
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (14): 1878-1882.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0157
• Article • Previous Articles
Received:2025-10-10
Revised:2025-12-25
Published:2026-05-15
Online:2026-04-14
Contact:
LI Zhen
通讯作者:
李振
作者简介:作者贡献:
李振负责研究思路设计、研究过程的实施、数据收集、统计学分析、论文起草及最终版本修订,对论文整体负责;王成勇提出研究思路、设计研究方案、具体观点或方法。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0157
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄 | 糖尿病史 | 高血压史 | 冠心病史 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥60岁 | <60岁 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | |||
| 预后良好组 | 59 | 53(89.83) | 6(10.17) | 13(22.03) | 46(77.97) | 16(27.12) | 43(72.88) | 13(22.03) | 46(77.97) | |
| 预后不良组 | 30 | 29(96.67) | 1(3.33) | 7(23.33) | 23(76.67) | 17(56.67) | 13(43.33) | 10(33.33) | 20(66.67) | |
| χ2值 | 1.283 | 0.019 | 7.442 | 1.325 | ||||||
| P值 | 0.257 | 0.890 | 0.006 | 0.250 | ||||||
| 组别 | 局部情况 | 骨转移 | 淋巴结转移 | 远处转移 | 转移部位 | |||||
| 有神经侵犯 | 无神经侵犯 | 有 | 无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | 无 | 单部位 | 多部位 | |
| 预后良好组 | 30(50.85) | 29(49.15) | 33(55.93) | 26(44.07) | 15(25.42) | 44(74.58) | 4(6.78) | 55(93.22) | 49(83.05) | 10(16.95) |
| 预后不良组 | 20(66.67) | 10(33.33) | 18(60.00) | 12(40.00) | 8(26.67) | 22(73.33) | 5(16.67) | 25(83.33) | 22(73.33) | 8(26.67) |
| χ2值 | 2.022 | 0.135 | 0.016 | 2.139 | 1.164 | |||||
| P值 | 0.155 | 0.714 | 0.899 | 0.144 | 0.281 | |||||
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group
| 组别 | 例数 | 年龄 | 糖尿病史 | 高血压史 | 冠心病史 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥60岁 | <60岁 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | |||
| 预后良好组 | 59 | 53(89.83) | 6(10.17) | 13(22.03) | 46(77.97) | 16(27.12) | 43(72.88) | 13(22.03) | 46(77.97) | |
| 预后不良组 | 30 | 29(96.67) | 1(3.33) | 7(23.33) | 23(76.67) | 17(56.67) | 13(43.33) | 10(33.33) | 20(66.67) | |
| χ2值 | 1.283 | 0.019 | 7.442 | 1.325 | ||||||
| P值 | 0.257 | 0.890 | 0.006 | 0.250 | ||||||
| 组别 | 局部情况 | 骨转移 | 淋巴结转移 | 远处转移 | 转移部位 | |||||
| 有神经侵犯 | 无神经侵犯 | 有 | 无 | 有 | 无 | 有 | 无 | 单部位 | 多部位 | |
| 预后良好组 | 30(50.85) | 29(49.15) | 33(55.93) | 26(44.07) | 15(25.42) | 44(74.58) | 4(6.78) | 55(93.22) | 49(83.05) | 10(16.95) |
| 预后不良组 | 20(66.67) | 10(33.33) | 18(60.00) | 12(40.00) | 8(26.67) | 22(73.33) | 5(16.67) | 25(83.33) | 22(73.33) | 8(26.67) |
| χ2值 | 2.022 | 0.135 | 0.016 | 2.139 | 1.164 | |||||
| P值 | 0.155 | 0.714 | 0.899 | 0.144 | 0.281 | |||||
| 组别 | 例数 | NLR | PLR | SII | MLR | PSA | FPSA | FPSA/PSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 预后良好组 | 59 | 2.62(2.14,3.46) | 152.15(114.84,192.48) | 464.72(343.37,782.30) | 0.27(0.20,0.38) | 31.02(12.93,77.93) | 3.24(1.32,8.75) | 0.10(0.06,0.17) |
| 预后不良组 | 30 | 4.15(3.32,5.35) | 131.02(92.55,194.70) | 699.34(630.72,904.81) | 0.49(0.41,0.61) | 36.76(15.13,100.00) | 2.40(0.60,9.78) | 0.10(0.04,0.17) |
| Z值 | -5.130 | -1.141 | -3.689 | -5.669 | -0.595 | -0.521 | -0.252 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.254 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.552 | 0.602 | 0.801 |
Table 2 Comparison of laboratory indexes between the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group
| 组别 | 例数 | NLR | PLR | SII | MLR | PSA | FPSA | FPSA/PSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 预后良好组 | 59 | 2.62(2.14,3.46) | 152.15(114.84,192.48) | 464.72(343.37,782.30) | 0.27(0.20,0.38) | 31.02(12.93,77.93) | 3.24(1.32,8.75) | 0.10(0.06,0.17) |
| 预后不良组 | 30 | 4.15(3.32,5.35) | 131.02(92.55,194.70) | 699.34(630.72,904.81) | 0.49(0.41,0.61) | 36.76(15.13,100.00) | 2.40(0.60,9.78) | 0.10(0.04,0.17) |
| Z值 | -5.130 | -1.141 | -3.689 | -5.669 | -0.595 | -0.521 | -0.252 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | 0.254 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.552 | 0.602 | 0.801 |
| 指标 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高血压病史 | 0.591 | 0.669 | 0.780 | 0.377 | 1.806 | 0.487~6.704 |
| NLR | 0.651 | 0.312 | 4.344 | 0.037 | 1.917 | 1.040~3.535 |
| SII | 0.006 | 0.002 | 8.174 | 0.004 | 1.006 | 1.002~1.010 |
| MLR | 5.205 | 2.373 | 4.813 | 0.028 | 182.211 | 1.742~19 063.546 |
| 常数项 | -9.183 | 2.036 | 20.353 | <0.001 | 0.000 | — |
Table 3 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors for poor prognosis in patients with advanced PCa
| 指标 | β | SE | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高血压病史 | 0.591 | 0.669 | 0.780 | 0.377 | 1.806 | 0.487~6.704 |
| NLR | 0.651 | 0.312 | 4.344 | 0.037 | 1.917 | 1.040~3.535 |
| SII | 0.006 | 0.002 | 8.174 | 0.004 | 1.006 | 1.002~1.010 |
| MLR | 5.205 | 2.373 | 4.813 | 0.028 | 182.211 | 1.742~19 063.546 |
| 常数项 | -9.183 | 2.036 | 20.353 | <0.001 | 0.000 | — |
| 变量 | AUC | 95%CI | P值 | 截断值 | 约登指数 | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLR | 0.834 | 0.746~0.922 | <0.001 | 3.57 | 0.581 | 73.33 | 84.75 |
| SII | 0.740 | 0.638~0.842 | <0.001 | 539.01 | 0.560 | 96.67 | 59.32 |
| MLR | 0.869 | 0.797~0.940 | <0.001 | 0.41 | 0.597 | 76.67 | 83.05 |
| 联合 | 0.926 | 0.874~0.978 | <0.001 | — | 0.715 | 83.33 | 88.14 |
Table 4 Analysis of the value of NLR, SII, and MLR in the prognostic diagnosis of advanced PCa
| 变量 | AUC | 95%CI | P值 | 截断值 | 约登指数 | 灵敏度(%) | 特异度(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLR | 0.834 | 0.746~0.922 | <0.001 | 3.57 | 0.581 | 73.33 | 84.75 |
| SII | 0.740 | 0.638~0.842 | <0.001 | 539.01 | 0.560 | 96.67 | 59.32 |
| MLR | 0.869 | 0.797~0.940 | <0.001 | 0.41 | 0.597 | 76.67 | 83.05 |
| 联合 | 0.926 | 0.874~0.978 | <0.001 | — | 0.715 | 83.33 | 88.14 |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
牟思博, 周昌明, 郑莹. 2025年美国癌症统计数据解读及对中国癌症防治工作的借鉴意义[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025, 35(6): 523-530. DOI:10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.06.001.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
卓涛, 杨蝴蝶, 安恒庆, 等. 转移性前列腺癌患者初始血清睾酮水平与预后相关指标的关系[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 29(6): 514-520. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2024.06.009.
|
| [8] |
茆飞, 杨超, 冀鲁.免疫细胞亚群与前列腺癌患者预后的关联性研究[J].中华男科学杂志, 2024, 30(4): 321-325.
|
| [9] |
单锋芝, 高小超, 刘进亮, 等. 前列腺癌患者血清PSA和总睾酮水平变化与病理Gleason评分和预后的相关性[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2024, 23(1): 101-102, 105.
|
| [10] |
孙琦景, 吴春磊, 何岩, 等. 前列腺癌患者miRNA-218表达水平与临床-病理特征及预后的关系[J]. 中国性科学, 2024, 33(5): 22-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2024.05.006.
|
| [11] |
张宇, 王宏权, 李俞润, 等. miR-146a、miR-23b水平与前列腺癌患者术前临床分期及预后的关系[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2024, 16(4): 774-777, 782.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
颜玲玲, 吴坚芬, 顾彬彬, 等. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对早期胃癌诊断的预测价值[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2022, 42(3): 163-170. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20210428-00250.
|
| [18] |
李伟, 曹嘉芮, 贾存乐, 等. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值在恶性肿瘤中的应用进展[J].中国老年学杂志, 2024, 34(15): 3826-3830.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [1] | WANG Siman, ZHANG Mengchu, LI Wen, XU Ai, XU Jin, GUO Rui, YAN Haixia. Research on the Construction of a Risk Prediction Model for Primary Hypertension with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Based on TCM Syndromes and Pulse Graph Parameters [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1840-1848. |
| [2] | WU Chunxiang, TIAN Jie, GUO Yi, DENG Bo, YU Jie, CAI Ning, SHEN Li. Analysis of the 8-year Trajectories and Influencing Factors of Medical-help-seeking Behavior of Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1660-1665. |
| [3] | ZHANG Jiawen, HU Jia, ZHENG Ying, DAI Tao. Research Review on Factors Affecting Medication Adherence in Patients with Chronic Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1753-1758. |
| [4] | LIAO Qiuhon, TAO Hong, YANG Xiaohui, YUAN Yonggui, LIN Shanshan, XU Wei, LI Yuxiu, PEI Yu. Prevalence of Depression and the Influencing Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a National Multicenter Cross-sectional Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(12): 1558-1565. |
| [5] | LIU Xiang, CHEN Hong, CUI Rui, GUO Zhichao, LI Panpan, CAO Zilong, JI Yiqing, YU Wenya. Consistencies and Differences in Early Childhood Development Characteristics in Megacities: a Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1411-1421. |
| [6] | YANG Fangting, XU Junfeng, YANG Qin, MA Yingzhi, ZHOU Ling, XIAO Jiangqin. Analysis of the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Intolerance of Uncertainty in AECOPD Patients under the Perspective of Health Ecology [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1434-1440. |
| [7] | HU Jiaqi, LI Duan, FANG Hao, FAN Xingying, DU Wei, ZHOU Hanni. Study on Predictive Model of Non-genetic Risk Factors for Hyperuricemia in a Physical Examination Cohort [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1324-1333. |
| [8] | YU Xinyan, MA Zhong, CAO Fan, SU Peng, LIN Ying, ZHANG Haicheng. Predicting the Risk of Depression in Elderly Patients with Cardiovascular Metabolic Diseases Using Single-lead Wearable Electrocardiography at the Community Level [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1300-1310. |
| [9] | DONG Kecheng, ZHANG Xingxia, YUAN Yongqing, JIANG Jie. A Comparative Analysis of the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Digital Health Literacy among County Residents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1340-1347. |
| [10] | WANG Xiaonan, RUAN Xiaonan, LIU Yang, WU Kang, QIU Hua, LIU Qingping, SONG Jiahui, GAO Jiaojiao, ZHOU Yi, LIU Xiaolin. Correlation between Anthropometric Indices and the Risk of Stroke: a Nested Case-control Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 1020-1028. |
| [11] | LIU Jinglin, ZHANG Jie, SONG Xiaokun, LI Bole. Study on Signal Mining and Influencing Factors of Adverse Events of Blinatumomab from 2014 to 2024 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 1077-1088. |
| [12] | CAO Lei, LIU Xuechun, JIANG Wei, CHEN Yan, YAN Sunhong, DU Jing. Study on the Prediction of Muscle Attenuation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke by the Cross-sectional Area and Thickness of the Temporalis Muscle [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 997-1007. |
| [13] | TIAN Ying, PAN Dianzhu. Analysis of Related Factors of Renal Function Impairment in AECOPD Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 885-892. |
| [14] | WANG Youyun, SONG Mingsha, LI Chunsheng, QIAO Hui. The Health Poverty Vulnerability and Its Influencing Factors of Chronic Diseases in Rural Ningxia in the Post-poverty Era [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 922-928. |
| [15] | LIU Shan, LI Fei, MENG Haodong, YANG Juan, QIAO Hui. The Vulnerability of Health Poverty and Its Influencing Factors of the Migrant Workers in Ningxia in the Post-poverty Era [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 929-935. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||