
Chinese General Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (07): 900-906.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0050
Special Issue: 儿科最新文章合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-04-02
Revised:2025-07-21
Published:2026-03-05
Online:2026-02-13
Contact:
ZHOU Bo
通讯作者:
周波
作者简介:作者贡献:
黎珏希负责文章的构思和撰写;李立圆、郭雨璇、肖小嫱负责研究设计和问卷发放;唐佩琪、蒲婷、左海汐、杨婷、樊小夏负责数据的收集和整理;周波负责论文的修订及质量控制,对论文整体负责。
基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0050
| 性别 | 例数 | 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | CTQ-SF得分[M(P25,P75),分] | PHQ-9得分[M(P25,P75),分] | AABS得分( | IADDS得分[M(P25,P75),分] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 2 531 | 14.0(13.0,16.0) | 42.0(34.0,54.0) | 11.0(10.0,14.0) | 50.2±8.5 | 3.0(1.0,5.0) |
| 女 | 3 338 | 14.0(13.0,16.0) | 40.0(33.0,51.0) | 11.0(10.0,14.0) | 50.4±8.0 | 2.0(1.0,5.0) |
| Z(t)值 | -3.700 | -5.174 | 1.985 | -1.282a | -6.747 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.047 | 0.200 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Comparison of age and scale scores between male and female adolescents
| 性别 | 例数 | 年龄[M(P25,P75),岁] | CTQ-SF得分[M(P25,P75),分] | PHQ-9得分[M(P25,P75),分] | AABS得分( | IADDS得分[M(P25,P75),分] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 2 531 | 14.0(13.0,16.0) | 42.0(34.0,54.0) | 11.0(10.0,14.0) | 50.2±8.5 | 3.0(1.0,5.0) |
| 女 | 3 338 | 14.0(13.0,16.0) | 40.0(33.0,51.0) | 11.0(10.0,14.0) | 50.4±8.0 | 2.0(1.0,5.0) |
| Z(t)值 | -3.700 | -5.174 | 1.985 | -1.282a | -6.747 | |
| P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.047 | 0.200 | <0.001 |
| 变量 | CTQ-SF得分 | PHQ-9得分 | AABS得分 | IADDS得分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTQ-SF得分 | 1.000 | — | — | — |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.266a | 1.000 | — | — |
| AABS得分 | 0.203a | 0.307a | 1.000 | — |
| IADDS得分 | 0.156a | 0.184a | 0.278a | 1.000 |
Table 2 Correlation analysis of CTQ-SF, PHQ-9, AABS, and IADDS scores among adolescents
| 变量 | CTQ-SF得分 | PHQ-9得分 | AABS得分 | IADDS得分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTQ-SF得分 | 1.000 | — | — | — |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.266a | 1.000 | — | — |
| AABS得分 | 0.203a | 0.307a | 1.000 | — |
| IADDS得分 | 0.156a | 0.184a | 0.278a | 1.000 |
| 结局变量 | 预测变量 | 回归系数显著性 | 整体拟合指数 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β值 | t值 | R值 | R2值 | F值 | ||
| PHQ-9得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.074 | 21.375a | 0.271 | 0.073 | 154.967 |
| AABS得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.083 | 10.494a | 0.363 | 0.132 | 223.051 |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.654 | 23.026a | ||||
| IADDS得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.022 | 8.444a | 0.340 | 0.116 | 153.674 |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.068 | 7.007a | ||||
| AABS得分 | 0.074 | 17.293a | ||||
Table 3 Chain mediation analysis among CTQ-SF scores, PHQ-9 scores, AABS scores, and IADDS scores
| 结局变量 | 预测变量 | 回归系数显著性 | 整体拟合指数 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β值 | t值 | R值 | R2值 | F值 | ||
| PHQ-9得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.074 | 21.375a | 0.271 | 0.073 | 154.967 |
| AABS得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.083 | 10.494a | 0.363 | 0.132 | 223.051 |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.654 | 23.026a | ||||
| IADDS得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.022 | 8.444a | 0.340 | 0.116 | 153.674 |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.068 | 7.007a | ||||
| AABS得分 | 0.074 | 17.293a | ||||
| 路径 | β值 | SE | 95%CI | 占比(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ind1:CTQ-SF得分→PHQ-9得分→IADDS得分 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.004~0.007 | 13.51 |
| Ind2:CTQ-SF得分→AABS得分→IADDS得分 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.005~0.008 | 16.22 |
| Ind3:CTQ-SF得分→PHQ-9得分→AABS得分→IADDS得分 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.003~0.004 | 10.81 |
| 总间接效应 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.013~0.017 | 40.54 |
| 直接效应 | 0.022 | 0.003 | 0.017~0.027 | 59.46 |
| 总效应 | 0.037 | 0.003 | 0.032~0.042 | 100.00 |
Table 4 Chain mediation path analysis of CTQ-SF scores affecting IADDS scores through PHQ-9 and AABS scores
| 路径 | β值 | SE | 95%CI | 占比(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ind1:CTQ-SF得分→PHQ-9得分→IADDS得分 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.004~0.007 | 13.51 |
| Ind2:CTQ-SF得分→AABS得分→IADDS得分 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.005~0.008 | 16.22 |
| Ind3:CTQ-SF得分→PHQ-9得分→AABS得分→IADDS得分 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.003~0.004 | 10.81 |
| 总间接效应 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.013~0.017 | 40.54 |
| 直接效应 | 0.022 | 0.003 | 0.017~0.027 | 59.46 |
| 总效应 | 0.037 | 0.003 | 0.032~0.042 | 100.00 |
| 结局变量 | 预测变量 | 回归系数显著性 | 整体拟合指数 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β值 | t值 | R值 | R2值 | F值 | ||
| PHQ-9得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.044 | 4.014a | 0.274 | 0.075 | 118.573 |
| 性别 | -0.476 | -1.514 | ||||
| CTQ-SF得分×性别 | 0.020 | 2.962b | ||||
| AABS得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.081 | 10.334a | 0.363 | 0.131 | 295.852 |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.657 | 23.177a | ||||
| IADDS得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.042 | 5.327a | 0.342 | 0.117 | 129.373 |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.069 | 7.083a | ||||
| AABS得分 | 0.075 | 17.377a | ||||
| 性别 | 0.096 | 0.425 | ||||
| CTQ-SF得分×性别 | -0.013 | -2.660b | ||||
Table 5 Gender as a moderator in the chain mediation pathway linking CTQ-SF scores to IADDS scores
| 结局变量 | 预测变量 | 回归系数显著性 | 整体拟合指数 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β值 | t值 | R值 | R2值 | F值 | ||
| PHQ-9得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.044 | 4.014a | 0.274 | 0.075 | 118.573 |
| 性别 | -0.476 | -1.514 | ||||
| CTQ-SF得分×性别 | 0.020 | 2.962b | ||||
| AABS得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.081 | 10.334a | 0.363 | 0.131 | 295.852 |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.657 | 23.177a | ||||
| IADDS得分 | CTQ-SF得分 | 0.042 | 5.327a | 0.342 | 0.117 | 129.373 |
| PHQ-9得分 | 0.069 | 7.083a | ||||
| AABS得分 | 0.075 | 17.377a | ||||
| 性别 | 0.096 | 0.425 | ||||
| CTQ-SF得分×性别 | -0.013 | -2.660b | ||||
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
张志华,孙业桓. 中国中学生网络成瘾现况及流行特征的Meta分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(10): 1481-1485.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
刘倩妤,王重一,郭蓝. 中学生童年期虐待与网络成瘾的关联:情绪行为问题的中介作用[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2024, 57(6): 351-359.
|
| [7] |
杨玲,曹华,马雪,等. 大学生童年创伤与网络成瘾的关系:应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(12): 732-737, 743. DOI: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2016.12.004.
|
| [8] |
孟现鑫,颜晨,俞德霖,等. 童年创伤与网络成瘾关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1087-1121.
|
| [9] |
郭世杰,于鲁璐,王学义. 童年期虐待对抑郁症的影响[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2021, 54(4): 310-314.
|
| [10] |
毛平,王露露,谭茗惠,等. 童年不良经历青少年心理健康现状及影响因素[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2021, 46(11): 1298-1305.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
胡宣,胡治国,骆宏. 不良童年经历对大学生学业倦怠的影响:时间观的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2024, 32(5): 1036-1040. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2024.05.015.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
王华君,姜鹰,杨萍萍,等. 儿童期虐待对大学生自伤行为的影响:抑郁的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理学进展, 2019(11): 1834-1842.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
吴艳,戴晓阳,温忠麟,等. 青少年学习倦怠量表的编制[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(2): 152-154.
|
| [19] |
昝玲玲,刘炳伦,刘兆玺. 中学生网络成瘾诊断量表的初步编制[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2008, 16(2): 123-125.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [1] | ZHAO Lili, LIU Lewei, GENG Feng, MO Daming, LIU Huanzhong. The Relationship between Suicidal Ideation and Childhood Trauma in Adolescents with Depressive Disorder: the Dual Mediating Effects of Depressive Symptom Severity and Low Vitamin D Levels [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1614-1621. |
| [2] | HUANG Chuanying, LIAO Xiaoyang, YANG Rong, LI Dongze, ZHANG Peng, JIA Yu, LIU Lidi. Interpretation of the Clinical Statement for Management of Female Cardiac Emergencies in 2024 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(12): 1427-1432. |
| [3] | FU Fanglin, PAN Yaojia, HAN Zheng, SUN Meng, GU Huaicong, WANG Weiqiang. Study on the Correlation between Body Roundness Index and Metabolically Obese Normal Weight Phenotype in an Elderly Population of Different Genders: Triglyceride Glucose Index as a Potential Influencing Factor [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(30): 3746-3752. |
| [4] | LI Zhiyong, LI Guohua, HUANG Pengfei, ZHANG Yunjing, LOU Xianzhe, ZHAO Junjian. Association of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell to HDL Cholesterol Ratio with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Different Genders [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(25): 3159-3163. |
| [5] | PAN Yaojia, WANG Weiqiang, YI Weizhuo, GAO Bing, FU Fanglin, HAN Zheng, SUN Meng, DONG Yaqin, GU Huaicong. Relationship between Triglyceride-glucose Index and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Middle-aged Obese Residents of Different Genders [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(29): 3628-3635. |
| [6] | SUN Yujing, ZHANG Jing, YU Hong, ZHOU Yuqiu, JIANG Wenlong, JIA Yannan. Effect of Childhood Trauma on Aggressive Behavior in Stable Schizophrenia Patients: the Chain Mediating Effect of Self-esteem and Resilience [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(23): 2899-2906. |
| [7] | RAO Yufeng, MENG Liheng, ZHOU Jia, LIANG Xinghuan, HUANG Zhenxing, QIN Yingfen. Phenotypically Male Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Patient with Huge Space-occupying Adrenal Masses: a Case Report and Literature Review [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(21): 2690-2694. |
| [8] | PAN Yuli,ZENG Xuan,LIN Xiujin,YU Miuyu,ZHANG Shengjie,CHEN Fenglan,WU Junduan. Relationship of the Risk of Adulthood Depression with Serum CRP,IP-10,TGF-β1 and Childhood Trauma:a Case-control Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(11): 1349-1353. |
| [9] | ZHAI Qian,FENG Lei,ZHANG Guofu,LIU Min,WANG Jingjing. Research Status of Internet Addiction in Adolescents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(13): 1687-1694. |
| [10] | QIU Hongyan,REN Yangjie,HOU Liyan. The Influence of Gender Preference and Sex Composition of Surviving Children on the Second Child Fertility Plan [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(5): 591-594. |
| [11] | WU Jiajia,ZHANG Yahui,TAO Yao,GUO Yiqiong,WU Yating,YUAN Xiao,GAO Qinghan,TAO Xiujuan,FAN Yanna,YANG Jianjun. Gender Differences in Plasma Phospholipid Fatty Acids and their Correlation with Blood Pressure in Community Elderly Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(35): 4298-4305. |
| [12] | LIU Liang,LIU Cuilian,ZHAO Xudong. Moderation Effect of Family Interpersonal Relationship in the Path from Anger Trait and Expression to Anxiety among College Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(25): 3125-3131. |
| [13] | HU Fei-li, WU Li-yun, ZHANG Xing-li, SHI Jian-nong. Rapid Development Period and Gender Difference of the Component of Effortful Control in 3-6 Years Old Children [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2016, 19(29): 3549-3553. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||