Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (34): 4351-4358.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0239
Special Issue: 内分泌代谢性疾病最新文章合辑
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-12-12
Revised:
2025-08-10
Published:
2025-12-05
Online:
2025-10-21
Contact:
WANG Zhonghua
通讯作者:
王中华
作者简介:
作者贡献:
王瓅珠提出研究思路,设计研究方案,负责研究命题的提出与设计,起草论文;李思涵、王心怡负责研究过程的实施;冒孙汐、邱杨负责数据收集和统计学分析,绘制图表;王中华负责最终版本修订,对论文负责。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0239
量表 | 得分范围 | 最低得分 | 最高得分 | 平均/中位得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ADKnowl | 0~116 | 10.0 | 92.0 | 52.5±16.5 |
低血糖 | 0~14 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 6.4±2.7 |
减少并发症的危险 | 0~16 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 9.8±4.1 |
吸烟/饮酒情况 | 0~11 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 3.0(0.0,5.0)a |
运动 | 0~9 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 2.9±1.9 |
足部护理 | 0~24 | 2.0 | 22.0 | 15.0±4.0 |
病情变化 | 0~8 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 2.6±1.3 |
糖尿病治疗 | 0~15 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 6.9±2.3 |
饮食 | 0~19 | 1.0 | 17.0 | 9.4±3.4 |
SECD6 | 1~10 | 1.7 | 10.0 | 6.4±1.2 |
症状管理自我效能 | 1~10 | 1.7 | 10.0 | 6.4±1.2 |
疾病共性自我效能 | 1~10 | 1.5 | 10.0 | 6.4±1.3 |
SDSCA | 0~84 | 16.1 | 67.1 | 37.9±6.9 |
饮食 | 0~7 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 5.3±0.9 |
血糖监测 | 0~7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 1.3±1.0 |
运动锻炼 | 0~7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 2.7±2.1 |
足部护理 | 0~7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 0.0(0.0,2.0)a |
用药依从性 | 0~7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 7.0(7.0,7.0)a |
DSQL | 27~135 | 29.0 | 84.0 | 48.3±8.6 |
治疗维度 | 1~5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.6±0.4 |
社会关系 | 1~5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.3±0.3 |
心理功能 | 1~5 | 1.0 | 6.1 | 1.8±0.4 |
生理功能 | 1~5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.0±0.5 |
Table 1 The ADKnowl,SECD6,SDSCA,DSQL scores of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
量表 | 得分范围 | 最低得分 | 最高得分 | 平均/中位得分 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ADKnowl | 0~116 | 10.0 | 92.0 | 52.5±16.5 |
低血糖 | 0~14 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 6.4±2.7 |
减少并发症的危险 | 0~16 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 9.8±4.1 |
吸烟/饮酒情况 | 0~11 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 3.0(0.0,5.0)a |
运动 | 0~9 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 2.9±1.9 |
足部护理 | 0~24 | 2.0 | 22.0 | 15.0±4.0 |
病情变化 | 0~8 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 2.6±1.3 |
糖尿病治疗 | 0~15 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 6.9±2.3 |
饮食 | 0~19 | 1.0 | 17.0 | 9.4±3.4 |
SECD6 | 1~10 | 1.7 | 10.0 | 6.4±1.2 |
症状管理自我效能 | 1~10 | 1.7 | 10.0 | 6.4±1.2 |
疾病共性自我效能 | 1~10 | 1.5 | 10.0 | 6.4±1.3 |
SDSCA | 0~84 | 16.1 | 67.1 | 37.9±6.9 |
饮食 | 0~7 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 5.3±0.9 |
血糖监测 | 0~7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 1.3±1.0 |
运动锻炼 | 0~7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 2.7±2.1 |
足部护理 | 0~7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 0.0(0.0,2.0)a |
用药依从性 | 0~7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 7.0(7.0,7.0)a |
DSQL | 27~135 | 29.0 | 84.0 | 48.3±8.6 |
治疗维度 | 1~5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.6±0.4 |
社会关系 | 1~5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.3±0.3 |
心理功能 | 1~5 | 1.0 | 6.1 | 1.8±0.4 |
生理功能 | 1~5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.0±0.5 |
特征 | 例数 | SDSCA得分 | DSQL得分 |
---|---|---|---|
性别 | |||
男 | 731 | 38.5±6.9 | 46.3±6.9 |
女 | 1 279 | 37.7±8.1 | 49.3±8.8 |
t值 | 2.07 | -4.64 | |
P值 | 0.014 | <0.001 | |
年龄 | |||
<65岁 | 673 | 38.5±7.0 | 46.3±8.0 |
≥65岁 | 1 337 | 37.7±6.9 | 49.3±8.7 |
t值 | 2.62 | -6.85 | |
P值 | 0.016 | <0.001 | |
职业状态 | |||
失业 | 1 255 | 38.2±6.4 | 47.5±8.9 |
就业 | 706 | 37.3±7.6 | 49.8±7.9 |
退休 | 49 | 39.8±8.0 | 47.4±7.6 |
F值 | 3.88 | 5.21 | |
P值 | 0.002 | <0.001 | |
受教育程度 | |||
初中及以下 | 1 853 | 37.8±6.9 | 48.6±8.6 |
高中及以上 | 157 | 38.9±7.2 | 45.3±7.5 |
t值 | 1.84 | 10.53 | |
P值 | 0.077 | <0.001 | |
婚姻状况 | |||
已婚 | 1 677 | 38.2±7.0 | 48.2±8.5 |
未婚/离异/丧偶 | 333 | 36.6±6.0 | 48.9±8.9 |
t值 | 4.86 | -1.00 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.192 | |
年收入 | |||
<5 000元 | 1 425 | 37.7±6.9 | 48.7±9.2 |
5 000~10 000元 | 380 | 37.6±6.0 | 48.1±6.0 |
10 001~50 000元 | 171 | 40.4±8.0 | 45.9±7.0 |
>50 000元 | 33 | 40.4±6.9 | 44.0±7.7 |
F值 | 7.30 | 10.42 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
糖尿病并发症 | |||
有 | 1 307 | 37.9±6.9 | 49.8±8.6 |
无 | 703 | 38.1±7.1 | 47.5±8.3 |
t值 | -1.38 | 2.89 | |
P值 | 0.481 | 0.004 |
Table 2 Comparison of SDSCA and DSQL scores in patients with different characteristics of type 2 diabetes mellitus
特征 | 例数 | SDSCA得分 | DSQL得分 |
---|---|---|---|
性别 | |||
男 | 731 | 38.5±6.9 | 46.3±6.9 |
女 | 1 279 | 37.7±8.1 | 49.3±8.8 |
t值 | 2.07 | -4.64 | |
P值 | 0.014 | <0.001 | |
年龄 | |||
<65岁 | 673 | 38.5±7.0 | 46.3±8.0 |
≥65岁 | 1 337 | 37.7±6.9 | 49.3±8.7 |
t值 | 2.62 | -6.85 | |
P值 | 0.016 | <0.001 | |
职业状态 | |||
失业 | 1 255 | 38.2±6.4 | 47.5±8.9 |
就业 | 706 | 37.3±7.6 | 49.8±7.9 |
退休 | 49 | 39.8±8.0 | 47.4±7.6 |
F值 | 3.88 | 5.21 | |
P值 | 0.002 | <0.001 | |
受教育程度 | |||
初中及以下 | 1 853 | 37.8±6.9 | 48.6±8.6 |
高中及以上 | 157 | 38.9±7.2 | 45.3±7.5 |
t值 | 1.84 | 10.53 | |
P值 | 0.077 | <0.001 | |
婚姻状况 | |||
已婚 | 1 677 | 38.2±7.0 | 48.2±8.5 |
未婚/离异/丧偶 | 333 | 36.6±6.0 | 48.9±8.9 |
t值 | 4.86 | -1.00 | |
P值 | <0.001 | 0.192 | |
年收入 | |||
<5 000元 | 1 425 | 37.7±6.9 | 48.7±9.2 |
5 000~10 000元 | 380 | 37.6±6.0 | 48.1±6.0 |
10 001~50 000元 | 171 | 40.4±8.0 | 45.9±7.0 |
>50 000元 | 33 | 40.4±6.9 | 44.0±7.7 |
F值 | 7.30 | 10.42 | |
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
糖尿病并发症 | |||
有 | 1 307 | 37.9±6.9 | 49.8±8.6 |
无 | 703 | 38.1±7.1 | 47.5±8.3 |
t值 | -1.38 | 2.89 | |
P值 | 0.481 | 0.004 |
Figure 2 Pathways of diabetes knowledge,self-efficacy on self-management,and quality of survival in patients with type 2 diabetes based on ITHBC modeling
模型 | 路径 | β(95%CI) | SE | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | ADKnowl得分→SECD6得分 | 0.109(0.005~0.011) | 0.002 | 4.793 | <0.001 |
SECD6得分→SDSCA得分 | 0.114(0.393~0.881) | 0.132 | 8.558 | <0.001 | |
ADKnowl得分→SDSCA得分 | 0.156(0.047~0.083) | 0.009 | 7.158 | <0.001 | |
模型2 | SDSCA得分→DSQL得分 | -0.079(-0.152~-0.044) | 0.029 | -3.964 | <0.001 |
SECD6得分→DSQL得分 | -0.377(-2.907~-2.343) | 0.160 | -16.762 | <0.001 | |
ADKnowl得分→DSQL得分 | -0.048(-0.048~-0.020) | 0.012 | -1.478 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Pathway results of ADKnowl and SECD6 scores on SDSCA and DSQL scores
模型 | 路径 | β(95%CI) | SE | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | ADKnowl得分→SECD6得分 | 0.109(0.005~0.011) | 0.002 | 4.793 | <0.001 |
SECD6得分→SDSCA得分 | 0.114(0.393~0.881) | 0.132 | 8.558 | <0.001 | |
ADKnowl得分→SDSCA得分 | 0.156(0.047~0.083) | 0.009 | 7.158 | <0.001 | |
模型2 | SDSCA得分→DSQL得分 | -0.079(-0.152~-0.044) | 0.029 | -3.964 | <0.001 |
SECD6得分→DSQL得分 | -0.377(-2.907~-2.343) | 0.160 | -16.762 | <0.001 | |
ADKnowl得分→DSQL得分 | -0.048(-0.048~-0.020) | 0.012 | -1.478 | <0.001 |
变量 | SDSCA | DSQL | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β(95%CI) | SE | t值 | P值 | β(95%CI) | SE | t值 | P值 | |
ADKnowl | ||||||||
低血糖 | 0.024(-0.135~0.247) | 0.079 | 0.404 | 0.563 | 0.181(0.283~0.600) | 0.094 | 7.787 | <0.001 |
减少并发症的危险 | -0.082(-0.372~0.031) | 0.083 | -2.235 | 0.097 | -0.213(-0.624~-0.289) | 0.098 | -4.712 | <0.001 |
吸烟/饮酒情况 | -0.180(-0.617~-0.229) | 0.080 | -3.070 | <0.001 | -0.032(-0.240~0.083) | 0.095 | -3.337 | 0.339 |
运动 | -0.059(-0.474~-0.005) | 0.095 | -3.178 | 0.045 | -0.117(-0.685~-0.294) | 0.113 | -5.224 | <0.001 |
足部护理 | 0.352(0.548~0.826) | 0.056 | 8.514 | <0.001 | 0.147(0.182~0.413) | 0.066 | 6.073 | <0.001 |
病情变化 | -0.003(-0.337~0.306) | 0.135 | -0.450 | 0.925 | 0.161(0.734~1.269) | 0.159 | 10.324 | <0.001 |
糖尿病治疗 | -0.134(-0.695~-0.246) | 0.089 | -7.431 | <0.001 | 0.119(0.244~0.619) | 0.106 | 3.320 | <0.001 |
饮食 | 0.161(0.220~0.503) | 0.059 | 10.162 | <0.001 | -0.197(-0.575~-0.340) | 0.070 | -9.245 | <0.001 |
SECD6 | ||||||||
症状管理自我效能 | 0.030(-0.374~0.739) | 0.239 | 2.941 | 0.520 | -0.115(-1.185~-0.259) | 0.283 | -0.439 | 0.002 |
疾病共性自我效能 | -0.052(-0.811~0.226) | 0.221 | 2.287 | 0.268 | -0.397(-2.756~-1.892) | 0.262 | -8.292 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Relationship between specific dimensions of ADKnowl and SECD6 with SDSCA and DSQL
变量 | SDSCA | DSQL | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β(95%CI) | SE | t值 | P值 | β(95%CI) | SE | t值 | P值 | |
ADKnowl | ||||||||
低血糖 | 0.024(-0.135~0.247) | 0.079 | 0.404 | 0.563 | 0.181(0.283~0.600) | 0.094 | 7.787 | <0.001 |
减少并发症的危险 | -0.082(-0.372~0.031) | 0.083 | -2.235 | 0.097 | -0.213(-0.624~-0.289) | 0.098 | -4.712 | <0.001 |
吸烟/饮酒情况 | -0.180(-0.617~-0.229) | 0.080 | -3.070 | <0.001 | -0.032(-0.240~0.083) | 0.095 | -3.337 | 0.339 |
运动 | -0.059(-0.474~-0.005) | 0.095 | -3.178 | 0.045 | -0.117(-0.685~-0.294) | 0.113 | -5.224 | <0.001 |
足部护理 | 0.352(0.548~0.826) | 0.056 | 8.514 | <0.001 | 0.147(0.182~0.413) | 0.066 | 6.073 | <0.001 |
病情变化 | -0.003(-0.337~0.306) | 0.135 | -0.450 | 0.925 | 0.161(0.734~1.269) | 0.159 | 10.324 | <0.001 |
糖尿病治疗 | -0.134(-0.695~-0.246) | 0.089 | -7.431 | <0.001 | 0.119(0.244~0.619) | 0.106 | 3.320 | <0.001 |
饮食 | 0.161(0.220~0.503) | 0.059 | 10.162 | <0.001 | -0.197(-0.575~-0.340) | 0.070 | -9.245 | <0.001 |
SECD6 | ||||||||
症状管理自我效能 | 0.030(-0.374~0.739) | 0.239 | 2.941 | 0.520 | -0.115(-1.185~-0.259) | 0.283 | -0.439 | 0.002 |
疾病共性自我效能 | -0.052(-0.811~0.226) | 0.221 | 2.287 | 0.268 | -0.397(-2.756~-1.892) | 0.262 | -8.292 | <0.001 |
[1] |
李聪. 农村居民重大疾病医疗救助公平性研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2016.
|
[2] |
吴剑. 基于二维象限法的农村老年2型糖尿病高危人群分类与差异化干预策略研究[D]. 南昌:江西中医药大学,2022.
|
[3] |
田慧,李春霖,纪立农,等. 中国老年2型糖尿病防治临床指南(2022年版)[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志,2022,30(1):2-51.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
唐鸿霞. 2型糖尿病患者使用糖尿病APP进行自我管理的析因设计研究[D]. 成都:成都医学院,2023.
|
[7] |
王海潮. 2型糖尿病患者家属血糖监测知信行现状及其影响因素分析[D]. 南充:川北医学院,2021.
|
[8] |
唐劲蓓,黄婷,朱瑛. 线上平台开展糖尿病足防护知识宣教对空巢中老年糖尿病患者自我管理水平及生存质量的影响[J]. 糖尿病新世界,2024,27(2):142-145. DOI:10.16658/j.cnki.1672-4062.2024.02.142.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
赵亚男,王静,李云峰. 老年2型糖尿病患者心理障碍干预的研究进展[J]. 老年医学与保健,2023,29(6):1407-1412.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
孟沙沙. 基于信息-动机-行为技巧模型的延续性护理干预在2型糖尿病患者中的应用研究[D]. 遵义:遵义医科大学,2019.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
张嫄婧. 中青年卒中后疲劳患者网络化认知行为疗法干预方案的构建与应用[D].新乡:新乡医学院,2023.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
欧宇. 2型糖尿病患者生存质量影响因素及结构方程模型构建[D]. 沈阳:中国医科大学,2023.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
张冬儿,李忠,唐文熙,等. 中西部农村两县高血压和2型糖尿病患者健康相关生命质量状况及其影响因素[J]. 医学与社会,2021,34(5):10-14. DOI:10.13723/j.yxysh.2021.05.003.
|
[29] | |
[30] |
张莉莉,徐丽,施慧. 延续性护理对糖尿病足高危患者的护理知识与自我管理能力的影响[J]. 糖尿病新世界,2023,26(20):113-116. DOI:10.16658/j.cnki.1672-4062.2023.20.113.
|
[31] | |
[32] |
冒鑫娥. 2型糖尿病患者健康信息素养、自我管理行为及健康结局关系的研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学,2020.
|
[33] |
程菊,李双双,朱枣兰. 自我管理健康教育方法在老年2型糖尿病护理中的应用价值[J]. 广东医学,2019,40(20):2898-2901,2906. DOI:10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20191094.
|
[1] | SU Ning, LIU Pingping, GUO Yumeng, LU Mingyue, ZHU Rui, YU Jianping. Investigation on the Prevention and Control Capacity of Infectious Diseases and Influencing Factors in Primary Medical and Health Service Institutions in Beijing in 2019-2022 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(35): 4473-4478. |
[2] | YIN Jiajia, YAO Li, ZHOU Zihan, LI Qinqin, WANG Tingrui, LIU Yan. Meta-analysis of Factors Influencing the Prevalence of Multimorbidity among the Elderly in Different Regions of China: a Comparative Study between the North and the South [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(34): 4326-4336. |
[3] | MA Nian, WANG Ziyun, TENG Xiaoyan, CHEN Yun, SUN Zhengyong. Study on the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Comorbidities among Urban-rural Elderly Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(34): 4344-4350. |
[4] | LIU Chunyan, DENG Zhaohui, SONG Yingbo, YANG Fang, SHI Qian, LI Yongxin, ZHANG Xin. Comparison of Prevalence and Comorbidity of Hypertension, Diabetes and Dyslipidemia in Xinjiang Residents [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(32): 4031-4037. |
[5] | WANG Hui, HU Yinhuan, FENG Xiandong, LIU Sha, WANG Yangfan. Comparison of Mental Health Status and Mental Health Service Demand between Rural Residents with and without Chronic Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(31): 3968-3973. |
[6] | YU Hairong, CHEN Shen, HUANG Jingyi, ZHANG Yuanyuan, LI Mengchao, CUI Yan, JI Minghui, SHEN Jiemiao. Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Silent Aspiration among Patients with Dysphagia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3619-3624. |
[7] | TANG Ling, ZHANG Guoliang, LI Zhenkun, SI Shengbo, LIU Qiang, CHEN Ren, REN Bailing. The Utilization and Influencing Factors of Health Services for Middle Aged and Elderly Chronic Disease Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(29): 3688-3693. |
[8] | HUANG Lili, JIANG Yan, TANG Min, ZHANG Jialei, HE Jiabei, ZHUANG Jianlin. A Study on the Influence of Health Education Based on the Know-Belief-Act Model and Self-efficacy Theory on the Consumption of Sugary Drinks among Grade 4 Elementary School Students [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(28): 3558-3565. |
[9] | WEI Jiaohua, PENG Huiru, PENG Jianye, TAN Wenting, HUANG Jine, FANG Li. Expression of the Serum MOTS-c and Its Correlation with Atrial Remodeling in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3271-3276. |
[10] | HU Jieman, TAN Feixiang, YUAN Anxin, CHEN Shiyu, TANG Chulei, YIN Yueheng, BA Lei, XU Qin. Analysis of the Trajectory of Postoperative Frailty and Influencing Factors in Patients with Colorectal Cancer [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3276-3282. |
[11] | CHOU Xintong, PENG Hanyu, MA Hui, ZHANG Zhen, SU Xian, QIU Hongyan. Maternal Preferences in Contraceptive Decision-making: an Analysis of Influencing Factors [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3294-3299. |
[12] | CHEN Junyu, HAN Guangli, LI Chunhong, CHEN Yidi, YANG Nana, LUO Xiaoxi. Classification Study of Self-management Types among Pregnant Women in Rural Areas Based on Cluster Analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3289-3293. |
[13] | HAN Xiao, LI Qiyu, GE Pu, FAN Siyuan, LIU Diyue, WU Yibo, ZHANG Qingshuang. The Impact of Behavioral Lifestyle on Quality of Life in Hypertensive Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(26): 3248-3258. |
[14] | YU Zizi, LIU Duli, LI Ximin, RUAN Chunyi, YIN Xiangyang, CAI Le. Analysis of the Prevalence and Self-management of Hypertension and Its Influencing Factors in Rural [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3137-3143. |
[15] | FAN Boyang, ZHANG Yu, SUN Wenning, ZHANG Huifang, WANG Yingjie, ZHANG Ao, ZHAO Yang, WANG Haipeng. Study of Behavioral Intention and Influencing Factors of Integrated Medical and Preventive Care Provided by Grassroots Doctors for Patients with Chronic Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(25): 3144-3150. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||