
Chinese General Practice ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (30): 3783-3788.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0262
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2021-12-17
Revised:2022-04-25
Published:2022-10-20
Online:2022-06-16
Contact:
Jun CHEN
About author:
通讯作者:
陈君
作者简介:基金资助:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinagp.net/EN/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0262
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄( | 病程〔M(P25,P75),月〕 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 9/21 | 41.1±10.9 | 3.00(2.00,12.00) |
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 10/20 | 41.3±10.1 | 4.50(1.00,23.25) |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.077a | 0.049b | -0.178 | |
| P值 | 0.781 | 0.961 | 0.859 |
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy patients between two groups
| 组别 | 例数 | 性别(男/女) | 年龄( | 病程〔M(P25,P75),月〕 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 9/21 | 41.1±10.9 | 3.00(2.00,12.00) |
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 10/20 | 41.3±10.1 | 4.50(1.00,23.25) |
| 检验统计量值 | 0.077a | 0.049b | -0.178 | |
| P值 | 0.781 | 0.961 | 0.859 |
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 11.63±3.23 | 14.57±2.69a | 15.10±2.78ab | 13.90±2.72ac |
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 10.67±3.65 | 16.37±1.81ad | 17.70±1.64abd | 17.90±1.30abcd |
| F值 | F交互=11.862,F时间=109.882,F组间=11.772 | ||||
| P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 | ||||
Table 2 Comparison of the Yasuhisa Tanaka 20 Score Scale score between two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 11.63±3.23 | 14.57±2.69a | 15.10±2.78ab | 13.90±2.72ac |
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 10.67±3.65 | 16.37±1.81ad | 17.70±1.64abd | 17.90±1.30abcd |
| F值 | F交互=11.862,F时间=109.882,F组间=11.772 | ||||
| P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 | ||||
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 46.37±9.66 | 43.36±7.43a | 42.34±8.12ab | 44.86±5.72ac |
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 44.72±8.76 | 35.48±7.34ad | 32.54±9.04abd | 29.87±6.63abcd |
| F值 | F交互=23.395,F时间=19.131,F组间=21.884 | ||||
| P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 | ||||
Table 3 Comparison of the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores between two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 46.37±9.66 | 43.36±7.43a | 42.34±8.12ab | 44.86±5.72ac |
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 44.72±8.76 | 35.48±7.34ad | 32.54±9.04abd | 29.87±6.63abcd |
| F值 | F交互=23.395,F时间=19.131,F组间=21.884 | ||||
| P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 | ||||
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 5.33±2.86 | 3.43±2.24a | 2.87±2.18ab | 3.47±2.22ac |
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 5.00±2.59 | 2.27±1.51ad | 1.47±1.17abd | 1.20±1.00abcd |
| F值 | F交互=6.722,F时间=45.391,F组间=8.360 | ||||
| P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 | ||||
Table 4 Comparison of the Visual Analogue Scale score for neck pain between two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 5.33±2.86 | 3.43±2.24a | 2.87±2.18ab | 3.47±2.22ac |
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 5.00±2.59 | 2.27±1.51ad | 1.47±1.17abd | 1.20±1.00abcd |
| F值 | F交互=6.722,F时间=45.391,F组间=8.360 | ||||
| P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 | ||||
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 107.13±14.19 | 111.29±13.46ad | 114.49±14.69abd | 113.11±15.38abcd |
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 110.88±13.49 | 124.99±12.81a | 129.02±12.36ab | 131.42±10.04ac |
| F值 | F交互=9.819,F时间=32.096,F组间=12.396 | ||||
| P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 | ||||
Table 5 Comparison of the Chinese version of the SF-36 score between two groups before and after treatment
| 组别 | 例数 | 治疗前 | 治疗后4周 | 治疗后8周 | 治疗后12周 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 常规康复组 | 30 | 107.13±14.19 | 111.29±13.46ad | 114.49±14.69abd | 113.11±15.38abcd |
| 改良八段锦组 | 30 | 110.88±13.49 | 124.99±12.81a | 129.02±12.36ab | 131.42±10.04ac |
| F值 | F交互=9.819,F时间=32.096,F组间=12.396 | ||||
| P值 | P交互<0.05,P时间<0.05,P组间<0.05 | ||||
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
戴文康,谢瑞,常晓娟,等. 八段锦治疗神经根型颈椎病的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 天津中医药,2020,37(4):422-428. DOI:10.11656/j.issn.1672-1519.2020.04.16.
|
| [3] |
奎瑜,陈秀华,徐振华,等. 陈氏飞针治疗椎动脉型颈椎病伴失眠的临床研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2016,19(21):2553-2556,2561. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.21.012.
|
| [4] |
张若冰. 推拿改善颈型颈椎病员工焦虑状态:疼痛缓解的中介作用[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志,2018,24(12):927-931. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2018.12.009.
|
| [5] |
李贞晶,瞿昱,孟宪忠. 针刺结合家庭锻炼对神经根型颈椎病患者疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 国际中医中药杂志,2019,41(12):1323-1326. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4246.2019.12.010.
|
| [6] | |
| [7] |
中国颈椎病诊治与康复指南2007年[R]. 北京:中国康复医学会颈椎病专业委员会,2007.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] | |
| [10] |
袁菊莲,罗伦,赵燕,等. 八段锦锻炼联合常规康复疗法在老年神经根型颈椎病患者康复治疗中的应用[J]. 中医正骨,2019,31(8):25-30,34.
|
| [11] |
中华外科杂志编辑部. 颈椎病的分型、诊断及非手术治疗专家共识(2018)[J]. 中华外科杂志,2018,56(6):401-402. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.06.001.
|
| [12] |
冯罡. "项八针"联合改良关节松动术对神经根型颈椎病患者颈痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2020,41(4):490-492,495. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2020.04.036.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
杨丽,侯洁,刘新春,等. 情绪反应性量表中文版的信效度检验[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2018,26(2):264-267. DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.02.012.
|
| [15] |
袁菊莲,代庆凯,段鑫,等. 地震后下肢截肢患者综合康复治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2009,24(8):741-743. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2009.08.017.
|
| [16] |
孙志成,顾晓美,欧阳钢,等. 基于虚拟现实的八段锦对养老机构老年骨质疏松症患者跌倒风险及生活质量的影响[J]. 中国医药导报,2020,17(1):90-93,97.
|
| [17] |
朱立国,于杰,高景华. 旋转手法治疗神经根型颈椎病研究概述[J]. 中医正骨,2005,17(8):69-70,73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-6015.2005.08.053.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
王小云,章路军,叶羽翀. 神经根型颈椎病神经根性疼痛与炎性因子相关性研究[J]. 福建医药杂志,2019,41(1):13-15.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
黄春兰,陆青梅,黄连欣,等. 颈椎病患者疾病不确定感与焦虑、抑郁相关性调查分析[J]. 中国医药导报,2013,10(9):109-110,113. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2013.09.043.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
李水琴,欧妍. 牵引联合颈椎关节松动术治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2018,40(1):63-65. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2018.01.017.
|
| [24] |
於先贵. 综合康复疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病65例[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2007,29(3):162-163. DOI:10.3760/j:issn:0254-1424.2007.03.025.
|
| [25] |
江建春. 神经根型颈椎病的中医药治疗研究概况[J]. 中医正骨,2015,27(11):71-74.
|
| [26] |
于杰,朱立国,洪毅,等. 中医综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效评价与长期随访[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志,2016,24(9):11-13,17.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
何欣蔚. 八段锦对颈型颈椎病患者临床康复疗效的观察[D]. 南京:南京中医药大学,2014.
|
| [29] |
张萍,王琰. 中高架势八段锦对溃疡性结肠炎患者焦虑、抑郁及生活质量的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(1):81-85. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.01.018.
|
| [30] |
雷聪云,叶秀春,纪伟娟,等. 八段锦对慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期肺肾气虚证患者运动耐力和生活质量的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2020,35(8):992-994. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.08.022.
|
| [1] | LI Feng, HU Changhao, LUO Xu. Progress in the Study of Influencing Factors and Intervention Strategies of Mental Health in Elderly Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(20): 2816-2828. |
| [2] | WU Ruining, ZHOU Ming, ZHANG Gongzi, LI Jun, XIE Suhang, LIU Yangxiaoxue, ZHANG Jiali, LIU Maomao, HUANG Liping. Study on Fixed and Mobile Exoskeleton Robots in Improving Lower Limb Function and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(17): 2326-2333. |
| [3] | Community Rehabilitation Working Committee of Chinese Rehabilitation Medicine Association. Chinese Expert Consensus on the Management of Home-based Rehabilitation for Cognitive Impairment (2026 Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(14): 1793-1802. |
| [4] | WANG Tingting, LIN Zehua, MA Yingchun, Committee of Kidney Disease Rehabilitation, Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. Specification of Rehabilitation Service for Elderly Patients with Comorbidity Complicated with Acute Kidney Injury [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(11): 1361-1366. |
| [5] | WANG Yuqi, YE Ruixue, GAO Yan, XUE Kaiwen, ZHOU Jing, LI Dongxia, HAO Yingzi, LI Xiaoxuan, WANG Yulong. Rehabilitation Grading Diagnosis System of the Domestic and Foreign Development Present Situation and Application Requirements [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(10): 1250-1255. |
| [6] | HU Qi, XU Ning, MA Ximin, HE Jiahui, QIAO Hui. The Health-related Quality of Life of Rural Women in the Southern Mountainous Regions of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region and Its Impact on the Utilization of Health Services [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(08): 988-996. |
| [7] | JIANG Xuan, CHEN Yinhai, LU Yuanwei, ZHANG Jiali, LIN Congxuan, KE Xiong. Impact of Childhood Adverse Experiences on Health-related Quality of Life in Adulthood: a Mediating Role of the Number of Chronic Diseases [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(07): 893-899. |
| [8] | YU Hao, LIAO Peng, LUO Li. Digital Therapy for Stroke: Progress and Challenges from Screening to Intervention [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(02): 240-246. |
| [9] | REN Panpan, JIA Changli, JIA Jingjing, XU Jinglin, CHEN Mengyao, ZHANG Xiang. The Impact of Livelihood Capitals on the Quality of Life of Rural Older Adults: a Study Based on Different Chronic Disease Conditions [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2026, 29(01): 129-136. |
| [10] | CEN Kaiyuan, FATIMAH Ahmedy, CHEN Hong, SHAO Mingchen, MEXMOLLEN Marcus, MOHD Fadzli Shukor. Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Management: Global Perspectives, Multimodal Interventions, and Personalized Strategies [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(36): 4627-4639. |
| [11] | LIU Yan, YUAN Yanling, LING Rong, WANG Lanyun, SUN Li. Scoping Review of Telemedicine Application in Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease Patients [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(36): 4640-4647. |
| [12] | Community Rehabilitation Working Committee of Chinese Rehabilitation Medicine Association. Expert Consensus on the Application of Virtual Reality Technology in Home-based Rehabilitation for Cancer-related Insomnia (2025 Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(35): 4385-4396. |
| [13] | WANG Lizhu, LI Sihan, WANG Xinyi, MAO Sunxi, QIU Yang, WANG Zhonghua. Pathway Analysis of the Impact of Diabetes Knowledge and Self-efficacy on Self-management and Quality of Survival among Rural Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on ITHBC Modeling [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(34): 4351-4358. |
| [14] | Community Rehabilitation Working Committee of Chinese Rehabilitation Medicine Association. Chinese Expert Consensus on Constipation Screening and Assessment for Community Cancer Patients (2025 Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(34): 4249-4257. |
| [15] | Community Rehabilitation Working Committee of Chinese Rehabilitation Medicine Association. Chinese Expert Consensus on Community-based Cancer-related Fatigue Management (2025 Edition) [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(33): 4117-4124. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||