
Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (15): 1857-1862.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0043
Special Issue: 跌倒最新文章合辑; 神经系统疾病最新文章合辑; 脑健康最新研究合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2021-12-22
Revised:2022-01-28
Published:2022-02-24
Online:2022-04-07
Contact:
Luwen ZHU
About author:
通讯作者:
朱路文
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0043
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | 病程(d) | 偏瘫侧(左/右) | 脑卒中类型(脑梗死/脑出血) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 34 | 20/14 | 56.5±11.2 | 38.4±10.8 | 19/15 | 22/12 |
| 观察组 | 33 | 21/12 | 54.9±13.1 | 36.9±12.2 | 17/16 | 24/9 |
| χ2(t)值 | 0.163 | 0.538a | 0.533a | 0.128 | 0.501 | |
| P值 | 0.686 | 0.592 | 0.596 | 0.720 | 0.479 |
Table 1 Comparison of general information of two groups of patients
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | 病程(d) | 偏瘫侧(左/右) | 脑卒中类型(脑梗死/脑出血) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | 34 | 20/14 | 56.5±11.2 | 38.4±10.8 | 19/15 | 22/12 |
| 观察组 | 33 | 21/12 | 54.9±13.1 | 36.9±12.2 | 17/16 | 24/9 |
| χ2(t)值 | 0.163 | 0.538a | 0.533a | 0.128 | 0.501 | |
| P值 | 0.686 | 0.592 | 0.596 | 0.720 | 0.479 |
| 组别 | 例数 | LE-FMA评分(分) | 6MWT步行距离(m) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |||||
| 对照组 | 34 | 17.8±3.3 | 25.1±4.0 | 8.226 | <0.001 | 159.9±10.9 | 211.6±7.5 | 20.856 | <0.001 | |||
| 观察组 | 33 | 18.3±3.1 | 27.9±3.6 | 11.527 | <0.001 | 161.3±11.2 | 248.2±9.3 | 34.472 | <0.001 | |||
| t值 | 0.563 | 2.947 | 0.543 | 17.692 | ||||||||
| P值 | 0.575 | 0.004 | 0.589 | <0.001 | ||||||||
| 组别 | BBS评分(分) | TUGT用时(s) | MBI评分(分) | |||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |
| 对照组 | 32.3±3.9 | 38.5±4.1 | 6.418 | <0.001 | 20.4±3.3 | 18.8±3.1 | 2.012 | 0.048 | 46.7±2.2 | 63.0±3.3 | 23.604 | <0.001 |
| 观察组 | 32.3±3.7 | 41.4±4.1 | 9.416 | <0.001 | 20.3±3.1 | 17.9±3.0 | 3.265 | 0.002 | 47.1±2.1 | 67.7±3.7 | 27.735 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 0.065 | 2.881 | 0.051 | 1.242 | 0.652 | 5.564 | ||||||
| P值 | 0.949 | 0.005 | 0.959 | 0.219 | 0.517 | <0.001 | ||||||
Table 2 Comparison of LE-FMA score,6MWT walking distance,BBS score,TUGT time and MBI score in two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | LE-FMA评分(分) | 6MWT步行距离(m) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |||||
| 对照组 | 34 | 17.8±3.3 | 25.1±4.0 | 8.226 | <0.001 | 159.9±10.9 | 211.6±7.5 | 20.856 | <0.001 | |||
| 观察组 | 33 | 18.3±3.1 | 27.9±3.6 | 11.527 | <0.001 | 161.3±11.2 | 248.2±9.3 | 34.472 | <0.001 | |||
| t值 | 0.563 | 2.947 | 0.543 | 17.692 | ||||||||
| P值 | 0.575 | 0.004 | 0.589 | <0.001 | ||||||||
| 组别 | BBS评分(分) | TUGT用时(s) | MBI评分(分) | |||||||||
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |
| 对照组 | 32.3±3.9 | 38.5±4.1 | 6.418 | <0.001 | 20.4±3.3 | 18.8±3.1 | 2.012 | 0.048 | 46.7±2.2 | 63.0±3.3 | 23.604 | <0.001 |
| 观察组 | 32.3±3.7 | 41.4±4.1 | 9.416 | <0.001 | 20.3±3.1 | 17.9±3.0 | 3.265 | 0.002 | 47.1±2.1 | 67.7±3.7 | 27.735 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 0.065 | 2.881 | 0.051 | 1.242 | 0.652 | 5.564 | ||||||
| P值 | 0.949 | 0.005 | 0.959 | 0.219 | 0.517 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 组别 | 例数 | 步长(cm) | 步频(步/min) | 步速(m/min) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 34 | 33.1±11.5 | 39.3±13.3 | 2.055 | 0.044 | 71.2±16.4 | 79.1±16.2 | 2.015 | 0.048 | 47.5±11.4 | 53.0±11.3 | 2.003 | 0.049 |
| 观察组 | 33 | 34.1±12.5 | 41.2±13.7 | 2.211 | 0.031 | 70.8±16.9 | 87.1±16.5 | 3.968 | <0.001 | 47.7±11.4 | 59.1±12.4 | 3.886 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 0.359 | 0.605 | 0.089 | 2.003 | 0.093 | 2.118 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.721 | 0.547 | 0.930 | 0.049 | 0.926 | 0.038 | |||||||
Table 3 Comparison of step length,step frequency and step speed in two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 步长(cm) | 步频(步/min) | 步速(m/min) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 34 | 33.1±11.5 | 39.3±13.3 | 2.055 | 0.044 | 71.2±16.4 | 79.1±16.2 | 2.015 | 0.048 | 47.5±11.4 | 53.0±11.3 | 2.003 | 0.049 |
| 观察组 | 33 | 34.1±12.5 | 41.2±13.7 | 2.211 | 0.031 | 70.8±16.9 | 87.1±16.5 | 3.968 | <0.001 | 47.7±11.4 | 59.1±12.4 | 3.886 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 0.359 | 0.605 | 0.089 | 2.003 | 0.093 | 2.118 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.721 | 0.547 | 0.930 | 0.049 | 0.926 | 0.038 | |||||||
| 组别 | 例数 | 室内活动评分 | 室外活动评分 | MFES总分 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 34 | 47.0±6.1 | 54.8±5.8 | 5.378 | <0.001 | 25.8±5.8 | 30.4±6.1 | 3.211 | 0.002 | 72.8±9.1 | 85.2±8.9 | 5.679 | <0.001 |
| 观察组 | 33 | 46.7±5.8 | 60.2±6.1 | 9.281 | <0.001 | 26.1±6.0 | 33.7±5.7 | 5.243 | <0.001 | 72.8±8.8 | 93.9±9.2 | 9.536 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 0.200 | 3.745 | 0.174 | 2.246 | 0.018 | 3.925 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.842 | <0.001 | 0.863 | 0.028 | 0.985 | <0.001 | |||||||
Table 4 Comparison of MFES score in two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 室内活动评分 | 室外活动评分 | MFES总分 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
| 对照组 | 34 | 47.0±6.1 | 54.8±5.8 | 5.378 | <0.001 | 25.8±5.8 | 30.4±6.1 | 3.211 | 0.002 | 72.8±9.1 | 85.2±8.9 | 5.679 | <0.001 |
| 观察组 | 33 | 46.7±5.8 | 60.2±6.1 | 9.281 | <0.001 | 26.1±6.0 | 33.7±5.7 | 5.243 | <0.001 | 72.8±8.8 | 93.9±9.2 | 9.536 | <0.001 |
| t值 | 0.200 | 3.745 | 0.174 | 2.246 | 0.018 | 3.925 | |||||||
| P值 | 0.842 | <0.001 | 0.863 | 0.028 | 0.985 | <0.001 | |||||||
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
《中国脑卒中防治报告》编写组. 《中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2020,17(5):272-281. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2020.05.008.
|
| [4] |
余溯源,刘延锦,郭丽娜,等. 远程运动想象疗法训练指导对老年缺血性脑卒中病人恐惧跌倒的影响[J]. 护理研究,2020,34(22):4063-4067. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.22.024.
|
| [5] |
中医康复临床实践指南·脑卒中制定工作组,林志诚,薛偕华,等. 中医康复临床实践指南·脑卒中[J]. 康复学报,2019,29(6):6-9,15. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1329.2019.06006.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
国家体育总局. 二十四式太极拳(太极拳普及系列丛书)[M]. 北京:人民体育出版社,2008.
|
| [9] |
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2015,48(6):435-444. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2015.06.002.
|
| [10] |
杨慧馨,唐强. 太极拳用于脑卒中患者运动功能障碍康复的临床观察[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2016,31(10):1146-1148. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2016.10.021.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
张通. 中国脑卒中康复治疗指南(2011完全版)[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(4):301-318.
|
| [13] |
高品操,唐芳,熊卫荣,等. 运动再学习方案联合靳三针疗法对缺血性脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的影响[J]. 康复学报,2019,29(5):50-53. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1329.2019.05050.
|
| [14] |
吕嘉轩,魏泽仁,郭郁,等. 基于胸椎三维度测量分析站桩调节脊柱平衡的效应[J]. 北京中医药大学学报,2017,40(11):909-916. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2017.11.007.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
郝燕萍,刘雪琴. 修订版跌倒效能量表在我国老年人群中的测试研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2007,42(1):19-21.
|
| [21] |
洪姿,朱玉连. 表面肌电在脑卒中后步行功能障碍分析中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(3):379-383. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.03.027.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
杨帆. 改良太极拳对于缺血性脑卒中偏瘫患者步行能力康复的疗效观察[D]. 北京:北京中医药大学,2019.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
陈悦,魏泽仁,郭郁,等. 应用生物力学信息分析站桩功训练诱发自主平衡效应的特征[J]. 北京中医药大学学报,2019,42(2):120-125. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2019.02.006.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
郭森林,陈昇,黄思源,等. 太极拳锻炼对脑卒中偏瘫患者影响效果的研究进展[J]. 洛阳师范学院学报,2019,38(8):44-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4970.2019.08.012.
|
| [1] | YANG Xiaofeng, LI Xianwen, WU Yanfeng, ZHANG Qian, CHEN Juan, ZHAO Fengjiao. Association of Serum Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Levels with the Risk of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2867-2873. |
| [2] | LIU Ying, LIU Shiwei, ZHANG Chi, SHEN Ji, ZHANG Yushan, ZHANG Jie, SANG Yingchen, WANG Youjiao, WANG Lei, ZHOU Houguang, SHI Hong. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Subjective Cognitive Decline among Older Stroke Patients in China [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2829-2835. |
| [3] | WU Zhen, XI Yaqi, HU Linlin. Characteristics of Policy Instrument Selection and Combination for Weight Management in China: a Content Analysis of National Policy Documents (2016-2025) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2766-2774. |
| [4] | WU Ruining, ZHOU Ming, ZHANG Gongzi, LI Jun, XIE Suhang, LIU Yangxiaoxue, ZHANG Jiali, LIU Maomao, HUANG Liping. Study on Fixed and Mobile Exoskeleton Robots in Improving Lower Limb Function and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2326-2333. |
| [5] | JI Ying, GUO Chuan, ZHU Shizhe, JI Panpan, WANG Tong, KAN Chaojie, WANG Qinglei. Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation of the Cerebellum on Different Balance Abilities in Patients with Supratentorial Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2022-2028. |
| [6] | HAN Yue, BIAN Zhe, GU Haochen, WANG Dali, PENG Yanbo. Impact of Cumulative Defined Daily Dose of Statins on Recurrence Risk in Ischemic Stroke Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1821-1826. |
| [7] | TIAN Anni, YANG Jing, SUN Jing, WANG Shichun. Effect of Robot-assisted Training on the Recovery of Hand Motor Function in Patients with Different Stages of Stroke: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1911-1920. |
| [8] | LIU Yang, LIANG Fang, WU Ling, LI Wenlei, LI Pengfei. Diagnostic Value of Non-conventional Lipids and the Triglyceride-glucose Index in First-onset Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1422-1429. |
| [9] | WANG Xiaonan, RUAN Xiaonan, LIU Yang, WU Kang, QIU Hua, LIU Qingping, SONG Jiahui, GAO Jiaojiao, ZHOU Yi, LIU Xiaolin. Correlation between Anthropometric Indices and the Risk of Stroke: a Nested Case-control Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 1020-1028. |
| [10] | CAO Lei, LIU Xuechun, JIANG Wei, CHEN Yan, YAN Sunhong, DU Jing. Study on the Prediction of Muscle Attenuation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke by the Cross-sectional Area and Thickness of the Temporalis Muscle [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 997-1007. |
| [11] | ZHANG Ling, HUANG Shuangying, XU Hui, MEI Huiting, HONG Yongping. Effects of Different Exercise Types on Fall Efficacy in the Elderly: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 741-751. |
| [12] | HU Naixiao, ZHANG Hao, WANG Bo, QI Xin, DONG Jianhong, XUE Ruizhong, ZHANG Qingsu. Study of the Therapeutic Effect of Intraoral Balloon Dilation Combined with K-point Stimulation in Patients with Post-stroke Pseudobulbar Palsy Associated Dysphagia and Trismus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 591-596. |
| [13] | ZHAO Xuejiao, LI Juan, LI Yujie, LU Ting, Xian Lihong, YAN Huan. Prevalence Trends and Influencing Factors for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(03): 380-392. |
| [14] | FAN Zhuanzhuan, LI Wenting, MA Guoliang. Relationship between the Chinese Visceral Adipose Index and Cardiovascular Disease in Postmenopausal Women: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(02): 180-187. |
| [15] | YU Hao, LIAO Peng, LUO Li. Digital Therapy for Stroke: Progress and Challenges from Screening to Intervention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(02): 240-246. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||