Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (27): 3447-3455.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0499
• Evidence-based Medicine • Previous Articles
Received:
2024-08-10
Revised:
2024-12-15
Published:
2025-09-20
Online:
2025-07-22
Contact:
HUANG Zhongxia
通讯作者:
黄仲夏
作者简介:
作者贡献:
张天宇进行论文构思、统计学处理、结果分析和论文撰写;于海搏和陈飞协助进行统计学处理;李新、张佳佳、詹晓凯、申曼、汤然、范斯斌和赵凤仪进行文献资料整理;黄仲夏对文章进行可行性分析、论文修订和质量监督管理,对文章整体负责。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0499
第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 国家/地区 | 研究类型 | 样本量(例) | 结局指标 | 中位年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 干预措施 | 质量评价得分(分) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI[ | 2011 | 中国 | 单中心前瞻性研究 | 31 | ①②③④⑤ | 21(15,36) | MD | 15 |
MISAWA[ | 2016 | 日本 | 多中心、随机对照试验 | 24 | ④⑤ | 62(54,69) | TD/安慰剂 | 6 |
KUWABARA[ | 2008 | 日本 | 开放性前瞻研究 | 9 | ②④⑤ | 65(42,85) | TD | 14 |
LI[ | 2018 | 中国 | 前瞻性Ⅱ期、单中心、单臂研究 | 41 | ①②③④⑤ | 49(21,70) | RD | 15 |
ROYER[ | 2012 | 法国 | 回顾性研究 | 20 | ①②③④⑤ | 60(32,79) | RD | 14 |
NOZZA[ | 2017 | 意大利 | 前瞻性单臂研究 | 18 | ①③⑤ | 60(44,76) | RD | 14 |
CAI[ | 2014 | 中国 | 回顾性研究 | 12 | ①②③④⑤ | 46(27,71) | RD | 14 |
SUICHI[ | 2020 | 日本 | 前瞻性单臂临床试验 | 5 | ②③④⑤ | 52(45,58) | RD | 14 |
LI[ | 2023 | 中国 | 单中心回顾性研究 | 239 | ①②③ | 46(23,66) | ASCT | 14 |
COOK[ | 2016 | 欧洲 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 127 | ① | 50(26,69) | ASCT | 14 |
KAWAJIRI-MANAKO[ | 2018 | 日本 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 95 | ①⑤ | 53(28,72) | ASCT | 13 |
KOOK[ | 2024 | 韩国 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 84 | ①② | 53(26,77) | ASCT | 14 |
D'SOUZA[ | 2012 | 美国 | 单中心研究 | 59 | ①② | 51(20,70) | ASCT | 15 |
DISPENZIERI[ | 2008 | 美国 | 单中心研究 | 30 | ① | 48.5(20,70) | ASCT | 13 |
Table 1 Basic characteristics of included literature
第一作者 | 发表时间(年) | 国家/地区 | 研究类型 | 样本量(例) | 结局指标 | 中位年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | 干预措施 | 质量评价得分(分) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI[ | 2011 | 中国 | 单中心前瞻性研究 | 31 | ①②③④⑤ | 21(15,36) | MD | 15 |
MISAWA[ | 2016 | 日本 | 多中心、随机对照试验 | 24 | ④⑤ | 62(54,69) | TD/安慰剂 | 6 |
KUWABARA[ | 2008 | 日本 | 开放性前瞻研究 | 9 | ②④⑤ | 65(42,85) | TD | 14 |
LI[ | 2018 | 中国 | 前瞻性Ⅱ期、单中心、单臂研究 | 41 | ①②③④⑤ | 49(21,70) | RD | 15 |
ROYER[ | 2012 | 法国 | 回顾性研究 | 20 | ①②③④⑤ | 60(32,79) | RD | 14 |
NOZZA[ | 2017 | 意大利 | 前瞻性单臂研究 | 18 | ①③⑤ | 60(44,76) | RD | 14 |
CAI[ | 2014 | 中国 | 回顾性研究 | 12 | ①②③④⑤ | 46(27,71) | RD | 14 |
SUICHI[ | 2020 | 日本 | 前瞻性单臂临床试验 | 5 | ②③④⑤ | 52(45,58) | RD | 14 |
LI[ | 2023 | 中国 | 单中心回顾性研究 | 239 | ①②③ | 46(23,66) | ASCT | 14 |
COOK[ | 2016 | 欧洲 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 127 | ① | 50(26,69) | ASCT | 14 |
KAWAJIRI-MANAKO[ | 2018 | 日本 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 95 | ①⑤ | 53(28,72) | ASCT | 13 |
KOOK[ | 2024 | 韩国 | 多中心回顾性研究 | 84 | ①② | 53(26,77) | ASCT | 14 |
D'SOUZA[ | 2012 | 美国 | 单中心研究 | 59 | ①② | 51(20,70) | ASCT | 15 |
DISPENZIERI[ | 2008 | 美国 | 单中心研究 | 30 | ① | 48.5(20,70) | ASCT | 13 |
亚组 | 血液学反应率(95%CI) | VEGF反应率(95%CI) | 神经系统反应率(95%CI) | ≥3级不良反应 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
发生率(95%CI) | 末次随访时的存活率(95%CI) | ||||
MD | 0.806(0.625~0.925) | 0.958(0.789~0.999) | 1.000(0.888~1.000) | 0.194(0.075~0.375) | 1.000(0.888~1.000) |
TD+RD | 0.726(0.517~0.897) | 0.887(0.798~0.956) | 0.642(0.325~0.909) | 0.047(0.000~0.204) | 0.978(0.930~1.000) |
ASCT | 0.830(0.730~0.912) | 0.800(0.484~0.989) | 0.926(0.882~0.958) | 0.543(0.419~0.663) | 0.908(0.878~0.934) |
Table 2 Outcomes of subgroup analysis based on type of systemic therapy regimen
亚组 | 血液学反应率(95%CI) | VEGF反应率(95%CI) | 神经系统反应率(95%CI) | ≥3级不良反应 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
发生率(95%CI) | 末次随访时的存活率(95%CI) | ||||
MD | 0.806(0.625~0.925) | 0.958(0.789~0.999) | 1.000(0.888~1.000) | 0.194(0.075~0.375) | 1.000(0.888~1.000) |
TD+RD | 0.726(0.517~0.897) | 0.887(0.798~0.956) | 0.642(0.325~0.909) | 0.047(0.000~0.204) | 0.978(0.930~1.000) |
ASCT | 0.830(0.730~0.912) | 0.800(0.484~0.989) | 0.926(0.882~0.958) | 0.543(0.419~0.663) | 0.908(0.878~0.934) |
亚组 | 血液学反应率 | VEGF反应率 | 神经系统反应率 | ≥3级不良反应发生率 | 末次随访时的存活率 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | |
MD | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
TD+RD | 71.098 | 0.016 | <0.001 | 0.647 | 87.468 | <0.001 | 80.418 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.438 |
ASCT | 83.009 | <0.001 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17.428 | 0.301 |
Table 3 Heterogeneity in subgroup analysis based on type of systemic therapy regimen
亚组 | 血液学反应率 | VEGF反应率 | 神经系统反应率 | ≥3级不良反应发生率 | 末次随访时的存活率 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | I2值(%) | P值 | |
MD | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
TD+RD | 71.098 | 0.016 | <0.001 | 0.647 | 87.468 | <0.001 | 80.418 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.438 |
ASCT | 83.009 | <0.001 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 17.428 | 0.301 |
项目 | 斜率(Intercept) | 95%CI | 截距(Slope) | 95%CI | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
血液学反应率 | 0.479 | 0.546~0.953 | 0.190 | -1.286~1.667 | 0.777 |
VEGF反应率 | 0.841 | 0.575~1.107 | 0.017 | -1.670~1.705 | 0.981 |
神经系统反应率 | 1.066 | 0.838~1.294 | -1.487 | -3.062~0.089 | 0.060 |
≥3级不良反应发生率 | 0.601 | 0.109~1.092 | -1.850 | -4.298~0.598 | 0.117 |
末次随访时的存活率 | 0.872 | 0.814~0.930 | 0.387 | -0.069~0.843 | 0.088 |
末次随访时的复发率 | 0.122 | -0.431~0.676 | -0.156 | -2.970~2.658 | 0.885 |
Table 4 Outcomes of Egger's test
项目 | 斜率(Intercept) | 95%CI | 截距(Slope) | 95%CI | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
血液学反应率 | 0.479 | 0.546~0.953 | 0.190 | -1.286~1.667 | 0.777 |
VEGF反应率 | 0.841 | 0.575~1.107 | 0.017 | -1.670~1.705 | 0.981 |
神经系统反应率 | 1.066 | 0.838~1.294 | -1.487 | -3.062~0.089 | 0.060 |
≥3级不良反应发生率 | 0.601 | 0.109~1.092 | -1.850 | -4.298~0.598 | 0.117 |
末次随访时的存活率 | 0.872 | 0.814~0.930 | 0.387 | -0.069~0.843 | 0.088 |
末次随访时的复发率 | 0.122 | -0.431~0.676 | -0.156 | -2.970~2.658 | 0.885 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
陈月红,杜亮,耿兴远,等. 无对照二分类数据的Meta分析在RevMan软件中的实现[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(7):889-896. DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.20140147.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] | |
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[1] | QUAN Jialin, ZHU Lin, SU Yu, CHEN Zekai, CHEN Ziqi, ZHANG Zhuofan. Research on the Improvement Effect of Exercise Modes on the Executive Function of Overweight or Obese Children or Adolescents: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3422-3431. |
[2] | JIANG Shihua, ZHU Zheng, REN Yingying, ZHU Yaolei, WANG Yue, GAO Xibin. Meta Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Myopia in Chinese Children and Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(24): 3043-3052. |
[3] | LI Hao, LI Jiangtao, LIU Dan, WANG Jianjun. Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab, Anifrolumab, and Telitacicept on the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2924-2933. |
[4] | WANG Xiaolin, LI Qiuyue, ZHOU Yanjun, ZHANG Jinhui, LIANG Tao. Incidence and Risk of Cardiovascular Toxicity with Fruquintinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(23): 2934-2940. |
[5] | MA Panpan, WANG Sijing, YOU Na, DING Dafa, LU Yibing. Efficacy and Safety of Danuglipron and Orforglipron in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2679-2685. |
[6] | HU Wanqin, YU Shenyan, CAO Xuehua, XIANG Feng, JIA Yu. Factors Associated with Precocious Puberty in Chinese Children: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2661-2671. |
[7] | ADILI Tuersun, CHENG Gang. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(21): 2686-2691. |
[8] | GUO Shengteng, ZHANG Fenfen, WAN Di, YU Dongmei, WANG Qinghua. Risk Factors for Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Acute Lung Injury: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2546-2554. |
[9] | WANG Biqing, ZHANG Ping, YANG Hongxia, WANG Qian, JU Chunxiao, ZHAO Junnan, MEI Jun, ZHANG Ying, XU Fengqin. Meta-analysis of Prevalence and Development Trend of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Hypertensive Patients in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2186-2192. |
[10] | FAN Yu, LI Rong, GONG Shuangying, YANG Xiaojuan, LI Rui. Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Postpartum Depression among Maternal Spouses in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2179-2185. |
[11] | HE Yun, FAN Huanfang, MA Pan, XU Shaoqing, YANG Liu, JIN Mingzhe, ZHANG Mingrui, CHEN Jiaqi. Effect of Postoperative Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Treated with Different Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapies: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1788-1794. |
[12] | ZHU Shengjie, DIAO Huaqiong, HANG Xiaoyi, SUN Wenjun. Network Meta-analysis of Different Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections for the Treatment of Posterior Circulatory Ischemic Vertigo [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1795-1808. |
[13] | WANG Xiaoyu, FENG Zhenzhen, WANG Jun, GUO Xiaochuan, LI Jiansheng. Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Systematic Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1527-1537. |
[14] | CHI Xun, LIU Sisi, CHEN Qiao, HU Yue, WANG Weixian. The Suitability of Four Nutritional Screening Tools for Nutritional Screening in Patients with Cirrhosis: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1395-1402. |
[15] | SHI Jian, WANG Yajing, HOU Ran, HUANG Yajie, DUAN Xiaoyang. Efficacy and Safety of EGFR-TKI Combined with Chemotherapy for the First-line Treatment of EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(11): 1383-1394. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||