中国全科医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (34): 4232-4240,4258.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0701

所属专题: 家庭医学的方法学精华特刊

• 全科科研生产力研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

2021年中国基本保健和全科医学科研论文生产力研究

曹新阳1, 汪洋2,*(), 徐志杰3, 许岩丽1,*()   

  1. 1.100053 北京市,《中国全科医学》杂志社有限公司
    2.100191 北京市,北京大学中国卫生发展研究中心
    3.310009 浙江省杭州市,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院全科医学科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-25 修回日期:2022-09-05 出版日期:2022-12-05 发布日期:2022-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 汪洋, 许岩丽
  • 曹新阳和汪洋共同为第一作者 曹新阳,汪洋,徐志杰,等. 2021年中国基本保健和全科医学科研论文生产力研究[J].中国全科医学,2022,25(34):4232-4240,4258.[www.chinagp.net]
    作者贡献:
    曹新阳负责数据收集、数据分析、论文初稿撰写、对论文进行审校;汪洋负责研究设计、部分数据筛选和分析、对论文进行审校;徐志杰参与部分研究设计,对论文进行审校;许岩丽参与部分研究设计并负责整体管理;汪洋、许岩丽为文章负责。

Primary Care and General Practice Research Paper Productivity Report in China in 2021

CAO Xingyang1, WANG Yang2,*(), XU Zhijie3, XU Yanli1,*()   

  1. 1.Publishing House Co., Ltd. of Journal of Chinese General Practice, Beijing 100053, China
    2.Peking University China Center for Health Development Studies, Beijing 100191, China
    3.Department of General Practice, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • Received:2022-08-25 Revised:2022-09-05 Published:2022-12-05 Online:2022-10-09
  • Contact: WANG Yang, XU Yanli
  • About author:
    CAO X Y, WANG Y, XU Z J, et al. Primary care and general practice research paper productivity report in China in 2021[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25 (34) : 4232-4240, 4258. CAO Xinyang and WANG Yang are the first authors

摘要: 背景 随着我国医疗卫生改革的深化,基本保健和全科医学研究近年在我国发展迅速,论文发表数量迅速增加。 目的 归纳和分析发表于2021年的我国基层卫生和全科医学研究领域的科研论文,探究其在论文发表数量、发表期刊、地域、机构、研究类别、研究方法、作者数量上的特点。 方法 本文结合了范围综述方法和文献计量技术,对中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、PubMed、Web of Science数据库中的,我国科研机构研究者于2021年发表的基本保健和全科医学领域的科研论文进行了系统检索和定量分析。 结果 在2021年,我国基本保健和全科医学领域发表的原创研究论文为3 122篇。其中基层医疗卫生机构发表的论文量占比为57.69%,但其论文多数为单一作者撰写;在此类机构中,东部基层医疗卫生机构发表的论文占比为80.12%;研究类别以临床研究(58.23%)和卫生服务研究(27.07%)为主;VOSviewer对关键词的共现分析显示其研究主题聚焦于"慢性病管理"和"家庭医生签约服务";这些论文在研究方法上多使用随机对照试验(40.87%)和横断面调查(36.71%);该领域绝大多数的论文均发表于非核心且非SCI/SSCI期刊(76.75%),仅有6.98%的论文发表于SCI/SSCI期刊。 结论 我国基本保健和全科医学领域的生产力水平目前已发展至全球首位,其中,东部地区的基层医疗卫生机构做出了主要贡献。其研究主题较贴近机构实践及国家的医疗卫生政策。但该领域目前仍存在一系列问题和挑战,如基层医疗卫生机构的研究者缺乏合作、大量使用随机对照试验方法的研究可能存在质量隐忧、国际SCI/SSCI期刊对我国该领域研究的认可度较低。

关键词: 初级卫生保健, 全科医学, 研究方法, 文献计量学, 综述

Abstract:

Background

With the deepening of health care reform in China, primary care and general practice researches have developed rapidly in recent years, and the number of papers published has increased rapidly.

Objective

Summarize and analyze the scientific research papers published in the field of primary care and general practice in China in 2021, explore the characteristics in the number of papers published, journals published, regions, institutions, research categories, research methods, and the number of authors.

Methods

Based on the disciplinary definition of the research concepts, themes and methods in this field, combining scoping review methods and bibliometric techniques, scientific research papers published by researchers in Chinese scientific research institutions in 2021 included in the CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and Web of Science database were retried, induced and analyzed. In this paper, combined with the scope review method and bibliometric technology, a systematic search and quantitative analysis were carried out on scientific research papers in the fields of primary care and general practice published by researchers in Chinese scientific research institutions in 2021 included in the CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and Web of Science databases.

Results

There are 3 122 original research papers published in the fields of primary care and general practice in China in 2021. The number of papers published by primary care institutions accounted for 57.69%, but most of the papers were completed by a single authoramong such institutions. Papers published by the eastern primary care institutions accounted for 80.12%. The research category is dominated by clinical research (58.23%) and health services researches (27.07%) , the co-occurrence analysis of keywords by VOSviewer shows that the research themes focus on "chronic disease management" and "contracted family doctor services", these papers mostly used randomized controlled trials (40.87%) and cross-sectional survey studies (36.71%) in research methods. The vast majority of papers in primary care and general practice field are published in non-core and non-SCI/SSCI journals (76.75%) , and only 6.98% of papers are published in SCI/SSCI journals.

Conclusion

The productivity level of primary care and general practice research in China has now reached the highest level in the world, of which the primary care institutions in the eastern region have made major contributions. The research topics in the primary care and general practice field are close to institutional practice and national health policy. However, there are still a series of problems and challenges in this field, such as the lack of cooperation among researchers in primary care institutions, the large number of studies using randomized controlled trial methods may have problems such as quality concerns and low recognition of research in this field in China by international SCI/SSCI journals.

Key words: Primary health care, General practice, Research methods, Bibliometrics, Review