
Chinese General Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (02): 193-199.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0215
Special Issue: 老年问题最新文章合辑; 老年人群健康最新文章合辑
• Original Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-04-10
Revised:2024-08-01
Published:2025-01-15
Online:2024-10-28
Contact:
WANG Fang
通讯作者:
王芳
作者简介:作者贡献:
秦伟提出主要研究思路,制订具体研究方案,撰写论文;涂刚英、万小梅负责研究的实施,进行数据的收集与整理,统计学分析,绘制图表;秦伟、王芳负责文章的质量控制与审查,对论文负责。
基金资助:CLC Number:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0215
| 类型 | 时间 | 运动项目 | 运动强度 | 运动频率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 热身运动 | 每次训练前 | 颈部运动、肩部内外旋、躯干左右转动、踝部运动 | RPE评分10~12分 | 3次/周,5~10 min/次 |
| 平衡强化训练 | 第1~4周 | 支撑下完成屈膝微蹲、提踵运动、单腿侧后摆、手臂弯举;靠墙横向行走、足跟足趾走 | 前2周RPE评分10~12分,后2周RPE评分12~14分 | 每周增加2~3组动作:每组10~12次或每侧20步,由重复5~10组减至重复3~5组;3次/周,30 min/次 |
| 第5~8周 | 屈膝微蹲、提踵运动、单腿侧后摆、负重手臂弯举;横向行走、简化侧向交叉走 | RPE评分12~14分 | 每组10~12次或每侧20步,重复3~5组;3次/周,30 min/次 | |
| 第9~12周 | 徒手深蹲、单腿站立、单腿侧后摆,负重手臂弯举;简化侧向交叉走、上下楼梯 | RPE评分12~14分 | ||
| 放松运动 | 每次训练后 | 筋膜放松、肌肉静态拉伸 | RPE评分10~12分 | 3次/周,5~10 min/次 |
| 有氧运动 | 晚餐1 h后 | 健步走 | RPE评分10~12分 | 3次/周,15~20 min/次 |
Table 1 Balanced-Strengthening exercise prescription
| 类型 | 时间 | 运动项目 | 运动强度 | 运动频率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 热身运动 | 每次训练前 | 颈部运动、肩部内外旋、躯干左右转动、踝部运动 | RPE评分10~12分 | 3次/周,5~10 min/次 |
| 平衡强化训练 | 第1~4周 | 支撑下完成屈膝微蹲、提踵运动、单腿侧后摆、手臂弯举;靠墙横向行走、足跟足趾走 | 前2周RPE评分10~12分,后2周RPE评分12~14分 | 每周增加2~3组动作:每组10~12次或每侧20步,由重复5~10组减至重复3~5组;3次/周,30 min/次 |
| 第5~8周 | 屈膝微蹲、提踵运动、单腿侧后摆、负重手臂弯举;横向行走、简化侧向交叉走 | RPE评分12~14分 | 每组10~12次或每侧20步,重复3~5组;3次/周,30 min/次 | |
| 第9~12周 | 徒手深蹲、单腿站立、单腿侧后摆,负重手臂弯举;简化侧向交叉走、上下楼梯 | RPE评分12~14分 | ||
| 放松运动 | 每次训练后 | 筋膜放松、肌肉静态拉伸 | RPE评分10~12分 | 3次/周,5~10 min/次 |
| 有氧运动 | 晚餐1 h后 | 健步走 | RPE评分10~12分 | 3次/周,15~20 min/次 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别[例(%)] | 年龄( | 文化程度[例(%)] | 婚姻状况[例(%)] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | 小学及以下 | 中学 | 专科及以上 | 未婚、离婚或丧偶 | 已婚 | |||
| 对照组 | 32 | 8(25.0) | 24(75.0) | 66.6±5.4 | 8(25.0) | 18(56.3) | 6(18.8) | 27(84.4) | 5(15.6) |
| 试验组 | 30 | 8(26.7) | 22(73.3) | 66.1±5.2 | 5(16.7) | 20(66.7) | 5(16.7) | 23(76.7) | 7(23.3) |
| χ2(t)值 | 0.026 | 0.343a | 1.143 | 0.987 | |||||
| P值 | 0.872 | 0.733 | 0.565 | 0.321 | |||||
| 组别 | 精神分裂症病程( | BMI( | 共病情况[例(%)] | 药物使用[例(%)] | |||||
| 无或1种疾病 | 2种及以上疾病 | 2种及以下 | 3种及以上 | ||||||
| 对照组 | 31.2±14.3 | 24.8±3.4 | 13(40.6) | 19(59.4) | 10(31.3) | 22(68.8) | |||
| 试验组 | 29.0±14.7 | 23.1±3.5 | 17(56.7) | 13(43.3) | 14(46.7) | 16(53.3) | |||
| χ2(t)值 | 0.602a | 1.888a | 2.118 | 1.934 | |||||
| P值 | 0.549 | 0.064 | 0.146 | 0.164 | |||||
Table 2 Comparison of general information between the two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别[例(%)] | 年龄( | 文化程度[例(%)] | 婚姻状况[例(%)] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男 | 女 | 小学及以下 | 中学 | 专科及以上 | 未婚、离婚或丧偶 | 已婚 | |||
| 对照组 | 32 | 8(25.0) | 24(75.0) | 66.6±5.4 | 8(25.0) | 18(56.3) | 6(18.8) | 27(84.4) | 5(15.6) |
| 试验组 | 30 | 8(26.7) | 22(73.3) | 66.1±5.2 | 5(16.7) | 20(66.7) | 5(16.7) | 23(76.7) | 7(23.3) |
| χ2(t)值 | 0.026 | 0.343a | 1.143 | 0.987 | |||||
| P值 | 0.872 | 0.733 | 0.565 | 0.321 | |||||
| 组别 | 精神分裂症病程( | BMI( | 共病情况[例(%)] | 药物使用[例(%)] | |||||
| 无或1种疾病 | 2种及以上疾病 | 2种及以下 | 3种及以上 | ||||||
| 对照组 | 31.2±14.3 | 24.8±3.4 | 13(40.6) | 19(59.4) | 10(31.3) | 22(68.8) | |||
| 试验组 | 29.0±14.7 | 23.1±3.5 | 17(56.7) | 13(43.3) | 14(46.7) | 16(53.3) | |||
| χ2(t)值 | 0.602a | 1.888a | 2.118 | 1.934 | |||||
| P值 | 0.549 | 0.064 | 0.146 | 0.164 | |||||
| 组别 | 例数 | BBS评分 | BI评分 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | ||
| 对照组 | 32 | 41.59±4.79 | 41.56±4.65 | 41.16±4.69 | 89.69±6.83 | 89.53±6.52 | 89.06±7.34 |
| 试验组 | 30 | 41.20±5.41 | 43.30±5.00a | 48.27±5.42abc | 89.83±6.36 | 91.17±6.11a | 94.33±4.50abc |
| F值 | F交互=52.687,F组别=5.584,F时间=40.531 | F交互=23.226,F组别=2.290,F时间=13.189 | |||||
| P值 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.021,P时间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.135,P时间<0.001 | |||||
Table 3 Comparison of BBS and BI scores between two groups pre-intervention and at 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention
| 组别 | 例数 | BBS评分 | BI评分 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | ||
| 对照组 | 32 | 41.59±4.79 | 41.56±4.65 | 41.16±4.69 | 89.69±6.83 | 89.53±6.52 | 89.06±7.34 |
| 试验组 | 30 | 41.20±5.41 | 43.30±5.00a | 48.27±5.42abc | 89.83±6.36 | 91.17±6.11a | 94.33±4.50abc |
| F值 | F交互=52.687,F组别=5.584,F时间=40.531 | F交互=23.226,F组别=2.290,F时间=13.189 | |||||
| P值 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.021,P时间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.135,P时间<0.001 | |||||
| 组别 | 例数 | FES-I总分 | 室内活动 | 室外活动 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | ||
| 对照组 | 32 | 37.03±6.32 | 36.94±5.96 | 36.03±6.51 | 21.69±4.15 | 21.41±3.78 | 20.84±3.64 | 15.34±4.95 | 15.53±4.30 | 15.19±4.97 |
| 试验组 | 30 | 36.13±6.44 | 38.50±5.69a | 43.70±5.74abc | 21.33±3.76 | 23.10±3.35a | 25.93±3.54abc | 14.80±4.38 | 15.40±3.98a | 17.77±3.94abc |
| F值 | F交互=80.414,F组别=3.412,F时间=45.966 | F交互=56.543,F组别=5.720,F时间=26.766 | F交互=12.309,F组别=0.359,F时间=8.988 | |||||||
| P值 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.070,P时间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.020,P时间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.551,P时间<0.001 | |||||||
Table 4 Comparison of FES-I scores between two groups pre-intervention and at 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention
| 组别 | 例数 | FES-I总分 | 室内活动 | 室外活动 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | 干预前 | 干预4周 | 干预12周 | ||
| 对照组 | 32 | 37.03±6.32 | 36.94±5.96 | 36.03±6.51 | 21.69±4.15 | 21.41±3.78 | 20.84±3.64 | 15.34±4.95 | 15.53±4.30 | 15.19±4.97 |
| 试验组 | 30 | 36.13±6.44 | 38.50±5.69a | 43.70±5.74abc | 21.33±3.76 | 23.10±3.35a | 25.93±3.54abc | 14.80±4.38 | 15.40±3.98a | 17.77±3.94abc |
| F值 | F交互=80.414,F组别=3.412,F时间=45.966 | F交互=56.543,F组别=5.720,F时间=26.766 | F交互=12.309,F组别=0.359,F时间=8.988 | |||||||
| P值 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.070,P时间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.020,P时间<0.001 | P交互<0.001,P组别=0.551,P时间<0.001 | |||||||
| [1] |
陆林. 沈渔邨精神病学 [M]. 6版.北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.
|
| [2] |
World Health Organization. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age [EB/OL]. (2008-03-17) [2024-01-14].
|
| [3] |
陈婉华, 麦剑欣, 叶君荣.降低精神科住院患者跌倒发生率的品管圈实践 [J].护理学报, 2020, 27 (18) : 29-33. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.18.029.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
蔡维维, 谢晖, 王飞, 等. 强化平衡训练对脑卒中患者跌倒预防效果的Meta分析 [J]. 牡丹江医学院学报, 2020, 41 (6) : 27-33, 48.
|
| [11] |
王悦同, 彭亮, 苏玉莹, 等. 平衡训练对慢性踝关节不稳影响效果的Meta分析 [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2024, 28 (24) : 3930-3936. DOI: 10.12307/2024.094.
|
| [12] |
世界卫生组织. ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类: 研究用诊断标准 [M]. 刘平, 译. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1995.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
黄聪, 王健, 温煦. 老年人的运动处方制定 [EB/OL]. (2022-09-29) [2022-11-29].
|
| [15] |
李燕, 黄丽华. 老年人平衡能力评估及干预的研究进展 [J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54 (4) : 603-608. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.04.026.
|
| [16] |
李奎成, 唐丹, 刘晓艳, 等.国内Barthel指数和改良Barthel指数应用的回顾性研究 [J].中国康复医学杂志, 2009, 24 (8) : 737-740.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2009.08.019.
|
| [17] |
郭启云, 郭沐洁, 张林, 等. 国际版跌倒效能量表汉化后信效度评价 [J]. 中国全科医学, 2015, 18 (35) : 4273-4276. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2015.35.001.
|
| [18] |
彭春政, 刘红存, 陈金鳌, 等.扰动太极拳对老年男性肌肉力量、步态特征和抗跌倒风险指数的影响 [J].中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43 (4) : 839-844. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2023.04.018.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
马雅军, 李晓东, 胡志灏, 等. 老年人认知功能和跌倒的关系研究 [J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22 (15) : 1784-1788. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.118.
|
| [21] |
王筱筱, 李呈, 方红, 等. 平衡训练对老年人跌倒发生及平衡功能影响的Meta分析 [J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33 (5) : 775-780. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.05.010.
|
| [22] |
李欣欣, 刘卉, 马沐佳. 太极拳与其他运动降低老年人跌倒风险的Meta分析 [J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2022, 28 (10) : 1169-1177. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2022.10.007.
|
| [23] |
吴延, 王广玲, 聂作婷, 等. 2022年版《世界指南:老年人跌倒的预防与管理》解读 [J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26 (10) : 1159-1163, 1171. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0842.
|
| [24] |
陈秀珍.基于自我效能理论的老年科住院患者跌倒效能现状及影响因素的研究 [D]. 北京: 北京中医药大学, 2020.
|
| [25] |
|
| [1] | ZHANG Ke, ZENG Xianchang, ZOLZAYA Enkhzaya, ZHU Yelin, HUANG Yiwen, LIU Zhenxiu, TAO Feng. Effect of Xiere Xingpi Yin on Eating Behaviors and Weight-related Outcomes in Patients with Obesity: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2759-2765. |
| [2] | BAO Ruolin, LU Chao, FENG Xin, YE Chunmei, LAI Fenhua, NI Zuowei, YANG Dongbo, ZHENG Yongtao. Predictive Model for Breakthrough Influenza Cases in the Elderly Population: a Nested Case-control Study [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(19): 2671-2677. |
| [3] | WU Ruining, ZHOU Ming, ZHANG Gongzi, LI Jun, XIE Suhang, LIU Yangxiaoxue, ZHANG Jiali, LIU Maomao, HUANG Liping. Study on Fixed and Mobile Exoskeleton Robots in Improving Lower Limb Function and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2326-2333. |
| [4] | ZHOU Hui, TANG Yubo, CHEN Jie, TANG Kejing, YUAN Gang, YAO Mi. Interpretation for the Reporting of Surrogate Endpoints in Randomized Controlled Trial Protocols: Based on SPIRIT and CONSORT Extension Checklist [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2107-2112. |
| [5] | JI Ying, GUO Chuan, ZHU Shizhe, JI Panpan, WANG Tong, KAN Chaojie, WANG Qinglei. Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation of the Cerebellum on Different Balance Abilities in Patients with Supratentorial Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(15): 2022-2028. |
| [6] | JIANG Nan, YANG Wei. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Press Needle Therapy on Improving Bowel Movements in Patients with Chronic Constipation and Mixed Hemorrhoids Following Hemorrhoidectomy Based on Regulating Intestinal Nerve Function [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1849-1857. |
| [7] | ZOU Jian, LI Wanping, GE Handa, JIN Zhe, RUFEINA· Tuerxun, LI Juan, WEI Anhua, FENG Da. Study on Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use among the Community Elderly Patients in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(13): 1759-1765. |
| [8] | PENG Jun, DING Jinglin, HAO Chenye, WU Cheng, ZHU Ronghui, GU Chunguang, GUAN Wenqi, WAN hui. A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Effectiveness of Online and Offline Training on Improving Digital Health Literacy among the Elderly [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1348-1353. |
| [9] | YANG Juan, LIU Shan, LI Fei, MENG Haodong, QIAO Hui, XIE Yongxin. Dynamic Monitoring and Analysis of Influencing Factors of Health Shocks in Rural Middle Aged and Elderly People in Ningxia: Empirical Research Based on 14 Years and Four Periods of Follow-up Data before and after Poverty Alleviation [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 914-921. |
| [10] | LIANG Lingjun, ZHANG Jun, CHEN Jianhui, GAO Yongshuang. Retrospective Analysis of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Risperidone from 2022 to 2024 [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 783-789. |
| [11] | ZHANG Ling, HUANG Shuangying, XU Hui, MEI Huiting, HONG Yongping. Effects of Different Exercise Types on Fall Efficacy in the Elderly: a Network Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(06): 741-751. |
| [12] | TIAN Rong, LI Kaiyang, YANG Mei, HUANG Jing, ZHANG Fei, ZHAO Qi. Current Situation Analysis of Outcome Indexes of Randomized Controlled Trial on Treatment of Peptic Ulcer with Chinese Medicine [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(05): 656-667. |
| [13] | HU Zhetao, PAN Xiaoyi. A Quantitative Research on Effectiveness of China's Community-dwelling Integrated Medical and Elderly Care Policy from the Perspective of Health Service Continuity [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(01): 42-49. |
| [14] | YU Xinyan, YANG Jianyun, JIANG Qingru, CHEN Tao, SU Peng, WANG Siyang, LUO Zhanwu, ZHANG Haicheng. Study on the Correlation between the Course of Hypertension and Autonomic Nervous System Damage in Elderly Patients in Primary Care Institutions in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Based on Single Lead Wearable Electrocardiogram Device [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(34): 4359-4370. |
| [15] | Expert Panel of the National Key R&D Program "Research on the Effects and Mechanisms of Multiple Types of Physical Stimulation on Body Function", Brain Function Detection and Regulation Rehabilitation Professional Committee of Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine, Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Professional Committee of Beijing Neurology Association. Expert Consensus on the Effects and Efficacy Evaluation of Non-invasive Neuromodulation in Elders with Disability and Dementia [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(34): 4258-4281. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||