Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (15): 1857-1862.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0043
Special Issue: 神经系统疾病最新文章合集; 跌倒最新文章合集
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-12-22
Revised:
2022-01-28
Published:
2022-02-24
Online:
2022-04-07
Contact:
Luwen ZHU
About author:
通讯作者:
朱路文
作者简介:
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0043
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | 病程(d) | 偏瘫侧(左/右) | 脑卒中类型(脑梗死/脑出血) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 34 | 20/14 | 56.5±11.2 | 38.4±10.8 | 19/15 | 22/12 |
观察组 | 33 | 21/12 | 54.9±13.1 | 36.9±12.2 | 17/16 | 24/9 |
χ2(t)值 | 0.163 | 0.538a | 0.533a | 0.128 | 0.501 | |
P值 | 0.686 | 0.592 | 0.596 | 0.720 | 0.479 |
Table 1 Comparison of general information of two groups of patients
组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | 病程(d) | 偏瘫侧(左/右) | 脑卒中类型(脑梗死/脑出血) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照组 | 34 | 20/14 | 56.5±11.2 | 38.4±10.8 | 19/15 | 22/12 |
观察组 | 33 | 21/12 | 54.9±13.1 | 36.9±12.2 | 17/16 | 24/9 |
χ2(t)值 | 0.163 | 0.538a | 0.533a | 0.128 | 0.501 | |
P值 | 0.686 | 0.592 | 0.596 | 0.720 | 0.479 |
组别 | 例数 | LE-FMA评分(分) | 6MWT步行距离(m) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |||||
对照组 | 34 | 17.8±3.3 | 25.1±4.0 | 8.226 | <0.001 | 159.9±10.9 | 211.6±7.5 | 20.856 | <0.001 | |||
观察组 | 33 | 18.3±3.1 | 27.9±3.6 | 11.527 | <0.001 | 161.3±11.2 | 248.2±9.3 | 34.472 | <0.001 | |||
t值 | 0.563 | 2.947 | 0.543 | 17.692 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.575 | 0.004 | 0.589 | <0.001 | ||||||||
组别 | BBS评分(分) | TUGT用时(s) | MBI评分(分) | |||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |
对照组 | 32.3±3.9 | 38.5±4.1 | 6.418 | <0.001 | 20.4±3.3 | 18.8±3.1 | 2.012 | 0.048 | 46.7±2.2 | 63.0±3.3 | 23.604 | <0.001 |
观察组 | 32.3±3.7 | 41.4±4.1 | 9.416 | <0.001 | 20.3±3.1 | 17.9±3.0 | 3.265 | 0.002 | 47.1±2.1 | 67.7±3.7 | 27.735 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.065 | 2.881 | 0.051 | 1.242 | 0.652 | 5.564 | ||||||
P值 | 0.949 | 0.005 | 0.959 | 0.219 | 0.517 | <0.001 |
Table 2 Comparison of LE-FMA score,6MWT walking distance,BBS score,TUGT time and MBI score in two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | LE-FMA评分(分) | 6MWT步行距离(m) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |||||
对照组 | 34 | 17.8±3.3 | 25.1±4.0 | 8.226 | <0.001 | 159.9±10.9 | 211.6±7.5 | 20.856 | <0.001 | |||
观察组 | 33 | 18.3±3.1 | 27.9±3.6 | 11.527 | <0.001 | 161.3±11.2 | 248.2±9.3 | 34.472 | <0.001 | |||
t值 | 0.563 | 2.947 | 0.543 | 17.692 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.575 | 0.004 | 0.589 | <0.001 | ||||||||
组别 | BBS评分(分) | TUGT用时(s) | MBI评分(分) | |||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | |
对照组 | 32.3±3.9 | 38.5±4.1 | 6.418 | <0.001 | 20.4±3.3 | 18.8±3.1 | 2.012 | 0.048 | 46.7±2.2 | 63.0±3.3 | 23.604 | <0.001 |
观察组 | 32.3±3.7 | 41.4±4.1 | 9.416 | <0.001 | 20.3±3.1 | 17.9±3.0 | 3.265 | 0.002 | 47.1±2.1 | 67.7±3.7 | 27.735 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.065 | 2.881 | 0.051 | 1.242 | 0.652 | 5.564 | ||||||
P值 | 0.949 | 0.005 | 0.959 | 0.219 | 0.517 | <0.001 |
组别 | 例数 | 步长(cm) | 步频(步/min) | 步速(m/min) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 33.1±11.5 | 39.3±13.3 | 2.055 | 0.044 | 71.2±16.4 | 79.1±16.2 | 2.015 | 0.048 | 47.5±11.4 | 53.0±11.3 | 2.003 | 0.049 |
观察组 | 33 | 34.1±12.5 | 41.2±13.7 | 2.211 | 0.031 | 70.8±16.9 | 87.1±16.5 | 3.968 | <0.001 | 47.7±11.4 | 59.1±12.4 | 3.886 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.359 | 0.605 | 0.089 | 2.003 | 0.093 | 2.118 | |||||||
P值 | 0.721 | 0.547 | 0.930 | 0.049 | 0.926 | 0.038 |
Table 3 Comparison of step length,step frequency and step speed in two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 步长(cm) | 步频(步/min) | 步速(m/min) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 33.1±11.5 | 39.3±13.3 | 2.055 | 0.044 | 71.2±16.4 | 79.1±16.2 | 2.015 | 0.048 | 47.5±11.4 | 53.0±11.3 | 2.003 | 0.049 |
观察组 | 33 | 34.1±12.5 | 41.2±13.7 | 2.211 | 0.031 | 70.8±16.9 | 87.1±16.5 | 3.968 | <0.001 | 47.7±11.4 | 59.1±12.4 | 3.886 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.359 | 0.605 | 0.089 | 2.003 | 0.093 | 2.118 | |||||||
P值 | 0.721 | 0.547 | 0.930 | 0.049 | 0.926 | 0.038 |
组别 | 例数 | 室内活动评分 | 室外活动评分 | MFES总分 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 47.0±6.1 | 54.8±5.8 | 5.378 | <0.001 | 25.8±5.8 | 30.4±6.1 | 3.211 | 0.002 | 72.8±9.1 | 85.2±8.9 | 5.679 | <0.001 |
观察组 | 33 | 46.7±5.8 | 60.2±6.1 | 9.281 | <0.001 | 26.1±6.0 | 33.7±5.7 | 5.243 | <0.001 | 72.8±8.8 | 93.9±9.2 | 9.536 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.200 | 3.745 | 0.174 | 2.246 | 0.018 | 3.925 | |||||||
P值 | 0.842 | <0.001 | 0.863 | 0.028 | 0.985 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of MFES score in two groups before and after treatment
组别 | 例数 | 室内活动评分 | 室外活动评分 | MFES总分 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | t配对值 | P值 | ||
对照组 | 34 | 47.0±6.1 | 54.8±5.8 | 5.378 | <0.001 | 25.8±5.8 | 30.4±6.1 | 3.211 | 0.002 | 72.8±9.1 | 85.2±8.9 | 5.679 | <0.001 |
观察组 | 33 | 46.7±5.8 | 60.2±6.1 | 9.281 | <0.001 | 26.1±6.0 | 33.7±5.7 | 5.243 | <0.001 | 72.8±8.8 | 93.9±9.2 | 9.536 | <0.001 |
t值 | 0.200 | 3.745 | 0.174 | 2.246 | 0.018 | 3.925 | |||||||
P值 | 0.842 | <0.001 | 0.863 | 0.028 | 0.985 | <0.001 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
《中国脑卒中防治报告》编写组. 《中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志,2020,17(5):272-281. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2020.05.008.
|
[4] |
余溯源,刘延锦,郭丽娜,等. 远程运动想象疗法训练指导对老年缺血性脑卒中病人恐惧跌倒的影响[J]. 护理研究,2020,34(22):4063-4067. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.22.024.
|
[5] |
中医康复临床实践指南·脑卒中制定工作组,林志诚,薛偕华,等. 中医康复临床实践指南·脑卒中[J]. 康复学报,2019,29(6):6-9,15. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1329.2019.06006.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
国家体育总局. 二十四式太极拳(太极拳普及系列丛书)[M]. 北京:人民体育出版社,2008.
|
[9] |
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2015,48(6):435-444. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2015.06.002.
|
[10] |
杨慧馨,唐强. 太极拳用于脑卒中患者运动功能障碍康复的临床观察[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2016,31(10):1146-1148. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2016.10.021.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
张通. 中国脑卒中康复治疗指南(2011完全版)[J]. 中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(4):301-318.
|
[13] |
高品操,唐芳,熊卫荣,等. 运动再学习方案联合靳三针疗法对缺血性脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的影响[J]. 康复学报,2019,29(5):50-53. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1329.2019.05050.
|
[14] |
吕嘉轩,魏泽仁,郭郁,等. 基于胸椎三维度测量分析站桩调节脊柱平衡的效应[J]. 北京中医药大学学报,2017,40(11):909-916. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2017.11.007.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
郝燕萍,刘雪琴. 修订版跌倒效能量表在我国老年人群中的测试研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2007,42(1):19-21.
|
[21] |
洪姿,朱玉连. 表面肌电在脑卒中后步行功能障碍分析中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(3):379-383. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.03.027.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
杨帆. 改良太极拳对于缺血性脑卒中偏瘫患者步行能力康复的疗效观察[D]. 北京:北京中医药大学,2019.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
陈悦,魏泽仁,郭郁,等. 应用生物力学信息分析站桩功训练诱发自主平衡效应的特征[J]. 北京中医药大学学报,2019,42(2):120-125. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2019.02.006.
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
郭森林,陈昇,黄思源,等. 太极拳锻炼对脑卒中偏瘫患者影响效果的研究进展[J]. 洛阳师范学院学报,2019,38(8):44-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4970.2019.08.012.
|
[1] | QIN Fengyin, ZHANG Qishan, LAI Jinjia, HUANG Yimin, HAN Guoyin, SUN Xinglan, WANG Fen, TAN Yibing. Current Status and Influencing Factors of the Intention to Screen for High-risk Stroke among Community Residents in Guangdong [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(34): 4283-4289. |
[2] | SU Kaiqi, LYU Zhuan, WU Mingli, LUO Meng, GAO Jing, NIE Chenchen, LIU Hao, FENG Xiaodong. Effect of Electroacupuncture on BDNF/TrkB/PI3K/Akt Pathway and Hippocampal Neuronal Protection in Rats with Learning and Memory Impairment after Ischemia Reperfusion [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4187-4193. |
[3] | YIN Miaomiao, CUI Liling, LI Yaqing, WANG Liqun, ZHANG Yue, WU Jialing. Effect of Dual Task on Walking Ability in Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Patients with Vestibular Symptoms [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(33): 4207-4212. |
[4] | JIAN Qiufeng, XU Ronghua, YAO Qian, ZHOU Yuanyuan. A Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Elderly Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4070-4079. |
[5] | YANG Yuxuan, ZHANG Han, DU Juan, WANG Lingling, XIE Yulei, YIN Kaiming, ZHANG Bo. Value of an Dynamic Eye-tracking Task in Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect after Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(32): 4020-4025. |
[6] | ZHU Lin, GUO Yankui, GAO Chen, CHEN Xuezhi, WANG Fashuai. Efficacy of Western Medicine, Chinese Patent Medicine and Their Combination on Post-stroke Insomnia: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3823-3832. |
[7] | XIAO Yuqian, BAI Yanjie, WANG Yan, CHEN Shuying, CHEN Limin, SUN Kexin, WAN Jun. Research Progress of Mitochondrial Transfer in Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(30): 3833-3840. |
[8] | LIU Yue, LIU Qi, DONG Hui, LIU Yaling. Neuropsychological Changes of Cognitive Reverters after Stroke Based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with a Double Threshold [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3417-3422. |
[9] | MIAO Guangrui, PANG Shuo, ZHOU Yuanhang, DUAN Mingxuan, BAI Linpeng, ZHANG Qingyang, ZHAO Xiaoyan, DONG Jianzeng. Short-term Prognostic Value of Early Fluid Balance and Lactate Clearance in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Combined with Cardiogenic Shock Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3397-3402. |
[10] | YAO Junjie, SHANG Qiangqiang, WANG Yufeng, LI Jiahui, LIU Chang, PANG Tingting. Wearable Inertial Sensors-based Efficacy Evaluation of Comprehensive Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation Due to Qi-stagnation and Blood-stasis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(27): 3450-3455. |
[11] | WANG Xiaowen, XIAO Tongling, WANG Yi, YANG Ying, XIA Xiaoshuang, LI Xin. Relationship between Homocysteine Level and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3290-3296. |
[12] | ZHENG Siting, HE Chunyu, ZHOU Jun, KONG Ye, YANG Xinyao, ZHOU Haiying, WEI Xiaofei. Summary of Best Evidence for Self-Management of Patients with Motor Dysfunction after Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3230-3237. |
[13] | Expert group of expert consensus on the application of ulinastatin in common clinical critical illness. Expert Consensus on the Application of Ulinastatin in Common Clinical Critical Illness [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(26): 3207-3219. |
[14] | DU Yuying, WANG Cailing, CUI Senlin, LEI lei, WANG Yanping, SONG Xueqin, HAN Shuqin, ZHANG Yanmei, WANG Baolan, HUANG Haixia, CHEN Mi, YAN Huirong, LI Dong, ZHANG Jingjing, REN Yu. Analysis of Appropriate Technology Promotion for Stroke Rehabilitation in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(25): 3178-3184. |
[15] | ZHANG Guoqing, TONG Tingting, WANG Ying, LI Kuiwu, ZHANG Lida, WU Xiaoqing, LI Chenglong, WANG Junli, ZHANG Junyu, HAN Wei. Effect and Mechanism of Tongdu Tiaoshen Electroacupuncture Pretreatment-mediated MiR-124-3p/GSK-3β/Cyp-D Signaling Pathway on Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in Cerebral Cortex of Rats with Cerebral Ischemia-reperfusion Injury [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(24): 3050-3060. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||