Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (21): 2679-2685.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0484
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-09-11
Revised:
2024-11-25
Published:
2025-07-20
Online:
2025-06-05
Contact:
LU Yibing
通讯作者:
鲁一兵
作者简介:
作者贡献:
马盼盼负责构思设计与撰写文章;王思静负责检索与筛选文献;游娜和丁大法负责文章的修订;鲁一兵负责文章的质量控制与审校工作。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0484
第一作者(年份) | 组别 | 干预措施 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 病程(年) | 疗程(周) | 初始HbA1c(%) | 初始FPG(mmol/L) | 体质量(kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONO(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 40 mg | 10 | 55.9±10.0 | 2.9±2.2 | 8 | 8.2±1.1 | 9.6±1.7 | 79.7±13.6 |
Danuglipron 80 mg | 9 | 58.0±6.7 | 9.1±5.8 | 8 | 8.6±1.0 | 9.8±1.8 | 79.6±10.0 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 50.7±7.5 | 5.7±7.7 | 8 | 8.4±1.2 | 9.1±2.6 | 81.5±10.4 | ||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 9 | 58.6±8.8 | 5.5±4.1 | 8 | 8.3±1.2 | 10.2±2.0 | 73.3±9.9 | |
SAXENA(2021)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 10 mg | 9 | 54.0±6.22 | 11.7±6.1 | 4 | 8.2±0.6 | 8.8±1.3 | 99.6±12.7 |
Danuglipron 15 mg | 9 | 56.1±9.53 | 8.1±4.2 | 4 | 8.6±0.6 | 11.0±1.8 | 92.9±22.5 | ||
Danuglipron 50 mg | 10 | 60.2±7.97 | 9.1±5.1 | 4 | 8.3±0.9 | 9.3±1.9 | 87.8±13.8 | ||
Danuglipron 70 mg | 9 | 58.3±5.32 | 11.6±4.6 | 4 | 8.3±0.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 86.9±18.6 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 55.8±7.68 | 10.8±4.7 | 4 | 8.5±1.0 | 10.9±1.5 | 101.6±17.4 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 58.6±6.69 | 9.2±5.9 | 4 | 8.2±0.7 | 9.8±2.4 | 87.9±19.7 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 8 | 58.3±3.81 | 9.2±7.4 | 4 | 8.2±1.0 | 10.0±1.6 | 84.9±15.3 | ||
Danuglipron 200 mg | 10 | 57.6±8.30 | 8.7±7.8 | 4 | 8.6±0.9 | 10.9±2.1 | 92.4±18.0 | ||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 25 | 57.6±7.71 | 8.5±6.8 | 4 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.3±1.8 | 94.3±17.7 | |
SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 2.5 mg | 68 | 58.9±9.30 | 8.8±6.31 | 16 | 8.10±1.03 | 9.4±2.4 | 90.9±20.13 |
Danuglipron 10 mg | 68 | 58.1±9.43 | 8.5±6.85 | 16 | 8.01±0.91 | 9.2±2.2 | 92.3±16.44 | ||
Danuglipron 40 mg | 71 | 59.6±8.58 | 8.0±5.82 | 16 | 8.00±0.89 | 9.2±2.2 | 90.2±18.74 | ||
Danuglipron 80 mg | 67 | 58.4±9.18 | 9.7±6.20 | 16 | 8.07±0.95 | 9.6±2.5 | 91.3±16.64 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 71 | 58.8±9.43 | 8.7±7.89 | 16 | 8.05±0.86 | 9.4±2.3 | 93.1±17.95 | ||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 66 | 57.9±10.27 | 8.8±6.90 | 16 | 8.24±0.90 | 9.6±2.4 | 90.1±17.54 | |
SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 80 mg | 20 | 59.5±9.55 | 9.33±5.16 | 12 | 8.14±1.025 | 9.9±2.1 | 96.410±20.43 |
Danuglipron 80 mg | 22 | 60.9±8.69 | 10.38±6.44 | 12 | 8.25±1.019 | 9.9±2.5 | 91.111±14.22 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 58.3±7.11 | 9.15±5.78 | 12 | 8.05±0.880 | 8.9±2.7 | 101.880±24.54 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 57.2±11.80 | 10.20±9.88 | 12 | 8.56±1.162 | 10.2±3.2 | 95.152±17.01 | ||
Danuglipron 200 mg | 21 | 59.0±9.31 | 7.87±4.83 | 12 | 8.24±1.162 | 9.3±3.0 | 86.365±13.64 | ||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 16 | 53.9±9.10 | 8.15±7.58 | 12 | 7.83±0.936 | 9.0±2.5 | 101.017±18.44 | |
PRATT(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 9 mg | 9 | 57.7±6.4 | 13.48±8.29 | 12 | 8.02±0.62 | 85.61±12.76 | |
OFG 15 mg | 10 | 59.6±4.6 | 15.02±11.97 | 12 | 7.84±0.74 | 88.02±14.36 | |||
OFG 21 mg | 14 | 55.3±8.0 | 9.48±5.48 | 12 | 8.36±1.31 | 92.09±18.78 | |||
OFG 27 mg | 9 | 58.8±4.6 | 7.60±4.39 | 12 | 7.82±0.69 | 92.80±15.36 | |||
OFG 45 mg | 9 | 62.8±4.4 | 10.38±4.78 | 12 | 7.93±0.79 | 81.49±10.24 | |||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 17 | 56.0±6.0 | 8.63±4.89 | 12 | 8.09±0.75 | 90.29±20.04 | ||
FRIAS(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 3 mg | 51 | 59.0±9.4 | 26 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.1±2.3 | 99.3±25.4 | |
OFG 12 mg | 56 | 57.4±9.2 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 99.3±18.1 | |||
OFG 24 mg | 47 | 60.5±9.1 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.5±2.5 | 98.5±22.9 | |||
OFG 36 mg | 61 | 59.7±9.2 | 26 | 8.0±0.7 | 8.8±1.6 | 98.9±17.5 | |||
OFG 45 mg | 63 | 58.5±9.4 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.2±2.0 | 104.6±25.1 | |||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 55 | 58.3±9.5 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 102.0±18.8 |
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
第一作者(年份) | 组别 | 干预措施 | 例数 | 年龄(岁) | 病程(年) | 疗程(周) | 初始HbA1c(%) | 初始FPG(mmol/L) | 体质量(kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONO(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 40 mg | 10 | 55.9±10.0 | 2.9±2.2 | 8 | 8.2±1.1 | 9.6±1.7 | 79.7±13.6 |
Danuglipron 80 mg | 9 | 58.0±6.7 | 9.1±5.8 | 8 | 8.6±1.0 | 9.8±1.8 | 79.6±10.0 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 50.7±7.5 | 5.7±7.7 | 8 | 8.4±1.2 | 9.1±2.6 | 81.5±10.4 | ||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 9 | 58.6±8.8 | 5.5±4.1 | 8 | 8.3±1.2 | 10.2±2.0 | 73.3±9.9 | |
SAXENA(2021)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 10 mg | 9 | 54.0±6.22 | 11.7±6.1 | 4 | 8.2±0.6 | 8.8±1.3 | 99.6±12.7 |
Danuglipron 15 mg | 9 | 56.1±9.53 | 8.1±4.2 | 4 | 8.6±0.6 | 11.0±1.8 | 92.9±22.5 | ||
Danuglipron 50 mg | 10 | 60.2±7.97 | 9.1±5.1 | 4 | 8.3±0.9 | 9.3±1.9 | 87.8±13.8 | ||
Danuglipron 70 mg | 9 | 58.3±5.32 | 11.6±4.6 | 4 | 8.3±0.6 | 10.4±1.8 | 86.9±18.6 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 55.8±7.68 | 10.8±4.7 | 4 | 8.5±1.0 | 10.9±1.5 | 101.6±17.4 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 9 | 58.6±6.69 | 9.2±5.9 | 4 | 8.2±0.7 | 9.8±2.4 | 87.9±19.7 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 8 | 58.3±3.81 | 9.2±7.4 | 4 | 8.2±1.0 | 10.0±1.6 | 84.9±15.3 | ||
Danuglipron 200 mg | 10 | 57.6±8.30 | 8.7±7.8 | 4 | 8.6±0.9 | 10.9±2.1 | 92.4±18.0 | ||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 25 | 57.6±7.71 | 8.5±6.8 | 4 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.3±1.8 | 94.3±17.7 | |
SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 2.5 mg | 68 | 58.9±9.30 | 8.8±6.31 | 16 | 8.10±1.03 | 9.4±2.4 | 90.9±20.13 |
Danuglipron 10 mg | 68 | 58.1±9.43 | 8.5±6.85 | 16 | 8.01±0.91 | 9.2±2.2 | 92.3±16.44 | ||
Danuglipron 40 mg | 71 | 59.6±8.58 | 8.0±5.82 | 16 | 8.00±0.89 | 9.2±2.2 | 90.2±18.74 | ||
Danuglipron 80 mg | 67 | 58.4±9.18 | 9.7±6.20 | 16 | 8.07±0.95 | 9.6±2.5 | 91.3±16.64 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 71 | 58.8±9.43 | 8.7±7.89 | 16 | 8.05±0.86 | 9.4±2.3 | 93.1±17.95 | ||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 66 | 57.9±10.27 | 8.8±6.90 | 16 | 8.24±0.90 | 9.6±2.4 | 90.1±17.54 | |
SAXENA(2023)[ | 试验组 | Danuglipron 80 mg | 20 | 59.5±9.55 | 9.33±5.16 | 12 | 8.14±1.025 | 9.9±2.1 | 96.410±20.43 |
Danuglipron 80 mg | 22 | 60.9±8.69 | 10.38±6.44 | 12 | 8.25±1.019 | 9.9±2.5 | 91.111±14.22 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 58.3±7.11 | 9.15±5.78 | 12 | 8.05±0.880 | 8.9±2.7 | 101.880±24.54 | ||
Danuglipron 120 mg | 22 | 57.2±11.80 | 10.20±9.88 | 12 | 8.56±1.162 | 10.2±3.2 | 95.152±17.01 | ||
Danuglipron 200 mg | 21 | 59.0±9.31 | 7.87±4.83 | 12 | 8.24±1.162 | 9.3±3.0 | 86.365±13.64 | ||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 16 | 53.9±9.10 | 8.15±7.58 | 12 | 7.83±0.936 | 9.0±2.5 | 101.017±18.44 | |
PRATT(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 9 mg | 9 | 57.7±6.4 | 13.48±8.29 | 12 | 8.02±0.62 | 85.61±12.76 | |
OFG 15 mg | 10 | 59.6±4.6 | 15.02±11.97 | 12 | 7.84±0.74 | 88.02±14.36 | |||
OFG 21 mg | 14 | 55.3±8.0 | 9.48±5.48 | 12 | 8.36±1.31 | 92.09±18.78 | |||
OFG 27 mg | 9 | 58.8±4.6 | 7.60±4.39 | 12 | 7.82±0.69 | 92.80±15.36 | |||
OFG 45 mg | 9 | 62.8±4.4 | 10.38±4.78 | 12 | 7.93±0.79 | 81.49±10.24 | |||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 17 | 56.0±6.0 | 8.63±4.89 | 12 | 8.09±0.75 | 90.29±20.04 | ||
FRIAS(2023)[ | 试验组 | OFG 3 mg | 51 | 59.0±9.4 | 26 | 8.0±0.8 | 9.1±2.3 | 99.3±25.4 | |
OFG 12 mg | 56 | 57.4±9.2 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 99.3±18.1 | |||
OFG 24 mg | 47 | 60.5±9.1 | 26 | 8.2±0.9 | 9.5±2.5 | 98.5±22.9 | |||
OFG 36 mg | 61 | 59.7±9.2 | 26 | 8.0±0.7 | 8.8±1.6 | 98.9±17.5 | |||
OFG 45 mg | 63 | 58.5±9.4 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.2±2.0 | 104.6±25.1 | |||
对照组 | 安慰剂 | 55 | 58.3±9.5 | 26 | 8.1±0.9 | 9.6±2.4 | 102.0±18.8 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
US Food & Drug Administration. RYBELSUS prescribing information 2019[EB/OL].[2023-08-29].
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[1] | ADILI Tuersun, CHENG Gang. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2686-2691. |
[2] | HU Wanqin, YU Shenyan, CAO Xuehua, XIANG Feng, JIA Yu. Factors Associated with Precocious Puberty in Chinese Children: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2661-2671. |
[3] | GUO Shengteng, ZHANG Fenfen, WAN Di, YU Dongmei, WANG Qinghua. Risk Factors for Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Acute Lung Injury: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2546-2554. |
[4] | FAN Yu, LI Rong, GONG Shuangying, YANG Xiaojuan, LI Rui. Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Postpartum Depression among Maternal Spouses in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2179-2185. |
[5] | WANG Biqing, ZHANG Ping, YANG Hongxia, WANG Qian, JU Chunxiao, ZHAO Junnan, MEI Jun, ZHANG Ying, XU Fengqin. Meta-analysis of Prevalence and Development Trend of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Hypertensive Patients in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2186-2192. |
[6] | ZHU Shengjie, DIAO Huaqiong, HANG Xiaoyi, SUN Wenjun. Network Meta-analysis of Different Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections for the Treatment of Posterior Circulatory Ischemic Vertigo [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1795-1808. |
[7] | HE Yun, FAN Huanfang, MA Pan, XU Shaoqing, YANG Liu, JIN Mingzhe, ZHANG Mingrui, CHEN Jiaqi. Effect of Postoperative Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Treated with Different Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapies: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1788-1794. |
[8] | LIU Caiping, ZHANG Yanhua, TANG Jianpin, WANG Chengpeng, XUE Fengfeng, WANG Huijuan, LI Chuanwei, ZHANG Guangya, LI Huafang. Efficacy and Safety of Long-acting Risperidone Microspheres in the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1622-1627. |
[9] | WANG Xiaoyu, FENG Zhenzhen, WANG Jun, GUO Xiaochuan, LI Jiansheng. Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Systematic Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1527-1537. |
[10] | SHI Jian, WANG Yajing, HOU Ran, HUANG Yajie, DUAN Xiaoyang. Efficacy and Safety of EGFR-TKI Combined with Chemotherapy for the First-line Treatment of EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1383-1394. |
[11] | CHI Xun, LIU Sisi, CHEN Qiao, HU Yue, WANG Weixian. The Suitability of Four Nutritional Screening Tools for Nutritional Screening in Patients with Cirrhosis: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1395-1402. |
[12] | GU Mingyu, QIN Tingting, QIAO Kun, BAI Xinyuan, WANG Yao, YANG Yutong, LI Xingming. A Network Meta-analysis of Primary Hypertension Management Patterns in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(10): 1265-1272. |
[13] | YANG Shuihua, YAO Guiying, TIAN Chen, YAN Yilong, LIU Jiayi, WANG Jiajia, TIAN Jinhui, NIU Meng, GE Long. MetaDTA: an Online Application for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(08): 1023-1032. |
[14] | SONG Fenfen, LI Shengmian. Real-World Study of Camrelizumab-based Regimen for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(07): 844-852. |
[15] | LIU Qin, CHENG Min, JIANG Fengqiong, LI Xiaoyu. Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Factors Affecting Enuresis in Chinese Children and Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(06): 763-770. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||