANG Jie, WANG Beining, GAO Yan. Comparative Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(29): 4326-4336. |
| [4] | WANG Wei, YU Fei, YAN Xiaohong. Application and Mechanisms of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Different Etiologies: Evidence from Ischemic and Non-ischemic Heart Failure [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(27): 3976-3984. |
| [5] | JIANG Yanlin, WANG Zhe, ZHAI Rui, ZHANG Mengjie, CHEN Xi, WANG Junhong. Screening Optimal Traditional Chinese Medicine Compound Formulas for ADHD Treatment: a Study Integrating Network Meta-analysis and Entropy-weighted TOPSIS Method [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(27): 3985-3994. |
| [6] | DU Ruofang, CAO Yang, LIU Dianna, ZHANG Qixin, WANG Xiaofan, SHI Enze, ZHANG Yuxin, LI Quanwang. A 10-Year Clinical Review of Raw Pinelliae Rhizoma in Tumor Treatment: Usage Patterns and Safety Evaluation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(27): 3995-4003. |
| [7] | CHEN Jingjing, BAI Xinyuan, SHA Huizi, SUN Yi, NI Jiayao, TONG Fan, ZOU Lu, MENG Fanyan, DU Juan. Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine plus S-1 Regimen versus S-1 Combined with Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan Regimen as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(26): 3767-3773. |
| [8] | ZHUANG Mingnan, YAN Henghao, XIAO Ningkun, YIN Mingyue, FAN Zhiwei, LIU Chaohui, ZOU Xintong, ZHOU Yuehua, BI Zhiyuan, DENG Hengzhi, WU Bitai, SONG Zhiquan, SHI Donglin. Effects of Interval and Continuous Training on Cognitive Function in Healthy Adults: a Systematic Review and Three-level Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(26): 3816-3828. |
| [9] | WANG Shuangrui, WANG Yongjia, FAN Xiaomin, LIU Xiangyu, HU Shunqing, YANG Zijian, ZHANG Xinjian. Efficacy and Safety of High-frequency Versus Low-frequency Stellate Ganglion Block Combined with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in the Treatment of Insomnia Disorder [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(25): 3678-3685. |
| [10] | ZHAO Yiru, HAO Xinyu, ZHAO Lei, ZHANG Caihui, WANG Zhaoxia, ZHANG Yueying. Summary of the Best Evidence for the Management of Diuretic Resistance in Patients with Heart Failure [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(25): 3694-3703. |
| [11] | WANG Rui, LUO Shuoming, YANG Liang, WANG Peng, ZHAO Yang, WANG Qi, ZHOU Zhiguang. Diabetes Prevalence among Older Adults in China: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(24): 3500-3508. |
| [12] | LI Xueni, LIU Gejing, LIU Yongming. Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure: a Meta-Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(24): 3509-3519. |
| [13] | SI Xinying, MA Wenyuan, GUO Zhixun, QI Shuo, CHEN Xiaoheng, LI Zhe, LI Lu, DING Zhiguo. Preliminary Development of a Syndrome Efficacy Evaluation Scale for Hypothyroidism Secondary to Hashimoto's Thyroiditis: Based on Expert Consultation and Clinical Investigation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(24): 3528-3537. |
| [14] | PEI Ruqing, ZHOU Yuqiu, ZHANG Siyu, LIU Xijun. Meta-analysis of Influencing Factors of Relapse in Chinese Patients with Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(23): 3359-3370. |
| [15] | LI Yutong, ZHAO Danting, JIANG Feng, WANG Yanna, LIU Yizong, LIANG Wenjuan, LU Jiahai. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of mRNA and Recombinant Protein Subunit Vaccines Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2744-2752. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||