
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (27): 3915-3923.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0040
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2026-02-27
Revised:2026-03-16
Published:2026-09-20
Online:2026-08-11
Contact:
WANG Xiuying
通讯作者:
汪秀英
作者简介:作者贡献:
蒋华杰提出主要研究目标,负责研究的构思与设计,研究的实施,撰写论文,对文章的知识性内容作批判性审阅;金瑞、马悦进行数据的收集与整理,统计学处理,图、表的绘制与展示;卓琳、李欣悦、崔景秋进行论文的修订,对文章的知识性内容作批判性审阅;汪秀英负责文章的质量控制与审查,对文章整体负责,监督管理。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0040
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄( | 身高( | 体质量( | BMI( | SBP( | DBP( | BUN( | Scr( | eGFR[ | FPG( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常组 | 6 934 | 69.0±6.4 | 167.5±5.8 | 71.7±10.3 | 25.5±3.2 | 138±18 | 83±11 | 5.45±1.43 | 76.61±18.83 | 108.12±57.11 | 5.92±1.62 |
| 异常组 | 779 | 70.7±6.6 | 168.0±5.8 | 75.5±11.0 | 26.7±3.5 | 141±19 | 83±12 | 6.46±2.05 | 94.65±27.62 | 84.70±47.38 | 5.82±1.29 |
| t(χ2)值 | -7.345 | -2.271 | -9.754 | -9.845 | -3.784 | -1.169 | -17.760 | -24.000 | 11.030 | 1.627 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.023 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.243 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.104 | |
| 组别 | TC( | TG( | HDL-C( | LDL-C( | PV( | 职业[例(%)] | 高血压[例(%)] | ||||
| 企业工人 | 企业文职 | 事业单位 | 公务员 | ||||||||
| 正常组 | 5.05±0.92 | 1.41±1.05 | 1.25±0.34 | 3.06±0.75 | 1.55±0.06 | 392(88.89) | 1 424(90.99) | 1 586(90.53) | 3 532(89.30) | 3 479(89.55) | |
| 异常组 | 5.14±1.05 | 1.85±1.52 | 1.17±0.32 | 3.12±0.80 | 1.55±0.06 | 49(11.11) | 141(9.01) | 166(9.47) | 423(10.70) | 406(10.45) | |
| t(χ2)值 | -2.579 | -10.740 | 6.591 | -2.010 | -2.019 | 4.844a | 1.060a | ||||
| P值 | 0.010 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 0.044 | 0.184 | 0.303 | ||||
Table 1 Comparison results of general data between normal and abnormal group
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄( | 身高( | 体质量( | BMI( | SBP( | DBP( | BUN( | Scr( | eGFR[ | FPG( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正常组 | 6 934 | 69.0±6.4 | 167.5±5.8 | 71.7±10.3 | 25.5±3.2 | 138±18 | 83±11 | 5.45±1.43 | 76.61±18.83 | 108.12±57.11 | 5.92±1.62 |
| 异常组 | 779 | 70.7±6.6 | 168.0±5.8 | 75.5±11.0 | 26.7±3.5 | 141±19 | 83±12 | 6.46±2.05 | 94.65±27.62 | 84.70±47.38 | 5.82±1.29 |
| t(χ2)值 | -7.345 | -2.271 | -9.754 | -9.845 | -3.784 | -1.169 | -17.760 | -24.000 | 11.030 | 1.627 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.023 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.243 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.104 | |
| 组别 | TC( | TG( | HDL-C( | LDL-C( | PV( | 职业[例(%)] | 高血压[例(%)] | ||||
| 企业工人 | 企业文职 | 事业单位 | 公务员 | ||||||||
| 正常组 | 5.05±0.92 | 1.41±1.05 | 1.25±0.34 | 3.06±0.75 | 1.55±0.06 | 392(88.89) | 1 424(90.99) | 1 586(90.53) | 3 532(89.30) | 3 479(89.55) | |
| 异常组 | 5.14±1.05 | 1.85±1.52 | 1.17±0.32 | 3.12±0.80 | 1.55±0.06 | 49(11.11) | 141(9.01) | 166(9.47) | 423(10.70) | 406(10.45) | |
| t(χ2)值 | -2.579 | -10.740 | 6.591 | -2.010 | -2.019 | 4.844a | 1.060a | ||||
| P值 | 0.010 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 0.044 | 0.184 | 0.303 | ||||
| 变量 | β | SE | Z值 | OR(95%CI) | P值 | PARc(sPAR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高SBP | 0.239 | 0.090 | 2.66 | 1.270(1.065~1.514) | 0.008 | 0.097 |
| 高TG | 0.591 | 0.128 | 4.61 | 1.806(1.405~2.322) | <0.001 | 0.056 |
| 低eGFR | 1.464 | 0.081 | 18.10 | 4.322(3.689~5.063) | <0.001 | 0.301 |
| 低HDL-C | 0.294 | 0.109 | 2.70 | 1.342(1.084~1.662) | <0.001 | 0.053 |
| 预测模型 | -3.061 | 0.070 | -43.60 | 0.047(0.041~0.054) | <0.001 | 0.430a |
Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of HUA related factors
| 变量 | β | SE | Z值 | OR(95%CI) | P值 | PARc(sPAR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高SBP | 0.239 | 0.090 | 2.66 | 1.270(1.065~1.514) | 0.008 | 0.097 |
| 高TG | 0.591 | 0.128 | 4.61 | 1.806(1.405~2.322) | <0.001 | 0.056 |
| 低eGFR | 1.464 | 0.081 | 18.10 | 4.322(3.689~5.063) | <0.001 | 0.301 |
| 低HDL-C | 0.294 | 0.109 | 2.70 | 1.342(1.084~1.662) | <0.001 | 0.053 |
| 预测模型 | -3.061 | 0.070 | -43.60 | 0.047(0.041~0.054) | <0.001 | 0.430a |
| 组合变量 | SUA 1组 | SUA 2组 | SUA 3组 | SUA 4组 | SUA 5组 | SUA 6组 | SUA 7组 | SUA 8组 | SUA 9组 | 合计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000 | 72 | 516 | 1 165 | 1 056 | 434 | 118 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 3 393 |
| 0001 | 3 | 39 | 113 | 113 | 56 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 347 |
| 0010 | 9 | 125 | 393 | 521 | 382 | 178 | 71 | 20 | 11 | 1 710 |
| 0011 | 0 | 8 | 37 | 67 | 53 | 36 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 218 |
| 0100 | 4 | 9 | 30 | 38 | 38 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 130 |
| 0101 | 3 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 27 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 111 |
| 0110 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 90 |
| 0111 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 65 |
| 1000 | 28 | 104 | 301 | 261 | 119 | 36 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 860 |
| 1001 | 3 | 11 | 22 | 19 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 81 |
| 1010 | 1 | 18 | 92 | 156 | 117 | 64 | 22 | 10 | 5 | 485 |
| 1011 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 22 | 17 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 72 |
| 1100 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 48 |
| 1101 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| 1110 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 40 |
| 1111 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 30 |
| 合计 | 124 | 847 | 2 239 | 2 381 | 1 343 | 528 | 166 | 53 | 32 | 7 713 |
Table 3 Cross-tabs of the combination of related variables and nine groups of SUA
| 组合变量 | SUA 1组 | SUA 2组 | SUA 3组 | SUA 4组 | SUA 5组 | SUA 6组 | SUA 7组 | SUA 8组 | SUA 9组 | 合计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000 | 72 | 516 | 1 165 | 1 056 | 434 | 118 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 3 393 |
| 0001 | 3 | 39 | 113 | 113 | 56 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 347 |
| 0010 | 9 | 125 | 393 | 521 | 382 | 178 | 71 | 20 | 11 | 1 710 |
| 0011 | 0 | 8 | 37 | 67 | 53 | 36 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 218 |
| 0100 | 4 | 9 | 30 | 38 | 38 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 130 |
| 0101 | 3 | 7 | 30 | 35 | 27 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 111 |
| 0110 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 90 |
| 0111 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 65 |
| 1000 | 28 | 104 | 301 | 261 | 119 | 36 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 860 |
| 1001 | 3 | 11 | 22 | 19 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 81 |
| 1010 | 1 | 18 | 92 | 156 | 117 | 64 | 22 | 10 | 5 | 485 |
| 1011 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 22 | 17 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 72 |
| 1100 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 48 |
| 1101 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| 1110 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 40 |
| 1111 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 30 |
| 合计 | 124 | 847 | 2 239 | 2 381 | 1 343 | 528 | 166 | 53 | 32 | 7 713 |
| 路径 | B | 95%CI | SE | 效应占比(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总效应 | 13.100 | 9.964~16.235 | 1.600 | |
| 直接效应 | 12.362 | 9.359~15.365 | 1.532 | 94.37 |
| 总的间接效应 | 0.738 | 0.439~1.037 | 0.152 | 5.63 |
| TG→SBP→SUA | 0.308 | 0.139~0.477 | 0.086 | 2.35 |
| TG→eGFR→SUA | 0.405 | 0.200~0.609 | 0.104 | 3.09 |
| TG→SBP→eGFR→SUA | 0.025 | 0.005~0.045 | 0.010 | 0.19 |
Table 4 Testing the mediating effect of triglyceride on serum uric acid metabolism
| 路径 | B | 95%CI | SE | 效应占比(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总效应 | 13.100 | 9.964~16.235 | 1.600 | |
| 直接效应 | 12.362 | 9.359~15.365 | 1.532 | 94.37 |
| 总的间接效应 | 0.738 | 0.439~1.037 | 0.152 | 5.63 |
| TG→SBP→SUA | 0.308 | 0.139~0.477 | 0.086 | 2.35 |
| TG→eGFR→SUA | 0.405 | 0.200~0.609 | 0.104 | 3.09 |
| TG→SBP→eGFR→SUA | 0.025 | 0.005~0.045 | 0.010 | 0.19 |
| [1] |
王旭,罗冬平,茹彦海, 等. 从慢性肾脏病角度看高尿酸血症与痛风的指南更新要点[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(33): 4191-4195. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.573.
|
| [2] |
程雅欣,李佳. 高尿酸血症和痛风动物模型及其建立方法的研究进展[J]. 中国实验动物学报, 2023, 31(2): 251-256. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4847.2023.02.015.
|
| [3] |
仲跻园,万沁. 中国西南地区社区人群血清尿酸水平与糖尿病发病的相关性及其性别差异性分析[J]. 山东医药, 2018, 58(30): 1-4.
|
| [4] |
王芹,王春,薛佳, 等. 2012—2016年南京市区体检人群血尿酸的职业、年龄、性别分布特点和相关因素分析[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2021, 60(1): 29-34.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
杨沿浪,周伟,张道友, 等. 不同性别高尿酸血症与慢性肾脏病的相关研究[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2018, 26(8): 825-830. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3949.2018.08.013.
|
| [7] |
宋薇. 南昌市社区40岁以上人群高尿酸血症流行病学调查及影响因素分析[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2013.
|
| [8] |
张钰,周典,白寰, 等. 安徽省某公立医院体检人群高尿酸血症相关危险因素分析[J]. 山东第一医科大学:山东省医学科学院学报, 2024, 45(5): 283-287.
|
| [9] |
魏若妍,张源,张复亮, 等. 上海市徐家汇街道老年人高尿酸血症、痛风患病状况及影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(16): 1954-1959, 1972. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.286.
|
| [10] |
胡丹,樊友文,涂卫平. 5种肾小球滤过率评估方程在2型糖尿病人群中的应用[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2020, 40(9): 744-748.
|
| [11] |
中国民族卫生协会重症代谢疾病分会,高尿酸血症相关疾病诊疗多学科共识专家组. 中国高尿酸血症相关疾病诊疗多学科专家共识(2023年版)[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 461-480. DOI: 10.19538/j.nk2023060106.
|
| [12] |
国家心血管病中心国家基本公共卫生服务项目基层高血压管理办公室,国家基层高血压管理专家委员会. 国家基层高血压防治管理指南2020版[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2021, 36(3): 209-220.
|
| [13] |
中国血脂管理指南修订联合专家委员会. 中国血脂管理指南(2023年)[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2023, 38(3): 237-271.
|
| [14] |
上海慢性肾脏病早发现及规范化诊治与示范项目专家组,高翔,梅长林. 慢性肾脏病筛查 诊断及防治指南[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2017, 37(1): 453-464.
|
| [15] |
黄志碧. 原发性肺癌危险因素及其人群归因危险度的研究[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 1999, 16(4): 447-449. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-930X.1999.04.023.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
赵磊磊,刘芳,韩金芳, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 生物技术世界, 2014(11): 216.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
中国老年医学学会高血压分会,北京高血压防治协会,国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心(中国人民解放军总医院, 等. 中国老年高血压管理指南2023[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2023, 31(6): 508-538. DOI: 10.16439/j.issn.1673-7245.2023.06.003.
|
| [25] |
李苏宁,陈祚,王增武, 等. 我国老年人高血压现状分析[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2019, 27(2): 140-148.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
张鹏,高鹰,杨洪喜, 等. 中国长寿地区老年人血尿酸水平与慢性肾脏病发病风险研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(31): 3884-3889, 3907. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0001.
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
李青,潘洁敏,包玉倩, 等. 2型糖尿病肾脏疾病患者血尿酸水平与肾功能不全的相关性[J]. 上海医学, 2013, 36(1): 59-62.
|
| [47] |
刘华,林娜. 高尿酸血症患者早期肾损害特点[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(12): 3312-3313.
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
陈源源,王增武,李建军, 等. 高血压患者血压血脂综合管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2019, 27(7): 605-614.
|
| [52] |
孙家赛. 氯沙坦钾片在老年原发性高血压伴高尿酸血症患者治疗中的疗效观察[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2023, 17(4): 119-121. DOI: 10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2023.04.036.
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
中华医学会内分泌学分会. 中国高尿酸血症与痛风诊疗指南(2019)[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2020, 36(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2020.01.001.
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
卓琳,陈思婷,高以焕, 等. 健康体检者高尿酸血症相关影响因素及效应关系探讨[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2022, 38(10): 880-886. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311282-20220116-00030.
|
| [59] |
|
| [1] | YANG Xiaofeng, LI Xianwen, WU Yanfeng, ZHANG Qian, CHEN Juan, ZHAO Fengjiao. Association of Serum Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Levels with the Risk of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2867-2873. |
| [2] | LI Yachan, YANG Yang, XU Qianting, KE Tingyu. Association between the Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index and Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(18): 2482-2488. |
| [3] | LIU Tianyuan, SANG Wanyue, PENG Jiping, CHENG Siyi, HUANG Yiyi, LI Ouwen, JIANG Hong, ZHOU Xiaoya. Correlation Analysis between Neurofilament Light Chain and the Risk of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Nocturnal Hypertension [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2014-2021. |
| [4] | QIU Xinyu, ZHAO Qian, CHEN Yufei, JIAMULE· Maimaitiyiming, HAN Congcong, AIKEDAN· Aierken, LI Xiaomei, YANG Yining. Weight Status and Metabolic Characteristics on the Longitudinal Trajectory of Systolic Blood Pressure: a Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2006-2013. |
| [5] | WU Zhiyuan, WANG Chuanxu, YANG Feng, ZHANG Xuming, ZHOU Jiabao, GAO Jiandong. Study on the Mechanism of Shizhi Fang in Uric Acid Transport-related Proteins in Hyperuricemia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1898-1910. |
| [6] | ZHANG Yaping, ZHAO Xuhao, PANG Ting, HE Xindi, YUAN Changzheng, WEN Xu, LIU Zuyun, XU Xin. Association between Health Physical Fitness and Successful Aging among Middle-aged and Elderly Adults in the Community [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1706-1712. |
| [7] | YUAN Weixia, AO Panpan, MA Yun, WU Fengfu, XU Facui, YU Juan, ZENG Qun, WEI Shaofeng, YUAN Lijia. The Predictive Value of Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index for Sarcopenia in Older Adults [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1673-1681. |
| [8] | HU Jiaqi, LI Duan, FANG Hao, FAN Xingying, DU Wei, ZHOU Hanni. Study on Predictive Model of Non-genetic Risk Factors for Hyperuricemia in a Physical Examination Cohort [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1324-1333. |
| [9] | LI Jie, YANG Xinhui, CAO Li, ZHANG Jing, JIANG Yue. Case Analysis of General Practice Diagnosis and Treatment in a "Three High" Patient with Coexistence and Fatty Liver Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 810-816. |
| [10] | ZHU Chenrui, LI Na, WU Yuntao, ZHAO Haiyan, HUANG Zhe, LIU Yan, JI Chunpeng, WU Shouling. The Impact of Serum Uric Acid Levels on New-onset Atrioventricular Block: a Prospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 583-590. |
| [11] | XIANG Fengling, WANG Yuankun, WANG Xiaoyan, HE Shengjie, GAN Jinhua. The Prevalence of Hyperuricemia among Children and Adolescents in China: a Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4206-4213. |
| [12] | LIU Chunyan, DENG Zhaohui, SONG Yingbo, YANG Fang, SHI Qian, LI Yongxin, ZHANG Xin. Comparison of Prevalence and Comorbidity of Hypertension, Diabetes and Dyslipidemia in Xinjiang Residents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(32): 4031-4037. |
| [13] | YANG Bingqing, YANG Tianyuan, HOU Chenxue, WANG Qi. Comparative Study on the Potential of Non-invasive Models in Evaluating Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Combined with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(32): 4067-4074. |
| [14] | ZHOU Qibao, LUO Xiao, CHEN Ling, CAO Junda, LI Juxiang, XU Jinsong, SU Hai. Clinical Study on the Diagnostic Value of Circadian Variability of Systolic Blood Pressure Combined with SDNN in Coronary Heart Disease [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(30): 3760-3765. |
| [15] | ZHOU Penglong, CHANG Jing, DING Suying, CHEN Jingfeng, WANG Tao, LI Chenyang. Correlation Analysis between Age-Stratified Differences in Fat-to-muscle Ratio and Hyperuricemia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(27): 3375-3384. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||