
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (16): 1980-1986.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0711
Special Issue: 中医最新文章合辑; 社区卫生服务最新研究合辑
• Chinese General Practice/Primary Care Services • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-03-02
Revised:2024-10-04
Published:2025-06-05
Online:2025-04-22
Contact:
DU Yue
通讯作者:
杜汋
作者简介:作者贡献:
李杰负责论文书写、文献查阅、数据处理、文章整体设计;杜汋对文章整体负责、监督管理;邵屾负责对初始数据进行处理;潘东负责收集数据;张雅欣协助分析。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0711
| 区域 | 投入指标 | 产出指标 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | |
| Dis1 | 207 | 28 | 914 | 313 488 651.25 | 1 102 647 | 4 | 3 752 |
| Dis2 | 190 | 89 | 1 300 | 274 302 044.93 | 675 169 | 162 | 1 422 |
| Dis3 | 233 | 39 | 993 | 281 991 938.83 | 969 531 | 33 | 3 148 |
| Dis4 | 155 | 59 | 959 | 194 804 577.98 | 506 834 | 0 | 1 436 |
| Dis5 | 92 | 0 | 227 | 121 346 685.26 | 177 774 | 0 | 456 |
| Dis6 | 111 | 44 | 434 | 144 801 281.90 | 463 881 | 0 | 76 247 |
| Dis7 | 148 | 18 | 618 | 270 789 516.37 | 750 277 | 0 | 939 |
| Dis8 | 135 | 62 | 318 | 89 654 756.60 | 169 366 | 47 | 61 |
| Dis9 | 63 | 35 | 322 | 99 126 862.11 | 245 847 | 0 | 193 |
| Dis10 | 81 | 43 | 415 | 77 829 559.26 | 224 025 | 0 | 212 |
| Dis11 | 218 | 36 | 1 039 | 268 414 789.16 | 889 960 | 1 | 479 |
| Dis12 | 159 | 68 | 1 602 | 132 058 970.60 | 611 032 | 0 | 3 472 |
| Dis13 | 28 | 0 | 522 | 13 503 527.34 | 58 466 | 0 | 3 594 |
| Dis14 | 132 | 16 | 535 | 37 669 479.20 | 117 308 | 1 | 1 691 |
| Dis15 | 119 | 16 | 523 | 68 096 411.10 | 180 951 | 8 | 637 |
| Dis16 | 189 | 60 | 718 | 57 314 697.77 | 65 803 | 0 | 561 |
| 均值 | 141.25 | 38.31 | 714.94 | 152 824 609.35 | 450 554.44 | 16 | 6 143.75 |
Table 1 Input-output indicators of grassroots traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment services in various districts of Tianjin in 2021
| 区域 | 投入指标 | 产出指标 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | |
| Dis1 | 207 | 28 | 914 | 313 488 651.25 | 1 102 647 | 4 | 3 752 |
| Dis2 | 190 | 89 | 1 300 | 274 302 044.93 | 675 169 | 162 | 1 422 |
| Dis3 | 233 | 39 | 993 | 281 991 938.83 | 969 531 | 33 | 3 148 |
| Dis4 | 155 | 59 | 959 | 194 804 577.98 | 506 834 | 0 | 1 436 |
| Dis5 | 92 | 0 | 227 | 121 346 685.26 | 177 774 | 0 | 456 |
| Dis6 | 111 | 44 | 434 | 144 801 281.90 | 463 881 | 0 | 76 247 |
| Dis7 | 148 | 18 | 618 | 270 789 516.37 | 750 277 | 0 | 939 |
| Dis8 | 135 | 62 | 318 | 89 654 756.60 | 169 366 | 47 | 61 |
| Dis9 | 63 | 35 | 322 | 99 126 862.11 | 245 847 | 0 | 193 |
| Dis10 | 81 | 43 | 415 | 77 829 559.26 | 224 025 | 0 | 212 |
| Dis11 | 218 | 36 | 1 039 | 268 414 789.16 | 889 960 | 1 | 479 |
| Dis12 | 159 | 68 | 1 602 | 132 058 970.60 | 611 032 | 0 | 3 472 |
| Dis13 | 28 | 0 | 522 | 13 503 527.34 | 58 466 | 0 | 3 594 |
| Dis14 | 132 | 16 | 535 | 37 669 479.20 | 117 308 | 1 | 1 691 |
| Dis15 | 119 | 16 | 523 | 68 096 411.10 | 180 951 | 8 | 637 |
| Dis16 | 189 | 60 | 718 | 57 314 697.77 | 65 803 | 0 | 561 |
| 均值 | 141.25 | 38.31 | 714.94 | 152 824 609.35 | 450 554.44 | 16 | 6 143.75 |
| 区域 | 技术效率(CCR) | 纯技术效率(BCC) | 规模效率(CCR/BCC) | 规模报酬情况 | 有效性 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dis1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis3 | 0.958 | 0.966 | 0.992 | drs | 无效 |
| Dis4 | 0.689 | 0.714 | 0.965 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis5 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis6 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis7 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis8 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis9 | 0.860 | 1.000 | 0.860 | irs | 弱有效 |
| Dis10 | 0.541 | 0.779 | 0.694 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis11 | 0.775 | 0.784 | 0.989 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis12 | 0.724 | 0.772 | 0.938 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis13 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis14 | 0.213 | 0.570 | 0.373 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis15 | 0.430 | 0.668 | 0.643 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis16 | 0.177 | 0.396 | 0.448 | irs | 无效 |
Table 2 Effectiveness score and returns to scale of grass-roots TCM diagnosis and treatment service operation in each district
| 区域 | 技术效率(CCR) | 纯技术效率(BCC) | 规模效率(CCR/BCC) | 规模报酬情况 | 有效性 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dis1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis3 | 0.958 | 0.966 | 0.992 | drs | 无效 |
| Dis4 | 0.689 | 0.714 | 0.965 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis5 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis6 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis7 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis8 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis9 | 0.860 | 1.000 | 0.860 | irs | 弱有效 |
| Dis10 | 0.541 | 0.779 | 0.694 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis11 | 0.775 | 0.784 | 0.989 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis12 | 0.724 | 0.772 | 0.938 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis13 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | — | 有效 |
| Dis14 | 0.213 | 0.570 | 0.373 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis15 | 0.430 | 0.668 | 0.643 | irs | 无效 |
| Dis16 | 0.177 | 0.396 | 0.448 | irs | 无效 |
| 区域 | 投入指标 | 产出指标 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-(X1) | 理想值 | S-(X2) | 理想值 | S-(X3) | 理想值 | S+(Y1) | 理想值 | S+(Y2) | 理想值 | S+(Y3) | 理想值 | S+(Y4) | 理想值 | |
| Dis3 | 35.87 | 197.13 | 1.34 | 37.66 | 47.71 | 945.29 | 13 013 746.42 | 295 005 685.25 | 0.00 | 969 531.00 | 0.00 | 33.00 | 0.00 | 3 148.00 |
| Dis4 | 44.35 | 110.65 | 33.33 | 25.67 | 471.66 | 487.34 | 0.00 | 194 804 577.98 | 21 075.64 | 527 909.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 436.00 |
| Dis10 | 17.91 | 63.09 | 9.51 | 33.49 | 91.76 | 323.25 | 20 303 513.80 | 98 133 073.06 | 16 732.71 | 240 757.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 49.08 | 261.08 |
| Dis11 | 47.08 | 170.93 | 13.85 | 22.15 | 249.68 | 789.32 | 0.00 | 268 414 789.16 | 0.00 | 889 960.00 | 1.46 | 2.46 | 2 485.08 | 2 964.08 |
| Dis12 | 36.28 | 122.72 | 53.18 | 14.82 | 872.56 | 729.44 | 40 192 494.10 | 172 251 464.70 | 0.00 | 611 032.00 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 205.61 | 3 677.61 |
| Dis14 | 56.75 | 75.25 | 6.88 | 9.12 | 230.00 | 305.00 | 58 780 404.85 | 96 449 884.05 | 55 517.10 | 172 825.10 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1 691.00 |
| Dis15 | 39.55 | 79.45 | 5.32 | 10.68 | 173.83 | 349.17 | 31 719 955.12 | 99 816 366.22 | 0.00 | 180 951.00 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 480.19 | 1 117.19 |
| Dis16 | 114.18 | 74.82 | 39.03 | 20.97 | 433.78 | 284.22 | 50 896 229.28 | 108 210 927.05 | 153 448.69 | 219 251.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 561.00 |
Table 3 Relaxation variables and ideal values of operational efficiency of grassroots traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment services in various districts with non DEA effectiveness
| 区域 | 投入指标 | 产出指标 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-(X1) | 理想值 | S-(X2) | 理想值 | S-(X3) | 理想值 | S+(Y1) | 理想值 | S+(Y2) | 理想值 | S+(Y3) | 理想值 | S+(Y4) | 理想值 | |
| Dis3 | 35.87 | 197.13 | 1.34 | 37.66 | 47.71 | 945.29 | 13 013 746.42 | 295 005 685.25 | 0.00 | 969 531.00 | 0.00 | 33.00 | 0.00 | 3 148.00 |
| Dis4 | 44.35 | 110.65 | 33.33 | 25.67 | 471.66 | 487.34 | 0.00 | 194 804 577.98 | 21 075.64 | 527 909.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 436.00 |
| Dis10 | 17.91 | 63.09 | 9.51 | 33.49 | 91.76 | 323.25 | 20 303 513.80 | 98 133 073.06 | 16 732.71 | 240 757.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 49.08 | 261.08 |
| Dis11 | 47.08 | 170.93 | 13.85 | 22.15 | 249.68 | 789.32 | 0.00 | 268 414 789.16 | 0.00 | 889 960.00 | 1.46 | 2.46 | 2 485.08 | 2 964.08 |
| Dis12 | 36.28 | 122.72 | 53.18 | 14.82 | 872.56 | 729.44 | 40 192 494.10 | 172 251 464.70 | 0.00 | 611 032.00 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 205.61 | 3 677.61 |
| Dis14 | 56.75 | 75.25 | 6.88 | 9.12 | 230.00 | 305.00 | 58 780 404.85 | 96 449 884.05 | 55 517.10 | 172 825.10 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1 691.00 |
| Dis15 | 39.55 | 79.45 | 5.32 | 10.68 | 173.83 | 349.17 | 31 719 955.12 | 99 816 366.22 | 0.00 | 180 951.00 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 480.19 | 1 117.19 |
| Dis16 | 114.18 | 74.82 | 39.03 | 20.97 | 433.78 | 284.22 | 50 896 229.28 | 108 210 927.05 | 153 448.69 | 219 251.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 561.00 |
| 区域 | 投入指标冗余 | 产出指标不足 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-(X1) | 冗余率(%) | S-(X2) | 冗余率 | S-(X3) | 冗余率(%) | S+(Y1) | 不足率(%) | S+(Y2) | 不足率(%) | S+(Y3) | 不足率(%) | S+(Y4) | 不足率(%) | |
| Dis3 | 35.87 | 15.39 | 1.34 | 3.44 | 47.71 | 4.80 | 13 013 746.42 | 4.61 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Dis4 | 44.35 | 28.61 | 33.33 | 56.49 | 471.66 | 49.18 | 0.00 | 0 | 21 075.64 | 4.16 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Dis10 | 17.91 | 22.11 | 9.51 | 22.11 | 91.76 | 22.11 | 20 303 513.80 | 26.09 | 16 732.71 | 7.47 | 0.00 | 0 | 49.08 | 23.15 |
| Dis11 | 47.08 | 21.59 | 13.85 | 38.48 | 249.68 | 24.03 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 1.46 | 146.00 | 2 485.08 | 518.81 |
| Dis12 | 36.28 | 22.82 | 53.18 | 78.21 | 872.56 | 54.47 | 40 192 494.10 | 30.44 | 0.00 | 0 | 2.12 | 0 | 205.61 | 5.92 |
| Dis14 | 56.75 | 42.99 | 6.88 | 42.99 | 230.00 | 42.99 | 58 780 404.85 | 156.04 | 55 517.10 | 47.33 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Dis15 | 39.55 | 33.24 | 5.32 | 33.24 | 173.83 | 33.24 | 31 719 955.12 | 46.58 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 480.19 | 75.38 |
| Dis16 | 114.18 | 60.41 | 39.03 | 65.05 | 433.78 | 60.41 | 50 896 229.28 | 88.80 | 153 448.69 | 233.19 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
Table 4 Relaxation variables and input redundancy rate,output insufficiency rate of non DEA effective grassroots traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment service operation efficiency in each district
| 区域 | 投入指标冗余 | 产出指标不足 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-(X1) | 冗余率(%) | S-(X2) | 冗余率 | S-(X3) | 冗余率(%) | S+(Y1) | 不足率(%) | S+(Y2) | 不足率(%) | S+(Y3) | 不足率(%) | S+(Y4) | 不足率(%) | |
| Dis3 | 35.87 | 15.39 | 1.34 | 3.44 | 47.71 | 4.80 | 13 013 746.42 | 4.61 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Dis4 | 44.35 | 28.61 | 33.33 | 56.49 | 471.66 | 49.18 | 0.00 | 0 | 21 075.64 | 4.16 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Dis10 | 17.91 | 22.11 | 9.51 | 22.11 | 91.76 | 22.11 | 20 303 513.80 | 26.09 | 16 732.71 | 7.47 | 0.00 | 0 | 49.08 | 23.15 |
| Dis11 | 47.08 | 21.59 | 13.85 | 38.48 | 249.68 | 24.03 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 1.46 | 146.00 | 2 485.08 | 518.81 |
| Dis12 | 36.28 | 22.82 | 53.18 | 78.21 | 872.56 | 54.47 | 40 192 494.10 | 30.44 | 0.00 | 0 | 2.12 | 0 | 205.61 | 5.92 |
| Dis14 | 56.75 | 42.99 | 6.88 | 42.99 | 230.00 | 42.99 | 58 780 404.85 | 156.04 | 55 517.10 | 47.33 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| Dis15 | 39.55 | 33.24 | 5.32 | 33.24 | 173.83 | 33.24 | 31 719 955.12 | 46.58 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 480.19 | 75.38 |
| Dis16 | 114.18 | 60.41 | 39.03 | 65.05 | 433.78 | 60.41 | 50 896 229.28 | 88.80 | 153 448.69 | 233.19 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
| 区域 | 技术效率 | 效率分类 |
|---|---|---|
| Dis1 | 0.808 | 高效 |
| Dis2 | 0.812 | 高效 |
| Dis3 | 0.821 | 高效 |
| Dis4 | 0.733 | 高效 |
| Dis5 | 0.838 | 高效 |
| Dis6 | 0.822 | 高效 |
| Dis7 | 0.912 | 高效 |
| Dis8 | 0.691 | 中效 |
| Dis9 | 0.901 | 高效 |
| Dis10 | 0.806 | 高效 |
| Dis11 | 0.885 | 高效 |
| Dis12 | 0.849 | 高效 |
| Dis13 | 0.737 | 高效 |
| Dis14 | 0.574 | 中效 |
| Dis15 | 0.711 | 高效 |
| Dis16 | 0.399 | 中效 |
| 均值 | 0.769 | 高效 |
Table 5 Analysis of the technical efficiency of traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment services in grassroots medical institutions in each district
| 区域 | 技术效率 | 效率分类 |
|---|---|---|
| Dis1 | 0.808 | 高效 |
| Dis2 | 0.812 | 高效 |
| Dis3 | 0.821 | 高效 |
| Dis4 | 0.733 | 高效 |
| Dis5 | 0.838 | 高效 |
| Dis6 | 0.822 | 高效 |
| Dis7 | 0.912 | 高效 |
| Dis8 | 0.691 | 中效 |
| Dis9 | 0.901 | 高效 |
| Dis10 | 0.806 | 高效 |
| Dis11 | 0.885 | 高效 |
| Dis12 | 0.849 | 高效 |
| Dis13 | 0.737 | 高效 |
| Dis14 | 0.574 | 中效 |
| Dis15 | 0.711 | 高效 |
| Dis16 | 0.399 | 中效 |
| 均值 | 0.769 | 高效 |
| 自变量 | 系数 | 标准误差 | t值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.990 | 0.241 | 4.103 |
| X2 | 0.821 | 0.990 | 0.829 |
| X3 | -0.707 | 0.236 | -0.300 |
Table 6 Analysis of factors influencing the technical efficiency of traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment services in grassroots medical institutions in various districts
| 自变量 | 系数 | 标准误差 | t值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.990 | 0.241 | 4.103 |
| X2 | 0.821 | 0.990 | 0.829 |
| X3 | -0.707 | 0.236 | -0.300 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于印发"十四五"中医药发展规划的通知:国办发〔2022〕5号 [EB/OL].(2022-03-03)[2025-03-31].
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
苏宇,郭丹丹,魏威,等.新医改下发挥基层中医服务优势促进分级诊疗制度构建[J].中国医院管理,2016,36(3):4-7.
|
| [5] |
尹朝霞,孔憧宇,邹先辉,等.深圳市社区卫生服务中心家庭医生签约居民门诊中医疾病谱分析[J].中国全科医学,2023,26(25):3112-3117,3126. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0601.
|
| [6] |
郭清. 我国近十年来中医药发展状况与趋势分析[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报,2019,43(10):1045-1051. DOI:10.16466/j.issn.1005-5509.2019.10.006.
|
| [7] | |
| [8] |
苗春霞,黄畅,黄晓静,等. 徐州市居民基层中医药服务就医意愿现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生事业管理,2023,40(2):157-160.
|
| [9] |
周春荣,俞佳丽,孔成英,等.新形式下综合医院中医适宜技术与中医药文化推广的现状[J]. 中医药管理杂志,2023,31(6):240-242. DOI:10.16690/j.cnki.1007-9203.2023.06.084.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] | |
| [14] |
徐海峰,季光,宋欣阳. 基层中医药适宜技术研究现状[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2022,37(10):5877-5879.
|
| [15] |
徐兴美,代震,王广通,等. 基于解释结构模型的基层中医药服务发展影响因素分析[J]. 中国医院,2023,27(3):37-40. DOI:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2023.03.10.
|
| [16] |
薛秦香,苏敏,高建民,等.陕西省新型农村合作医疗基金运行效率研究:基于标杆管理和超效率DEA模型[J]. 中国卫生经济,2015,34(5):43-45. DOI:10.7664/CHE20150512.
|
| [17] | |
| [18] | |
| [19] |
陈露,张春蕾,魏亚卿,等. 基于DEA模型的海南省基层卫生资源配置效率研究[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2019,39(2):109-113. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5916.2019.02.009.
|
| [20] |
李娜,李萌,杨威. 基于DEA模型的山西省三级综合医院运营效率评价[J].中国医院,2020,24(6):21-23. DOI:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2020.06.06.
|
| [21] |
张航.基于DEA和SFA的我国卫生资源配置效率分析与评价[D].天津:天津医科大学,2016.
|
| [22] |
卢文倩. 2011-2018年天津市中医医院医疗资源配置公平与效率分析[D].天津:天津中医药大学,2021.
|
| [23] |
吴弈天,姚峥嵘,王艳翚,等.基于三阶段DEA模型的我国公立医院医疗机构运营效率分析[J]. 南京中医药大学学报,2022,23(5):331-338.
|
| [24] |
赵康普,马爽. 基于DEA的全国各地区基层卫生资源配置效率分析[J]. 中国医院,2021,25(12):27-30. DOI:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2021.12.09.
|
| [1] | LI Zhenyu, ZHU Qiong, CHEN Rong, LU Jing, YU Zhijie, SHEN Fulai, SHEN Yi, FENG Yu, LIU Mei. A Single-group Community Intervention Trial on Improving the Service Efficiency of Contracted Residents Via an Enhanced Medical-preventive "Micro" Integration Service Package [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 3020-3027. |
| [2] | LI Wenping, CHEN Jianhua, XU Jiapei, JIN Xue, PAN Zihan, CHI Chunhua. A Scoping Review on the Empowerment of Community Elderly Health Services by Digital-Intelligent Health Management Platforms [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(21): 2938-2949. |
| [3] | PANG Shu, SUN ying, JIANG Chunyan. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Fried's Frailty Phenotype and the FRAIL Scale in Assessing Pre-frailty among Community-dwelling Older Adults Undergoing Health Examinations [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2664-2670. |
| [4] | ZHAO Xinxin, SUN Xiaoting, LUO Xinhao, SUN Jin, PENG Derong, ZHENG Jialin. Research on the Localization of the Patient-centered Medical Home Model in China: Adaptation Mechanisms, Challenges, and Pathway Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2608-2613. |
| [5] | CHEN Yan, SHEN Dequan, SHENG Renlei, CHANG Yujie, YANG Jiaqi, DING Jie, SUN Zhifang, WANG Dahui. Influencing Factors and Importance Ranking of the Utilization of Primary-level Traditional Chinese Medicine Preventive and Health Care Services for the Elderly [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2182-2189. |
| [6] | CHEN Bihua, LIN Qiyi, LI Wuhua, SU Jin, TU Liping, SHI Lan, DING Xiaoqin, YI Chuntao. The Influencing Factors and Mechanisms of the Work Output Level of Family Doctor Teams from the Perspective of Team Effectiveness [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2167-2173. |
| [7] | FU Mingyuan, YU Xiaoyi, GE Caiying, KONG Min. Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia: Prevalence and Determinants among Community-based Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2252-2258. |
| [8] | ZHENG Zelu, ZHOU Jun, LIANG Zhi, WANG Xuehui, XU Feng, LI Oujing, XIAO Hong, LIU Xiaoyu, YANG Qingmei, ZHANG Mei, LIN Na, MI Baohong, CHEN Weiheng. Comorbidity Profiles and Treatment Patterns of Osteoarthritis Patients: a Cross-sectional Study Based on Community Medical Records [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(16): 2205-2213. |
| [9] | WANG Yeming, ZHOU Qi, LI Jingya, CHEN Siying, WANG Junrui, DUAN Qinlei, CHEN Yaolong, CAO Bin, Respiratory Disease Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, Infectious Diseases Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese Guidelines for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Influenza in Primary Care (2025 Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1633-1644. |
| [10] | ZHANG Han, ZHANG Hua, CAI Genshen, LIAN Dongbo, ZHANG Jing. Construction of Weight Loss Clinic in Grassroots Medical Institutions and Typical Case Studies [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1520-1524. |
| [11] | WANG Na, ZHAI Fangming. Study on Quality Evaluation of Community Health Service of Patients with Multiple Chronic Diseases Based on Ratchet Effect: Taking Medical Insurance as a Moderator Variable [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 982-987. |
| [12] | LIU Xuchu, WANG Wuxi. Community Health Services Center Branding Strategy: Theory and Practice [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(04): 457-463. |
| [13] | ZHANG Yan, AI Yunjie, WANG Chenzhou, GAO Hongxia. Policy Value and Practical Challenges of High-quality Development Contracted Family Doctor Services [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(31): 3879-3883. |
| [14] | LIN Qiyi, YANG Yunfeng, GU Wenqin, XU Liping, DING Hongjuan, SU Jin, ZHOU Peng, YI Chuntao. Practice and Prospects for the Construction of "Combination of General and Specialized disciplines" Characteristics in Communities Based on the Medical Alliance: Taking Fenglin Street Community Health Service Center in Xuhui District, Shanghai as an Example [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(28): 3554-3557. |
| [15] | JI Bing, JIANG Dudu, CHEN Chen, ZHENG Yanling, SHI Jianwei, FANG Lizheng, DU Xueping. Constructing a Comprehensive Community Clinical Pathway for Herpes Zoster under Graded Treatment Framework [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3110-3118. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||