Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (15): 1857-1862.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0043
Special Issue: 神经系统疾病最新文章合辑; 跌倒最新文章合辑; 脑健康最新研究合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-12-22
Revised:
2022-01-28
Published:
2022-02-24
Online:
2022-04-07
Contact:
Luwen ZHU
About author:
通讯作者:
朱路文
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0043
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | 病程(d) | 偏瘫侧(左/右) | 脑卒中类型(脑梗死/脑出血) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 34 | 20/14 | 56.5±11.2 | 38.4±10.8 | 19/15 | 22/12 |
观察组 | 33 | 21/12 | 54.9±13.1 | 36.9±12.2 | 17/16 | 24/9 |
χ2(t)值 | 0.163 | 0.538a | 0.533a | 0.128 | 0.501 | |
P值 | 0.686 | 0.592 | 0.596 | 0.720 | 0.479 |
Table 1 Comparison of general information of two groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | 病程(d) | 偏瘫侧(左/右) | 脑卒中类型(脑梗死/脑出血) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 34 | 20/14 | 56.5±11.2 | 38.4±10.8 | 19/15 | 22/12 |
观察组 | 33 | 21/12 | 54.9±13.1 | 36.9±12.2 | 17/16 | 24/9 |
χ2(t)值 | 0.163 | 0.538a | 0.533a | 0.128 | 0.501 | |
P值 | 0.686 | 0.592 | 0.596 | 0.720 | 0.479 |
组别 | 例数 | LE-FMA评分(分) | 6MWT步行距离(m) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |||||
对照组 | 34 | 17.8±3.3 | 25.1±4.0 | 8.226 | <0.001 | 159.9±10.9 | 211.6±7.5 | 20.856 | <0.001 | |||
观察组 | 33 | 18.3±3.1 | 27.9±3.6 | 11.527 | <0.001 | 161.3±11.2 | 248.2±9.3 | 34.472 | <0.001 | |||
t值 | 0.563 | 2.947 | 0.543 | 17.692 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.575 | 0.004 | 0.589 | <0.001 | ||||||||
组别 | BBS评分(分) | TUGT用时(s) | MBI评分(分) | |||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |
对照组 | 32.3±3.9 | 38.5±4.1 | 6.418 | <0.001 | 20.4±3.3 | 18.8±3.1 | 2.012 | 0.048 | 46.7±2.2 | 63.0±3.3 | 23.604 | <0.001 |
观察组 | 32.3±3.7 | 41.4±4.1 | 9.416 | <0.001 | 20.3±3.1 | 17.9±3.0 | 3.265 | 0.002 | 47.1±2.1 | 67.7±3.7 | 27.735 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.065 | 2.881 | 0.051 | 1.242 | 0.652 | 5.564 | ||||||
P值 | 0.949 | 0.005 | 0.959 | 0.219 | 0.517 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of LE-FMA score,6MWT walking distance,BBS score,TUGT time and MBI score in two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | LE-FMA评分(分) | 6MWT步行距离(m) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |||||
对照组 | 34 | 17.8±3.3 | 25.1±4.0 | 8.226 | <0.001 | 159.9±10.9 | 211.6±7.5 | 20.856 | <0.001 | |||
观察组 | 33 | 18.3±3.1 | 27.9±3.6 | 11.527 | <0.001 | 161.3±11.2 | 248.2±9.3 | 34.472 | <0.001 | |||
t值 | 0.563 | 2.947 | 0.543 | 17.692 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.575 | 0.004 | 0.589 | <0.001 | ||||||||
组别 | BBS评分(分) | TUGT用时(s) | MBI评分(分) | |||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |
对照组 | 32.3±3.9 | 38.5±4.1 | 6.418 | <0.001 | 20.4±3.3 | 18.8±3.1 | 2.012 | 0.048 | 46.7±2.2 | 63.0±3.3 | 23.604 | <0.001 |
观察组 | 32.3±3.7 | 41.4±4.1 | 9.416 | <0.001 | 20.3±3.1 | 17.9±3.0 | 3.265 | 0.002 | 47.1±2.1 | 67.7±3.7 | 27.735 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.065 | 2.881 | 0.051 | 1.242 | 0.652 | 5.564 | ||||||
P值 | 0.949 | 0.005 | 0.959 | 0.219 | 0.517 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 步长(cm) | 步频(步/min) | 步速(m/min) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 33.1±11.5 | 39.3±13.3 | 2.055 | 0.044 | 71.2±16.4 | 79.1±16.2 | 2.015 | 0.048 | 47.5±11.4 | 53.0±11.3 | 2.003 | 0.049 |
观察组 | 33 | 34.1±12.5 | 41.2±13.7 | 2.211 | 0.031 | 70.8±16.9 | 87.1±16.5 | 3.968 | <0.001 | 47.7±11.4 | 59.1±12.4 | 3.886 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.359 | 0.605 | 0.089 | 2.003 | 0.093 | 2.118 | |||||||
P值 | 0.721 | 0.547 | 0.930 | 0.049 | 0.926 | 0.038 |
Table 3 Comparison of step length,step frequency and step speed in two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 步长(cm) | 步频(步/min) | 步速(m/min) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 33.1±11.5 | 39.3±13.3 | 2.055 | 0.044 | 71.2±16.4 | 79.1±16.2 | 2.015 | 0.048 | 47.5±11.4 | 53.0±11.3 | 2.003 | 0.049 |
观察组 | 33 | 34.1±12.5 | 41.2±13.7 | 2.211 | 0.031 | 70.8±16.9 | 87.1±16.5 | 3.968 | <0.001 | 47.7±11.4 | 59.1±12.4 | 3.886 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.359 | 0.605 | 0.089 | 2.003 | 0.093 | 2.118 | |||||||
P值 | 0.721 | 0.547 | 0.930 | 0.049 | 0.926 | 0.038 |
组别 | 例数 | 室内活动评分 | 室外活动评分 | MFES总分 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 47.0±6.1 | 54.8±5.8 | 5.378 | <0.001 | 25.8±5.8 | 30.4±6.1 | 3.211 | 0.002 | 72.8±9.1 | 85.2±8.9 | 5.679 | <0.001 |
观察组 | 33 | 46.7±5.8 | 60.2±6.1 | 9.281 | <0.001 | 26.1±6.0 | 33.7±5.7 | 5.243 | <0.001 | 72.8±8.8 | 93.9±9.2 | 9.536 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.200 | 3.745 | 0.174 | 2.246 | 0.018 | 3.925 | |||||||
P值 | 0.842 | <0.001 | 0.863 | 0.028 | 0.985 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of MFES score in two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 室内活动评分 | 室外活动评分 | MFES总分 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 47.0±6.1 | 54.8±5.8 | 5.378 | <0.001 | 25.8±5.8 | 30.4±6.1 | 3.211 | 0.002 | 72.8±9.1 | 85.2±8.9 | 5.679 | <0.001 |
观察组 | 33 | 46.7±5.8 | 60.2±6.1 | 9.281 | <0.001 | 26.1±6.0 | 33.7±5.7 | 5.243 | <0.001 | 72.8±8.8 | 93.9±9.2 | 9.536 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.200 | 3.745 | 0.174 | 2.246 | 0.018 | 3.925 | |||||||
P值 | 0.842 | <0.001 | 0.863 | 0.028 | 0.985 | <0.001 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
《中国脑卒中防治报告》编写组. 《中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2020,17(5):272-281. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2020.05.008.
|
[4] |
余溯源,刘延锦,郭丽娜,等. 远程运动想象疗法训练指导对老年缺血性脑卒中病人恐惧跌倒的影响[J]. 护理研究,2020,34(22):4063-4067. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.22.024.
|
[5] |
中医康复临床实践指南·脑卒中制定工作组,林志诚,薛偕华,等. 中医康复临床实践指南·脑卒中[J]. 康复学报,2019,29(6):6-9,15. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1329.2019.06006.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
国家体育总局. 二十四式太极拳(太极拳普及系列丛书)[M]. 北京:人民体育出版社,2008.
|
[9] |
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2015,48(6):435-444. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2015.06.002.
|
[10] |
杨慧馨,唐强. 太极拳用于脑卒中患者运动功能障碍康复的临床观察[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2016,31(10):1146-1148. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2016.10.021.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
张通. 中国脑卒中康复治疗指南(2011完全版)[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(4):301-318.
|
[13] |
高品操,唐芳,熊卫荣,等. 运动再学习方案联合靳三针疗法对缺血性脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的影响[J]. 康复学报,2019,29(5):50-53. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1329.2019.05050.
|
[14] |
吕嘉轩,魏泽仁,郭郁,等. 基于胸椎三维度测量分析站桩调节脊柱平衡的效应[J]. 北京中医药大学学报,2017,40(11):909-916. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2017.11.007.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
郝燕萍,刘雪琴. 修订版跌倒效能量表在我国老年人群中的测试研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2007,42(1):19-21.
|
[21] |
洪姿,朱玉连. 表面肌电在脑卒中后步行功能障碍分析中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(3):379-383. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.03.027.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
杨帆. 改良太极拳对于缺血性脑卒中偏瘫患者步行能力康复的疗效观察[D]. 北京:北京中医药大学,2019.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
陈悦,魏泽仁,郭郁,等. 应用生物力学信息分析站桩功训练诱发自主平衡效应的特征[J]. 北京中医药大学学报,2019,42(2):120-125. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2019.02.006.
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
郭森林,陈昇,黄思源,等. 太极拳锻炼对脑卒中偏瘫患者影响效果的研究进展[J]. 洛阳师范学院学报,2019,38(8):44-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4970.2019.08.012.
|
[1] | YANG Ji, ZHANG Yao, ZHAO Yingqiang, ZHANG Qiuyue. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of TCM Three-level Prevention and Control Model in the Management of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke: a Single-center, Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(22): 2750-2761. |
[2] | TAN Yi, ZHU Lihong, YIN Zengwei, HOU Shunan, YU Houming. A Real-world Study of MRI-guided Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(20): 2508-2515. |
[3] | CHU Tianyu, GU Yan. Carotid Artery Calcification Features in Plaque Stability and Clinical Events [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(18): 2247-2252. |
[4] | TAN Wenbin, LI Jia, LIU Mingyu, LU Yongxin, CHENG Yaxin. Research Progress on the Influence of Nervous System Diseases and Related Therapeutic Drugs on Osteoporosis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(17): 2092-2100. |
[5] | LI Mei, JIANG Dongsheng, ZHAO Jingjing, CAO Yajing, ZHANG Fan, TANG Lijuan, LIU Xiaoli. Correlation Analysis of Homocysteine and Stroke in People over 40 Years Old [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(14): 1723-1729. |
[6] | ZHAO Zhixin, MEI Yongxia, WANG Xiaoxuan, JIANG Hu, WANG Wenna, ZHANG Zhenxiang. Cognition and Experience of Social Participation in Stroke Survivors: a Meta-synthesis Based on Qualitative Studies [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(10): 1273-1280. |
[7] | ZHOU Chenxi, LIN Beilei, TANG Shangfeng, ZHANG Zhenxiang, WANG Xiaoxuan, JIANG Hu, ZHANG Dudu, LIU Bowen, LI Xin. Construction of Conceptual Framework of Proactive Health Behavior in Stroke Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 534-540. |
[8] | DU Huijie, LIU Xingyu, XU Minghuan, YANG Xuezhi, ZHANG Huiqin, MO Jiali, LU Yi, KUANG Jie. Advances in the Prognostic Prediction of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Using Machine Learning Predictive Models as an Example [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 554-560. |
[9] | ZHANG Pingshu, XUE Jing, XING Aijun, WANG Lianhui, MA Qian, FU Yongshan, YUAN Xiaodong. Study on Sleep Status and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Acute Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 548-553. |
[10] | LIU Zuting, XU Minghuan, YANG Xuezhi, MO Jiali, LIU Xingyu, DU Huijie, ZHANG Huiqin, YI Yingping, KUANG Jie. Correlation between the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and Risk of Ischemic Stroke Recurrence [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 541-547. |
[11] | NI Xiaojia, LIN Hao, LUO Xufei, KUANG Zhuoran, LIU Yunlan, GUO Jianwen, CHEN Yaolong, CAI Yefeng, Working Group of Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (2023 Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(05): 521-533. |
[12] | QIN Wei, TU Gangying, WAN Xiaomei, WANG Fang. Effects of Balance-strengthening Training on Balance Ability in Elderly Inpatients with Schizophrenia: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 193-199. |
[13] | YUAN Dan, WANG Ying, WANG Yingpeng, XU Li, XUE Jia, CHENG Jingjing, WANG Haipeng. Effect of the Remote Ischemic Postconditioning on the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke beyond Time Window: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 169-174. |
[14] | LIN Jiali, ZHANG Shuyang, LIN Jiaying, ZHOU Yuxin, ZHAO Yuehua, CHEN Yun, JIA Jie. Correlation between Upper Limb Motor Function and Attention after Stroke: a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 208-213. |
[15] | REN Xiaoqiao, WANG Pan, WU Hao, JI Yong, SHI Zhihong. Correlation of Serum Uric Acid to Serum Creatinine Ratio with the Recurrence of Cerebrovascular Events and Mortality in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Disease: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(02): 175-182. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||