Chinese General Practice

    Next Articles

Analysis of the Development Trend of General Practice in China: Based on the Research Paper Data of Chinese General Practice from 2015 to 2024

  

  1. 1.China National Center for Biotechnology Development, Beijing 100039, China;2.Institute for Healthy China, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;3.Publishing House of Journal of Chinese General Practice, Beijing 100053, China;4.General Practice School, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • Received:2025-05-26 Revised:2025-06-24 Accepted:2025-06-30
  • Contact: LIANG Wannian,Professor/Doctoral supervisor;E-mail:liangwn@tsinghua.edu.cn

中国全科医学发展态势分析——基于《中国全科医学》2015—2024年研究型论文数据

  

  1. 1.100039 北京市,中国生物技术发展中心;2.100084 北京市,清华大学健康中国研究院;3.100053 北京市,中国全科医学杂志社;4.518055 广东省深圳市,南方科技大学全科医学院
    宋超和许岩丽为共同第一作者
  • 通讯作者: 梁万年,教授/博士生导师;E-mail:liangwn@tsinghua.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金第 75 批面上资助(2024M753607);中国科学技术信息研究所情报工程实验室开放基金研究项目(202303)

Abstract: Background General practice in China is currently undergoing rapid development, yet significant gaps remain compared with developed countries in Europe and America. As the most authoritative journal in the field of general practice in Chinese, Chinese General Practice has published a large number of highquality research articles over the past decade, making it an important vehicle for studying the development trends of general practice in China. Objective To clarify the research trends in domestic general practice as represented by Chinese General Practice, and to identify research hotspots, scientific collaborations, and the academic impact of highly cited articles. Methods Using research articles published in Chinese General Practice from January 1, 2015 to August 23, 2024 as a microcosm, bibliometric methods were employed together with Python for data preprocessing and visualization software such as VOSviewer and UCINET. Analyses were conducted on publication trends and research hotspots, institutional collaborations and key teams, and the academic impact of highly cited articles. Data retrieval and download were completed on August 23, 2024. Results Over the past decade, Chinese General Practice published a total of 8 422 research articles. The proportion of research articles among all published papers increased from 43.45% (574/1 321) in 2015 to 87.68% (726/828) in 2024, showing an overall upward trend. The published research articles were mainly supported by projects such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (1 345 articles, 15.97%). The top five keywords by frequency were: influencing factors analysis (815 times), diabetes (558 times), elderly (537 times), community health services (481 times), and treatment outcome (370 times). Research hotspots focused on chronic disease health management and community health services, analysis of influencing factors in geriatric diseases, prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes/stroke in middleaged populations, diagnosis and prognosis of maternal and childrelated diseases, as well as metaanalyses of treatment outcomes and risk factor identification for multiple diseases. In terms of research institutions, five major collaboration networks have roughly formed, with the Department of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University being the most productive research team (66 articles). The total citation count of research articles showed a rapid year-by-year increase. Capital Medical University demonstrated the strongest academic influence, with a total citation count of 3 607. Conclusion Chinese General Practice pays close attention to the latest cuttingedge research achievements in general practice in China and strives to build the highest academic platform for domestic general practice research. The main contributing institutions in Chinese general practice research remain universities and research institutes, concentrated in major cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing, and Guangzhou. The highly cited research articles published in the journal strike a balance between empirical studies and policy analysis, jointly promoting new advances in general practice research in China.

Key words: General practice, Research hotspots, Scientific collaboration, Research report, Journal article, Bibliometrics

摘要: 背景 当前我国全科医学正处于快速发展阶段,但与欧美发达国家尚有较大差距。《中国全科医学》作为中文领域具有权威性的全科医学领域期刊,近十年刊载了大量高水平的研究型论文,成为研究国内全科医学发展态势的重要载体。目的 明晰以《中国全科医学》为代表的国内全科医学研究态势,厘清研究热点、科研合作与高被引学术影响力。方法 以《中国全科医学》期刊2015-01-01—2024-08-23刊发的研究型论文为“缩影”,利用文献计量学的研究方法,结合Python数据预处理和VOSviewer、UCINET等可视化软件,对发文趋势与研究热点、机构合作与重要团队、高被引学术影响等做出分析。数据检索和下载日期为2024-08-23。结果 近十年,《中国全科医学》共刊发研究型论文8 422篇。研究型论文发文量在全部论文发文量中的占比由2015年的43.45%(574/1 321)增长到2024年的87.68%(726/828),总体呈上升趋势。所刊发的研究型论文主要受到国家自然科学基金等项目资助(1 345篇,15.97%)。词频排在前5位的关键词依次为影响因素分析(815次)、糖尿病(558次)、老年人(537次)、社区卫生服务(481次)、治疗结果(370次)。研究热点聚焦于慢性病健康管理与社区卫生服务、老年病影响因素分析、中年群体2型糖尿病/脑卒中防治、妇幼相关疾病的诊断预后、多疾病诊疗结果荟萃分析与危险因素识别。研究机构方面,当前已经大致形成5大合作网络,同济大学附属杨浦医院全科医学科是主要科研产出团队(66篇)。研究型论文的总被引量呈逐年快速递增趋势,首都医科大学研究产出具有较强的学术影响力,总被引量达3 607次。结论 《中国全科医学》期刊高度关注我国在全科医学领域最新前沿研究成果,力求打造国内全科医学研究最高学术阵地;国内全科医学研究单位依然以高校和科研院所为主,集中在北京市、上海市、南京市、广州市等主要城市;所刊发的高被引研究型论文比较兼顾实证研究和政策分析,共同推动国内全科医学领域研究新进展。

关键词: 全科医学, 研究热点, 科研合作, 研究报告, 期刊论文, 文献计量学

CLC Number: