Abstract: Objective　To compare the status，hotspots and frontiers of health management research at home and abroad.Methods　On September 20，2017，we searched Web of ScienceTM and CNKI for articles concerning health management included between 2007 and 2017.Bibliometric method and knowledge mapping technique were used to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the included articles in terms of number，research hotspots，frontiers and trends，distribution of prolific authors and institutions.Results　Number of the included articles：totaled 3 258 articles were included，including 2 407 published abroad，and 851 published in China.The most prolific author：YASUMURA was the most prolific foreign author（34 articles），and XUE Fu-zhong and LU Jian-hua were the most prolific domestic authors（each published 13 articles）．The most prolific institution：Fukushima Med Univ，School of Health Policy & Management，Nanjing Medical University，were the most prolific foreign institution，domestic institution，respectively，publishing 52，16 articles，respectively.Research hotspots：the top 5 hotspots in foreign studies were about care，management，disease，health and system，while those in domestic studies were about chronic disease，hypertension，diabetes，elderly people and influencing factors.Research frontiers：foreign articles mainly focused on post-epidemic/disaster follow-up survey，chronic disease management，and health management in different industries from different perspectives.Domestic articles mainly concentrated on health management in grassroots medical institutions，satisfaction analysis of health management，rural health management，and health literacy.Conclusion　The number of articles about health management published domestically is increasing rapidly，but the cooperations between prolific authors are not close.Foreign and domestic studies are different in terms of hotspots，frontiers and perspectives，and the former's advanced strengths are worthy of reference，for they can promote the further development of domestic health management research.

Key words: Health promotion, Pictorial works, Bibliometrics, Health management

摘要： 目的　探讨国内外健康管理研究现状、热点及前沿，对比国内外健康管理研究的异同点。方法　文献检索时间为2017-09-20。以Web of ScienceTM和中国知网中2007—2017年收录的卫生领域健康管理相关文献为数据基础，采用文献计量学方法和知识图谱方法，从发文量、高产作者和研究机构分布、研究热点和研究前沿、发展趋势等方面进行定量、定性分析。结果　在检索时间段内，国外的发文量为2 407篇，YASUMURA为最高产作者，共发文34篇，Fukushima Med Univ以52篇的发文量排在研究机构的首位，care（关怀、看护）、management（管理）、disease（疾病）、health（健康）、system（系统）居研究热点的前5位，研究前沿主要集中在对流行病或灾难发生后的追踪调查、慢性病管理以及在不同行业、不同层面的分类。国内的发文量为851篇，薛付忠和卢建华为最高产作者，均发文13篇，南京医科大学医政学院以16篇的发文量排在研究机构的首位，慢性病、高血压、糖尿病、老年人、影响因素成为研究热点的前5位，研究前沿主要集中在基层健康管理、满意度分析、农村健康管理、健康素养。结论　国内健康管理相关文献发文量的增速较快，但未形成较强的高产作者合作网络。国内外健康管理相关文献的研究热点和研究前沿不同，特别是健康管理的研究视角不同，这为国内健康管理的发展提供了新的思路。国内的健康管理可以借鉴国外发展的经验，促进我国卫生领域健康管理研究的进一步应用和发展。

关键词: 健康促进, 图谱, 文献计量学, 健康管理